[Bug 1062623] Re: enable grub-2.00 boot-from-luks support

2013-05-08 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Thanks for keeping this updated Adam! I don't complete understand though - I believe the only real change needed is that this step: 8: append GRUB_CRYPTODISK_ENABLE=y to /etc/default/grub gets done automatically. Would it be harmful to just stick that in the default template for all setups?

[Bug 1062623] Re: enable grub-2.00 luks support

2012-10-09 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
I erroneously filed this bug against partman-crypto - should have probably been grub-installer. ** Package changed: partman-crypto (Ubuntu) = grub-installer (Ubuntu) ** Summary changed: - enable grub-2.00 luks support + enable grub-2.00 boot-from-luks support ** Description changed: (I

[Bug 1062623] [NEW] enable grub-2.00 luks support

2012-10-05 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Public bug reported: (I suppose this comes too late in the release cycle to make the change, but perhaps it's simple enough:) With only minimal manual intervention, I found I could use today's Ubuntu Server 12.10 daily iso to install a system with luks+lvm and no separate /boot partition (which

Re: [Bug 878492] Re: Keyboard shortcut - F10 shortcut is used to show menu and this is wrong

2012-02-27 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:18:29AM -, Nick Rundy wrote: User has a almost maximized window and taps Alt+F5 to restore the window. But instead it maximizes. So then he's got to hit Alt+F5 again. Speaking as such a user, I'd say the cost of hitting Alt+F5 a second time, when my fingers are

[Bug 877006] Re: regression: shortcut-keys can't be disabled anymore

2012-02-17 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 878492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878492 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 726639 F10 is captured even if gnome-terminal setting is explictly set to not capture ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 878492 Keyboard shortcut

[Bug 822382] Re: unchecking the Enable the menu shortkey (F10 by default) do not allow to th e midnigth commander to exit using F10 key

2012-02-17 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 878492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878492 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 726639 F10 is captured even if gnome-terminal setting is explictly set to not capture ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 878492 Keyboard shortcut

[Bug 775435] Re: gnome-terminal under unity does not obey the enable menu shortcut setting

2012-02-17 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 878492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878492 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 726639 F10 is captured even if gnome-terminal setting is explictly set to not capture ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 878492 Keyboard shortcut

[Bug 766188] Re: None of the gnome-terminal keyboard shortcut settings let me use F10 for exit in mc

2012-02-17 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 878492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878492 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 726639 F10 is captured even if gnome-terminal setting is explictly set to not capture ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 878492 Keyboard shortcut

[Bug 750700] Re: Unity Compiz plugin captures F10 for menu even when explicitly disabled in gnome-terminal

2012-02-17 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 878492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878492 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 726639 F10 is captured even if gnome-terminal setting is explictly set to not capture ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 878492 Keyboard shortcut

[Bug 726639] Re: F10 is captured even if gnome-terminal setting is explictly set to not capture

2012-02-17 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 878492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878492 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 878492 Keyboard shortcut - F10 shortcut is used to show menu and this is wrong -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 722680] Re: Unexpected F10 key behaviour in GNOME terminal

2012-02-17 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 878492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878492 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 726639 F10 is captured even if gnome-terminal setting is explictly set to not capture ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 878492 Keyboard shortcut

[Bug 553864] Re: 'F10' keystroke captured by Terminal window

2012-02-17 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 878492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878492 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 726639 F10 is captured even if gnome-terminal setting is explictly set to not capture ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 878492 Keyboard shortcut

[Bug 194155] Re: mc and gnome-terminal, F10 key conflict

2012-02-17 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 878492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878492 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 726639 F10 is captured even if gnome-terminal setting is explictly set to not capture ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 878492 Keyboard shortcut

[Bug 732249] Re: f10 keybinding of global menu conflicts with non-global-menu applications

2012-02-17 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 878492 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878492 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 878492 Keyboard shortcut - F10 shortcut is used to show menu and this is wrong -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 878492] Re: Keyboard shortcut - F10 shortcut is used to show menu and this is wrong

2012-02-10 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
With the latest packages for 12.04, the menu focus seems to have changed to Alt-F10 as proposed. It also seems though that there isn't a maximise shortcut at all anymore, is that right? (It would be fine I think to combine it into Alt-F5 as proposed above.) -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 782763] Re: update-manager marks updated packages as Manually installed

2012-02-08 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Confirmed: I see the same behaviour on a system that now runs 12.04 (Precise). (I believe fkrull is right that this was a problem for quite a while already, but have never paid attention to it much, as more than 9 out of 10 upgrades I run out of aptitude) Desired behaviour: update-manager would

Re: [Bug 892609] Re: powernap reverts cpufreq scaling_governor setting to performance

2011-12-13 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Hi Andres, thanks for picking this up. I've been running the machine in question without powernap for a couple of weeks now, so I reinstalled it just now to answer your questions, and... I don't seem to be able to reproduce the previous problems. The scaling_governor is now ondemand as it should

[Bug 892609] Re: powernap reverts cpufreq scaling_governor setting to performance

2011-12-13 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
** Changed in: powernap (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/892609 Title: powernap reverts cpufreq scaling_governor setting to performance To

[Bug 892609] [NEW] powernap reverts cpufreq scaling_governor setting to performance

2011-11-19 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Public bug reported: After installing powernap on a Ubuntu 11.10 Server system, and possibly only after a subsequent reboot, I found the system to be running with the performance scaling_governor, which was a change from the original behaviour where the system would have the ondemand governor by

[Bug 644825] Re: screen unpredictably crashes

2011-06-06 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 375625 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375625 I have experienced both this bug (where the client complains it can't find the master process anymore) and the bug now marked a duplicate, #375625 (where the client freezes, but indeed the master process also

[Bug 629607] Re: hd-media images don't match latest 10.04.1 iso

2010-09-22 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Aha, great! Thank you for your patience to explain - it's much appreciated! -- hd-media images don't match latest 10.04.1 iso https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629607 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 637635] [NEW] please make powernap depend on/recommend anacron

2010-09-13 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: powernap This would seem useful to me because servers spending time sleeping will otherwise miss cron jobs. Thanks! ** Affects: powernap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please make powernap depend on/recommend anacron

[Bug 629607] Re: hd-media images don't match latest 10.04.1 iso

2010-09-13 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
** Package changed: ubuntu = debian-installer (Ubuntu) -- hd-media images don't match latest 10.04.1 iso https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629607 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 571018] Re: lucid partitioner creates unusable disk space when creating software raid arrays

2010-09-04 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Just to add in case it's helpful: the same unusable entry can be seen when creating a partition in an encrypted volume. (Out of curiosity, can I ask what this space represents?) -- lucid partitioner creates unusable disk space when creating software raid arrays

[Bug 629607] [NEW] hd-media images don't match latest 10.04.1 iso

2010-09-03 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Public bug reported: I would like to request an update for the hd-media images under http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid/main/installer- amd64/current/images/ to match the iso for the recent maintenance release 10.04.1 (I did manage to boot from a usb-disk with the vmlinuz / initrd.gz

[Bug 269974] Re: suspend via Fn+F1 or lid-close behave differently

2009-11-18 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
I updated the description: the previous description conflated lots of different issues. (also, better late than never I guess: thanks Andres!) ** Description changed: - I just installed Ubuntu 8.04.1 with the amd64 alternate installer on a - Dell Latitude D630. It's an all-Intel version, ie

[Bug 410933] Re: No sound in fresh jaunty install until disabling external amplifier

2009-10-01 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
My findings are the same as Darxus': Using the 29 Sep daily-live i386 image, audio was not immediately audible, but Daniel's suggested alsa+modprobe commands fixed that. The model of Vaio used is a 'VGN-B1VP(E)' (as reported by lshal). Thanks Daniel! -- No sound in fresh jaunty install until

[Bug 410933] Re: No sound in fresh jaunty install until disabling external amplifier

2009-10-01 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
ubu...@ubuntu:~$ lspci -nv |grep -A1 0401 00:1f.5 0401: 8086:24c5 (rev 03) Subsystem: 104d:81c5 Thanks again! -- No sound in fresh jaunty install until disabling external amplifier https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 410933] Re: No sound in fresh jaunty install until disabling external amplifier

2009-09-29 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
I can confirm the problem also occurs here, after a fresh install of Ubuntu 9.04 on a Vaio VGN-B1VP, and the fix works. I applied all available updates per 30 September 2009, played with the levels in alsamixer to no avail (and then restored them to their initial values), then found this mention

[Bug 410933] Re: No sound in fresh jaunty install until disabling external amplifier

2009-09-29 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- No sound in fresh jaunty install until disabling external amplifier https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 410933] Re: No sound in fresh jaunty install until disabling external amplifier

2009-09-29 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
I'm taking the liberty to mark this bug confirmed, given that I can reproduce it on another Vaio model, and given that the same solution was also mentioned at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LaptopTestingTeam/SonyVaioVGN-T350 (however, those wiki notes were written for 7.10 and 8.04). Desired behaviour:

[Bug 359531] Re: LVM file name maximum length is shorter than in ext3

2009-04-12 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Hi, thanks for the follow-up. So your tests suggest that ext3 long- filename support is broken in Ubuntu 9.04, while the use of encrypted LVM may or may not be influencing the problem. As 9.04 is still under development, can you add what date your install disc was from, and whether you tried to

[Bug 359531] Re: LVM file name maximum length is shorter than in ext3

2009-04-11 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Hi, you're right that ext3 has a limited filename size at 255 bytes - it depends on what character encoding you use how many characters that implies, but at most 255. In your example with only underscores and numbers I think you should be able to fit 255. It works for me. LVM is not a file

[Bug 325343] Re: [python-gnuplot] plot() function plots only one point of data

2009-02-22 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
I installed the newer package from Intrepid, available at http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/python-gnuplot (all its dependencies are satisfied on 8.04, too). As far as I can tell this doesn't exhibit the one-data point bug. I'm not sure how to zoom though, so I couldn't get the module to either

Re: [Bug 59695] Re: High frequency of load/unload cycles on some hard disks may shorten lifetime

2009-02-13 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Nicolò Chieffo 84ye...@gmail.com wrote: It's ok for me that my disk saves power while on battery, but I cannot understand why once the read head is unloaded, every minute it is loaded again. If the PC is idle who is causing the load cycle? There might be a

[Bug 241331] Re: Running a non-existing command in the background causes exit

2009-02-11 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Sort of to my surprise, I managed to reproduce this. I entered does not exist at the bash prompt, and the shell exited. On opening a new Gnome terminal, I was quite surprised to find that that line made it into my bash history (which suggests it's a fairly clean exit). I had another succes with

[Bug 241331] Re: Running a non-existing command in the background causes exit

2009-02-11 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
I had a look at the bash code that handles this, but there's so much conditional forking and all... really way over my head for now. As a guidance for setting the importance of this bug (to whomever is allowed to do that), I'd say it is of low importance. I just played around a bit in gdb, and

[Bug 241331] Re: Running a non-existing command in the background causes exit

2009-02-11 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Sorry: clarification to the file just appended with the previous comment: I didn't type the line that says exit, it appears as a result of trying cats . This is the manifestation of the bug... -- Running a non-existing command in the background causes exit

[Bug 225130] Re: Cannot get back to a terminal after X has started

2009-02-11 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Many thanks for your answer, Trel. From your information it seems it was an nVidia driver issue. I hope you don't mind that I'll go ahead and mark this bug as invalid for bash. ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Cannot get back to a terminal after X has started

[Bug 225130] Re: Cannot get back to a terminal after X has started

2009-02-11 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Hello again Trel. I'm marking the bug as incomplete: could you add which hardware you are using with this (particularly the graphics hardware), and whether it's the free or non-free graphics driver? ** Changed in: nvidia-kernel-common (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: bash = nvidia-kernel-common

[Bug 327874] [NEW] Behaviour for unset HISTFILESIZE in bashrc not in accordance with man page

2009-02-10 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bash This is on Ubuntu 8.04.2 for amd64, with bash package version 3.2-0ubuntu18. (but in fact the problem occurs similarly on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.3, for example) According to man bash If HISTFILESIZE is not set, no truncation is performed. In

[Bug 225130] Re: Cannot get back to a terminal after X has started

2009-02-10 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
This is most likely not a bug in bash, but rather in the video driver, which doesn't allow switching between X and the consoles. Can you supply information on your brand of graphics hardware and the drivers used? Please then mark this as a bug against the relevant xserver-xorg package, and mark it

[Bug 327874] Re: Behaviour for unset HISTFILESIZE in bashrc not in accordance with man page

2009-02-10 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
and marked invalid. ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Yung-Chin Oei (patsoe) Status: New = Invalid -- Behaviour for unset HISTFILESIZE in bashrc not in accordance with man page https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327874 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 258383] Re: SLIME looks for wrong lisp by default

2009-02-08 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
I can confirm this bug on a clean Ubuntu 8.04.2 amd64 (ie I never installed slime or even emacs on it before), and adding the proposed line to ~/.emacs is indeed a working solution. ** Changed in: slime (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- SLIME looks for wrong lisp by default

[Bug 310213] Re: README.debian does not explain how to activate vimoutliner addon

2009-02-03 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
I ran into the same surprise trying to install the addon on Ubuntu 8.04. I believe the fix suggested by Chris Schoonbee is perfectly in accordance with the cited Debian policy. The issue also affects Debian Unstable as well as Testing: neither declare a Recommend: vim-addon- manager ** Changed

[Bug 310213] Re: README.debian does not explain how to activate vimoutliner addon

2009-02-03 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
The related Debian bug is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=435704 (I can't figure out how to set the association in Launchpad). ** Also affects: vimoutliner (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=435704 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown --

[Bug 158385] Re: addons path wrong in debian.vim

2009-02-03 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
The original bug as reported by Daniel White concerns the absence of a registry file, and was fixed for Hardy, see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/vimoutliner/0.3.4-8 - however, the problem still encountered by gravies and Daniel Chen is described in this other bug report:

[Bug 158385] Re: addons path wrong in debian.vim

2009-02-03 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Oops, I linked a Jaunty page when I meant https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/vimoutliner/0.3.4-8 but of course the package is the same. -- addons path wrong in debian.vim https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158385 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 233942] Re: genisoimage generates wrong DVD-Video images

2008-11-30 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Without upgrading 8.04 to 8.10, the issue can also be resolved by upgrading only the genisoimage package. This only involved installing the binary package shipped in 8.10. After doing that I was able to produce an iso that is WinXP-readable. -- genisoimage generates wrong DVD-Video images

[Bug 269974] Re: suspend via Fn+F1 or lid-close behave differently

2008-10-03 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Further info, update: I get the same behaviour as I get with Fn+F1 when I choose hibernate from the quit-menu, so I guess that that's related. I believe the problem with resuming from hibernation is that the disk volume layout on my system, which consists of an LVM partition with several

[Bug 269974] [NEW] suspend via Fn+F1 or lid-close behave differently

2008-09-13 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Public bug reported: I just installed Ubuntu 8.04.1 with the amd64 alternate installer on a Dell Latitude D630. It's an all-Intel version, ie X3100 graphics and iwl3945 Wifi. All the latest updates have been installed. Funny behaviour: when I close the lid, it smoothly goes into suspend, and on

[Bug 204326] Re: nm-applet 0.6.6 does not show any wireless networks

2008-04-29 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 188282 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188282 This does not seem to be a duplicate of bug #188282. That bug report is about the b43 driver breaking the installer. This bug report is about a post-install problem. -- nm-applet 0.6.6 does not show any

[Bug 48758] Re: [Ubuntu 6.06] couldn't find RGB GLX visual (not driver-specific)

2008-01-14 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
See my comment https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg- video-vesa/+bug/48758/comments/7 ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-vesa (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- [Ubuntu 6.06] couldn't find RGB GLX visual (not driver-specific)

Re: [Bug 48758] Re: [Ubuntu 6.06] couldn't find RGB GLX visual (not driver-specific)

2008-01-14 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
Thanks for the update. I'm afraid I don't have the Ubuntu system handy anymore to test on, but when I upgraded to 7.04 last August the problem was gone. I realise that's not very much information, apologies for that! I looked at the bug you mention, but that sounds like a different problem to me

[Bug 110011] Re: Feisty ipython segfaults on import tab

2007-09-11 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
The suggested fix works well here - although I didn't do %upgrade (I hadn't picked up that part) but rather just commented out the line in ~/.ipython/ipy_user_conf.py Thanks! -- Feisty ipython segfaults on import tab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110011 You received this bug notification

[Bug 49559] Re: connected USB mouse prevents resume from suspend-to-RAM

2006-06-25 Thread Yung-Chin Oei
The problem disappeared this week - I don't know exactly after which changes, I only found out by accident, when I forgot to unplug my mouse and the machine nevertheless resumed just fine! There was an update to acpi-support which I didn't pay too much attention to at the time, but supposedly