[Bug 32357] Re: Installer doesn't recognise SATA disks as primary.
@ Dexus +1 -- Installer doesn't recognise SATA disks as primary. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567557] Re: Lucid Asrock ION sata disk not detected?
No I didnt try maverick, nor is there any point, simply because the xbmc is barely now supporting lucid, I dont think dismissing lucid altogether, without fixing it there is a solution, not that t matters, since I doubt a fix will ever appear. One waits months here just to get irrelevant questions. -- Lucid Asrock ION sata disk not detected? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567557 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397734] Re: can't eject cdrom with hardware button
doesnt work on minimal karmic -- can't eject cdrom with hardware button https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397734 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567557] Re: Lucid Asrock ION sata disk not detected?
can anyone pls have a look at this at all. -- Lucid Asrock ION sata disk not detected? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567557 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567557] Re: Lucid Asrock ION sata disk not detected?
@ daniel used the isos available now from here http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/netboot/lucid/ and also all the available desktop install images from http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/releases/10.04/release/ @ colin the syslog is 8MB The partman log I cant find for the minimal karmic install and since the lucid fails no logs are created. I did a full search for partman and no yielded results, please let me know if I can create the information required for you using my current install. ** Attachment added: syslog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/46354039/syslog -- Lucid Asrock ION sata disk not detected? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567557 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567557] Re: Lucid Asrock ION sata disk not detected?
Hi I would appreciate that if you could perhaps pass this to someone who can triage this, as it happens IRC and both channels you mention are very disappointing, in my experience it only fuels frustration. Hope you can help otherwise this will never get looked at. -- Lucid Asrock ION sata disk not detected? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567557 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567557] Re: Lucid Asrock ION sata disk not detected?
Is anyone ever going to look at this? ** Description changed: - Binary package hint: dmraid - Minimal Lucid install 32 and 64bit have failed systematically up to and inclusive of files available on the 19th April. Purpose is to test our xbmc complete installer (bash ncurses script) with the newer Ubuntu distro, since both Jaunty and Karmic are fully working and compatible as well as installing with no issues.. This project is affected by the non install possibility. Expected the partitioner to detect disk and present normal partitioning options. Inserting and running disks works ok until, system hangs and install does not proceed, when the disk partitioner starts detecting disks, this hangs at about 43%. This is likely to affect all ION based systems, due to their similar hw - profiles and components. + profiles and components. (confirmed various ION based machines similar + issue) attached are some logs which hopefully help diagnose this and help fix. If extra logs are needed please ask. ***Edit added partitioner as possible package at fault here. Not sure about that. -- Lucid Asrock ION sata disk not detected? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567557 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567557] Re: Lucid Asrock ION sata disk not detected?
Just tested the full desktop installer and it doesnt install either to hdd on system, whatever it is, Lucid is borked big time. -- Lucid Asrock ION sata disk not detected? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567557 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567557] [NEW] Lucid Asrock ION sata disk not detected?
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dmraid Minimal Lucid install 32 and 64bit have failed systematically up to and inclusive of files available on the 19th April. Purpose is to test our xbmc complete installer (bash ncurses script) with the newer Ubuntu distro, since both Jaunty and Karmic are fully working and compatible as well as installing with no issues.. This project is affected by the non install possibility. Expected the partitioner to detect disk and present normal partitioning options. Inserting and running disks works ok until, system hangs and install does not proceed, when the disk partitioner starts detecting disks, this hangs at about 43%. This is likely to affect all ION based systems, due to their similar hw profiles and components. attached are some logs which hopefully help diagnose this and help fix. If extra logs are needed please ask. ***Edit added partitioner as possible package at fault here. Not sure about that. ** Affects: partitioner (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Lucid Asrock ION sata disk not detected? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567557 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567557] Re: Lucid Asrock ION sata disk not detected?
** Attachment added: Logs http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44925208/logs.rar ** Description changed: Binary package hint: dmraid Minimal Lucid install 32 and 64bit have failed systematically up to and inclusive of files available on the 19th April. Purpose is to test our xbmc complete installer (bash ncurses script) with the newer Ubuntu distro, since both Jaunty and Karmic are fully working and compatible as well as installing with no issues.. This project is affected by the non install possibility. Expected the partitioner to detect disk and present normal partitioning options. Inserting and running disks works ok until, system hangs and install does not proceed, when the disk partitioner starts detecting disks, this hangs at about 43%. This is likely to affect all ION based systems, due to their similar hw profiles and components. attached are some logs which hopefully help diagnose this and help fix. If extra logs are needed please ask. + + ***Edit dmraid was automatically selected but is not the package in + question. ** Package changed: dmraid (Ubuntu) = partitioner (Ubuntu) ** Description changed: Binary package hint: dmraid Minimal Lucid install 32 and 64bit have failed systematically up to and inclusive of files available on the 19th April. Purpose is to test our xbmc complete installer (bash ncurses script) with the newer Ubuntu distro, since both Jaunty and Karmic are fully working and compatible as well as installing with no issues.. This project is affected by the non install possibility. Expected the partitioner to detect disk and present normal partitioning options. Inserting and running disks works ok until, system hangs and install does not proceed, when the disk partitioner starts detecting disks, this hangs at about 43%. This is likely to affect all ION based systems, due to their similar hw profiles and components. attached are some logs which hopefully help diagnose this and help fix. If extra logs are needed please ask. - ***Edit dmraid was automatically selected but is not the package in - question. + ***Edit added partitioner as possible package at fault here. Not sure + about that. -- Lucid Asrock ION sata disk not detected? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567557 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 530641] Re: ImportError: No module named configobj
Erm ok thanks for whatever help I know perfectly well that new releases get addressed first. This is not however a fix for karmic, therefore not applicable. Your initial reply to my post could have said that sorry can you explain better, not after 3 posts tell me Im incomprehensible, I found that quite offensive for however correct you may have been. Especially since I had mentioned karmic. No matter its all water under the bridge, Lets not get sidetracked Im not sure why bug was marked invalid.. I recommend ppa files should be removed as they do not work. Thanks for your help though -- ImportError: No module named configobj https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 440470] Re: [ubuntu-boot-experience] nForce2_smbus conflicts with ACPI region SM00
This problem will exist for a long long time the proof of this as they say is in the pudding, priority low... (jokes) other ancient bugs still exist since forever up until even Lucid. 1st ALL ION platforms will and do exibit this error regardless of distro. 2nd Thers a lack of Linux drivers for a monitoring chipset which would very likely solve this. 3rd laxing kernel fixes this but borks all sorts. -- [ubuntu-boot-experience] nForce2_smbus conflicts with ACPI region SM00 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440470 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 440470] Re: [ubuntu-boot-experience] nForce2_smbus conflicts with ACPI region SM00
I have experienced same issue with all karmic kernels acpi laxing is not a real fix even if it suppresses the error, in some way the must be some IO probing being done by acpi and sensors banging IO ports which I understand can be harmful for hw. The asrock ION family has a hw monitoring/control chip with no drivers available in the wild from either Asrock or Linux communities. Asrock first line support say W83677HG-I (the chip in question) has linux drivers yet nowhere are they to be found. I believe that this chip is also part of solving this issue properly lm- sensors project have a request for such driver but nothing so far is up. Also noticed issues with kernels up to -18 karmic flavours have issues with supporting modules like coretemp for instance where the coretemp.ko must be compiled in order to work. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/485234 This is all related IMO. -- [ubuntu-boot-experience] nForce2_smbus conflicts with ACPI region SM00 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440470 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485234] Re: linux-image
its worth mentioning that Im using a minimal install on a Asrock ION 330 HT and theres many issues with that system and karmic minimal install. as I install Karmic minimal Im greeted straight away with conflict with ic2 smbus conflicts before I get terminal prompt to log in. Maybe this is platform specific which would make things worst but facts are what I have reported is real. pls find attached the file requested neither files work. on a side note I have also found way too many bugs associated with minimal installs so many that I don't have time to document and report them all. ** Attachment added: both coretemp files which promote same error http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36831191/coretemp.rar -- linux-image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485234] Re: linux-image
ah also pls note Jaunty works 200% ok with same install and I get to ic2 smbus conflicts nor anything else described here. Im also aware that the IO ports being access by both acpi and lm sensors is not good however my findings are that 2.6.32 kernel fix all the issues described here -- linux-image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485234] Re: linux-image
well honestly like I said karmic was such a nightmare that it is practically impossible to run on this machine I mentioned the coretemp.ko since I cannot run karmic and its too much of a headache to even try fixing it. as for the size discrepancy, one is plain vanilla as it comes with install which doesnt support my hardware the other is a specific version which supports more hardware in this case my machine. The -orig is the original file of course 19kb and the other is 95kb. No idea why the files would report different strings or why they do. they both should load just fine on the karmic kernel when I compiled the 2.6.32 from kernel from scratch these files as they are both load no issues (all systems go) as for the 2.6.31 kernel like I said no way in hell will it load neither file nor will it resolve other issues with the system like the ic2-smbus conflicts... Really unless I create a custom minimal install disk with the 2.6.32 kernel and install that I see no other solution until this kernel is official and a proper minimal install can be used installing the .32 kernel instead of the offending ones which are now whats on offer labelled stable. -- linux-image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485238] Re: apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack', )
Well if I said Karmic then it was karmic, like I said the documentation
does point to that.
On another note could you be a gentleman and ping someone to get some
ball rolling on other bug report since it will either be addressed
properly with the introduction of a decently working kernel on the
2.6.32 family.
Im not using Karmic as a minimal install anymore for various reason
mainly the kernel bugs. which reminds me when I have the time to report
other bugs with the minimal .isos Karmic seems to me to have been rammed
out the door.
--
apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack',)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485238] Re: apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack', )
###Also, the error you got shows that it was actually reading the
.apport file and stumbled over an invalidly formatted line. If there
###were problems with recognizing the command line arguments, it would
have looked completely different.
Well in this case some bug does exist in the minimal install flavour
which it is quite beyond me since you dont see the same, however that
may be the erro was as described and whaever caused it did it to more
than one file.
Pehaps the Karmic documentation on this should be revised and the root
of why this has happened on a minimal install spits out that error when
like you say it should have outputed that -c is invalid to start with.
regards.
--
apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack',)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485234] Re: linux-image
Well I have supplied the apport file and all the information I found pertinent. I realise that whoever is dealing with this cant jump at any 1 report, I get it ppl have all sorts of things in live to do. My comment regarding the no one cares part, really came from the OLDER bug I linked to on my post where it was reported fixed and indeed its not if you check down that original bug report to a way older Ubuntu Distro. I understand also that have two instances probing the same bus can break things potentially damage hardware and that from 2.6.29 has sorta changed in regards to that so this does not happen. However it does not explain why a older kernel fixes it like the 2.6.32rc7. Nor does it explain why froa very long time this was reported on the other report and no official reply was given. I apologise if it sounded ungrateful at sme stage, I hope this gets looked at and the necessary patches applied so that everything works as expected. This has forced me to stop doinbg Karmic based custom minimal installs for the issues posted even before adding any sensors monitoring sw it already presents conflicts with SMbus access. I can only blame it on testers not reporting it properly though in this instace its a silent on boot comment which is apparently not logged. Heres hoping I can get Karmic posted on my plentifull requests for custom systems atm Im no longer running Karmic besides on VM. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- linux-image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485238] Re: apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack', )
Actually no the switch is ubuntu-bug -c /tmp/linux-image.apport if the
-c is redundant then the documentation is wrong. If you use -c which is
for path then IT will bug out and this is how the documentations says
you should do it and thats where it craps out...
I remember saying I used the -c at least twice b4.
Never mind thx a lot at least you replied more than I can say for the
other report who no one has gone near it.
--
apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack',)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485238] Re: apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack', )
like I said the bug only occurrs when your trying to later upload the
apport generated file and the error is a s documented.
the file is here http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35849216/linux-
image.apport
Pertaining to another bug no one has even touched or commeneted and is far more
serious then this
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/485234
Mind this is Happening on a Asrock ION again its model independant I
have no issues with other machines installed and configured same way.
--
apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack',)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485234] Re: linux-image
What no one cares about this at all? Why bother reporting it? -- linux-image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485238] Re: apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack', )
the bug does not exist when doing apport-cli -f -p linux the bug occurrs
when you do ubuntu-bug -c path
--
apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack',)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 284245] Re: Laptop support XPS M1730 IBEX 8.10
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- Laptop support XPS M1730 IBEX 8.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485238] Re: apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack', )
the package was the linux-kernel and there was no crash report I was
gathering info to report another issue and apport failed to work as
expected.
I donthave anymore information relevant to this except what I posted
already which is irrelevant since this bug is independent of the other,
at least this is what it has lead me to.
judging by response I dont think any notice will be taken.
--
apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack',)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485234] [NEW] linux-image
Public bug reported: This HAPPENS WITH ANY KARMIC KERNEL EVEN 2.6.31.1 ProblemType: Bug Well this is really silly from a stable supposedly release that has been tested for months. AND has been reported FIXED on Bug #296478 I'm here to tell you its not fixed, does not work, period. uname -r is 2.6.31-15-generic KARMIC KOALA 9.10 I have tried this with default files as system is installed with minimal karmic install I get error FATAL: Error inserting coretemp (/lib/modules/2.6.31-15-generic/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko): Invalid module format and I have tried it with the description below. FATAL ERRORS EXIST. dmesg outputs this [ 4563.803572] coretemp: no symbol version for module_layout WTH?? I have this issue and further more on jaunty kernel 2.6.28-16 modprobe coretemp worked perfectly after I replaced sensors-detect in /usr/sbin/ with this file http://www.lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk/prog/detect/sensors-detect chmod 755 this file and added a pre-patched coretemp.ko from http://mabene.icomedias.com/coretemp.ko and place it in its path which varies on kernel name but is in my instance /lib/modules/2.6.31-15-generic/kernel/drivers/hwmon/ obviously I renamed the existing files by doing e.g. filename.extension-orig. JUST FOR TESTING PURPOSES. This is my sensors-detect output The modules load during that so it has to work but in no obvious way. http://pastebin.com/f2ae9c41b LM-SENSORS is Version: 1:3.1.1-4~ppa0 sensors -s outputs No sensors found! Make sure you loaded all the kernel drivers you need. Try sensors-detect to find out which these are. modprobe fails with errors as described. doing /etc/init.d/lm-sensors start or service lm-sensors start outputs * Setting sensors limits [fail] should say ok when I do # modprobe coretemp or # modprobe -v coretemp I get the same silly error FATAL: Error inserting coretemp (/lib/modules/2.6.31-15-generic/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko): Invalid module format. This worked fine in Jaunty kernels with no issues in EITHER CASE and all my CPU temps were posted when doing # sensors Doing sensors-detect is able to see/load modules which are coretemp, ic2-nforce2, ic2-dev I cannot load any of them using modprobe ic2-nforce2, ic2-dev it says FATAL: Module ic2_dev not found. makes anyone wonder if bug reports are addressed or even read in some cases. silly bugs are allowed to travel down for years without being fixed in some cases. ok I get it its all free and ppl do it in their spare time they have families/jobs/live like most of us do well I do anywho... just dont get it why this is reported and not fixed. or when ppl just add it as a duplicate of e.g. Bug #296478 and so sometimes even having dozens of 'duplicate' bugs that when u read have nothing in relation in the majority of cases. As a obvious result it gets ignored. So much for support. The only kernel which fixes this is the 2.6.32rc7 which I have downloaded from mainline for testing. though the system is only accessible via ssh and stays at blinking cursor on machine. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: 2.6.31.14 coretemp.ko fatal karmic -- linux-image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485234] Re: linux-image
** Attachment added: linux-image.apport http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35849216/linux-image.apport ** Description changed: This HAPPENS WITH ANY KARMIC KERNEL EVEN 2.6.31.1 ProblemType: Bug Well this is really silly from a stable supposedly release that has been tested for months. AND has been reported FIXED on Bug #296478 I'm here to tell you its not fixed, does not work, period. uname -r is 2.6.31-15-generic KARMIC KOALA 9.10 I have tried this with default files as system is installed with minimal karmic install I get error FATAL: Error inserting coretemp (/lib/modules/2.6.31-15-generic/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko): Invalid module format and I have tried it with the description below. FATAL ERRORS EXIST. dmesg outputs this [ 4563.803572] coretemp: no symbol version for module_layout WTH?? I have this issue and further more on jaunty kernel 2.6.28-16 modprobe coretemp worked perfectly after I replaced sensors-detect in /usr/sbin/ with this file http://www.lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk/prog/detect/sensors-detect chmod 755 this file and added a pre-patched coretemp.ko from http://mabene.icomedias.com/coretemp.ko and place it in its path which varies on kernel name but is in my instance /lib/modules/2.6.31-15-generic/kernel/drivers/hwmon/ obviously I renamed the existing files by doing e.g. filename.extension-orig. JUST FOR TESTING PURPOSES. This is my sensors-detect output The modules load during that so it has to work but in no obvious way. http://pastebin.com/f2ae9c41b LM-SENSORS is Version: 1:3.1.1-4~ppa0 sensors -s outputs No sensors found! Make sure you loaded all the kernel drivers you need. Try sensors-detect to find out which these are. modprobe fails with errors as described. doing /etc/init.d/lm-sensors start or service lm-sensors start outputs * Setting sensors limits [fail] should say ok - when I do # modprobe coretemp or # modprobe -v coretemp I get the same silly error FATAL: Error inserting coretemp (/lib/modules/2.6.31-15-generic/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko): Invalid module format. + when I do # modprobe coretemp or # modprobe -v coretemp I get the same silly error FATAL: Error inserting coretemp (/lib/modules/2.6.31-15-generic/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko): Invalid module format. This worked fine in Jaunty kernels with no issues in EITHER CASE and all my CPU temps were posted when doing # sensors - I was able to load the modules recognised via sensors-detect which are coretemp, ic2-nforce2, ic2-dev I cannot load any of them in the ic2-nforce2, ic2-dev it says FATAL: Module ic2_dev not found. + Doing sensors-detect is able to see/load modules which are coretemp, ic2-nforce2, ic2-dev I cannot load any of them using modprobe ic2-nforce2, ic2-dev it says FATAL: Module ic2_dev not found. makes anyone wonder if bug reports are addressed or even read in some cases. silly bugs are allowed to travel down for years without being fixed in some cases. ok I get it its all free and ppl do it in their spare time they have families/jobs/live like most of us do well I do anywho... just dont get it why this is reported and not fixed. or when ppl just add it as a duplicate of e.g. Bug #296478 and so sometimes even having dozens of 'duplicate' bugs that when u read have nothing in relation in the majority of cases. As a obvious result it gets ignored. So much for support. The only kernel which fixes this is the 2.6.32rc7 which I have downloaded from mainline for testing. though the system is only accessible via ssh and stays at blinking cursor on machine. -- linux-image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485238] [NEW] apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack', )
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apport
I collected a report via cli like apport-cli -f -p package kept it for
later sending as ubuntu-bug -c path
this is being done in Karmic Koala 9.10 with shipping kernel and
backports kernel doesnt make a differnce. This bug has been reported as
fixed it is clearly no since I get this message
*** Error: Invalid problem report
This problem report is damaged and cannot be processed.
ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack',)
unable to use this package in this manner. does not do what it says on
tin
** Affects: apport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack',)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485238] Re: apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack', )
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: apport
- I collected a
+ I collected a report via cli like apport-cli -f -p package kept it for
+ later sending as ubuntu-bug -c path
+
+ this is being done in Karmic Koala 9.10 with shipping kernel and
+ backports kernel doesnt make a differnce. This bug has been reported as
+ fixed it is clearly no since I get this message
+
+ *** Error: Invalid problem report
+
+ This problem report is damaged and cannot be processed.
+
+ ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack',)
+
+ unable to use this package in this manner. does not do what it says on
+ tin
--
apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack',)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485234] Re: linux-image
** Description changed: - This HAPPENS WITH ANY KARMIC KERNEL EVEN 2.6.31.1 + This HAPPENS WITH ANY KARMIC KERNEL EVEN 2.6.31.14 ProblemType: Bug Well this is really silly from a stable supposedly release that has been tested for months. AND has been reported FIXED on Bug #296478 I'm here to tell you its not fixed, does not work, period. uname -r is 2.6.31-15-generic KARMIC KOALA 9.10 I have tried this with default files as system is installed with minimal karmic install I get error FATAL: Error inserting coretemp (/lib/modules/2.6.31-15-generic/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko): Invalid module format and I have tried it with the description below. FATAL ERRORS EXIST. dmesg outputs this [ 4563.803572] coretemp: no symbol version for module_layout WTH?? I have this issue and further more on jaunty kernel 2.6.28-16 modprobe coretemp worked perfectly after I replaced sensors-detect in /usr/sbin/ with this file http://www.lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk/prog/detect/sensors-detect chmod 755 this file and added a pre-patched coretemp.ko from http://mabene.icomedias.com/coretemp.ko and place it in its path which varies on kernel name but is in my instance /lib/modules/2.6.31-15-generic/kernel/drivers/hwmon/ obviously I renamed the existing files by doing e.g. filename.extension-orig. JUST FOR TESTING PURPOSES. This is my sensors-detect output The modules load during that so it has to work but in no obvious way. http://pastebin.com/f2ae9c41b LM-SENSORS is Version: 1:3.1.1-4~ppa0 sensors -s outputs No sensors found! Make sure you loaded all the kernel drivers you need. Try sensors-detect to find out which these are. modprobe fails with errors as described. doing /etc/init.d/lm-sensors start or service lm-sensors start outputs * Setting sensors limits [fail] should say ok when I do # modprobe coretemp or # modprobe -v coretemp I get the same silly error FATAL: Error inserting coretemp (/lib/modules/2.6.31-15-generic/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko): Invalid module format. This worked fine in Jaunty kernels with no issues in EITHER CASE and all my CPU temps were posted when doing # sensors Doing sensors-detect is able to see/load modules which are coretemp, ic2-nforce2, ic2-dev I cannot load any of them using modprobe ic2-nforce2, ic2-dev it says FATAL: Module ic2_dev not found. makes anyone wonder if bug reports are addressed or even read in some cases. silly bugs are allowed to travel down for years without being fixed in some cases. ok I get it its all free and ppl do it in their spare time they have families/jobs/live like most of us do well I do anywho... just dont get it why this is reported and not fixed. or when ppl just add it as a duplicate of e.g. Bug #296478 and so sometimes even having dozens of 'duplicate' bugs that when u read have nothing in relation in the majority of cases. As a obvious result it gets ignored. So much for support. The only kernel which fixes this is the 2.6.32rc7 which I have downloaded from mainline for testing. though the system is only accessible via ssh and stays at blinking cursor on machine. -- linux-image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296478] Re: coretemp doesn't support intel atom processors
well this is really silly from a stable sort of release that has been tested for months. my uname -r is 2.6.31-14-generic I have this issue and further more on jaunty kernel 2.6.28-16 modprobe coretemp worked perfectly after I replaced sensors-detect in /usr/sbin/ with this file http://www.lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk/prog/detect/sensors-detect chmod 755 this file and added a prepatched coretemp.ko from http://mabene.icomedias.com/coretemp.ko and place it in its path which varies on kernel name but is in my instance /lib/modules/2.6.31-14-generic/kernel/drivers/hwmon/ obviously I renamed the existing files by doing e.g. filename.extension-orig. when I do # modprobe coretemp or # modprobe -v coretemp I get a silly error FATAL: Error inserting coretemp (/lib/modules/2.6.31-14-generic/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko): Invalid module format this procedure worked fine in jaunty kernels with no issues and all my cpu temps were posted when doing # sensors makes anyone wonder if bug reports are addressed or even read in some cases. silly bugs are allowed to travel down for years without being fixed in some cases. ok I get it its all free and ppl do it in their spare time they have families/jobs/live like most of us do well I do anywho... just dont get it why this is reported and not fixed. or when ppl just add it as a duplicate of e.g. bug #1524614 and so sometimes even having dozens of 'duplicate' bugs that when u read have nothing in relation in the majority of cases. As a obvious result it gets ignored. So much for karmic im back to jaunty. Since Karmic as more kernel issues then I care to spend weeks fixing. -- coretemp doesn't support intel atom processors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 260001] Re: ubiquity crashed with InstallStepError in configure_bootloader()
Here is how I resolved this issue. I am runnig a triple boot environment on one HDD I have XP PRO/Vista Ultimate SP1 with a modivied BCD (vista boot loader alomost like grub really) Vista want to take control and Ubuntu wants to take control... its a battle. Ubuntu resides on the secondary slave drive with it s own swap space. Previously with no issues I altered the Vista BCD to include XP/Vista/Ubuntu hardy and when I slected hardy i was passed to the grub loader. all was fine. enter IBEX Upgrading in my case failed miserably CD had no errors and all was fine, fresh install failked as well with this error so determined I decided to win I had to let UBUNTU grub do the job I also had a sata drive which I unplugged for some reason IDE/sata mix during install for me is a no no. I proceeded to formats the slave HDD completley and then install with a completly pre formated HDD, result no errors, Except now I have to boot Linux by default and loog at that ugly grub menu (regardless of what you do its still ugly and clumbsy) now I boot all 3 but made the slave drive be the first bootable device in bios, had I not done that, selecting UBUNTU form the vista bcd load the grub for dos with anerro and shows a grub Never got that why... I got mine working at last though disapointed since openoffice is stil 2.4 not 3.0 and TBH besides a few fixes I rather have staid with 8.4.0.1LTS and you really dont have that much else going for it nothing looks inovative Sorry for the offtopic bit. -- ubiquity crashed with InstallStepError in configure_bootloader() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 260001] Re: ubiquity crashed with InstallStepError in configure_bootloader()
Yes I found exact same issue further more upgrade from LTS also failed with dozens of errors. So when I finally decided to do a clean install Grub failed to install and resulting in the reported error. Also worth mentioning that installing from live session will never go past the loading partition utility and result in more errors. 8.10 is definitely worst now then it was when on Beta 2... In fact I would have thought this was at all not ready for release. On a personal observation I could never while using beta 2 to a triple boot like I did with Hardy, I dont know what the devs did though theire hard work I feel sorry to report it needs more polishing. -- ubiquity crashed with InstallStepError in configure_bootloader() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
I agree totally that Microsoft leads the OS market simply because unfortunatly of 3 main and very importatnt facts! 1) Hardware support 2) Great sofware that though commercial is not developed for Linux and this should be. Interopeability 3) Rubbish email support Cant import Windows live mail account .iaf format into Linux. setting up email is a pita in linux sloppy really. Overall I have to agree its not just a case of building machines with hardware that UBUNTU supports is a question of widespread development of drivers that support the state of the art hardware like SLI mostly in laptops and for those that are gamers well thge development of games that can be just installed in linux like thy would in windows, teh same for sofware like Photoshop, Autocad, Revit, Microstation, 3dsMAX, SAP, EPOS and on to other industry standards software... That were this to happen I tell you that the marriage inbetween Open source free OS and paid/commercial sofware professionals use would be more appealing for companies to make a switch because either way you look at it your saving a huge amount of money in licensing. no retraining on similar packages and instant more organised productivity and efficiency. The Future of Linux OR UBUNTU in this case is to embrace the standard industry standards that professionals are used too in other ares and maybe then gradually they would give the opensource replacements a try and learn as they go suggesting to companies a use it cause its free its not allways the most appealing approach. Though it makes a great case. People moan about Microsoft rubbish, resource hogging OS that really in the end ends up winning because widespread hardware support on every main stream machine is extremely important I cant use a web cam in linuc x or a scanner at home without using WINE eh nice as that is it still looks sloppy or similar ,messengers are not Video Orientaded like 1 messenger to rule them all Pidgin fo e.g. where it to support a multi Video Chat via the MSN network or its own free protocols man oh man. I praize Linux and the values the ideals of the people that put so much effort into making UBUNTU stand well out and be the most viable distro. I also agree that too many distros that really each try to offer something diffrerent and then people moan about the 50 flavours of Vista eh! Though some education in differences that exist in between Linux and windows I have to say that personally I live with triple boot platforms because each has a unique feature that I like and prefer over the other. but fix these 3 issue and Microsoft will be Broke in no time... And I would switch my whole network to Linux and my works network and many other companies would follow suit. So heres the question how to get commercial developers to develop drivers and sofware for Linux instead. more so that the few that already do... And all with a nice GUI not everyone is a linux Buff people are afraid of a dos prompt never mind being afraid of so much more powerfull Linux Console. Openoffice support on IRC is a joke... jst thought I throw that in. -- Microsoft has a majority market share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 284238] [NEW] triple booting IBEX
Public bug reported: I have 4 HDD's on my PC first I have to unplug the SATA drives and leave the IDE ones on. Otherwise I never get a bootable HARDY or IBEX but that not the main problem. I have then two IDE Drives one master 500 GB partitioned and XP pro on one and Vista Ultimate on the other. On the second slave IDE HDD 80GB I have a 5GB SWAP and the rest is for Linux hell why not. I tehn modify the Vista BCD to include a pointer to Linux and I get a nive menu with all the OS's and if I picked UBUNTU HARDY I got the boot menu with the generic kernel, repair memetest and Vista longhorn and other OS's That How I wanted my Machine to boot and it worked like a charm. Enter IBEX no longer able to boot into IBEX even having modified pointers to same place I installed the GRUB to (not) MBR I get to boot to IBEX if I make the salve drive the first drive to boot from in Bios. But otherwise forget it. Now someone is gonna say but you can USE GRUB to do the JOB E ugly not N00b friendly if Im trying to convince my friends to double triple boot and I dont wanna be sorting it out for them. Grub editors In Linux are not that great either so GUI orientated on this is not a viable workable solution, Using easyBCD dont work either... ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- triple booting IBEX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284238 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 284247] [NEW] Intrepid IBEX 8.10 beta No GAMING LCD Support Dell XPS M1730
Public bug reported: doesnt recognise it or support GAMING LCD Support Dell XPS M1730 not on this beta I suppose I have to endure Microsoft yet longer :( WHY why do you I have to suffer this torture with all this please please save me. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - iaf. Live Hotmail Account importing support to evolution + iaf. Live Hotmail Account importing support to evolution Intrepid IBEX 8.10 beta ** Summary changed: - iaf. Live Hotmail Account importing support to evolution Intrepid IBEX 8.10 beta + Intrepid IBEX No webcam support ** Description changed: - For people like me that are used to using outlook or microsoft Live mail - you set up an account and expot into a file which is .iaf extension as - you guys know. - - Also when I really mannually set up Evolution getting it to separate 5 - email accounts is annoying and should be handled by default, thunderbird - is not that much better so I end up just using web mail in linux which - tbh is faster and way simpler but not the way it should be. + Doesn not support at all on even mildy or badly just doesnt exist. + embeded webcam on Laptop Dell XPS M1730 or on PC Microsoft VX 3000 + pretty bad for this stage of UBUNTU releases. ** Summary changed: - Intrepid IBEX No webcam support + Intrepid IBEX 8.10 beta No webcam support ** Summary changed: - Intrepid IBEX 8.10 beta No webcam support + Intrepid IBEX 8.10 beta No scanner support ** Description changed: - Doesn not support at all on even mildy or badly just doesnt exist. - embeded webcam on Laptop Dell XPS M1730 or on PC Microsoft VX 3000 - pretty bad for this stage of UBUNTU releases. + doesnt recognise it or support canon lide 500f. \still not in hardy and + not on this beta I suppose I have to endure Microsoft yet longer :( ** Summary changed: - Intrepid IBEX 8.10 beta No scanner support + Intrepid IBEX 8.10 beta No Ageia Physix support ** Description changed: - doesnt recognise it or support canon lide 500f. \still not in hardy and - not on this beta I suppose I have to endure Microsoft yet longer :( + doesnt recognise it or support cAgeia Physix not on this beta I suppose + I have to endure Microsoft yet longer :( WHY why do you I have to suffer + this torture ** Summary changed: - Intrepid IBEX 8.10 beta No Ageia Physix support + Intrepid IBEX 8.10 beta No GAMING LCD Support Dell XPS M1730 ** Description changed: - doesnt recognise it or support cAgeia Physix not on this beta I suppose - I have to endure Microsoft yet longer :( WHY why do you I have to suffer - this torture + doesnt recognise it or support GAMING LCD Support Dell XPS M1730 not on + this beta I suppose I have to endure Microsoft yet longer :( WHY why do + you I have to suffer this torture with all this please please save me. -- Intrepid IBEX 8.10 beta No GAMING LCD Support Dell XPS M1730 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284247 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 284245] [NEW] Laptop support XPS M1730 IBEX 8.10
Public bug reported: I ran the live CD I installed it to Laptop DELL XPS M1730 cant get the wifi card though recognised to connect to router I enter the wpa2 key and nothing happens, Cycles round and round and nothing. Support generally for SLI is well not great it heats up beyond normal parameters and well not after long I was restoring a IMAGE of the Previous OS. Overall still quite disapointed at poor hardware support hope that Final 8.10 will be way better more stable. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Laptop support XPS M1730 IBEX 8.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 284245] Re: Laptop support XPS M1730 IBEX 8.10
Sorry I should have been more specific Im using 32bit OS, In Hardy wast really supported either even on different laptop well recognised but unable to make a conection so I guess pretty much the same the wifi card is the intel 4965AGN GFX Drivers were opensource at first I installed the nvidia management console and I was using Ibex 8.10 beta I did try the proprietary gfx version 177 or whatnot but made no differnce whatsoever though those drivers are suppose to support SLI on windows environment is Vista 32 bit the latest drivers are 175.32beta dont know if there is a corrrelation with those and Linux or if linux has a dif version numbering. the resolution went to 1920x1200 as it was supposed to but no SLI. After a long while the laptop kept getting hotter and hoter though fans are supposedly trigger by bios I never heard anything going from my point of view IBEX beta was interfering with something either to prevent it breaking or just not to let it work this laptops as dual fans on gfx cards and a fan for CPU, hope that clears something up. -- Laptop support XPS M1730 IBEX 8.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 284247] Re: Intrepid IBEX 8.10 beta No GAMING LCD Support Dell XPS M1730
Right its like the logitech G15 keyboard it has a small LCD that displays various stats gamming for the gamers CPU usage etc etc I use lavalys Everest to display temperatures and whatnot else thta I find usefull on there you can retrive pop3 email open your prefered email client as it is and much much more http://www.3dnews.ru/_imgdata/img/2008/07/21/89113.jpg thats a picture of the panel in question though not much is showing on there the same software from the Logitech keyboard is the same as that so it technically the same http://www.trustedreviews.com/peripherals/review/2006/12/07/Logitech-G15 -Gaming-Keyboard/p1 http://www.cixar.com/~segphault/blog/res/programming/python/g15torrent/g15torrent_full.jpg they all the same hardware only the sofware and whatever drivers to acess it can make use of that Display for whatver you like... -- Intrepid IBEX 8.10 beta No GAMING LCD Support Dell XPS M1730 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284247 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253645] [NEW] Icons overlay each other
Public bug reported: I find that icons invariably overlay over each other on the same position on desktop. for instance \i hve a Folder on right hadn corner or anything else and if a drive is mounted or any other icons are made appear by Linux on desktop it seems it doesnt cre that that particular space is already occupied by another icon, this is intermittent I cannot eproduce this evry time but it doesm appen... see screenshots Im on Hrrdy 8.0.4.1 and doesnt matter kernel 2.6.24-19 or 2.6.24-20 ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Icons overlay each other https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253645 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253645] Re: Icons overlay each other
** Attachment added: screenshot of oddity http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16453294/Desktop.zip -- Icons overlay each other https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253645 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253645] Re: Icons overlay each other
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 40872 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/40872 IBeing a bug duplicate for what I read no one cares about this on that other bug report this should be address otherwise dont I wont waste my time poting bug reports. -- Icons overlay each other https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253645 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253206] Re: epson r300 with integrated card reader.
will be righ on it in a few minutes... -- epson r300 with integrated card reader. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253206 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253206] Re: epson r300 with integrated card reader.
I folowed your instructions here are results ** Attachment added: Bug reportinfo requested. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16463960/Bug%20reportinfo.zip -- epson r300 with integrated card reader. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253206 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251344] Re: Hardy proposed 2.6.24-20-generic kernel update will not boot
I believe these failures are AMD CPU bound sine I hav e tested 15 machines and 4 of which are MAD and those failed. On another note intrepid loads ok -- Hardy proposed 2.6.24-20-generic kernel update will not boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253206] [NEW] epson r300 with integrated card reader.
Public bug reported: Though similar bugs been reported with diffrente hardware my printer a Epson R300 will not load or recognise a 2GB SD card in ubuntu but oit doe in winodws, I tried differente drivers for same printer and all while printer works fine this card cannot be read in hardy 8.4.0.1. Thois is a normal SD 2GB card and my XPS M1730 reads it ok my acer n50 premium reads it ok my Packard bell Imax reas it ok. The printer is attatched to a AMD platform if that helps since I know many bugs are founfd to be strangely related to AMD platforms. Please if needing more info do ask. lsusb command does not report the card after insertion... any other card below 2GB is read with no issues. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- epson r300 with integrated card reader. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253206 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251344] Re: Hardy proposed 2.6.24-20-generic kernel update will not boot
I add this as well as a also very dispoiting experience with my first ubuntu install I get this kind of thing... Mistakes happen but I thught that was onlly reseverd to Microsoft. Rant aside since this is a critical and known issue should be withrawn from servers and auto porposed nupdates ASAP until proper fix is availabel. Same is true wit RT versions of kernel in fact no flavour of linux that will install the proposed 2.6.24-20 wll work... I know we can always revert to the previous kernel but lets be realistic here. -- Hardy proposed 2.6.24-20-generic kernel update will not boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251401] Re: package ubuntustudio-audio 0.28 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16276672/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16276673/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package ubuntustudio-audio 0.28 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251401 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251401] [NEW] package ubuntustudio-audio 0.28 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Public bug reported: IT all started when my ibuntu 8.04.1lt kernel 2.6.24-19 got a prompt fo a string of kernel updates a few libs and I saw a new kernel 2.6.24-20 come up on that update as well, I dont have any weird repos or any unstable releases checked on my sources... SO I did and soon found out that the kernel 2.6.24-20 would go past grub to the line over top right ornr sayin starting up and hung there forever. Im not a savvy linux user so I went to \ubuntu for help (what a mistake) Going there for help is like two things, waiting in line with food coupons during ww2 or waiting to be going out getting pissed and waking up next to a ugly girl... Suffice to say I wont be gong to #ubuntu for help (no one gives a crap) I have been in much busier channels and we all got served properly and the replies are if you have a psin when who raise your left arm dont raise your left arm) so Im sorry for the rant but you should nkow that this bug report is becaue in the ned I went at it unguided since none of the people have the time or brains to help. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Jul 24 02:36:14 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Package: ubuntustudio-audio 0.28 PackageArchitecture: i386 SourcePackage: ubuntustudio-meta Title: package ubuntustudio-audio 0.28 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-generic i686 ** Affects: ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package ubuntustudio-audio 0.28 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251401 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251405] [NEW] package timidity 2.13.2-19ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: timidity I got a update notice from console to update to amongst other things to kernel 2.6.24-20 as well as a string of updates and to the 2.4.24-19 and some libs Kernel 2.26.24-19 was fine butt on reboot 2.6.24-20 wouldg get past the starting up line fklashing at the right left corner of screen... Tried the useless #ubuntu channel where theire solotion anything is if it hurts your arm when you move it dont move it sort of thing) I read tons of info and been learning linux by myself mostly btv your own help channel is a joke (I know its all free and free time) I do opensource werk myself, so here it is a error that should a been a update from a 2.6.24-19 to a 2.6.24-20 (over automatic updates) on HArdy 8.04.1LTS adn ends up in something totally unrelated csue I caouldnt get the help or guidane I needed, maybe #ubuntu should have a)more people helping that care b)closed SOrry but ubuntu for me so far and the help is a koke, winodws is less agro I tell you. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Jul 24 02:36:13 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Package: timidity 2.13.2-19ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: i386 SourcePackage: timidity Title: package timidity 2.13.2-19ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-generic i686 ** Affects: timidity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package timidity 2.13.2-19ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251405 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251405] Re: package timidity 2.13.2-19ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16276725/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16276726/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package timidity 2.13.2-19ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251405 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 249811] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.24-19-generic 2.6.24-19.36 [modified: lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.pcimap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.dep lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/mo
Public bug reported: Failed to install kernels after download ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jul 18 08:51:53 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17 Package: linux-image-2.6.24-19-generic 2.6.24-19.36 [modified: lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.pcimap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.dep lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.ieee1394map lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.usbmap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.isapnpmap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.inputmap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.seriomap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.alias lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.symbols] PackageArchitecture: i386 SourcePackage: linux Title: package linux-image-2.6.24-19-generic 2.6.24-19.36 [modified: lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.pcimap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.dep lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.ieee1394map lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.usbmap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.isapnpmap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.inputmap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.seriomap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.alias lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.symbols] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17 Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-generic i686 ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package linux-image-2.6.24-19-generic 2.6.24-19.36 [modified: lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.pcimap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.dep lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.ieee1394map lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.usbmap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.isapnpmap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.inputmap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.seriomap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.alias lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.symbols] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249811 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 249811] Re: package linux-image-2.6.24-19-generic 2.6.24-19.36 [modified: lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.pcimap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.dep lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modu
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16148155/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16148156/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package linux-image-2.6.24-19-generic 2.6.24-19.36 [modified: lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.pcimap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.dep lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.ieee1394map lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.usbmap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.isapnpmap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.inputmap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.seriomap lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.alias lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/modules.symbols] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249811 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 86393] Re: bzr+ssh:// no progress bar
also slightly non related but ubuntu 8.04 when applying themes the e when you sign with root to do some admin any progrss bars are flat non skinned as well as all the GUI around -- bzr+ssh:// no progress bar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86393 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 32357] Re: Installer doesn't recognise SATA disks as primary.
Right after I downloaded and started installing the Ubuntu 8.04.1 LTS on a mixed sata/ide drive environment I experienced similar issues when placing the MBR onto the IDE drive that I had partinoned and hadson partition 1 XP Pro and on Partions 2 Ubuntu and on partition 3 linux swap the other sata drives just contain data and I thought not much of this untiol I repeatedly experienced error 21 no matter where I placed the ubuntu mbr... Work around is to unplug the sata drives do the install and then when all is fine plug them back up and all is well Solution? well just do what I said... -- Installer doesn't recognise SATA disks as primary. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 128516] Re: ebox-firewall fails to configure
I have other issues where it causes ubuntu to stop responding in in some cases even stops booting recovery did little except that I havd to amnually remove ebox firewall from ubuntu and tryust me on this after 8 tries I gave up nd will not consider ebox as a solutions until it rains gold -- ebox-firewall fails to configure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128516 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
