[Bug 1003611] [NEW] package libqt4-svg 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: libqt4-svg:amd64 4
Public bug reported: failed when running apt-get upgrade ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libqt4-svg 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed May 23 15:15:08 2012 DuplicateSignature: Unpacking replacement libqt4-svg ... dpkg: error processing libqt4-svg:i386 (--configure): libqt4-svg:i386 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4 cannot be configured because libqt4-svg:amd64 is in a different version (4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1) ErrorMessage: libqt4-svg:amd64 4 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110426) SourcePackage: qt4-x11 Title: package libqt4-svg 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: libqt4-svg:amd64 4 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-30 (23 days ago) ** Affects: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003611 Title: package libqt4-svg 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: libqt4-svg:amd64 4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt4-x11/+bug/1003611/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1003611] Re: package libqt4-svg 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: libqt4-svg:amd64 4
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003611 Title: package libqt4-svg 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: libqt4-svg:amd64 4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt4-x11/+bug/1003611/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1003622] [NEW] package libqt4-designer 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: libqt4-designer:amd64 4
Public bug reported: t ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libqt4-designer 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.38-generic 3.2.16 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed May 23 15:37:33 2012 ErrorMessage: libqt4-designer:amd64 4 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110426) SourcePackage: qt4-x11 Title: package libqt4-designer 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: libqt4-designer:amd64 4 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-30 (23 days ago) ** Affects: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003622 Title: package libqt4-designer 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: libqt4-designer:amd64 4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt4-x11/+bug/1003622/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1003622] Re: package libqt4-designer 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: libqt4-designer:amd64 4
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003622 Title: package libqt4-designer 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: libqt4-designer:amd64 4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt4-x11/+bug/1003622/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991973] Re: backlight comes back on after screen is blaned and powered off
I can't seem to get it to happen again (still using fglrx) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991973 Title: backlight comes back on after screen is blaned and powered off To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/991973/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991973] Re: backlight comes back on after screen is blaned and powered off
It actually happens with fglrx, but I had to wait much longer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991973 Title: backlight comes back on after screen is blaned and powered off To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/991973/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991858] Re: volume keys stop working after brightness keys are used
The reason the fn + audio keys don't do anything is that the commands in ~/.config/openbox/lubuntu-rc.xml are lik commandamixer -q sset Master 3%+/command commandamixer -q sset Master 3%-/command commandamixer -q sset Master toggle/command The problem with this is that amixer can't find anything on my system with the -c1 option there. Another problem is taht while toggling master off mutes everything, toggling it again does not unmute everything. So, I changed these things in lubuntu-rc.xml to invoke these scripts (I got some of the ideas from someobody else's post from somewhere else) volume_up.sh: #!/bin/bash CURRENT_STATE=`amixer -c 1 get Master | egrep 'Playback.*?\[o' | egrep -o '\[o.+\]'` if [[ $CURRENT_STATE == '[on]' ]]; then #amixer -q -c 1 set Master mute cd . # just a noop else amixer -q -c 1 set Master unmute amixer -q -c 1 set Headphone unmute amixer -q -c 1 set Speaker unmute fi amixer -q -c 1 sset Master 3dB+ unmute volume_down.sh: #!/bin/bash CURRENT_STATE=`amixer -c 1 get Master | egrep 'Playback.*?\[o' | egrep -o '\[o.+\]'` if [[ $CURRENT_STATE == '[on]' ]]; then #amixer -q -c 1 set Master mute cd . # just a noop else amixer -q -c 1 set Master unmute amixer -q -c 1 set Headphone unmute amixer -q -c 1 set Speaker unmute fi amixer -q -c 1 sset Master 3dB- unmute toggle_mute.sh: #!/bin/bash CURRENT_STATE=`amixer -c 1 get Master | egrep 'Playback.*?\[o' | egrep -o '\[o.+\]'` if [[ $CURRENT_STATE == '[on]' ]]; then amixer -c 1 set Master mute else amixer -c 1 set Master unmute amixer -c 1 set Headphone unmute amixer -c 1 set Speaker unmute fi % changes iin volume work too, i just like the progression with +/- 3dB better -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991858 Title: volume keys stop working after brightness keys are used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/991858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 992248] Re: xscreensaver does not turn off lcd when told to do so
My bad. I didn't have Power Mangement Enabled checked. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992248 Title: xscreensaver does not turn off lcd when told to do so To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/992248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991858] [NEW] volume keys stop working after brightness keys are used
Public bug reported: I have this notebook SONY VAIO YB3V1E/S with AMD E-450 I am running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (Lubuntu) When I first login, I can use the fn+ audio keys on the notebook to adjust the volume and mute/umute the audio. I get the small visual feedback window and the audio feedback as well. But if I use the fn + brightness keys to adjust the brightness, then the fn+ audio keys stop working. The brightness keys continue to work. If I kill gnome-settings-daemon and start it again, then the fn + audio keys start working again until I use the brightness keys again. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991858 Title: volume keys stop working after brightness keys are used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/991858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991858] Re: volume keys stop working after brightness keys are used
i guess since killing and restarting gnome-settings-daemon makes it work again until the fn + display keys are used again, that the package should be gnome-settings-daemon ** Package changed: ubuntu = gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991858 Title: volume keys stop working after brightness keys are used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/991858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991858] Re: volume keys stop working after brightness keys are used
also, i'm using fglrx display driver from the ubuntu repos. The problem didn't happend in 11.10 (I upgraded from an original 11.10 install). In 11.10, the volume keys always worked, but I didn't get any visual or audio feedback when using them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991858 Title: volume keys stop working after brightness keys are used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/991858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991970] [NEW] notebook goes back to sleep immediately after being resumed
Public bug reported: I'm using 12.04 LTS (Lubuntu) on a Sony VAIO YB3V1E/S AMD E-450 notebook. This didn't happend in 11.10 (I installed 11.10 originally and upgraded it). If I have xfce4-power-manger set to suspend on lid close, then when I open the lid and press a key to resume it, the notebook resumes briefly and then goes backt to sleep. My guess is that maybe xfce4-power-manager is getting a spurrious lid close event after or during the first wakeup. A second key press resumes it again and then it stays awake like it's supposed to. If I disable the use of the lid key for suspsend and do it manually using the sleep key (fn + F12), then I don't have the problem. I'm using the fglrx driver from the ubuntu repository. ** Affects: xfce4-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991970 Title: notebook goes back to sleep immediately after being resumed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-power-manager/+bug/991970/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991973] [NEW] backlight comes back on after screen is blaned and powered off
Public bug reported: I am using 12.04 LTS (Lubuntu) on a Sony VAIO YB3V1E/S with AMD E-450. If I tell xscreensaver to quick power off the display in blank only mode, then when the screen is blanked, the backlight stays off only for a minute or two and then the backlight comes back on. I am usigng the fglrx driver from the Ubuntu repository. I think this is an X server bug because if I turn dpms off in the xorg.conf, and then ssh into the blanked machine and use vbetool to turn off the backlight, then it doesn't come back on by itself. ** Affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991973 Title: backlight comes back on after screen is blaned and powered off To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/991973/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991970] Re: notebook goes back to sleep immediately after being resumed
I just did a fresh re-install of 12.04 lubuntu. I checked it with the default opensource radeon driver and with the fglrx driver from the repos, and it does not happen anymore with either. So I guess it was probably an artifact of doing the upgrade from 11.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991970 Title: notebook goes back to sleep immediately after being resumed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-power-manager/+bug/991970/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 992248] [NEW] xscreensaver does not turn off lcd when told to do so
Public bug reported: I did a fresh install of lubuntu 12.04 LTS 64-bit on my Sony VAIO YB3V1E/S with AMD E-450. I cannot make xscreensaver turn off the lcd even when i check quick power off in blank only mode. I am using blank only mode. my workaround is to have a perl script that watches the output of xscreensaver-command -watch and uses either vbetool or xset to turn the lcd off when the screen blanks and back on when it unblanks. ** Affects: xscreensaver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992248 Title: xscreensaver does not turn off lcd when told to do so To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/992248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991973] Re: backlight comes back on after screen is blaned and powered off
I did a fresh reinstall of lubuntu 12.04 LTS (64bit was 64bit before) and i could reprpduce it with the default radeon opensource driver but not with the proprietary fglrx from the repository. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991973 Title: backlight comes back on after screen is blaned and powered off To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/991973/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 992253] [NEW] radeon driver causes notebook fan to run always on at least medium speed
Public bug reported: I have a Sony VAIO YB3V1E/S with AMD E-450. I did a fresh install of lubuntu 64bit 12.04 LTS on it, and i noticed that with the default opensource driver, the fan would never go below the medium speed (it seems to have three speeds: low, medium, and high). With the proprietary fglrx driver form the repos, the fan normally stays on the low speed when doing easy stuff like browsing the web, etc. I am guessing that the opensource driver probably isn't throttling down the gpu to save power (and heat). ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992253 Title: radeon driver causes notebook fan to run always on at least medium speed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/992253/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991858] Re: volume keys stop working after brightness keys are used
I did a fresh install of 64bit lubuntu 12.04 LTS (was using 64bit before also), and now the fn + audio keys don't do anything at all, just like in 11.10, even before i use the fn + brightness keys. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991858 Title: volume keys stop working after brightness keys are used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/991858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 803943] Re: compiz consuming a lot of cpu
Thanks for explaining what compiz really is. I'm sure it's not an issue for people using real cpus. But for me on my atom n270 netbook, I just can't spare the cycles. I've switched to lubuntu desktop. I like it it. I think Unity 3D is nice, and it was quite usable even on my hardware. But lubuntu is even better. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/803943 Title: compiz consuming a lot of cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-core/+bug/803943/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 809060] Re: Windows stretched after setting virtual screen resolution
I'm pretty sure this bug is now (in 11.10) a duplicate of bug 881046 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/881046 I got the source package for xorg-server and removed the patch 219_fedora-pointer-barriers.diff and built it and installed the xserver-common and xserver-xorg-core packages I built I can confirm that zoom and pan with xrandr now work for me as expected. Before I did this, I also tried zooming (but not panning) with openbox and it had the same problem. So I think now the problem is this patch for the X server. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809060 Title: Windows stretched after setting virtual screen resolution To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/809060/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 803943] Re: compiz consuming a lot of cpu
I have a Dell Mini 10v (atom N270, Intel GMA 950 graphics) running 11.10 and Unity. I sshed into it from another machine and ran top. If I have gnome-terminal maximized and sitting at the shell prompt, then compiz consumes a steady 2% cpu. If I have firefox maximized (like right now with this page's tab showing), compiz consumes a steady 3% cpu. If I play a video in vlc or smplayer, then compiz consumes 17-18% cpu constantly. I don't understand why compiz needs to consume even 2 or 3% cpu when doing nothing (firefox does the same, btw). And I really don't undserstand why it needs to consume 17 or 18% cpu when I'm playing a video and not doing any window management. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/803943 Title: compiz consuming a lot of cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-core/+bug/803943/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 911992] Re: video apps using wrong xv overlay type in Unity 2D
I'm not sure I really understand it as well as I thought. In Unity 2D, i get really bad video playback unless I can force the app to use the Video Overlay xv adapter. And for example, in smplayer, I get blue window when it starts up, which I guess is from the Video Overlay. When I switch back to Unity 3D, I get good performance and the blue background using Video Overlay. But I also get good performance, and no blue background, (again in smplayer) using the default xv, or using Textured Video. So I really have no idea why the performance is worse in Unity 2D. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911992 Title: video apps using wrong xv overlay type in Unity 2D To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/911992/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 911992] [NEW] video apps using wrong xv overlay type in Unity 2D
Public bug reported: I have a Dell Mini 10v with Intel GMA 950 graphics. I'm running Ubuntu 11.10. My package version of xserver-xorg-video-intel is 2:2.15.901-1ubuntu2.1 I changed from Unity 3D to 2D, and the performance of video playback apps became very bad (adobe flash, vlc, mplayer, smplayer). I found that xvinfo was listing two video overlay adpaters. The first was Textured Video and the 2nd was Video Overlay. I assumed the problem was they were using Textured Video when they should be using Video Overlay. I was able to tell smplayer and mplayer to use Video Overlay, and their performance returned to normal. I was not able to figure out how to tell adobe flash or vlc which adapter to use. My theory is that compiz in Unity 3D is acquiring exclusive use of the Textured Video overlay, so that the apps don't try to use it. But in Unity 2D metacity isn't using it, so the video playback apps naively use the first available xv adapter they find. I think the solution would be to change the driver to report the Video Overlay adapter first and the Textured Video adapter second. ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911992 Title: video apps using wrong xv overlay type in Unity 2D To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/911992/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 809060] Re: Windows stretched after setting virtual screen resolution
I think I'm seeing the same problem in a different way. I'm trying to scale instead of pan. I have a Dell Mini 10V netbook running 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot fianl release, and I was using this script (worked fine with the old netbook- launcher-efl) to scale the screen to 1024x768 when some app shows a dialog box that doesn't fit on the 1024x600 display. #!/bin/sh if xrandr | head -n1 | grep -q '1024 x 600'; then xrandr --output LVDS1 --scale 1.0x1.28 else xrandr --output LVDS1 --scale 1.0x1.0 fi When I switch to 1024x768 scaled, it draws ok, but I can't move the mouse below where the virtual Y=600 is on the screen. So I can't get at the OK button or whatever I'm trying to get at that didn't fit on 1024x600. BTW, I really like Unity now and wouldn't go back to netbook-launcher- efl, even if I could. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809060 Title: Windows stretched after setting virtual screen resolution To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/809060/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 620318] Re: Wireless slow to reconnect after suspend and resume
I have a Dell Inspiron Mini 10V and was having the problem with having to wait 30 seconds to get reconnected to my wifi AP after resuming. I'm always suspending and resuming in the same place. I'm running 10.10 now and had the problem in 10.04 LTS also. The workaround mentioned above (commenting out the lines in /usr/lib/pm- utils/sleep.d/55NetworkManager) works for me. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620318 Title: Wireless slow to reconnect after suspend and resume -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 274405] Re: network manager slow to reconnect after suspend/resume
I posted to Bug #620318 (which seems to be from other Broadcom users). The workaround mentioned there (commenting out the lines in /usr/lib/pm- utils/sleep.d/55NetworkManager) works for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274405 Title: network manager slow to reconnect after suspend/resume -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 274405] Re: network manager slow to reconnect after suspend/resume
I have a Dell Inspiron Mini 10V and am using the Broadcom STA wifi driver and network manager. When I suspend my computer (aka sleep, aka suspend to ram) and then wake it up in the same place, I have to wait about 30 seconds for the wifi to reconnect. I am running 10.10 now. I had the same problem in 10.04 LTS. I don't remember if the problem occurred in the 9.x release I was running briefly before 10.04 LTS came out. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274405 Title: network manager slow to reconnect after suspend/resume -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 487785] Re: Cannot open BiT anymore
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 409130 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409130 This is a duplicate. The fix is in the linked bug #409130 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 409130 launching backintime fails to start -- Cannot open BiT anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487785 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu (via bug 409130). -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461470] Re: HDD(s) incorrectly detected
I'm also bitten by this bug, no sda :( but all the others show up. And sda shows up everywhere else. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- HDD(s) incorrectly detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461470 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461470] Re: HDD(s) incorrectly detected
I've gotten a fix. On the live cd I uninstalled the dmraid package, restarted the installer and now sda shows. -- HDD(s) incorrectly detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461470 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459054] Re: ubiquity partition step does not show some hard drives
I was also getting this. On the live cd I uninstalled the dmraid package, restarted the installer and now sda shows. -- ubiquity partition step does not show some hard drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409130] Re: launching backintime fails to start
** Also affects: backintime (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- launching backintime fails to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409130 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409130] Re: launching backintime fails to start
** Changed in: backintime (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- launching backintime fails to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409130 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409130] Re: launching backintime fails to start
To Karmic release deciders, this is a simple one line fix for a common bug with this version of Back in Time. When karmic is out this bug will most likely affect a lot of new users that will start to use Back in Time because it's in Ubuntu's repos. -- launching backintime fails to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409130 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212441] Re: Mediatomb Init Script not working : upnp error -117
Unfortunately the workaround proposed in the mediatomb faq no longer works on Jaunty as detailed by comment #4. I also tried setting eth0 in the interface file and tried removing network manager and tried moving mediatomb to start after NetworkManager in rc2 (the apparent default runlevel) but none of those worked. I also tried a script with a sleep of 60 seconds then it would restart mediatomb and that also didn't work. I wanted to emulate the behaviour of the ntp daemon which seems to start with the network. On further investigation I found the directories if- up.d and if-down.d in /etc/network which contain scripts that run when the network comes up and goes down respectively. Emulating a line from the ntp script I created two scripts for mediatomb. The one in if-up.d executes: invoke-rc.d mediatomb restart and in if-down.d it executes: invoke-rc.d mediatomb stop After I rebooted my machine mediatomb now starts up automatically with the network. I'm attaching a tar archive with the two scripts, you can cd to /etc/network and untar the archive there. Last thing, the links in the rcX directories are now pointless so I removed mine by executing: sudo update-rc.d -f mediatomb remove And finally, you can always check /var/log/mediatomb.log for details on if mediatomb is running. ** Attachment added: scripts to start and stop mediatomb with the network http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29505275/mediatombnetscripts.tar -- Mediatomb Init Script not working : upnp error -117 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212441 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366866] Re: Init script not working because network interfaces are not ready
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 212441 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212441 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 212441 Mediatomb Init Script not working : upnp error -117 -- Init script not working because network interfaces are not ready https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366866 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363883] Re: Jaunty regression: Mediatomb stops working?
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 212441 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212441 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 212441 Mediatomb Init Script not working : upnp error -117 -- Jaunty regression: Mediatomb stops working? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363883 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129910] Re: Blank ttys when using vesafb (vga=xxx)
Please keep in mind the Ubuntu Code of Conduct: http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct -- Blank ttys when using vesafb (vga=xxx) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129910 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 77178] Re: Refresh-rate problems when starting X after usplash
This issue cleared up. I've since switched to an nvidia card away from my ATi X800 which had a lot of these types of quirks. -- Refresh-rate problems when starting X after usplash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77178 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176249] Grub ignores device.map when booting
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub My system has 3 drives, 2 SATA drives that are sda sdb and one IDE drive that's hda. In my device.map file I did the following: (hd0) /dev/sda (hd1) /dev/sdb (hd2) /dev/hda Windows is installed on hda, but in my menu.lst I have to configure it as if Windows is on (hd1), which tells me that grub is not reading the settings from my device.map file. ** Affects: grub (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Grub ignores device.map when booting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176249 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 121915] Re: dund in /etc/init.d/bluetooth fails with Failed to connect to the local SDP server. Connection refused(111) error. Solution included
This problem persists in Gutsy for dund. Adding a sleep 1 at the recommended place fixes the issue. -- pand in /etc/init.d/bluetooth fails with Failed to connect to the local SDP server. Connection refused(111) error. Solution included https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121915 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103828] Re: [needs packaging] Simple Invoices
** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: Richard Bailey (rmjb) = (unassigned) -- [needs packaging] Simple Invoices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103828 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 64100] Re: cpufreq-applet does not show text label for 2nd CPU
The behaviour no longer exists under Feisty, I just checked and the applets load fine. ** Changed in: gnome-applets (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- cpufreq-applet does not show text label for 2nd CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 42532] Re: MASTER: New partition size UI is confusing
I'm installing Feisty on my work laptop and this confused me. Also, answers on ubuntuforums.org were not convincing and went both ways as to if this referred to the size of the new partition --New Partition Size-- or the new size of the existing partition --New Partition Size--. Too bad it's still not adjusted since Dapper but I think changing to wording to Shrink existing partition to would be good enough. -- MASTER: New partition size UI is confusing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42532 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
With the symlink, if it even works, you still wont be able to boot from it because there will be no raid45 or raid456 symlink in the initramfs. Don't do the raid456 symlink since the version of dmraid release for feisty it expecting raid45. Create that symlink instead and see if it works. -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103770] Re: dmraid 4th disk problem
The raid45 or raid456 is another problem already reported here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/102973 -- dmraid 4th disk problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103770 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106829] Re: on a JMB363, dmraid does not show paritions
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 106825 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106825 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 106825 on a JMB363, dmraid package install hangs -- on a JMB363, dmraid does not show partitions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106829 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106829] Re: on a JMB363, dmraid does not show paritions
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 106825 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106825 Your both bugs are related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219058 -- on a JMB363, dmraid does not show partitions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106829 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106825] Re: on a JMB363, dmraid package install hangs
This bug is know upstream. dmraid does not yet support the JMicron controller. ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #219058 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219058 ** Also affects: dmraid (upstream) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219058 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- on a JMB363, dmraid package install hangs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106825 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106825] Re: on a JMB363, dmraid package install hangs
** Also affects: dmraid (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219058 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- on a JMB363, dmraid package install hangs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106825 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96277] Re: Recognize hdd size incorrected.
For large disks/partitions fdisk cannot work with the entire available size. I cannot find what the limit is right now. What tool did you use to see that the raid array only has 749GB capacity? For large partitions/disks you should use parted instead of fdisk and may have to change the partition table type to GPT instead of MSDOS. I don't know how well ubuntu handles GPT partition tables. -- Recognize hdd size incorrected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 22474] Re: gparted does not like /dev/mapper devices
** Tags added: dmraid -- gparted does not like /dev/mapper devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106177] Re: make dmraid play nice with udev
If this will make upgrades to feisty possible for dmraid users, should it make it in before feisty is released? Or should more testing and work go into this and it not be rushed? -- make dmraid play nice with udev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 106177] Re: make dmraid play nice with udev
You are referring to your first patch where your call dmraid -ay when a block device is detected? -- make dmraid play nice with udev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93810] Re: dmraid not starting on system boot
Ready for upload, would like this to get in before feisty since it breaks upgrades from edgy for those that have / on FakeRAID. -- dmraid not starting on system boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93810 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
If all that is required is a linking then link use raid45.ko as the symlink and use the published dmraid package, not the one I've uploaded to this bug report. Since ubuntu's kernel does not yet have the raid456.ko module I'm not going to commit the changes I did to the dmraid package (which was simply to change calls for the raid45 module to raid456). -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
** Description changed: Binary package hint: dmraid This packaged version of dmraid, for RAID setups other than 0 or 1, is still looking for kernel module raid45, when I believe the kernel has been using module raid456 since kernel 2.6.18. + + This depends on bug 97655 -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
Hi Chad, I'm sorry to say that this most likely wont be fixed in time for Feisty's release. In order to have a proper and stable release different parts of Ubuntu have to be frozen at different times, and the kernel was frozen back on April 5th: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeistyReleaseSchedule Since this bug depends on a module being in the kernel, either raid45, dm-raid45 or raid456, this means this bug wont be fixed in time for Feisty. However, don't drop interest in the bug, we have to make sure it gets into Feisty +1 due in October. Because of this I'm unassigning myself from the bug and subscribing to both this and the one you indicated at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/97655 ** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu) Assignee: Richard Bailey = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103828] Re: [needs packaging] Simple Invoices
** Changed in: Ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = Richard Bailey Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress -- [needs packaging] Simple Invoices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103828 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Richard Bailey Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103770] Re: dmraid 4th disk problem
Reported upstream: https://www.redhat.com/archives/ataraid-list/2007-April/msg0.html -- dmraid 4th disk problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103770 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
Hello nox216, what architecture are you using? I would like you to test an updated package before I submit the patch. Time is of the essence since Feisty is only 2 weeks away. -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
Please test this package to see if it works. This will work on the i386 architecture. If you used x86_64 let me know. ** Attachment added: dmraid_1.0.0.rc13-2ubuntu3_i386_rmjb.deb http://librarian.launchpad.net/7180622/dmraid_1.0.0.rc13-2ubuntu3_i386_rmjb.deb -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103828] [needs packaging] Simple Invoices
Public bug reported: Simple Invoices is a simple web based invoicing solution for personal /home-office/small business needs. Simple Invoices offers the basic option to enable people to create and manage invoicing. URL: http://www.simpleinvoices.org/ License: GPL ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Tags: needs-packaging -- [needs packaging] Simple Invoices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103828 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
Chad, you can test with this package. ** Attachment added: dmraid_1.0.0.rc13-2ubuntu3_amd64_rmjb.deb http://librarian.launchpad.net/7193021/dmraid_1.0.0.rc13-2ubuntu3_amd64_rmjb.deb -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93810] Re: dmraid not starting on system boot
I do not have access to a feisty installation at hand but can someone check what order dmraid is run relative to udev? You can check this is /etc/rcS. dmraid should be initialised *after* udev for this same reason. There was a bug about this in debian that was fixed, I opened a bug here but that was dismissed since this issue was no longer occurring at that time. If it has re-emerged a simple fix would be to move dmraid to initialize after udev in rcS. -- dmraid not starting on system boot https://launchpad.net/bugs/93810 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67299] Re: mdadm causes boot to hang for 4 minutes
cat /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf DEVICE partitions cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid5] [raid4] md0 : active raid5 hda6[0] hdd1[2] hdc1[1] 390700544 blocks level 5, 32k chunk, algorithm 0 [3/3] [UUU] unused devices: none cat /etc/fstab # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # file system mount point type options dump pass proc/proc procdefaults0 0 # /dev/hda2 -- converted during upgrade to edgy UUID=92a0c172-7a07-47f6-9ca3-e6935cb93642 / ext3 defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1 # /dev/hda1 -- converted during upgrade to edgy UUID=b04c24c9-8a1c-43fa-ac79-e456cc6d437f /boot ext3 defaults 0 2 # /dev/hda5 -- converted during upgrade to edgy UUID=b4749463-67b8-4d80-bd3b-98366fee3d4b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/hdb/media/cdrom0 udf,iso9660 user,noauto 0 0 /dev/evms/shares /mnt/sharesxfs defaults0 0 #/dev/sda1 /mnt/backup ext3rw,noatime 0 0 ls -l /dev/disk/by-uuid total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2007-04-02 22:23 92a0c172-7a07-47f6-9ca3-e6935cb93642 - ../../hda2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2007-04-02 22:23 b04c24c9-8a1c-43fa-ac79-e456cc6d437f - ../../hda1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2007-04-02 22:23 b4749463-67b8-4d80-bd3b-98366fee3d4b - ../../hda5 Hope that helps. -- mdadm causes boot to hang for 4 minutes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67299 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98846] Re: dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
I did it this way because debian has both udev and dmraid at different points in rcS, dmraid's point (what I'm trying to set to 11) is dependent on ubuntu's place in rcS.d. This way, when dmraid needs to be sync'd/merged again from debian, it will still remove a non S11 link if it exists. -- dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d https://launchpad.net/bugs/98846 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98846] Re: dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
No I don't object, my concern right now it to get this update in before the freeze on Thursday. -- dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98846 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67299] Re: mdadm causes boot to hang for 4 minutes
This scenario is also happening to me, for me the wait can be over 10 minutes. I also use evms and have lvm2 on md in a raid 5. I have the updated mdadm package from edgy-updates installed. If there's any info that I can provide to help debug this issue please let me know. -- mdadm causes boot to hang for 4 minutes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67299 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98846] Re: dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
Can one of you, Steve or Michael check this new diff and if it's good release it? I want to get this in before feisty since I think it's already affecting people. -- dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d https://launchpad.net/bugs/98846 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98846] Re: dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
** Attachment added: updated debdiff with test before call to update-rc.d -f remove http://librarian.launchpad.net/7100087/dmraid.debdiff -- dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d https://launchpad.net/bugs/98846 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98846] Re: dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
Reverted to in progress to iron out updating symlink in rcS.d ** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = In Progress -- dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d https://launchpad.net/bugs/98846 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98846] Re: dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
The update-rc.d -f remove is in preparation to run: dh_installinit -p dmraid -- start 11 S . start 51 0 6 . later on in the rules. It used to be: dh_installinit -p dmraid -- start 04 S . start 51 0 6 . Without that dmraid gets two entries in rcS.d... I've tested it ** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d https://launchpad.net/bugs/98846 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 42555] Re: syslog-ng causes ubuntu-minimal to be removed.
Will this make it into ubuntu before Feisty? -- syslog-ng causes ubuntu-minimal to be removed. https://launchpad.net/bugs/42555 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98846] Re: dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
I'm a green packager so I'll take any advice you give, but I was working on the premise that the call to dh_installinit always exists in the rules so in subsequent upgrades the update-rc.d -f remove will get called and dh_installinit will put back the file. -- dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d https://launchpad.net/bugs/98846 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98846] Re: dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
** Attachment added: debdiff for update http://librarian.launchpad.net/7052432/dmraid.debdiff -- dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d https://launchpad.net/bugs/98846 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98846] Re: dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
Ready for upload -- dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d https://launchpad.net/bugs/98846 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98846] dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dmraid dmraid should be initialised after udev. It's currently at S04 while udev is at S10. See: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=367796 ** Affects: dmraid (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Richard Bailey Status: In Progress ** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Richard Bailey Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress -- dmraid starts before udev in rcS.d https://launchpad.net/bugs/98846 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 91237] Re: java library not found
I tested this on stock feisty beta and iriverter launches and works properly. Can you test again? Some dependent packages were probably updated. -- java library not found https://launchpad.net/bugs/91237 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93810] Re: dmraid not starting on system boot
I just checked and yes, dmraid is initializing before udev in rcS.d. What this means is that dmraid sets up the devices in /dev/mapper, then udev is run and it completely rebuilds /dev, throwing out what dmraid did. Currently udev is initialized at S10 and dmraid at S04, it should be changed to S11. -- dmraid not starting on system boot https://launchpad.net/bugs/93810 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93810] Re: dmraid not starting on system boot
Can someone who is currently experiencing this error test with this new deb? It's the same upstream version, the only difference is that dmraid is initialised at S11 instead of S04, i.e. after udev. I appended my username to the end of the file in case others want to try to build a deb and attached it to this bug we wont get confused. ** Attachment added: dmraid_1.0.0.rc13-2ubuntu2_i386_rmjb.deb http://librarian.launchpad.net/6988738/dmraid_1.0.0.rc13-2ubuntu2_i386_rmjb.deb -- dmraid not starting on system boot https://launchpad.net/bugs/93810 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93810] Re: dmraid not starting on system boot
** Attachment added: debdiff to move dmraid to S11 in rcS.d http://librarian.launchpad.net/6988744/dmraid.debdiff -- dmraid not starting on system boot https://launchpad.net/bugs/93810 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93810] Re: dmraid not starting on system boot
** Attachment added: updated debdiff with new maintainer dmraid init move http://librarian.launchpad.net/6988898/dmraid.debdiff -- dmraid not starting on system boot https://launchpad.net/bugs/93810 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 65809] Re: Delete imported images from the camera doesn't
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #421853 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421853 ** Also affects: gthumb (upstream) via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421853 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Delete imported images from the camera doesn't https://launchpad.net/bugs/65809 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 65809] Re: Delete imported images from the camera doesn't
I got that impression from reading my camera's manual. It did not explicitly say that you can't delete over PTP, but it did say to use PTP only for printing (PictBridge) and use USB for PC. And since I got this error it just fit to me. In the USB mode things work as expected. I also used gThumb on a Dakota Digital Single Use camera that gThumb supports in PTP mode, but there also it does not delete. However, according to this blog post by a gphoto2 contributor it seems that deleting over PTP is possible, but not in all cameras: http://www.advogato.org/person/Marcus/diary.html?start=105 I'm aware that you're also a gphoto2 contributor. Hopefully gThumb will detect the delete-ability of cameras and enable/disable this option as needed. -- Delete imported images from the camera doesn't https://launchpad.net/bugs/65809 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 94722] Re: [needs-packaging] ANts P2P
** Summary changed: - ANts P2P + [needs-packaging] ANts P2P -- [needs-packaging] ANts P2P https://launchpad.net/bugs/94722 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93905] Re: [needs-packaging] ripole
** Summary changed: - Package request for ripole + [needs-packaging] ripole -- [needs-packaging] ripole https://launchpad.net/bugs/93905 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 65809] Re: Delete imported images from the camera doesn't
Hi, it's been quite some time since I experienced this bug, however since then I realised that this option only applies when the camera is in USB Mass Storage Mode and not PTP Mode, which is what I was in when I got this error. From my limited understanding of how things are supposed to work I believe that in PTP Mode the memory is read-only. In this case the option to Delete imported images from the camera should not even be selectable since it will never happen. -- Delete imported images from the camera doesn't https://launchpad.net/bugs/65809 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93890] Package request for reaper3d
Public bug reported: Description: 3D space combat simulator URL: http://reaper3d.sourceforge.net/ GPL Licence ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Tags added: needs-packaging -- Package request for reaper3d https://launchpad.net/bugs/93890 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93898] Package request for rename
Public bug reported: Description: Simple but powerful cli tool for mass renaming files (using regular expressions) URL: http://rename.berlios.de/ GPL Software ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Tags added: needs-packaging -- Package request for rename https://launchpad.net/bugs/93898 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93905] Package request for ripole
Public bug reported: Description: OLE2 file stream extractor used by amavis to detect viruses URL: http://www.pldaniels.com/ripole/ BSD License ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Tags added: needs-packaging -- Package request for ripole https://launchpad.net/bugs/93905 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73537] Re: Devede needs vcdimager software
Backport request here: https://launchpad.net/edgy-backports/+bug/93544 ** Changed in: devede (Ubuntu) Assignee: Richard Bailey = (unassigned) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Devede needs vcdimager software https://launchpad.net/bugs/73537 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89076] Re: dependencies are not corrent
** Changed in: iriverter (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- dependencies are not corrent https://launchpad.net/bugs/89076 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 91237] Re: java library not found
Hello, what version of the iriverter package were you using when this error occurred? iriverter was recently updated to 0.16-0ubuntu2 Also any more details about your installation that might help, such as the version of java-gcj-compat and libswt3.2-gtk-java that you have installed. ** Changed in: iriverter (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info -- java library not found https://launchpad.net/bugs/91237 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89076] Re: dependencies are not corrent
** Changed in: iriverter (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Fix Committed -- dependencies are not corrent https://launchpad.net/bugs/89076 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89076] Re: dependencies are not corrent
** Changed in: iriverter (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Richard Bailey -- dependencies are not corrent https://launchpad.net/bugs/89076 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89076] Re: dependencies are not corrent
** Attachment added: debdiff for update http://librarian.launchpad.net/6608728/iriverter.diff -- dependencies are not corrent https://launchpad.net/bugs/89076 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89076] Re: dependencies are not corrent
Ready for upload -- dependencies are not corrent https://launchpad.net/bugs/89076 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89076] dependencies are not corrent
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: iriverter iriverter depends on java-gcj-compat or sun-java5-bin, but if sun- java5-bin is installed iriverter does not work. It should not depend on sun-java5-bin at all. ** Affects: iriverter (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- dependencies are not corrent https://launchpad.net/bugs/89076 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
