After thinking a while about this, and having a look at our configuration for
focal I thik the reason for this issue during the upgrade is that the
`multipathd.service` and `multipathd.socket` were already masked in our focal
setup.
The `multipath-tools` packet is nevertheless attempting to res
Afterwards the unit is masked:
```
root@resolver-test:~# systemctl status multipath-tools
○ multipathd.service
Loaded: masked (Reason: Unit multipathd.service is masked.)
Active: inactive (dead)
```
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
The interessting part of the Error message is:
```
Failed to restart multipath-tools.service: Unit multipath-tools.service failed
to load properly, please adjust/correct and reload service manager: File exists
See system logs and 'systemctl status multipath-tools.service' for details.
invoke-rc.d:
Public bug reported:
Bug-Report suggested by mechanism during `do-release-upgrade -d` from
20.04 focal to 22.04 jammy on a test machine. First upgrade attempt.
| Extra debug information will be added to the bug report automatically.
Haven't seen this information, yet. ;-)
#1928374 does'nt really
Steve Arnolds package for bionic from
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stunnel4/+bug/1847275/comments/25
works for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847275
Title:
stunnel4:
I also think CVE-2021-20230 and this bug are probably two different
things. But Steve Arnold is also addressing CVE-2021-20230 in
Comment#25, and it's still considered unfixed on
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-20230. So there is a a relation to
this CVE, but CVE-2021-20230 is not describing t
** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2021-20230
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847275
Title:
stunnel4: "INTERNAL ERROR: Bad magic at ssl.c, line 117" - DoS
** Description changed:
In the past weeks we experienced few systems coming up without started
dbus-daemon after reboots due to updates.
The first occurrence happens on January 21th 2021, since this time we
were experiencing 0 up to 2 machines with this issue on each reboot
cycle affe
Public bug reported:
In the past weeks we experienced few systems coming up without started
dbus-daemon after reboots due to updates.
The first occurrence happens on January 21th 2021, since this time we
were experiencing 0 up to 2 machines with this issue on each reboot
cycle affecting all (appr
This affects dbus, but the last change that could probably have caused
this was in systemd.
** Package changed: dbus (Ubuntu) => systemd (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: dbus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
i?bug=890127 ? It's in the
same state as the bug here, an I understand it as an upstream bug report.
Kind regards,
Lars
--
Lars Kollstedt
Telefon: +49 6151 16-71027
E-Mail: l...@man-da.de
man-da.de GmbH
Dolivostraße 11
64293 Darmstadt
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Darmstadt
Amtsgericht D
his is on
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phpldapadmin/+bug/1829987>.
Kind regargs,
Lars
--
Lars Kollstedt
Telefon: +49 6151 16-71027
E-Mail: l...@man-da.de
man-da.de GmbH
Dolivostraße 11
64293 Darmstadt
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Darmstadt
Amtsgericht Darmstadt, HRB 9484
Ge
Public bug reported:
Hi,
on Ubuntu 18.4 LTS bionic phpldapadmin prints the following messages:
Deprecated: Function create_function() is deprecated in
/usr/share/phpldapadmin/lib/functions.php on line 1083
Notice: Undefined variable: _SESSION in
/usr/share/phpldapadmin/lib/session_functions.php
Hi,
I also ran into this also on xenial. For me also taking the files under
xenial-updates instead of xenial (as far as possible) fixed this for me.
Thanks to buntix for the hint.
But as the message "for unknown reasons" said, this can happen for
different reasons. In my case the libc6-udeb was p
** Tags added: xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817358
Title:
Ubuntu 16.04 netboot installation failed during loading of installer
component libc6-udeb
To manage notification
Hi Scott,
thanks.
Done so far:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Pix-workaround-should-be-partially-disabled-when-DANE-is-in-use-td101264.html
Kind regards,
Lars
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Hi again,
the 500second threshold is probably only trigggered when the server
greeting is replaced by stars, Which is still done (by default) by newer
Cisco ASAs, that at least support ESMTP and in the case we ran into this
also let the STARTTLS pass properly.
Combining PIXes which are not ESMTP
Public bug reported:
Hi,
Postfix by default enables the pix workarround for an server after a
message has been queued for more than 500s.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_pix_workaround_threshold_time
If the server with an downtime of more than 500s has DANE enabled. And
we're respec
Hi Markus,
this was originally a Bug about SHA-1 signed repositories in local0
breaking the entire installation. The Error messages displayed,
where/are not really good, changing to the shell of the install system,
and having a look at /var/log/syslog there shows more.
This was in 2016 and mainly
Of course only if they're inheriting special repositories this way. But
the bugs referenced here IMHO are showing lot's of examples representing
different reasons and ways to do this. ;-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hello again,
I don't really have an opinion if this should be solved by
- changing the priority of gnupg or gnupg2 (if that wasn't only another
unrelated side effect of the change described in Comment #7)
- adding a dependency to gnupg2 | gnupg to apt-setup-udeb if that would be
possible.
Hello,
Bug #1761030 indeed describes the same issues.
I've also a modified udeb in use, now. And it's working for me, but the
setup is almost the same.
d-i apt-setup/local0/source boolean false
d-i apt-setup/local0/key string
http://software.ubuntu.man-da.de/software/key.gpg
d-i apt-setup/local
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1754075 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754075
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1754075
apt-setup uses apt-key but probably should not anymore
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
On Monday, 9 April 2018 12:56:12 CEST Lars Kollstedt wrote:
[...]
> This patch should IMHO work, but I have no opportunity to test it without
> your help, since we're in udeb and testing preseed issues. ;-)
Hi again,
20 times looked at it and still overlooked one detail.
This must o
I'm also trying to assign a useful name to the key added this way.
This patch should IMHO work, but I have no opportunity to test it without your
help, since we're in udeb and testing preseed issues. ;-)
Kind regards,
Lars
--
Lars Kollstedt
Telefon: +49 6151 16-71027
E-Mail: l
In apt-setup-0.104ubuntu5/generators/60local there is an call
$chroot $ROOT apt-key add "/tmp/key$i.pub"
which would be the origin of this message.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17540
Hi again,
switching to installation shell, and doing a
chroot /target
apt install gnupg2
exit
exit
allows me to complete the installation, when continuing with the
installation step preparing installation sources after this.
The /var/log/syslog from the installation system shows the following
m
Hi again,
on March 2nd we were already on 2.2.4-1ubuntu1 so there obviously was
something fixing this. Since the package already wasn't marked as
important this time.
On this time adding the keys still worked fine.
The last days it didn't on bionic.
Kind regards,
Lars
--
You received this b
Hi,
looks like this has happened when changing the source of gnupg to gnupg2
with 2.2.4-1ubuntu1.
The old source
svn://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-gnupg/gnupg/trunk/
contains the Package as important.
The new source
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-gnupg/gnupg2.git
contains the Package as optional
Didn't want to throw out apt-setup.
** Package changed: gnupg (Ubuntu) => apt-setup (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: gnupg (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
apt-key complains about missing necessary gnupg or gnupg2 package.
** Package changed: apt-setup (Ubuntu) => gnupg (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754075
Title:
apt-setup us
Hi again,
https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2387570 may be about the same thing.
But I can't see what #1553147 should have to do with this, this is referering
to Xenial, we and also gregster is talking about bionic.
On Xenial I stumbled in to #1553121 which had another reason, the
SHA1
Repeating Comment to make the Bugs clickable (can't edit):
Hi again,
https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2387570 may be about the same thing.
But I can't see what Bug #1553147 should have to do with this, this is
referering to Xenial, we and also gregster is talking about bionic.
On Xenia
Hi,
This also seems to affect me. But with a completely local repository within the
preseed-File, and a local key download using http.
d-i apt-setup/local0/key string
http://software.ubuntu.man-da.de/software/key.gpg
But I'm not sure add-apt-key has anything to do with this, since this
package
Hello together,
this seems to affect me, too. On Ubuntu 16.4 LTS.
Lots off Syslog lines with:
Feb 2 12:44:01 ws-kollstedt org.kde.KScreen[1925]: kscreen: Primary output
changed from KScreen::Output(Id: 638 , Name: "DVI-I-1" ) ( "DVI-I-1" ) to
KScreen::Output(Id: 638 , Name: "DVI-I-1" ) ( "DVI-
Hi,
I stumbled into something very similar when using apt-rdepends on
Ubunutu 16.4 LTS (xenial). I think it's the same Bug.
It felt like apt-rdepends used dependencies of the eldest or alphabetically
first package available. Obviously not the dependencies from the latest one.
This is also descr
** Description changed:
#apt-rdepends xuggler
xuggler
- Depends: ffmpeg (>= 0.7.2)
- ...
+ Depends: ffmpeg (>= 0.7.2)
+ ...
ffmpeg <--this dependencies is for ffmpeg 0.5.1
- Depends: libavcodec-extra-52 (>= 4:0.5.1-1)
- Depends: libavcodec52 (>= 4:0.5.1-1)
- Depends: libavdevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1575572 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575572
Send to fast. :-( Tab, Enter wasn't a good idea, in the Bugtrackers
WebGUI. :-( ;-)
The differences between the versions and platforms are probably just
timing. But this happens deterministically on xenial,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1575572 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575572
Hi Martin,
the fix for Bug #1575572 released yesterday turns the situation from bad
to worse from my experience. Since I saw this on i686 only before, I am
experiencing this also on amd64 since installing t
Hi Adam, hi Schlomo,
for me it works with the package that has been put into proposed on the
evening of May 11th 2016.
Sorry for the late reply.
On Wednesday, 11. Mai 2016, 16:42:12 Adam Conrad wrote:
> Please help us by testing this new package. See
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnablePr
Hi Collin,
oops, missed the deb again. :-( ;-) Thank you for correcting. :-) :-)
Attached the corrected one for completeness. ;-)
base-installer (1.158ubuntu3) already contains the corrected. Obviously
you have also corrected the indentation matching the lines above in
1.158ubuntu3. :-)
As f
On Monday, 2. May 2016, 16:13:37 I wrote:
> As far as I know ~anders-kaseorg should be right in Bug #155. The
> keys are statically imported to the trusted-Keychain. The SHA-1 o
> signature isn't used for any verification in any apt mechanisms I know.
> For this reason the warning in the output
Hi all,
to clarify somthing that might be missunderstood in my previous post.
Of course the hpe stuff is OT. What I meant to say with this, is that
the list on https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Apt/Sha1Removal is still
incompletely reflecting the repositories affected, and will probably
always be.
T
Sorry, was the old name:
> The SHA1 warnings/errors also affects the repositories on
> http://downloads.linux.hp.com, but they don't offically support
> Ubuntu 16.4 LTS (xenial), yet.
Of course this is http://downloads.linux.hpe.com/, now. ;-)
--
You received this bug notification because you a
Hi all,
first thanks to ~juliank, this lead me to an workaround for this in my
case.
In our case netboot install failed with a "no suitable kernel found with
your apt settings" (message text written down from memory), when our
internal software repository was included to bootstrap our deployment
Hi all,
I also stumbled into this Bug in Ubuntu 16.4 LTS (xenial).
I can't really confirm this for ubuntu 14.4 (trusty) so far. I can
confirm the the line causing this to be already in 1.144ubuntu1 but it
doe'snt seem to have effect (at least for me and our pxe install
environment).
My last 14.4
Dear Mr. Brun,
on Friday, 4. April 2014, 18:07:05 you wrote:
> Just installed xymon on ubuntu server used the apt-get install to
> get the latest, so I'm at 4.3.0-0.beta2. I have the exact problem as
> titusx described. The history works if I manually edit the URL.I
> see the patch, but
And as I already said. I did get the version dependency out. So here is
the patch file without whitespace garbage for lucid.
** Patch added: "lk2013-05-24_historybutton_lucid.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xymon/+bug/1103428/+attachment/3685570/+files/lk2013-05-24_historybutt
Posting a modified version of my last mail to Axel Beckert... with some
updates:
On Thuesday, 23. May 2013, 22:32:33 Axel Beckert wrote:
[...]
> I rather expected that it was fixed in another way, but I haven't
> found any evidence.
Indeed they did:
| web/history.c: fprintf(htmlrep, "%s
Hi Axel,
I can't find Ulric's patch in neither in 4.3.10 and 4.3.11 from
http://xymon.sourceforge.net/ nor in 4.3.7-1. They all still contain the bug in
strfunc.c:
| static strbuffer_t *result = NULL;
| char *inp, *endp;
| char c;
|
| if (!result) result = newstrbuffer(4
Patch from #21 (for lucid) included via debian/patches folder.
** Patch added: "Patch to xymon_4.3.0~beta2.dfsg-5ubuntu0.1 using Patch from
#21"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xymon/+bug/1103428/+attachment/3658624/+files/historybutton_lucid4.patch
--
You received this bug notif
Patch from #22 included via debian/patches folder.
** Patch added: "Patch to xymon_4.3.0~beta2.dfsg-9.1ubuntu0.1 using Patch from
#22"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xymon/+bug/1103428/+attachment/3658615/+files/historybutton_precise4.patch
--
You received this bug notification b
And here the patch for the ones who only like to have the Increment to
7-CVE-2011-1716, as it is needed for 12.04LTS precise.
** Patch added: "Increment to 7-CVE-2011-1716"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xymon/+bug/1103428/+attachment/3658611/+files/lk1103428-precise_2013-01-29.patc
For the ones who only like to have the Increment to 9-CVE-2011-1716, as
it is needed for 10.04LTS Lucid.
** Patch added: "Increment to 9-CVE-2011-1716"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xymon/+bug/1103428/+attachment/3658610/+files/lk1103428-lucid_2013-01-29.patch
--
You received thi
And of course the Lucid patch the should be also posted as Unique Patch.
** Patch added: "Unique Format Patch of historybutton_lucid2.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xymon/+bug/1103428/+attachment/3658589/+files/historybutton_lucid3.patch
--
You received this bug notificatio
Hmm... can't really reproduce this. The history_button2.patch does't
really apply because it was an old-style diff -r patch, which seems to
be deprecated. But that results in the patch beeing threaded as empty,
not in the errors displayed above.
My steps are:
tar xzf xymon_4.3.0~beta2.dfsg.orig.ta
Here also the one for Lucid. They are to understand as patch for the
sourcecode of the last package (4.3.0~beta2.dfsg-5ubuntu0.1) for lucid.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103428
Title
** Patch added: "Patch for 10.04 LTS (based on Code posted by Ulric Eriksson)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xymon/+bug/1103428/+attachment/3505736/+files/historybutton_lucid2.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Now I'm running another patch on the "in preparation" machine. It is
based on the code you (Ulric Eriksson) provided above. But i've removed
the pragma if. Internaly I use 4.3.0~beta2.dfsg-9.1ubuntu0.1-0.3 so
don't wonder it has the same version number as the old patch above.
It of course replaces
But setting the pragma if to 1 would lead to an error beause rn is used
below, and not declared any more. So the pragma if should IMHO better be
removed, leaving in the fixed code permanently.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
> FWIW, here's how I "solved" the problem when I found it. It's ugly, but
> running in production and works.
Indeed ughly. ;-) The multiple buffers solution with a static counter with a
static rolling over counter.
Of course this works. Until there is one value not copied out of the
buffer until
This works for me on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise.
The htmlquoted funtion comes in via a patch in the debian/patches dir,
so patching the patch. ;-) :-(
** Patch added: "Patch for 12.04 LTS"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xymon/+bug/1103428/+attachment/3505543/+files/historybutton_prec
Yes, of course. An old C++ chalenge. No automatic free when the last
pointer to the dynamicaly allocated memory is removed. :-(
Since this is passed as an argument the free if neecessary must come from
outside of the function. Other possible solutions should be:
- To use mulitple static buffer
Now providing, more specific patches for the 10.04 LTS and 12.04 LTS
packes. When using this withing daemons, you'll need to look where you
can free the buffer again, but since this is only used within the cgi-
scripts I did'nt try.
We are now using the patched packages and it looks good, until no
Ulric Eriksson on 2013-01-23 wrote:
[...]
> The bug is fixed in the current version of xymon, so simply upgrading the
> version used to build the xymon package in ubuntu
> would suffice.
[..]
I think this is not what I want, since there are some heavy weithed changes in
configuration behavior, I
Yes. It was my mistake.
I downgraded the virtual package hobbit. And that of course has not effect.
Downgrading the xymon-Package fixes the problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103
This bug also affects 10.04 (lucid) LTS, but 8.04 (hardy) is not
affected yet.
The history form looks like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also the macros/variables for the header templates are affected. Most of
them are containing the value of &BBHOST. Also in the &BBSVC and &BBIP
Macros
67 matches
Mail list logo
