from:"John"

Ubuntu can not ship an unconfined bwrap profile, doing so allows a
trivial by-pass of the unprivileged user namespace restrictions.

An alternative profile for bwrap is provided by the apparmor-profiles
package in /usr/share/apparmor/extra-profiles/bwrap-userns-restrict

it is not enabled by default at this time due to a need to fix an
interaction with flatpak.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064849

Title:
  Ubuntu 24.04 desktop icons ng image thumbnails no longer displayed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons-ng/+bug/2064849/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2079983] Re: Thumbnails in desktop doesn't work due to apparmor restrictions

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2064849 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064849

Ubuntu can not ship an unconfined bwrap profile, doing so allows a
trivial by-pass of the unprivileged user namespace restrictions.

An alternative profile for bwrap is provided by the apparmor-profiles
package in /usr/share/apparmor/extra-profiles/bwrap-userns-restrict

it is not enabled by default at this time due to a need to fix an
interaction with flatpak.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079983

Title:
  Thumbnails in desktop doesn't work due to apparmor restrictions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2079983/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1795649] Re: evince from snap doesn't save position in pdf document

@Mingun: in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1969896 you
reported this is still affecting Ubuntu 24.04.1

Can you provide log entries with the denials you are encountering?

  sudo dmesg | grep DENIED


Also you reported

  $ LANG=C sudo apparmor_parser -R /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.evince
  apparmor_parser: Unable to remove "/usr/bin/evince". Profile doesn't exist

can you provide what is returned by
  ls /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.evince

and
  sudo aa-status | grep evince

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1795649

Title:
  evince from snap doesn't save position in pdf document

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/1795649/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1969896] Re: Evince Document Viewer(42.0) does not remember last page in 22.04 and opens in a tiny window when launched

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1795649 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1795649

@Mingun: I have replied in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/1795649

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969896

Title:
  Evince Document Viewer(42.0) does not remember last page in 22.04 and
  opens in a tiny window when launched

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1969896/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2079924] Re: Could not determine the upgrade An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade

2024-09-09 Thread John Warr

Spot on. Many thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079924

Title:
  Could not determine the upgrade   An unresolvable problem occurred
  while calculating the upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2079924/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2080024] Re: Can't load some pages with chromium (steam, ebay, snyk.io)

2024-09-09 Thread John

Nevermind.  Things seem to have just started working across all sites?
Maybe it was some kind of network related thing at work? Apologies. I
will close the ticket.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080024

Title:
  Can't load some pages with chromium (steam, ebay, snyk.io)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/2080024/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2080024] Re: Can't load some pages with chromium (steam, ebay, snyk.io)

2024-09-09 Thread John

Well, I don't see where I can close it or mark it resolved, but feel
free to close it on your side.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080024

Title:
  Can't load some pages with chromium (steam, ebay, snyk.io)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/2080024/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2080024] Re: Can't load some pages with chromium (steam, ebay, snyk.io)

2024-09-09 Thread John

This is happening with all coworkers that are also running Ubuntu (or at
least those that I have found and had them test it)  This is also
affecting brave and chrome.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080024

Title:
  Can't load some pages with chromium (steam, ebay, snyk.io)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/2080024/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2080024] [NEW] Can't load some pages with chromium (steam, ebay, snyk.io)

2024-09-09 Thread John

Public bug reported:

When loading some sites in chromium or chrome the connection is refused.
This happens for ebay.com, app.snyk.io and and steam (steampowered.com,
or their forums).  Firefox seems to work, and coworkers on Windows/Mac
seem to be fine.  This does not happen on my Manjaro install (running
version Chromium 128.0.6613.119 Arch Linux ) which seems to be working
fine.  When chromium is run from the console, I get the following output
when one of the offending pages is loaded:

[46636:46662:0909/101324.832079:ERROR:ssl_client_socket_impl.cc(882)] handshake 
failed; returned -1, SSL error code 1, net_error -100
[46636:46662:0909/101351.892719:ERROR:ssl_client_socket_impl.cc(882)] handshake 
failed; returned -1, SSL error code 1, net_error -100
[46636:46662:0909/101411.953654:ERROR:ssl_client_socket_impl.cc(882)] handshake 
failed; returned -1, SSL error code 1, net_error -100

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: chromium-browser 2:1snap1-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-41.41-generic 6.8.12
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-41-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Mon Sep  9 10:30:21 2024
DiskUsage:
 FilesystemType   Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
 /dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-ubuntu--lv ext4   466G   97G  346G  22% /
 tmpfs tmpfs  7.7G  128M  7.6G   2% /dev/shm
 /dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-ubuntu--lv ext4   466G   97G  346G  22% /
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 SHELL=/usr/bin/zsh
 TERM=xterm-256color
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
Snap.Changes: no changes found
Snap.ChromeDriverVersion: ChromeDriver 128.0.6613.113 
(9597ae93a15d4d03089b4e9997b1072228baa9ad-refs/branch-heads/6613@{#1429})
Snap.ChromiumVersion: Chromium 128.0.6613.113 snap
SourcePackage: chromium-browser
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080024

Title:
  Can't load some pages with chromium (steam, ebay, snyk.io)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/2080024/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2080022] [NEW] package linux-headers-6.8.0-41-generic 6.8.0-41.41 failed to install/upgrade: installed linux-headers-6.8.0-41-generic package post-installation script subprocess returned error ex

2024-09-09 Thread John dude

Public bug reported:

No LSB modules are available.
Description:Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
Release:24.04

linux update
failed

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: linux-headers-6.8.0-41-generic 6.8.0-41.41
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-36.36-generic 6.8.4
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-36-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: lkp_Ubuntu_6_8_0_36_36_generic_106 nvidia_modeset nvidia 
zfs
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/seq:fjean  3518 F pipewire
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  fjean  3518 F pipewire
  fjean  3523 F wireplumber
 /dev/snd/controlC1:  fjean  3523 F wireplumber
CRDA: N/A
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
Date: Mon Sep  9 19:01:48 2024
ErrorMessage: installed linux-headers-6.8.0-41-generic package 
post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 11
InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-06-11 (90 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64 (20240424)
MachineType: LENOVO 20S1SFJJ0K
ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/BOOT/ubuntu_qblng4@/vmlinuz-6.8.0-36-generic 
root=ZFS=rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_qblng4 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.12, Python 3.12.3, python3-minimal, 
3.12.3-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: N/A
RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks.
RelatedPackageVersions: grub-pc N/A
SourcePackage: linux
Title: package linux-headers-6.8.0-41-generic 6.8.0-41.41 failed to 
install/upgrade: installed linux-headers-6.8.0-41-generic package 
post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 11
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 10/31/2023
dmi.bios.release: 1.30
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: N2XET40W (1.30 )
dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
dmi.board.name: 20S1SFJJ0K
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: SDK0J40697 WIN
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: None
dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.16
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrN2XET40W(1.30):bd10/31/2023:br1.30:efr1.16:svnLENOVO:pn20S1SFJJ0K:pvrThinkPadT14Gen1:rvnLENOVO:rn20S1SFJJ0K:rvrSDK0J40697WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNone:skuLENOVO_MT_20S1_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPadT14Gen1:
dmi.product.family: ThinkPad T14 Gen 1
dmi.product.name: 20S1SFJJ0K
dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_20S1_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPad T14 Gen 1
dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T14 Gen 1
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package noble

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080022

Title:
  package linux-headers-6.8.0-41-generic 6.8.0-41.41 failed to
  install/upgrade: installed linux-headers-6.8.0-41-generic package
  post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 11

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2080022/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2079924] Re: Could not determine the upgrade An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade

2024-09-09 Thread John Warr

I have disabled ALL the PPAs to be sure and the result is:

An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade.

This was caused by: 
* Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu 
This is most likely a transient problem, 
please try again later. 
If none of this applies, then please report this bug using the 
command 'ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core' in a terminal. If 
you want to investigate this yourself the log files in 
'/var/log/dist-upgrade' will contain details about the upgrade. 
Specifically, look at 'main.log' and 'apt.log'. 



** Attachment added: "main.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2079924/+attachment/5814798/+files/main.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079924

Title:
  Could not determine the upgrade   An unresolvable problem occurred
  while calculating the upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2079924/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2079958] [NEW] how to fix this

2024-09-09 Thread john william

Public bug reported:

how to fix this

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:22.04.17
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-79.86-generic 5.15.111
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-79-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: lkp_Ubuntu_5_15_0_79_86_generic_106
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CrashDB: ubuntu
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Mon Sep  9 12:44:48 2024
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-15 (1089 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_IN
 SHELL=/usr/bin/zsh
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2024-09-09 (0 days ago)
VarLogDistupgradeAptlog:
 Log time: 2024-09-09 12:44:04.893854
 Log time: 2024-09-09 12:44:17.141552
 Log time: 2024-09-09 12:44:48.286782
 Log time: 2024-09-09 12:44:51.807468

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079958

Title:
  how to fix this

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2079958/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2079924] [NEW] Could not determine the upgrade An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade

2024-09-08 Thread John Warr

Public bug reported:

* Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu 
Please use the tool 'ppa-purge' from the ppa-purge 
package to remove software from a Launchpad PPA and 
try the upgrade again.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:22.04.19
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-40.40~22.04.3-generic 6.8.12
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-40-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.6
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CrashDB: ubuntu
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sun Sep  8 14:57:33 2024
InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-28 (164 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20240220)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2024-09-08 (0 days ago)

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079924

Title:
  Could not determine the upgrade   An unresolvable problem occurred
  while calculating the upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2079924/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2079841] Re: Revert fix for "Kernel fails to enable XSAVE when running in a “v5” AMD SEV-SNP VM"

** Description changed:

  SRU Justification
  
  [Impact]
  
  * LP #2069204 disabled CET Shadow Stack on SEV-SNP due to CPUID emulation bug 
not being fixed in VMs until October 2024.
  * This issue is now fixed, so the patch can be reverted.
  
  [Fix]
  
  * Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: x86/hyperv: temporarily disable CET SS on SEV-
  SNP due to a paravisor bug"
  
  [Test Plan]
  
  * Compile tested
  * Boot tested
- * Microsoft tested
  
  [Regression potential]
  
  * Reverting back to previous state, so regression very unlikely.
  * Changes isolated, minimal regression risk
  
  [Other info]
  
  * SF #00387447

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079841

Title:
  Revert fix for "Kernel fails to enable XSAVE when running in a “v5”
  AMD SEV-SNP VM"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2079841/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077487] Re: Broken atime in 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 (noble's version)

** Description changed:

+ SRU Justification
+ 
  [Impact]
  
  * 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 has the 6.7 compat series, including 
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/commit/db4fc559cc1931b9219e62aa505cd5c51a17b232, 
but does not include the fix for that commit (affects both pre-6.7 and 
post-6.7),
  
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/commit/f0bf7a247dbb030d68c7fd2b5526dd111cc775d0. 
This manifests for me on the current (6.8.0-40.40~22.04.3) 22.04 HWE kernel as 
writes to a file resetting atime back to 0 (reads still seem to work as 
expected though given that state), which of course breaks real-world things (in 
my case, I can no longer successfully run LLVM's test suite).
  
  Thanks to CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO=y being the default it seems like
  this isn't a kernel memory disclosure and is instead a deterministic use
  of 0, so I don't believe this to be a blatant security vulnerability.
  This also explains the behaviour observed above.
  
  This needs fixing in noble, and then propagating back through whatever
  kernels are pulling in this version, since linux-modules vendors copies
  of the pre-built DKMS modules, with the current 6.8 HWE kernel using
  2.2.2-0ubuntu9 explicitly.
  
  [Fix]
  
  * Include f0bf7a247dbb: "[PATCH] Linux 6.7 compat: zfs_setattr fix atime
  update" from upstream ZFS as quilt patch.
  
  [Test Case]
  
  * Build tested against Noble generic
  * Ran autopkgktests for regressions, none encountered
  
  [Where things could go wrong]
  
  * Low chance of regression, isolated instantiation and logic fix.
  * Addition of time delta check could cause issues during unexpected delay > 2 
seconds.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077487

Title:
  Broken atime in 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 (noble's version)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2077487/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2079019] Re: Unable to enforce/disable profiles using aa-enforce/aa-disable

2024-09-06 Thread John Johansen

This is fixed in 4.0.2 and should be part of the next SRU


** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079019

Title:
  Unable to enforce/disable profiles using aa-enforce/aa-disable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2079019/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2079841] [NEW] Revert fix for "Kernel fails to enable XSAVE when running in a “v5” AMD SEV-SNP VM"

Public bug reported:

SRU Justification

[Impact]

* LP #2069204 disabled CET Shadow Stack on SEV-SNP due to CPUID emulation bug 
not being fixed in VMs until October 2024.
* This issue is now fixed, so the patch can be reverted.

[Fix]

* Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: x86/hyperv: temporarily disable CET SS on SEV-
SNP due to a paravisor bug"

[Test Plan]

* Compile tested
* Boot tested
* Microsoft tested

[Regression potential]

* Reverting back to previous state, so regression very unlikely.
* Changes isolated, minimal regression risk

[Other info]

* SF #00387447

** Affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Noble)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Oracular)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079841

Title:
  Revert fix for "Kernel fails to enable XSAVE when running in a “v5”
  AMD SEV-SNP VM"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2079841/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077487] Re: Broken atime in 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 (noble's version)

Updating LP bug to SRU justification format.

** Description changed:

- 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 has the 6.7 compat series, including 
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/commit/db4fc559cc1931b9219e62aa505cd5c51a17b232, 
but does not include the fix for that commit (affects both pre-6.7 and 
post-6.7),
+ [Impact]
+ 
+ * 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 has the 6.7 compat series, including 
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/commit/db4fc559cc1931b9219e62aa505cd5c51a17b232, 
but does not include the fix for that commit (affects both pre-6.7 and 
post-6.7),
  
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/commit/f0bf7a247dbb030d68c7fd2b5526dd111cc775d0. 
This manifests for me on the current (6.8.0-40.40~22.04.3) 22.04 HWE kernel as 
writes to a file resetting atime back to 0 (reads still seem to work as 
expected though given that state), which of course breaks real-world things (in 
my case, I can no longer successfully run LLVM's test suite).
  
  Thanks to CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO=y being the default it seems like
  this isn't a kernel memory disclosure and is instead a deterministic use
  of 0, so I don't believe this to be a blatant security vulnerability.
  This also explains the behaviour observed above.
  
  This needs fixing in noble, and then propagating back through whatever
  kernels are pulling in this version, since linux-modules vendors copies
  of the pre-built DKMS modules, with the current 6.8 HWE kernel using
  2.2.2-0ubuntu9 explicitly.
+ 
+ [Fix]
+ 
+ * Include f0bf7a247dbb: "[PATCH] Linux 6.7 compat: zfs_setattr fix atime
+ update" from upstream ZFS as quilt patch.
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ 
+ * Build tested against Noble generic
+ * Ran autopkgktests for regressions, none encountered
+ 
+ [Where things could go wrong]
+ 
+ * Low chance of regression, isolated instantiation and logic fix.
+ * Addition of time delta check could cause issues during unexpected delay > 2 
seconds.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077487

Title:
  Broken atime in 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 (noble's version)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2077487/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067034] Re: "error: race condition detected" when trying to run --shell snap that doesn't exist.

2024-09-05 Thread John Magdy Lotfy

it affects me too Ubuntu 22.04.4
Kernel : 6.8.0-40
snap2.63+22.04ubuntu0.1
snapd   2.63+22.04ubuntu0.1
series  16


** Also affects: ubuntu
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** No longer affects: ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067034

Title:
  "error: race condition detected" when trying to run --shell snap that
  doesn't exist.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/2067034/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076291] Re: kernel panic was caused by a fatal exception due to a null pointer dereference in the iptable_nat module

2024-09-03 Thread John Cabaj

Fix verified by Microsoft and included in this release.

** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy-linux-azure 
verification-needed-noble-linux-azure
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy-linux-azure 
verification-done-noble-linux-azure

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076291

Title:
  kernel panic was caused by a fatal exception due to a null pointer
  dereference in the iptable_nat module

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2076291/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078001] Re: Backport "net: mana: Fix race of mana_hwc_post_rx_wqe and new hwc response"

2024-09-03 Thread John Cabaj

** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078001

Title:
  Backport "net: mana: Fix race of mana_hwc_post_rx_wqe and new hwc
  response"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2078001/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077105] Re: cloud-images do not produce sboms

2024-09-03 Thread John Chittum

** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: cloud-images
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077105

Title:
  cloud-images do not produce sboms

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2077105/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2065088] Re: AppArmor profiles allowing userns not immediately active in 24.04 live image

2024-09-03 Thread John Johansen

Disabling the user namespace restriction is certainly one possible
direction, and would be the easiest for Noble.

The other possible route is using aa-notify, which now has the ability
to produce a prompt for the user. An example gif can be seen at
https://gitlab.com/-/project/4484878/uploads/ea5f41c3e1799fcf4d6c0c41af86553a/demo_aa_notify.webm

it is currently only in Oracular, and there are some bug fixes coming to
the current version, but the plan is to SRU the ability to Noble.

For those who want to play with it, instructions are below. It is
available for noble via the ppa at https://launchpad.net/~apparmor-
dev/+archive/ubuntu/apparmor-backports.

it can be install via
sudo apt install apparmor-notify

basic instructions are available via
man aa-notify

it will install a default configuration in "/etc/apparmor/notify.conf".
The default configuration can be modified on a per user basis by copying
it to "$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/apparmor/notify.conf" which is generally
"$HOME/.config/apparmor/notify.conf" or to
"$HOME/.apparmor/notify.conf". A custom configuration is not needed
unless you want to use filtering to make it less noisy.

Currently regular notifications will happen for all apparmor events, but they
can be filtered using the config file.

the notifier can be started via the shell with
aa-notify -p -s1 --prompt-filter=userns

or by adding it to startup applications

There is a bug with the user namespace notification where it currently
requires "--prompt-filter=userns" as part of the command arguments
instead of being set in the config file.

--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065088

Title:
AppArmor profiles allowing userns not immediately active in 24.04 live
image

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2065088/+subscriptions

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078770] [NEW] how to fix this

2024-09-02 Thread john william

Public bug reported:

need some help commands

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:22.04.17
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-79.86-generic 5.15.111
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-79-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: lkp_Ubuntu_5_15_0_79_86_generic_106
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CrashDB: ubuntu
CrashReports:
 600:120:125:37:2024-09-02 17:17:30.166381882 +0530:2024-09-02 
17:17:30.166381882 +0530:/var/crash/_usr_bin_do-release-upgrade.0.uploaded
 644:0:125:0:2024-09-02 17:17:27.218428549 +0530:2024-09-02 17:17:27.218428549 
+0530:/var/crash/_usr_bin_do-release-upgrade.0.upload
 640:0:125:619116:2024-09-02 17:17:27.218428549 +0530:2024-09-02 
17:17:27.258427914 +0530:/var/crash/_usr_bin_do-release-upgrade.0.crash
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Tue Sep  3 10:09:46 2024
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-15 (1083 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_IN
 SHELL=/usr/bin/zsh
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2024-09-03 (0 days ago)
VarLogDistupgradeAptlog:
 Log time: 2024-09-03 10:09:05.912027
 Log time: 2024-09-03 10:09:12.855336
 Log time: 2024-09-03 10:09:45.585232
 Log time: 2024-09-03 10:09:49.070120

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078770

Title:
  how to fix this

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2078770/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2046844] Re: AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many applications to crash with SIGTRAP

2024-08-30 Thread John Johansen

An updated aa-notify that can prompt the user to create a profile is
available in oracular, and for noble via
https://launchpad.net/~apparmor-dev/+archive/ubuntu/apparmor-backports.
The plan is to get more testing on it and then SRU to noble.

it can be install via
  sudo apt install apparmor-notify

basic instructions are available via
  man aa-notify

it will install a default configuration in "/etc/apparmor/notify.conf".
The default configuration can be modified on a per user basis by copying
it to "$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/apparmor/notify.conf" which is generally
"$HOME/.config/apparmor/notify.conf" or to
"$HOME/.apparmor/notify.conf". A custom configuration is not needed
unless you want to use filtering to make it less noisy.

Currently regular notifications will happen for all apparmor events, but they 
can be filtered using the config file.
  

the notifier can be started via the shell with
  aa-notify -p -s1 --prompt-filter=userns

or by adding it to startup applications

There is a bug with the user namespace notification where it currently
requires "--prompt-filter=userns" as part of the command arguments
instead of being set in the config file.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046844

Title:
  AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many applications
  to crash with SIGTRAP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/2046844/+subscriptions


-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068602] Re: kernel oops in aafs_create in noble/oracular

2024-08-29 Thread John Johansen

Looking into it. This appears to be an issue with the parent missing
when trying to create the child in aafs.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: ubuntu-realtime
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068602

Title:
  kernel oops in aafs_create in noble/oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-realtime/+bug/2068602/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2071445] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 for Azure unable to run 32bit binaries

2024-08-28 Thread John Cabaj

** Also affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Triaged

** Also affects: linux-signed-azure (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Invalid

** Also affects: linux-signed-azure-6.8 (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Invalid

** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071445

Title:
  Ubuntu 24.04 for Azure unable to run 32bit binaries

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2071445/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077991] Re: Provide an arm64 linux-azure 64k kernel variant

2024-08-28 Thread John Cabaj

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
  * Microsoft requested 64k page size flavour.
  
  [Fix]
  
  * Add flavour and configs for 64k flavour
  
  [Test Case]
  
  * Compile tested
  * Boot tested
  
  [Where things could go wrong]
  
- * Low chance of regression. Isolated logic fix.
+ * Low chance of regression as no logic changed.
+ * Simply adding a new flavour, easily verified by checking built packages.
  
  [Other Info]
  
  * SF #00388238

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077991

Title:
   Provide an arm64 linux-azure 64k kernel variant

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2077991/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078043] [NEW] The package 'postgresql-client-12' is marked for removal but it is in the removal deny list.

2024-08-28 Thread john Britto

Public bug reported:

On OS upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04, getting below error

 The package 'postgresql-client-12' is marked for removal but it is in
the removal deny list.

Done
Entering ResolveByKeep
  MarkInstall ubuntu-standard:amd64 < 1.481.3 -> 1.539.1 @ii umU IPb > FU=1
  previously satisfied important dependency on tcpdump:amd64
  Installing tcpdump:amd64 as Recommends of ubuntu-standard:amd64
MarkInstall tcpdump:amd64 < 4.99.1-3ubuntu0.2 -> 4.99.4-3ubuntu4 @ii umU Ib 
> FU=0
Installing libpcap0.8t64:amd64 as Depends of tcpdump:amd64
  MarkInstall libpcap0.8t64:amd64 < none -> 1.10.4-4.1ubuntu3 @un uN Ib > 
FU=0
  Installing libibverbs1:amd64 as Depends of libpcap0.8t64:amd64
MarkInstall libibverbs1:amd64 < none -> 50.0-2build2 @un uN IPb > FU=0
Installing ibverbs-providers:amd64 as Recommends of libibverbs1:amd64
  MarkInstall ibverbs-providers:amd64 < none -> 50.0-2build2 @un uN > 
FU=0
  MarkInstall ubuntu-desktop:amd64 < 1.481.3 -> 1.539.1 @ii umU IPb > FU=1
  previously satisfied important dependency on network-manager-pptp-gnome:amd64
  Installing network-manager-pptp-gnome:amd64 as Recommends of 
ubuntu-desktop:amd64
MarkInstall network-manager-pptp-gnome:amd64 < 1.2.10-1 -> 1.2.12-3build2 
@ii umU Ib > FU=0
Installing network-manager-pptp:amd64 as Depends of 
network-manager-pptp-gnome:amd64
  MarkInstall network-manager-pptp:amd64 < 1.2.10-1 -> 1.2.12-3build2 @ii 
umU Ib > FU=0
  Installing ppp:amd64 as Depends of network-manager-pptp:amd64
MarkInstall ppp:amd64 < 2.4.9-1+1ubuntu3 -> 2.4.9-1+1.1ubuntu4 @ii umU 
> FU=0
  Installing pptp-linux:amd64 as Depends of network-manager-pptp:amd64
MarkInstall pptp-linux:amd64 < 1.10.0-1build3 -> 1.10.0-1build4 @ii ugU 
> FU=0

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:22.04.19
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-119.129-generic 5.15.160
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-119-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.6
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CrashDB: ubuntu
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Wed Aug 28 14:48:08 2024
DistributionChannelDescriptor:
 # This is the distribution channel descriptor for the OEM CDs
 # For more information see http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor
 canonical-oem-somerville-focal-amd64-20200502-85
InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-01-28 (578 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 "Focal" - Build amd64 LIVE Binary 20200502-05:58
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2024-08-28 (0 days ago)
VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:
 
mtime.conffile..etc.update-manager.release-upgrades: 2024-08-08T19:11:50.180990

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade jammy third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078043

Title:
   The package 'postgresql-client-12' is marked for removal but it is in
  the removal deny list.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2078043/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077991] [NEW] Provide an arm64 linux-azure 64k kernel variant

2024-08-27 Thread John Cabaj

Public bug reported:

[Impact]

* Microsoft requested 64k page size flavour.

[Fix]

* Add flavour and configs for 64k flavour

[Test Case]

* Compile tested
* Boot tested

[Where things could go wrong]

* Low chance of regression. Isolated logic fix.

[Other Info]

* SF #00388238

** Affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Jammy)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Noble)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Oracular)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077991

Title:
   Provide an arm64 linux-azure 64k kernel variant

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2077991/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077105] Re: cloud-images do not produce sboms

2024-08-27 Thread John Chittum

** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Noble)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => John Chittum (jchittum)

** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Jammy)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => John Chittum (jchittum)

** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Focal)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => John Chittum (jchittum)

** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => John Chittum (jchittum)

** Changed in: cloud-images
 Assignee: (unassigned) => John Chittum (jchittum)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077105

Title:
  cloud-images do not produce sboms

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2077105/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060767] Re: Foliate does not run in Ubuntu 24.04 due to apparmor issue

An updated aa-notify that can prompt the user to create a profile is
available in oracular, and for noble via
https://launchpad.net/~apparmor-dev/+archive/ubuntu/apparmor-backports.
The plan is to get more testing on it and then SRU to noble.

it can be install via
  sudo apt install apparmor-notify

basic instructions are available via
  man aa-notify

it will install a default configuration in "/etc/apparmor/notify.conf".
The default configuration can be modified on a per user basis by copying
it to "$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/apparmor/notify.conf" which is generally
"$HOME/.config/apparmor/notify.conf" or to
"$HOME/.apparmor/notify.conf". A custom configuration is not needed
unless you want to use filtering to make it less noisy.

Currently regular notifications will happen for all apparmor events, but they 
can be filtered using the config file.
  

the notifier can be started via the shell with
  aa-notify -p -s1 --prompt-filter=userns

or by adding it to startup applications

There is a bug with the user namespace notification where it currently
requires "--prompt-filter=userns" as part of the command arguments
instead of being set in the config file.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060767

Title:
  Foliate does not run in Ubuntu 24.04 due to apparmor issue

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2060767/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063976] Re: Apparmor breaking nsjail in AOSP

An updated aa-notify that can prompt the user to create a profile is
available in oracular, and for noble via
https://launchpad.net/~apparmor-dev/+archive/ubuntu/apparmor-backports.
The plan is to get more testing on it and then SRU to noble.

it can be install via
  sudo apt install apparmor-notify

basic instructions are available via
  man aa-notify

it will install a default configuration in "/etc/apparmor/notify.conf".
The default configuration can be modified on a per user basis by copying
it to "$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/apparmor/notify.conf" which is generally
"$HOME/.config/apparmor/notify.conf" or to
"$HOME/.apparmor/notify.conf". A custom configuration is not needed
unless you want to use filtering to make it less noisy.

Currently regular notifications will happen for all apparmor events, but they 
can be filtered using the config file.
  

the notifier can be started via the shell with
  aa-notify -p -s1 --prompt-filter=userns

or by adding it to startup applications

There is a bug with the user namespace notification where it currently
requires "--prompt-filter=userns" as part of the command arguments
instead of being set in the config file.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063976

Title:
  Apparmor breaking nsjail in AOSP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2063976/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056555] Re: Allow bitbake to create user namespace

An updated aa-notify that can prompt the user to create a profile is
available in oracular, and for noble via
https://launchpad.net/~apparmor-dev/+archive/ubuntu/apparmor-backports.
The plan is to get more testing on it and then SRU to noble.

it can be install via
  sudo apt install apparmor-notify

basic instructions are available via
  man aa-notify

it will install a default configuration in "/etc/apparmor/notify.conf".
The default configuration can be modified on a per user basis by copying
it to "$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/apparmor/notify.conf" which is generally
"$HOME/.config/apparmor/notify.conf" or to
"$HOME/.apparmor/notify.conf". A custom configuration is not needed
unless you want to use filtering to make it less noisy.

Currently regular notifications will happen for all apparmor events, but they 
can be filtered using the config file.
  

the notifier can be started via the shell with
  aa-notify -p -s1 --prompt-filter=userns

or by adding it to startup applications

There is a bug with the user namespace notification where it currently
requires "--prompt-filter=userns" as part of the command arguments
instead of being set in the config file.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056555

Title:
  Allow bitbake to create user namespace

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2056555/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056555] Re: Allow bitbake to create user namespace

An updated aa-notify that can prompt the user to create a profile is
available in oracular, and for noble via
https://launchpad.net/~apparmor-dev/+archive/ubuntu/apparmor-backports.
The plan is to get more testing on it and then SRU to noble.

it can be install via
  sudo apt install apparmor-notify

basic instructions are available via
  man aa-notify

it will install a default configuration in "/etc/apparmor/notify.conf".
The default configuration can be modified on a per user basis by copying
it to "$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/apparmor/notify.conf" which is generally
"$HOME/.config/apparmor/notify.conf" or to
"$HOME/.apparmor/notify.conf". A custom configuration is not needed
unless you want to use filtering to make it less noisy.

Currently regular notifications will happen for all apparmor events, but they 
can be filtered using the config file.
  

the notifier can be started via the shell with
  aa-notify -p -s1 --prompt-filter=userns

or by adding it to startup applications

There is a bug with the user namespace notification where it currently
requires "--prompt-filter=userns" as part of the command arguments
instead of being set in the config file.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056555

Title:
  Allow bitbake to create user namespace

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2056555/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077105] Re: cloud-images do not produce sboms

2024-08-26 Thread John Chittum

** Description changed:

  cloud images are not currently producing spdx formatted SBOMs equally.
  Some builds do produce sboms continuously.
  
  all cloud images must produce SBOMs, across all Suites and products.
  
  # REQUIREMENTS #
  
  * Current calls to create_manifest in livecd-rootfs/live-build/functions must 
not break
  * sbom generation must only be done for ubuntu-cpc project.
  
+ # IMPACT #
+ 
+ * will only affect `ubuntu-cpc` project
+ * will add the creation of a new file
+ * the SBOM requirement is part of Canonical's SSDLC efforts as well as 
partner contracts (multiple partners are requiring SBOMs for each generated 
artifact)
+ 
  # TEST PLAN #
  * test all the ubuntu-cpc livecd-rootfs only hooks and series. ensure that an 
spdx formatted sbom, manifest, and filelist is generated and saved
  * test non-ubuntu-cpc hook and make sure that nothing is generated (check for 
calls of create_manifest. if they aren't even calling it, then it's safe)
  * test private ubuntu-cpc hooks. ensure that current calls to create_manifest 
are not broken
+ * test buildd builds to ensure no manifest is generated and no error is 
raised.
  
- # POSSIBLE REGRESSIONS #
+ # POSSIBLE REGRESSIONS / WHERE PROBLEMS COULD OCCUR #
  * any hook calling create_manifest is at risk if there is an issue with 
create_manifest
+ * outside CPC specific hooks, the only build calling create_manifest is 
`buildd`. however this is not in the `ubuntu-cpc` project so it should skip the 
sbom generation.
  * any build where access to the snapstore is restricted, as this requires a 
snap
- * NOTE: launchpad livefs builds have access to the snapstore
+ * NOTE: launchpad livefs builds have access to the snapstore

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077105

Title:
  cloud-images do not produce sboms

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2077105/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077497] [NEW] Relaos from back-up fail

2024-08-20 Thread John Dunn

Public bug reported:

On reloading ubuntu from back-up disk installation failed for unknown
reason

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: ubiquity 22.04.17
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-43.46-generic 5.15.39
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-43-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.470
Date: Wed Aug 21 15:34:41 2024
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed 
maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks.
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy ubiquity-22.04.17 ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077497

Title:
  Relaos from back-up fail

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/2077497/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077413] Re: apparmor unconfined profile blocks signal sending

2024-08-20 Thread John Johansen

peer=unconfined in most cases is not meant to be any. It is just that
the policy could not distinguish between the different unconfined
processes.

Confined processes were still being blocked by the peer=unconfined rule.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077413

Title:
  apparmor unconfined profile blocks signal sending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/2077413/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077105] Re: cloud-images do not produce sboms

2024-08-15 Thread John Chittum

** Description changed:

  cloud images are not currently producing spdx formatted SBOMs equally.
  Some builds do produce sboms continuously.
  
  all cloud images must produce SBOMs, across all Suites and products.
+ 
+ # REQUIREMENTS #
+ 
+ * Current calls to create_manifest in livecd-rootfs/live-build/functions must 
not break
+ * sbom generation must only be done for ubuntu-cpc project.
+ 
+ # TEST PLAN #
+ * test all the ubuntu-cpc livecd-rootfs only hooks and series. ensure that an 
spdx formatted sbom, manifest, and filelist is generated and saved
+ * test non-ubuntu-cpc hook and make sure that nothing is generated (check for 
calls of create_manifest. if they aren't even calling it, then it's safe)
+ * test private ubuntu-cpc hooks. ensure that current calls to create_manifest 
are not broken
+ 
+ # POSSIBLE REGRESSIONS #
+ * any hook calling create_manifest is at risk if there is an issue with 
create_manifest
+ * any build where access to the snapstore is restricted, as this requires a 
snap
+ * NOTE: launchpad livefs builds have access to the snapstore

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077105

Title:
  cloud-images do not produce sboms

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2077105/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077105] [NEW] cloud-images do not produce sboms

2024-08-15 Thread John Chittum

Public bug reported:

cloud images are not currently producing spdx formatted SBOMs equally.
Some builds do produce sboms continuously.

all cloud images must produce SBOMs, across all Suites and products.

** Affects: cloud-images
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077105

Title:
  cloud-images do not produce sboms

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2077105/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2051918] Re: Ubuntu CVE-2024-21626 runc vulnerability

2024-08-15 Thread John Chittum

** Changed in: cloud-images
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051918

Title:
  Ubuntu CVE-2024-21626 runc vulnerability

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2051918/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076291] Re: kernel panic was caused by a fatal exception due to a null pointer dereference in the iptable_nat module

2024-08-13 Thread John Cabaj

** Also affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076291

Title:
  kernel panic was caused by a fatal exception due to a null pointer
  dereference in the iptable_nat module

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2076291/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076598] [NEW] friendly-names by default

2024-08-12 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov

Public bug reported:

friendly-names by default

https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/02/29/%23ubuntu-devel.html#t18:08

ahasenack   xnox: hi, still around? :)  18:08
ahasenack   xnox: back in 2019, you added this change to multipath-tools: 
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/commit/?id=8adefeb66a6628d1e27d3da32ddac70e73149796
  18:08
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Commit 8adefeb in ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools 
"0.7.4-2ubuntu6 (patches unapplied) import/0.7.4-2ubuntu6"  18:08
ahasenack   xnox: we have been carrying it as delta since then, as debian 
rejected it 
(https://salsa.debian.org/linux-blocks-team/multipath-tools/-/merge_requests/4/diffs?commit_id=43b060cfdcf18c76efd12f17ebc7bbb241b39598)


I believe this was to ensure that d-i installer, and installed system zfcp 
devices match.

If you want to drop that change, that's fine, but retest that s390x
subiquity installer onto zfcp devices have friendly names during the
install, and remain the same/stable after the install.

Or at the very least check that initrd, and live system, and installed
systems all have the same multipath config with friendly names turned on
by default.

** Affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076598

Title:
  friendly-names by default

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2076598/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076291] Re: kernel panic was caused by a fatal exception due to a null pointer dereference in the iptable_nat module

2024-08-09 Thread John Cabaj

** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076291

Title:
  kernel panic was caused by a fatal exception due to a null pointer
  dereference in the iptable_nat module

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2076291/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076291] Re: kernel panic was caused by a fatal exception due to a null pointer dereference in the iptable_nat module

2024-08-08 Thread John Cabaj

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
  * Microsoft has requested a patch to address a kernel panic issue
+ similar to the upstream issue here -
+ 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20240731213046.6194-2-pa...@netfilter.org/
  
  [Fix]
  
  * Clean cherry-pick upstream commit 5830aa863981: "netfilter: iptables:
- Fix null-ptr-deref in iptable_nat_table_init("
+ Fix null-ptr-deref in iptable_nat_table_init()"
  
  [Test Plan]
  
  * Build and boot tested
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  
- * Low regression risk
+ * Low regression risk, mostly shifting logic
+ * Change to order of register_pernet_subsys() and xt_register_template() 
could expose some other logic being held together under race condition
  
  [Other info]
  
  * SF #00391736

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076291

Title:
  kernel panic was caused by a fatal exception due to a null pointer
  dereference in the iptable_nat module

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2076291/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073414] Re: Include Azure Site Recovery module in Azure kernel

2024-08-08 Thread John Cabaj

** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal-linux-azure
** Tags added: verification-done-focal-linux-azure

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073414

Title:
  Include Azure Site Recovery module in Azure kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2073414/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076294] [NEW] loginctl terminate-session "" fails

2024-08-07 Thread John Cobb

Public bug reported:

I have been experimenting with wayfire lately and in the course of that
I started to use loginctl terminate-session "" as a way of loging out.
In wayfire this works fine. Out of curiosity I also used it to attempt
to logout from a gnome session and it fails with "Failed to issue method
call: Caller does not belong to any known session." I also observed that
XDG_SESSION_ID was not set. (Whereas it was in the wayfire session). I
don't know if the missing variable is the cause of the problem or merely
a symptom. I tried both xorg and the gnome version of wayland but the
symptoms were the same.

There is clearly no serious functional problem with loginctl, one can
see the session numbers and terminate by explicitly using a number. It
just makes it harder to reliably identify ones specific session. I
cannot claim this is a bug that inconveniences me. On the other hand
idiosyncrasies of this sort waste peoples time and are best eliminated.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: gnome (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-39.39-generic 6.8.8
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-39-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Wed Aug  7 22:37:17 2024
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 TERM=xterm-256color
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
SourcePackage: meta-gnome3
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: meta-gnome3 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076294

Title:
  loginctl terminate-session "" fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meta-gnome3/+bug/2076294/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076291] [NEW] kernel panic was caused by a fatal exception due to a null pointer dereference in the iptable_nat module

2024-08-07 Thread John Cabaj

Public bug reported:

[Impact]

* Microsoft has requested a patch to address a kernel panic issue

[Fix]

* Clean cherry-pick upstream commit 5830aa863981: "netfilter: iptables:
Fix null-ptr-deref in iptable_nat_table_init("

[Test Plan]

* Build and boot tested

[Where problems could occur]

* Low regression risk

[Other info]

* SF #00391736

** Affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Jammy)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- kernel panic was caused by a fatal exception due to a null pointer 
dereference in the iptable_nat module  Case Team (4)  Case Time Cards (5) 
Open Activities (0) Activity History (0) Files (0) Case History (10+) 
SurveyMonkey Responses (0) Emails (0) Case Status History (5) Case Reviews (0) 
Case Comments (0) Notes (0)  Tabs  Details Contacts Comments 
Files Related Knowledge Tracking Assets Account Cases  Case 
Action Plan and Engineering Notes  Action Plan  Engineering Notes  Post 
New Case Time Card  Share an update...  I've provided a test kernel   To link 
to a record, enter / then start typing the record name.  To Canonical 
Ltd. Only  Case Case Details  Time Spent (Minutes)  Solution Sent Tick 
Solution Sent Tick Status Waiting on Customer Workaround Sent Tick 
Workaround Sent Tick Most Recent Activity  All Updates Emails 
Private Answers Call Logs Text Posts Status Changes  Skip Feed View 
This Post Click to collapse post Melissa Carlson Melissa Carlson August 7, 2024 
at 1:58 PM Post To: Internal  Kernel Escalation Hi John,  Azure is 
requesting to pull in the following upstream patch to address an issue they're 
seeing on AKS: 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20240731213046.6194-2-pa...@netfilter.org/
 Based on this coming from AKS I would expect we'll want to evaluate 
pulling this in for 5.15+ but I've asked Jack to confirm.  Let us know if 
you see any concerns with pulling this patch in.  -Melissa This content is 
a preview of a link. patchwork.kernel.org  patchwork.kernel.org  
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20240731213046.6194-2-pa...@netfilter.org/
 Comment Click to expand post System System August 7, 2024 at 12:39 PM Case 
Case updated View This Post Click to collapse post Melissa Carlson Melissa 
Carlson August 7, 2024 at 1:38 PM Post To: All
+ kernel panic was caused by a fatal exception due to a null pointer 
dereference in the iptable_nat module

** Also affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076291

Title:
  kernel panic was caused by a fatal exception due to a null pointer
  dereference in the iptable_nat module

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2076291/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

2024-07-31 Thread John Cabaj

All modules built successfully as part of kernel build in each
respective release (Noble, Jammy, and Focal).

** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal verification-needed-jammy 
verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: verification-done-focal verification-done-jammy 
verification-done-noble

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063362] Re: Backport for 22.04, 20.04, and 18.04

2024-07-31 Thread John Cabaj

All modules built successfully as part of kernel build in each
respective release (Noble, Jammy, and Focal).

** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done-focal verification-done-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063362

Title:
  Backport for 22.04, 20.04, and 18.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2063362/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073414] Re: Include Azure Site Recovery module in Azure kernel

2024-07-30 Thread John Cabaj

** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Fix Committed => New

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: Fix Committed => New

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: Fix Committed => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073414

Title:
  Include Azure Site Recovery module in Azure kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2073414/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073414] Re: Include Azure Site Recovery module in Azure kernel

2024-07-29 Thread John Cabaj

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073414

Title:
  Include Azure Site Recovery module in Azure kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2073414/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2071445] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 for Azure unable to run 32bit binaries

2024-07-29 Thread John Cabaj

** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071445

Title:
  Ubuntu 24.04 for Azure unable to run 32bit binaries

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2071445/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2074070] Re: unable to get WPA supplicant status via wpa-cli utility from a snap

2024-07-26 Thread John Johansen

So I have some questions about the snap run under the wpa_client case.

Is this trace repeatable? This one is odd to me in a couple of ways like
we are getting a timeout without every doing a select/poll/... so either
it is somehow missing from the trace or its being done by interrupt.

The trace starts to differ with the 
  fstat(1, {st_mode=S_IFIFO|0600, st_size=0, ...}) = 0

instead of
  pselect6(4, ...   <- Why is this one missing
  recvfrom(3, ...   <- missing can be explained by time out
  newfstatat(1, ...

the missing pselect/poll.. of any kind is weird and needs to be
investigated. The missing recvfrom can be explained by the timeout.

the change from newfstatat to fstat in the snap might give a clue. I
think we might be looking at a seccomp issue where newfstatat or at
least something used to detect if newfstatat is present is being
blocked. My guess is the code to select this is in glibc.

This might also explain pselect6 missing. If glibc is setting some local
vars that it is using to conditionally determine which syscall to use.
It may just be straight up returning an error (eg timeout) without
making a syscall of any kind. Again this is conjecture and needs to be
investigated.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074070

Title:
  unable to get WPA supplicant status via wpa-cli utility from a snap

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wpa/+bug/2074070/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056555] Re: Allow bitbake to create user namespace

2024-07-25 Thread John Johansen

@richard-purdie-1:

I can completely agree that its sad that security is stopping what
amounts to better security. We are open to suggestions on how to improve
the situation.

Distro specific hacks are ugly, an additional burden and aren't a
desirable solution. The end goal is to make it so the user can easily
allow applications like bitbake to function. The plan is to SRU said
functionality back into 24.04, it is just taking longer than was planned
for.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056555

Title:
  Allow bitbake to create user namespace

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2056555/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056555] Re: Allow bitbake to create user namespace

2024-07-25 Thread John Johansen

@ross: yes the plan is to enable unshare and bwrap with custom profiles.
It is possible to test if this would work for your use case by copying
these profiles to the system and loading them.

Whether it will work really depends on whether unshare can do all the
necessary privileged operations. The child that unshare will spawn will
not be able to do anything that requires capabilities, as what is being
denied above.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056555

Title:
  Allow bitbake to create user namespace

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2056555/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2069362] Re: Request to enable VDPA kernel config

2024-07-25 Thread John Cabaj

** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble-linux-azure
** Tags added: verification-done-noble-linux-azure

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069362

Title:
  Request to enable VDPA kernel config

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2069362/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2070402] Re: net: mana: Add support for page sizes other than 4KB on ARM64

2024-07-25 Thread John Cabaj

** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy-linux-azure 
verification-needed-noble-linux-azure
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy-linux-azure 
verification-done-noble-linux-azure

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070402

Title:
  net: mana: Add support for page sizes other than 4KB on ARM64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/2070402/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2046486] Re: units with credentials fail in LXD containers

2024-07-25 Thread John Chittum

blech, sorry, misclicks trying to get things added properly

marking as affects cloud-images as producers of the lxd images.

** Also affects: systemd
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** No longer affects: systemd

** Also affects: cloud-images
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: cloud-images
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046486

Title:
  units with credentials fail in LXD containers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2046486/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072883] Re: Docker scout reports critical and high vulnerabilities for Ubuntu docker images with installed gosu

2024-07-23 Thread John Chittum

you can check any progress in Ubuntu by checking the issue tracker

https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-24790

https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-24791

it looks like 2024-24690 is fixed, so may be a false-positive.

24791 is still in needs-triage on the page.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072883

Title:
  Docker scout reports critical and high vulnerabilities for Ubuntu
  docker images with installed gosu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2072883/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073704] [NEW] iwlwifi: Can't parse empty family 8000 OTP/NVM sections

2024-07-21 Thread John Manko

Public bug reported:


[ 3500.567001] [ cut here ]
[ 3500.567005] Invalid rxb from HW 2561
[ 3500.567036] WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 25326 at 
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/rx.c:1488 
iwl_pcie_rx_handle+0x3dc/0x640 [iwlwifi]
[ 3500.567062] Modules linked in: ip_vs_rr xt_ipvs ip_vs xt_REDIRECT xt_nat 
veth vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel xt_policy xt_mark xt_bpf 
nf_conntrack_netlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo xt_addrtype vboxnetadp(OE) 
vboxnetflt(OE) vboxdrv(OE) ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE 
nft_chain_nat xt_CHECKSUM xt_comment xt_tcpudp nft_compat iptable_raw 
iptable_mangle iptable_nat nf_nat ccm nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 
nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_tables libcrc32c rfcomm snd_seq_dummy snd_hrtimer overlay 
qrtr cmac algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg bnep nvidia_uvm(POE) binfmt_misc 
nls_iso8859_1 nvidia_drm(POE) nvidia_modeset(POE) intel_rapl_msr 
intel_rapl_common intel_uncore_frequency intel_uncore_frequency_common 
nvidia(POE) intel_tcc_cooling x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp 
snd_sof_pci_intel_cnl snd_sof_intel_hda_common soundwire_intel 
snd_sof_intel_hda_mlink soundwire_cadence snd_sof_intel_hda snd_sof_pci 
snd_sof_xtensa_dsp snd_sof snd_sof_utils snd_soc_hdac_hda snd_hda_ext_core 
snd_soc_acpi_intel_match snd_soc_acpi
[ 3500.567095]  soundwire_generic_allocation snd_hda_codec_realtek 
soundwire_bus coretemp snd_hda_codec_generic snd_soc_core iwlmvm 
snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_compress ac97_bus snd_pcm_dmaengine snd_hda_intel 
mac80211 snd_intel_dspcfg snd_intel_sdw_acpi snd_hda_codec snd_hda_core 
snd_hwdep libarc4 snd_pcm btusb snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event btrtl btintel 
snd_rawmidi cmdlinepart btbcm btmtk iwlwifi spi_nor snd_seq mei_pxp mei_hdcp 
ee1004 snd_seq_device bluetooth mtd snd_timer rapl ecdh_generic intel_cstate 
joydev mxm_wmi intel_wmi_thunderbolt wmi_bmof snd input_leds mei_me i2c_i801 
spi_intel_pci cfg80211 ecc spi_intel soundcore i2c_smbus mei intel_pch_thermal 
intel_pmc_core intel_vsec pmt_telemetry acpi_pad acpi_tad pmt_class mac_hid 
kvm_intel kvm irqbypass iptable_filter ip6table_filter ip6_tables br_netfilter 
bridge stp llc arp_tables msr parport_pc ppdev lp parport efi_pstore nfnetlink 
dmi_sysfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 dm_crypt dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log 
hid_logitech_hidpp hid_logitech_dj hid_generic usbhid hid
[ 3500.567137]  uas usb_storage crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul polyval_clmulni 
polyval_generic ghash_clmulni_intel nvme sha256_ssse3 sha1_ssse3 e1000e 
nvme_core ahci xhci_pci libahci nvme_auth xhci_pci_renesas video wmi 
aesni_intel crypto_simd cryptd
[ 3500.567147] CPU: 11 PID: 25326 Comm: irq/135-iwlwifi Tainted: PW  OE 
 6.8.0-38-generic #38-Ubuntu
[ 3500.567149] Hardware name: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7B17/MPG 
Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B17), BIOS 1.40 02/21/2019
[ 3500.567150] RIP: 0010:iwl_pcie_rx_handle+0x3dc/0x640 [iwlwifi]
[ 3500.567167] Code: ca 8b 43 34 83 43 30 08 83 e8 08 89 43 34 e9 73 fe ff ff 
44 89 f0 89 d6 45 89 e6 41 89 c4 48 c7 c7 6d 61 0f c1 e8 b4 16 48 c9 <0f> 0b 4c 
89 ff e8 ba 37 ff ff 8b 55 d4 85 d2 0f 95 c0 41 21 c6 e9
[ 3500.567168] RSP: 0018:9b78c03d0e18 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 3500.567170] RAX:  RBX: 8918cfe34000 RCX: 
[ 3500.567171] RDX:  RSI:  RDI: 
[ 3500.567172] RBP: 9b78c03d0e80 R08:  R09: 
[ 3500.567172] R10:  R11:  R12: 0004
[ 3500.567173] R13: 0001 R14:  R15: 8918f99d0028
[ 3500.567174] FS:  () GS:8927edb8() 
knlGS:
[ 3500.567175] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 80050033
[ 3500.567176] CR2: 7f4dc27cc998 CR3: 000a4823c002 CR4: 003726f0
[ 3500.567177] Call Trace:
[ 3500.567178]  
[ 3500.567180]  ? show_regs+0x6d/0x80
[ 3500.567183]  ? __warn+0x89/0x160
[ 3500.567186]  ? iwl_pcie_rx_handle+0x3dc/0x640 [iwlwifi]
[ 3500.567206]  ? report_bug+0x17e/0x1b0
[ 3500.567210]  ? handle_bug+0x51/0xa0
[ 3500.567212]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x80
[ 3500.567214]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20
[ 3500.567217]  ? iwl_pcie_rx_handle+0x3dc/0x640 [iwlwifi]
[ 3500.567232]  ? iwl_pcie_rx_handle+0x3dc/0x640 [iwlwifi]
[ 3500.567247]  ? enqueue_task+0x53/0x180
[ 3500.567249]  iwl_pcie_napi_poll+0x2e/0x150 [iwlwifi]
[ 3500.567265]  __napi_poll+0x30/0x200
[ 3500.567268]  net_rx_action+0x181/0x2e0
[ 3500.567270]  __do_softirq+0xde/0x363
[ 3500.567272]  do_softirq.part.0+0x41/0x80
[ 3500.567275]  
[ 3500.567275]  
[ 3500.567276]  __local_bh_enable_ip+0x72/0x80
[ 3500.567278]  iwl_pcie_irq_handler+0x4df/0xb70 [iwlwifi]
[ 3500.567293]  ? __pfx_irq_thread_fn+0x10/0x10
[ 3500.567295]  irq_thread_fn+0x21/0x70
[ 3500.567297]  irq_thread+0xf8/0x1c0
[ 3500.567298]  ? __pfx_irq_thread_dtor+0x10/0x10
[ 3500.567300]  ? __pfx_irq_thread+0x10/0x10
[ 3500.567301]  kthread+0xef/0x120
[ 3500.567303]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[

[Bug 2051574] Re: gnome-shell-portal-helper crashed with SIGTRAP in waitUntilSyncedOrDie() from WebKit::XDGDBusProxy::launch() ["bwrap: setting up uid map: Permission denied" ; "Failed to fully launch

2024-07-19 Thread John Johansen

@jamesh:

for the profile please give it a short non-path based name, and option
for local additions

abi ,
include 

profile gnome-shell-portal-helper /usr/libexec/gnome-shell-portal-helper 
flags=(default_allow) {
  userns,

  # Site-specific additions and overrides. See local/README for details.
  include if exists 
}

this way if locations change the name remains stable and readable. The
attachment (path portion) can be updated, and even then have multiple
locations

other wise looks good.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051574

Title:
  gnome-shell-portal-helper crashed with SIGTRAP in
  waitUntilSyncedOrDie() from WebKit::XDGDBusProxy::launch() ["bwrap:
  setting up uid map: Permission denied" ; "Failed to fully launch dbus-
  proxy: Child process exited with code 1"]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2051574/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

This is a debdiff for Focal applicable to 0.1.0-0ubuntu7~20.04.1. This
was built using sbuild against a Focal chroot, and works as intended.

** Patch added: "5-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~20.04.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+attachment/5798610/+files/5-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~20.04.1.debdiff

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
  * For Focal and Jammy releases, the package never left the -proposed pocket 
due to dh-dkms being added to initial upload during sponsorship, which is not 
available in those respective releases.
  * For Noble release, the package is only installable via DKMS, but cannot be 
built and signed alongside the kernel build during kernel SRU cycle 
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/StableReleaseCadence). This is because the 
kernel source directory was fixed to /lib/modules/($uname -r), which works for 
building when DKMS package is installed, but not when built within context of a 
Launchpad kernel build, where the build headers are self-contained during the 
build process.
  * Correcting src/md5.c also mistakenly set to public domain in copyright
  * Using debhelper-compat (= 12) for Focal
  * Correcting section from "misc" to "kernel"
  * Removing executable permissions from C source files
+ * Updating Standards-Version to 4.7.0
  
  [Fix]
  
  * Simple re-package, with updated .dkms file, dependencies, and
  copyright
  
  [Test Plan]
  
  * Install requisite kernel (Focal, Jammy, or Noble) in some virtual 
environment (LXD or otherwise)
  * Install DKMS module, which will rebuild against the kernel installed
  * Ensure DKMS module builds and installs properly, and the module can be 
inserted via insmod
  
  * Microsoft has additionally tested the module in-depth
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  
  * Regression risk is low as this module has been tested already, and these 
changes are limited to packaging.
  * These updates allow the module to build for both Focal and Jammy, as those 
packages never left the -proposed pocket due to build dependency issues.
  * In the case of Noble, the risk is that this could fail to build in some 
unforeseen circumstance where the kernel_source_dir variable is missing, though 
that would point to broader issues in DKMS.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

This is a debdiff for Jammy applicable to 0.1.0-0ubuntu7~22.04.1. This
was built using sbuild against a Jammy chroot, and works as intended.

** Patch added: "5-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~22.04.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+attachment/5798609/+files/5-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~22.04.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

This is a debdiff for Noble applicable to 0.1.0-0ubuntu7~24.04.1. This
was built using sbuild against a Noble chroot, and works as intended.

** Patch added: "6-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~24.04.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+attachment/5798608/+files/6-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~24.04.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

This is a debdiff for Oracular applicable to 0.1.0-0ubuntu7. This was
built using sbuild against a Oracular chroot, and works as intended.

** Patch added: "4-0.1.0-0ubuntu7.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+attachment/5798587/+files/4-0.1.0-0ubuntu7.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

This is a debdiff for Noble applicable to 0.1.0-0ubuntu7~24.04.1. This
was built using sbuild against a Noble chroot, and works as intended.

** Patch added: "5-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~24.04.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+attachment/5798400/+files/5-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~24.04.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

This is a debdiff for Focal applicable to 0.1.0-0ubuntu7~20.04.1. This
was built using sbuild against a Focal chroot, and works as intended.

** Patch added: "4-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~20.04.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+attachment/5798402/+files/4-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~20.04.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

This is a debdiff for Jammy applicable to 0.1.0-0ubuntu7~22.04.1. This
was built using sbuild against a Jammy chroot, and works as intended.

** Patch added: "4-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~22.04.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+attachment/5798401/+files/4-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~22.04.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

This is a debdiff for Oracular applicable to 0.1.0-0ubuntu7. This was
built using sbuild against a Oracular chroot, and works as intended.

** Patch added: "3-0.1.0-0ubuntu7.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+attachment/5798399/+files/3-0.1.0-0ubuntu7.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
  * For Focal and Jammy releases, the package never left the -proposed pocket 
due to dh-dkms being added to initial upload during sponsorship, which is not 
available in those respective releases.
  * For Noble release, the package is only installable via DKMS, but cannot be 
built and signed alongside the kernel build during kernel SRU cycle 
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/StableReleaseCadence). This is because the 
kernel source directory was fixed to /lib/modules/($uname -r), which works for 
building when DKMS package is installed, but not when built within context of a 
Launchpad kernel build, where the build headers are self-contained during the 
build process.
  * Correcting src/md5.c also mistakenly set to public domain in copyright
  * Using debhelper-compat (= 12) for Focal
+ * Correcting section from "misc" to "kernel"
+ * Removing executable permissions from C source files
  
  [Fix]
  
  * Simple re-package, with updated .dkms file, dependencies, and
  copyright
  
  [Test Plan]
  
  * Install requisite kernel (Focal, Jammy, or Noble) in some virtual 
environment (LXD or otherwise)
  * Install DKMS module, which will rebuild against the kernel installed
  * Ensure DKMS module builds and installs properly, and the module can be 
inserted via insmod
  
  * Microsoft has additionally tested the module in-depth
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  
  * Regression risk is low as this module has been tested already, and these 
changes are limited to packaging.
  * These updates allow the module to build for both Focal and Jammy, as those 
packages never left the -proposed pocket due to build dependency issues.
  * In the case of Noble, the risk is that this could fail to build in some 
unforeseen circumstance where the kernel_source_dir variable is missing, though 
that would point to broader issues in DKMS.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

This is a debdiff for Focal applicable to 0.1.0-0ubuntu7~20.04.1. This
was built using sbuild against a Focal chroot, and works as intended.

** Patch added: "3-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~20.04.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+attachment/5798322/+files/3-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~20.04.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

This is a debdiff for Jammy applicable to 0.1.0-0ubuntu7~22.04.1. This
was built using sbuild against a Jammy chroot, and works as intended.

** Patch added: "3-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~22.04.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+attachment/5798321/+files/3-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~22.04.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

This is a debdiff for Oracular applicable to 0.1.0-0ubuntu7. This was
built using sbuild against a Oracular chroot, and works as intended.

** Patch added: "2-0.1.0-0ubuntu7.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+attachment/5798319/+files/2-0.1.0-0ubuntu7.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

This is a debdiff for Noble applicable to 0.1.0-0ubuntu7~24.04.1. This
was built using sbuild against a Noble chroot, and works as intended.

** Patch added: "4-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~24.04.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+attachment/5798320/+files/4-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~24.04.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

This is a debdiff for Oracular applicable to 0.1.0-0ubuntu7. This was
built using sbuild against a Oracular chroot, and works as intended.

** Patch added: "1-0.1.0-0ubuntu7.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+attachment/5798318/+files/1-0.1.0-0ubuntu7.debdiff

** Also affects: involflt (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: involflt (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: involflt (Ubuntu Focal)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => John Cabaj (john-cabaj)

** Changed in: involflt (Ubuntu Noble)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => John Cabaj (john-cabaj)

** Changed in: involflt (Ubuntu Oracular)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => John Cabaj (john-cabaj)

** Changed in: involflt (Ubuntu Jammy)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => John Cabaj (john-cabaj)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module involflt doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module doesn't build for kernel at build time

This is a debdiff for Noble applicable to 0.1.0-0ubuntu7~24.04.1. This
was built using sbuild against a Noble chroot, and works as intended.


** Patch added: "3-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~24.04.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+attachment/5798315/+files/3-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~24.04.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module doesn't build for kernel at build time

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
- * Kernel source directory was fixed to /lib/modules/($uname -r), which works 
for building when DKMS package is installed, but not when built within context 
of a kernel build
- * dh-dkms was added to initial upload during sponsorship, but is not 
available in Jammy or Focal. This prevents the package from building.
+ * For Focal and Jammy releases, the package never left the -proposed pocket 
due to dh-dkms being added to initial upload during sponsorship, which is not 
available in those respective releases.
+ * For Noble release, the package is only installable via DKMS, but cannot be 
built and signed alongside the kernel build during kernel SRU cycle 
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/StableReleaseCadence). This is because the 
kernel source directory was fixed to /lib/modules/($uname -r), which works for 
building when DKMS package is installed, but not when built within context of a 
Launchpad kernel build, where the build headers are self-contained during the 
build process.
  * Correcting src/md5.c also mistakenly set to public domain in copyright
  * Using debhelper-compat (= 12) for Focal
  
  [Fix]
  
  * Simple re-package, with updated .dkms file, dependencies, and
  copyright
  
  [Test Plan]
  
- * Compile and install dkms module
- * Microsoft tested
+ * Install requisite kernel (Focal, Jammy, or Noble) in some virtual 
environment (LXD or otherwise)
+ * Install DKMS module, which will rebuild against the kernel installed
+ * Ensure DKMS module builds and installs properly, and the module can be 
inserted via insmod
+ 
+ * Microsoft has additionally tested the module in-depth
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  
- * Low regression risk
+ * Regression risk is low as this module has been tested already, and these 
changes are limited to packaging.
+ * These updates allow the module to build for both Focal and Jammy, as those 
packages never left the -proposed pocket due to build dependency issues.
+ * In the case of Noble, the risk is that this could fail to build in some 
unforeseen circumstance where the kernel_source_dir variable is missing, though 
that would point to broader issues in DKMS.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module doesn't build for kernel at build time

This is a debdiff for Focal applicable to 0.1.0-0ubuntu7. This was built
using sbuild against a Focal chroot, and works as intended.

** Patch added: "2-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~20.04.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+attachment/5798105/+files/2-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~20.04.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module doesn't build for kernel at build time

This is a debdiff for Jammy applicable to 0.1.0-0ubuntu7~22.04.1. This
was built using sbuild against a Jammy chroot, and works as intended.

** Patch added: "2-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~22.04.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+attachment/5798104/+files/2-0.1.0-0ubuntu7~22.04.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073010

Title:
  Module doesn't build for kernel at build time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt/+bug/2073010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073010] Re: Module doesn't build for kernel at build time