[Bug 2061245] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 - GNOME on Xorg session crashes on launch
I'm having the same xorg crash problem on Xubuntu 24.04 beta, see #2061246 (dup'ed to here.) I can reproduce the problem with a Ubuntu 24.04 beta install, but there xorg always crashes, unlike the Xubuntu/xfce4 flavor where the first login after booting fails but trying again immediately will succeed. There's some crash info left in Xorg.0.log, I'll attach it. ** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/2061245/+attachment/5764900/+files/Xorg.0.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061245 Title: Ubuntu 24.04 - GNOME on Xorg session crashes on launch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/2061245/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1970402] Re: Initrd out of memory error after upgrade to 22.04
I'm also experiencing the Out of Memory error on a fresh install of Ubuntu Server 22.04 on an Intel NUC BXNUC10i5FNK1 with 8GB of memory. After pressing any key it boots to a kernel panic stating not syncing VFS, unable to mount root fs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970402 Title: Initrd out of memory error after upgrade to 22.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1970402/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1960018] Re: Boot Failure - linux-image-5.13.0-28-generic | regression
Just did a fresh install of 20.04.3 LTS, updated & installed linux- generic-hwe-20.04 and it booted up just fine. Only difference is /etc/default/grub on a client's appliance, this is the default/grub on the machine that freezes: # If you change this file, run 'update-grub' afterwards to update # /boot/grub/grub.cfg. # For full documentation of the options in this file, see: # info -f grub -n 'Simple configuration' GRUB_DEFAULT=0 GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=hidden GRUB_TIMEOUT=0 GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR=`lsb_release -i -s 2> /dev/null || echo Debian` GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash" GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0" # Uncomment to enable BadRAM filtering, modify to suit your needs # This works with Linux (no patch required) and with any kernel that obtains # the memory map information from GRUB (GNU Mach, kernel of FreeBSD ...) #GRUB_BADRAM="0x01234567,0xfefefefe,0x89abcdef,0xefefefef" # Uncomment to disable graphical terminal (grub-pc only) #GRUB_TERMINAL=console # The resolution used on graphical terminal # note that you can use only modes which your graphic card supports via VBE # you can see them in real GRUB with the command `vbeinfo' #GRUB_GFXMODE=640x480 # Uncomment if you don't want GRUB to pass "root=UUID=xxx" parameter to Linux #GRUB_DISABLE_LINUX_UUID=true # Uncomment to disable generation of recovery mode menu entries GRUB_DISABLE_RECOVERY="true" # Uncomment to get a beep at grub start #GRUB_INIT_TUNE="480 440 1" GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER="true" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960018 Title: Boot Failure - linux-image-5.13.0-28-generic | regression To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe-5.13/+bug/1960018/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1960018] Re: Boot Failure - linux-image-5.13.0-28-generic | regression
Same thing, hardware is an Intel NUC NUC10i5FNK. OS: Ubuntu Server 20.04.3 LTS. Kiosk machine, when I select 5.13.0-28 to boot, it just freezes at loading ramdisk. 5.11.0-46-generic works just fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960018 Title: Boot Failure - linux-image-5.13.0-28-generic | regression To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe-5.13/+bug/1960018/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1953333] [NEW] package libpython3.8:amd64 3.8.10-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
Public bug reported: notice while upgrading ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: libpython3.8:amd64 3.8.10-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-41.45~20.04.1-generic 5.11.22 Uname: Linux 5.11.0-41-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18 AptOrdering: python3.8:amd64: Install libpython3.8-stdlib:amd64: Install python3.8-minimal:amd64: Install libpython3.8-minimal:amd64: Install NULL: ConfigurePending Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip Date: Mon Dec 6 10:52:47 2021 ErrorMessage: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-12-06 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819) Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, python3-minimal, 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 PythonDetails: N/A RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3 apt 2.0.6 SourcePackage: python3.8 Title: package libpython3.8:amd64 3.8.10-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: python3.8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195 Title: package libpython3.8:amd64 3.8.10-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.8/+bug/195/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1906542] Re: echo 1 >> /sys/module/zfs/parameters/zfs_max_missing_tvds says premission error, unable to reapair lost zfs pool data
(A bit delayed, but just for anyone finding this...) No, you cannot remove a FAULTED normal data device - device_removal involves migrating all the data off the old one, which you cannot do if it's not there. (logs and caches are different.) You'll need to recreate the pool. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906542 Title: echo 1 >> /sys/module/zfs/parameters/zfs_max_missing_tvds says premission error, unable to reapair lost zfs pool data To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1906542/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949249] [NEW] zfs send --dedup with HWE kernel modules produces unreceivable stream
Public bug reported: If you do zfs send -D with 0.8.x userland and 2.0.x kernel, it will actually try to produce a deduplicated send stream (whereas 2.0.x userland stubs out that flag and prints a "this did nothing, stop trying to use it" note). On the system that generated it (20.04 amd64, running 5.11.0-38-generic with zfs-0.8.3-1ubuntu12.13 zfs-kmod-2.0.2-1ubuntu5.1): $ dd if=/dev/urandom of=/badidea/1 bs=1M count=16 $ sudo dd if=/dev/urandom of=/badidea/1 bs=1M count=16 $ sudo cp /badidea/1 /badidea/2 $ sudo zfs snap badidea@snap1 $ sudo zfs send -RLeD badidea@snap1 > dedupstream $ sudo zfs recv badidea/badbadidea < dedupstream internal error: Unknown error 1037 Aborted On my Debian 10 testbed running zfs-2.1.99-422_gb0f3f393d (and same for kmod): cannot receive: stream has unsupported feature, feature flags = 7 This functionality was dropped in commit 196bee4cfd576fb15baa6a64ad6501c594f45497. Since it does all its voodoo in userland, it can indeed still generate a dedup'd stream. Might it make sense to at least print a warning if using zfs send --dedup with 2.0.x, as well as maybe copying the warning that 2.0.x spits out on attempting to receive such a stream, so people don't conclude that being unable to receive a send stream they generated means their system is broken? ** Affects: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949249 Title: zfs send --dedup with HWE kernel modules produces unreceivable stream To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1949249/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1947902] Re: Under particular load, virtio-scsi backed / errors out
I lied, it totally happens on 20.04 (w/5.4.0-89-generic) and 21.04 (5.11.0-37-generic), I just had forgotten I hadn't used virtio-scsi on them, just SATA. Oh boy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947902 Title: Under particular load, virtio-scsi backed / errors out To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed/+bug/1947902/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1947902] [NEW] Under particular load, virtio-scsi backed / errors out
Public bug reported: As I often do, I tried running OpenZFS git master's ZFS Test Suite against the new Ubuntu 21.10 release, to make sure nothing was secretly broken. This is on an Ubuntu 21.10 amd64 VM (running 5.13.0-20-generic) inside VirtualBox 6.1.26 on Windows 10 x64, using virtio-scsi for the root disk. The host is not experiencing any errors or low disk space or anything whenever this occurs, and other VMs running on the host and same physical disk are unaffected. I have seen failures like this happen before when using VirtualBox's TRIM/discard functionality, but that has to be very explicitly enabled on the VM, and it's not. It runs fine for a bit...then suddenly everything crashes and burns, after the root disk starts erroring out: [ 5281.077557] virtio_scsi virtio1: request:id 869 is not a head! [ 5284.066557] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#390 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s [ 5284.066561] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#390 CDB: Write(10) 2a 00 01 d4 a3 78 00 00 a0 00 [ 5284.066562] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 30712696 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x800 phys_seg 20 prio class 0 [ 5284.066575] Aborting journal on device sda3-8. [ 5284.066580] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#391 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s [ 5284.066581] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#391 CDB: Write(10) 2a 00 01 d4 18 00 00 00 08 00 [ 5284.066582] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 30676992 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x800 phys_seg 1 prio class 0 [ 5284.066584] Buffer I/O error on dev sda3, logical block 3702784, lost sync page write [ 5284.066586] JBD2: Error -5 detected when updating journal superblock for sda3-8. [ 5284.070494] EXT4-fs error (device sda3): ext4_journal_check_start:83: comm rs:main Q:Reg: Detected aborted journal [ 5284.070666] EXT4-fs (sda3): Remounting filesystem read-only [ 5284.071033] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#392 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s [ 5284.071036] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#392 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 02 79 f1 80 00 00 08 00 [ 5284.071037] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 41546112 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x80700 phys_seg 1 prio class 0 [ 5284.071047] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#393 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s [ 5284.071049] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#393 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 02 79 f1 a0 00 00 18 00 [ 5284.071049] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 41546144 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x80700 phys_seg 3 prio class 0 [ 5284.071055] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#394 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s [ 5284.071057] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#394 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 02 79 f1 d8 00 00 08 00 [ 5284.071057] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 41546200 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x80700 phys_seg 1 prio class 0 [ 5284.071062] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#395 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s [ 5284.071064] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#395 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 02 79 f1 f0 00 00 08 00 [ 5284.071064] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 41546224 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x80700 phys_seg 1 prio class 0 [ 5284.071071] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#396 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s [ 5284.071072] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#396 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 02 79 f2 00 00 00 18 00 [ 5284.071073] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 41546240 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x80700 phys_seg 3 prio class 0 [ 5284.071078] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#397 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s [ 5284.071079] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#397 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 02 79 f2 20 00 00 08 00 [ 5284.071080] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 41546272 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x80700 phys_seg 1 prio class 0 [ 5284.071085] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#398 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s [ 5284.071086] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#398 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 02 79 f2 00 00 00 08 00 [ 5284.071087] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 41546240 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 1 prio class 0 [ 5284.071092] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#399 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s [ 5284.071093] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#399 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 02 79 f2 00 00 00 08 00 [ 5284.071094] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 41546240 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 1 prio class 0 [ 5406.093848] scsi_io_completion_action: 2 callbacks suppressed [ 5406.093857] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#402 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s [ 5406.093861] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#402 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 00 24 ff 40 00 00 08 00 [ 5406.093862] print_req_error: 2 callbacks suppressed [ 5406.093863] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 2424640 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 1 prio class 0 [ 5406.093868] Read-error on swap-device (8:0:2424648) [ 5406.093937] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] tag#403 FAILED
[Bug 1931779] Re: kdump just hung out of the box
My suggestion would be to print a warning unconditionally on first install that you should test it and not assume it will just work, and/or to not set crashkernel=... with the default in the first place so people have to go explicitly set it (and, implicitly, read about the fact that one size does not fit all when finding out how). (I would even do the former if your very next commit landed the heuristic estimator to improve this, until you were confident it worked in the majority of cases.) I know it's not readily programmatically possible to tell "will this work" short of actually doing it, because haha hardware, my lament is that in my experience, the default has _never_ worked, on my VMs or real hardware, and I would not expect something to configure itself with defaults, resulting in e.g. kdump-config status reporting "ready to kdump" when asked, and then...not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931779 Title: kdump just hung out of the box To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/makedumpfile/+bug/1931779/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1931779] Re: kdump just hung out of the box
I suppose I should have made it clear that just changing the amount of memory reserved was not sufficient. Perhaps it would be useful to print a message saying "hey, I know we set something by default, but we don't expect that to actually work, so you should probably test and adjust it"? Because it sounds like it's not expected to work out of the box, and configuring it to "on, but doesn't actually work or warn you" when you install the package seems worse than not configuring it, similar to how I wouldn't expect installing ccache to result in it sticking itself in my PATH, reporting "ccache enabled and working" when asked, but then defaulting to a max cache size of 4 kilobytes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931779 Title: kdump just hung out of the box To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/makedumpfile/+bug/1931779/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1931779] Re: kdump just hung out of the box
** Description changed: I tried installing kdump-tools (1.6.7-1ubuntu2.2) on my up to date 20.04 system, installed specifically to try reproducing a bug. But when I tried, after kdump-config status reported "ready to dump" on reboot, echo 'c' | sudo tee /proc/sysrq-trigger, it printed the panic to console and then just hung forever. After some blind guessing and twiddling both variables, I found that - crashkernel=512M-:256M works. + crashkernel=512M-:256M works on this particular setup. (MS7850 + motherboard, i5-4670 CPU, 5.4.0-42-generic kernel) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931779 Title: kdump just hung out of the box To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/makedumpfile/+bug/1931779/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1931779] [NEW] kdump just hung out of the box
Public bug reported: I tried installing kdump-tools (1.6.7-1ubuntu2.2) on my up to date 20.04 system, installed specifically to try reproducing a bug. But when I tried, after kdump-config status reported "ready to dump" on reboot, echo 'c' | sudo tee /proc/sysrq-trigger, it printed the panic to console and then just hung forever. After some blind guessing and twiddling both variables, I found that crashkernel=512M-:256M works. ** Affects: makedumpfile (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931779 Title: kdump just hung out of the box To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/makedumpfile/+bug/1931779/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1902767] Re: do-release-upgrade exits with "An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade"
Thanks. I eventually removed enough packages from the system to allow the upgrade to work. It was a long time ago so I don't remember the details anymore and I think I threw out my notes. Since then, apt upgrades, including kernel upgrades, have been working fine. Just one more year, and we get to do this all over again... On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:03 PM Jesse Mallen <1902...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I also ran into this exact issue attempting an upgrade from 18.04 to > 20.04. Let me know if I can provide any additional detail. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902767 > > Title: > do-release-upgrade exits with "An unresolvable problem occurred while > calculating the upgrade" > > Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader package in Ubuntu: > Confirmed > > Bug description: > This error comes up both before and after removing two ppas using ppa- > purge. Note that I am using a low-latency kernel with bionic. I would > suspect this but I upgraded another system running this kernel with no > problems. > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 > Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:18.04.40 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-52.57~18.04.1-lowlatency 5.4.65 > Uname: Linux 5.4.0-52-lowlatency x86_64 > NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia > ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.18 > Architecture: amd64 > CrashDB: ubuntu > Date: Tue Nov 3 13:18:42 2020 > InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-06-07 (148 days ago) > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 > (20200203.1) > PackageArchitecture: all > ProcEnviron: >TERM=xterm-256color >PATH=(custom, no user) >LANG=en_US.UTF-8 >SHELL=/bin/bash > SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader > Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader > UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2020-11-03 (0 days ago) > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1902767/+subscriptions > > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902767 Title: do-release-upgrade exits with "An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1902767/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1922996] [NEW] alien 8.95.3 cannot create any debs
Public bug reported: As described in Debian bugs [1] and [2], alien 8.95.3 (and .1 and .2, but those aren't being shipped by any release of Ubuntu) cannot successfully generate any debs, ever - with neither bug patched, it will error out on attempting to generate any deb at all due to a syntax error in the debian/rules it generates, and with that fixed, it will incorrectly locate the files to be installed (e.g. /usr/include files will end up in /include, and so on). Please package 8.95.4 for Hirsute, or anyone who wants to use alien to generate debs on Hirsute will be quite sad. (Yes, to be clear, I did verify these bugs reproduce on Ubuntu's 8.95.3 alien package, though it was sort of a foregone conclusion, since Ubuntu doesn't appear to patch it at all.) [1] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983492 [2] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985835 ** Affects: alien (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922996 Title: alien 8.95.3 cannot create any debs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alien/+bug/1922996/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1767431] Re: restore type-ahead find, again
This is really annoying, counter-intuitive behaviour. At the very least the old behaviour should be restorable by a setting. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767431 Title: restore type-ahead find, again To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1767431/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1912215] Re: Unable to select time zone when installing
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1903312 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903312 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1903312 Ubiquity not selecting correct timezone when connected to Internet -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912215 Title: Unable to select time zone when installing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1912215/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1912215] [NEW] Unable to select time zone when installing
Public bug reported: When installing Kubuntu with the daily build, I am unable to select a time zone. With nothing selected, I clicked to proceed with the install and it appears to still proceed as expected. I'm reporting as whilst installation appeared to work correctly for me, there may be fringe cases where more than one time zone may be in use(USA). I have tried a second install, testing in that area, and the Time Zone field remains unpopulated. This is my first report, so I've probably done everything wrong! :o) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "kub_daily_timezone_installer_USA.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912215/+attachment/5454172/+files/kub_daily_timezone_installer_USA.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912215 Title: Unable to select time zone when installing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1912215/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786822] Re: Pinta constantly crashes in Ubuntu 18.04 fresh install
I updated mono ``` Mono JIT compiler version 6.12.0.90 (tarball Fri Sep 4 14:02:38 UTC 2020) Copyright (C) 2002-2014 Novell, Inc, Xamarin Inc and Contributors. www.mono-project.com TLS: __thread SIGSEGV: altstack Notifications: epoll Architecture: amd64 Disabled: none Misc: softdebug Interpreter: yes LLVM: yes(610) Suspend: hybrid GC:sgen (concurrent by default) ``` I rebooted and it still crashes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786822 Title: Pinta constantly crashes in Ubuntu 18.04 fresh install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pinta/+bug/1786822/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1906312] [NEW] Atempted to install UBUNTU 20.04 with windows 10 three times. It always stops 3/4 of the way.
Public bug reported: 11/30/20 PROBLEM: attempted to install ubuntu 20.04 with windows 10. stops 3/4 of the way through. I think the problem is the partitioning of the drive, or the fact that I am using a gaming computer. I had ben running only UBUNTU on this computer for over a year. Computer: MSI X470, AMD® Ryzen 5 1600 six-core processor, Memory: 16 GB New: 1.0 TB Hard disk: WDC WD10EZEX-00RKKA0 Unplugged old drives. Only the new drive connected. Successfully installed windows 10 from CD. Within Windows: Disabled fast startup. Disabled secure boot. Shrunk Drive C by 1/2 to make free space for Linux. I ran Ubuntu 20.04 from a USB pen drive and selected INSTALL. While installing, I created 3 new Linux partitions: /dev/sda2, 24 GB, Ext4, / target /dev/sda5, 471 GB, Ext4, /home target /dev/sda6, 17 MB, Linux Swap Continued installation of UBUNTU 20.04 : Failed ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 20.04 LTS ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy pkgname N: Unable to locate package pkgname ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ /var/log/syslog and /var/log/partman bash: /var/log/syslog: Permission denied richc...@verizon.net ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: ubiquity 20.04.15 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-26.30-generic 5.4.30 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-26-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./boot/grub/efi.img CasperMD5CheckResult: fail CasperVersion: 1.445 Date: Mon Nov 30 10:39:20 2020 InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed maybe-ubiquity quiet splash --- LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423) SourcePackage: ubiquity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ubiquity-20.04.15 ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906312 Title: Atempted to install UBUNTU 20.04 with windows 10 three times. It always stops 3/4 of the way. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1906312/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1902767] Re: do-release-upgrade exits with "An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade"
I've just noticed an additional problem - do-release-upgrade did not restore third-party repositories to /etc/apt/sources.list, so all my third party packages have silently stopped being updated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902767 Title: do-release-upgrade exits with "An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1902767/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1246441] Re: do-release-upgrade fails with "Could not calculate the upgrade"
Thanks for checking. I have submitted the bug report. It is bug #1902767. On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 12:36 PM Brian Murray <1246...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Please submit a new bug using 'ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader' as > that will add log files which I can examine to help sort out the > situation. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246441 > > Title: > do-release-upgrade fails with "Could not calculate the upgrade" > > Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader package in Ubuntu: > Invalid > > Bug description: > Could not calculate the upgrade > > An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade. > >This can be caused by: >* Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu >* Running the current pre-release version of Ubuntu >* Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu > > If none of this applies, then please report this bug using the command > 'ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core' in a terminal. > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 > Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:0.192.13 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-32.47-generic 3.8.13.10 > Uname: Linux 3.8.0-32-generic i686 > ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8.5 > Architecture: i386 > CheckboxSubmission: c3bdf3cb22c4bd8acbc2616fa3f80669 > CheckboxSystem: edda5d4f616ca792bf437989cb597002 > CrashDB: ubuntu > Date: Wed Oct 30 23:59:27 2013 > InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-10-20 (375 days ago) > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 > (20120423) > MarkForUpload: True > PackageArchitecture: all > SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader > UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-10-30 (0 days ago) > VarLogDistupgradeTermlog: > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1246441/+subscriptions > > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246441 Title: do-release-upgrade fails with "Could not calculate the upgrade" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1246441/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1902767] [NEW] do-release-upgrade exits with "An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade"
Public bug reported: This error comes up both before and after removing two ppas using ppa- purge. Note that I am using a low-latency kernel with bionic. I would suspect this but I upgraded another system running this kernel with no problems. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:18.04.40 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-52.57~18.04.1-lowlatency 5.4.65 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-52-lowlatency x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.18 Architecture: amd64 CrashDB: ubuntu Date: Tue Nov 3 13:18:42 2020 InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-06-07 (148 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20200203.1) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2020-11-03 (0 days ago) ** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic dist-upgrade -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902767 Title: do-release-upgrade exits with "An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1902767/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1246441] Re: do-release-upgrade fails with "Could not calculate the upgrade"
I added the PPA packages back in, reinstalled the related software, and removed them with ppa-purge. Followed that with apt update, autoremove and a necessary reboot. After all that, I got the same "unresolvable problem" error when I tried to do-release-upgrade. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246441 Title: do-release-upgrade fails with "Could not calculate the upgrade" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1246441/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1246441] Re: do-release-upgrade fails with "Could not calculate the upgrade"
I added the PPA packages back in, reinstalled the related software, and removed them with ppa-purge. Followed that with apt update, autoremove and a necessary reboot. After all that, I got the same "unresolvable problem" error when I tried to do-release-upgrade. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246441 Title: do-release-upgrade fails with "Could not calculate the upgrade" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1246441/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1246441] Re: do-release-upgrade fails with "Could not calculate the upgrade"
I followed instructions and removed all ppas using add-apt-repository --remove followed by ppa-purge. Nothing changed in the flow of do- release-upgrade. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246441 Title: do-release-upgrade fails with "Could not calculate the upgrade" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1246441/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1880211] Re: Logwatch package points to wrong location for zfs utils
I'm running Ubuntu 16.04.7 LTS 64bit and Logwatch 7.4.2. My root user has /sbin in the path and when I run zpool I don't have to prefix it with the path. Still to make this logwatch section work, I had previously edited my /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/zz-zfs on lines 54 and 55 to have the a different path "/sbin/zpool" and "/sbin/zfs" some time back. However recently logwatch stopped reporting the ZFS section. For some strange reason file zz-zfs lines 54 and 55 now say: my $pathto_zpool = $ENV{'pathto_zpool'} || 'zpool'; my $pathto_zfs = $ENV{'pathto_zfs'} || 'zfs'; And $pathto_zpool gets set to zpool. But the test on line 59 takes the "exit 0". This test for existence requires a path!!! So whoever changed this did this wrong! I AGAIN have changed these lines to: my $pathto_zpool = $ENV{'pathto_zpool'} || '/sbin/zpool'; my $pathto_zfs = $ENV{'pathto_zfs'} || '/sbin/zfs'; and all is working! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880211 Title: Logwatch package points to wrong location for zfs utils To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+bug/1880211/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1895970] [NEW] trying to install to new partition on existing removable drive
Public bug reported: I think that it attached the crash report, but on initial installation, it let me resize a ntfs partition to do ext4. It looks like it was installing and then it said that I had a fatal error. I will try again to see if I can boot from the created drive but it is trying to send a bug report. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: ubiquity 20.04.15.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-42.46-generic 5.4.44 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-42-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.4 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.445.1 Date: Thu Sep 17 08:27:16 2020 InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu-mate.seed quiet splash --- LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-MATE 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731) SourcePackage: grub-installer UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ubiquity-20.04.15.2 ubuntu-mate -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895970 Title: trying to install to new partition on existing removable drive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1895970/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1892782] [NEW] linuxfx settings shows error when double clicking an icon
Public bug reported: Reproduce the error: Open system settings, you should see "winfx settings" screen. Double click one of the icons. it may work but if you double click one of the icons again, you'll see an error message that says: This application has raised an unexpected error and must abort" [29] invalid object FrmMain.BtnContas_Click.387 Ignore or Close are the buttons to click. Description:Windowsfx 10 Release:10 N: Unable to locate package pkgname ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "error message dialog" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892782/+attachment/5404227/+files/error.xcf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892782 Title: linuxfx settings shows error when double clicking an icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1892782/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1880211] Re: Logwatch package points to wrong location for zfs utils
Same problem occurs with logwatch 7.4.2-1ubuntu1 in U 16: No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS Release:16.04 Codename: xenial fix is the same. regards rich -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880211 Title: Logwatch package points to wrong location for zfs utils To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+bug/1880211/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1880682] Re: LTS 20.04 install fails with probe failure locating drives that were FreeBSD (pfSense) formatted
** Package changed: apport (Ubuntu) => installation-report (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880682 Title: LTS 20.04 install fails with probe failure locating drives that were FreeBSD (pfSense) formatted To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1880682/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1880682] [NEW] LTS 20.04 install fails with probe failure locating drives that were FreeBSD (pfSense) formatted
Public bug reported: I tried to install LTS 20.04 on a machine (e5-2670 powered) which had drives (Crucial 500GB SATA, HGST 2GB rotating) formatted for a pfSense (FreeBSD) test. Install failed to probe for disks multiple times. dd'ing zeros over the front part of thedrives allowed installation to proceed. ** Affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880682 Title: LTS 20.04 install fails with probe failure locating drives that were FreeBSD (pfSense) formatted To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1880682/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1878249] [NEW] package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93.16+2.02-2ubuntu8.15 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit st
Public bug reported: /boot/vmlinuz-5.1.15-surface-linux-surface is unsigned. E: Your kernels are not signed with a key known to your firmware. This system will fail to boot in a Secure Boot environment. dpkg: error processing package grub-efi-amd64-signed (--configure): installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93.16+2.02-2ubuntu8.15 Uname: Linux 5.1.15-surface-linux-surface x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.14 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue May 12 12:10:22 2020 ErrorMessage: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-02-19 (813 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20170801) Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.9, python3-minimal, 3.6.7-1~18.04 PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.17, python-minimal, 2.7.15~rc1-1 RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.0.5ubuntu2.3 apt 1.6.12 SourcePackage: grub2-signed Title: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93.16+2.02-2ubuntu8.15 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2020-05-12 (0 days ago) ** Affects: grub2-signed (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package bionic third-party-packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878249 Title: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93.16+2.02-2ubuntu8.15 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post- installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1878249/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1878096] [NEW] Log to file does not work in loggedfs 0.9-0
Public bug reported: The log to file functionality does not appear to work in 0.9-0ubuntu2 (default on Ubuntu Focal). On 0.5-0ubuntu4 (tried on Ubuntu Xenial) the -l flag wrote the log to the specified file. In 0.9-0 the log always ends up written to syslog regardless of what I specify to -l. Example: loggedfs -l /tmp/log.txt /tmp/mydir -> On 0.5-0 all operations on mydir are written to log.txt -> On 0.9-0 all operations on mydir are written to syslog Weirdly if I run loggedfs in the foreground (using -f) it seems to work as expected and the log is written to the specified file. I've also tried installing 0.5-0 onto Ubuntu Focal and it works as expected. Either there is a bug here, or the behavior has changed and the instructions not updated. ** Affects: loggedfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878096 Title: Log to file does not work in loggedfs 0.9-0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/loggedfs/+bug/1878096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1872001] Re: 5.3.0-46-generic - i915 - frequent GPU hangs / resets rcs0
I followed the steps above on Linux Mint, and the output of "journalctl -b | grep i915" no longer had the "GPU HANG or Resetting rcs0 for hang on rcs0" errors. I also confirmed that running Zoom no longer has any lags or hangs. It works as expected. So confirming this fix worked! (Sorry, I'm new to this forum and not sure if I'm supposed to put tags on my message like Chris did above). tags: added: verification-done-eoan removed: verification-needed-eoan Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872001 Title: 5.3.0-46-generic - i915 - frequent GPU hangs / resets rcs0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1872001/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1872001] Re: 5.3.0-46-generic - i915 - frequent GPU hangs / resets rcs0
I can also confirm that this problem continues in 5.3.0-51-generic However, I see it very frequently (not just for 5 seconds... happening all the time) with two different use cases. 1) When i have a headset (with a mic) plugged into the front audio port. One of my cores also goes to 100% utilization. or 2) When I run Zoom conferencing software. Here is the journalctl output with 5.3.0-51-generic: journalctl -b | grep i915 Apr 30 08:02:17 breath-mint kernel: i915 :00:02.0: vgaarb: deactivate vga console Apr 30 08:02:17 breath-mint kernel: i915 :00:02.0: vgaarb: changed VGA decodes: olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=io+mem:owns=io+mem Apr 30 08:02:17 breath-mint kernel: [drm] Finished loading DMC firmware i915/kbl_dmc_ver1_04.bin (v1.4) Apr 30 08:02:17 breath-mint kernel: [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20190619 for :00:02.0 on minor 1 Apr 30 08:02:17 breath-mint kernel: fbcon: i915drmfb (fb0) is primary device Apr 30 08:02:17 breath-mint kernel: i915 :00:02.0: fb0: i915drmfb frame buffer device Apr 30 08:02:26 breath-mint kernel: snd_hda_intel :00:1f.3: bound :00:02.0 (ops i915_audio_component_bind_ops [i915]) Apr 30 08:03:11 breath-mint kernel: [drm:intel_pipe_update_end [i915]] *ERROR* Atomic update failure on pipe B (start=4635 end=4636) time 115 us, min 1073, max 1079, scanline start 1072, end 1080 Apr 30 08:04:15 breath-mint kernel: [drm:intel_pipe_update_end [i915]] *ERROR* Atomic update failure on pipe B (start=8521 end=8522) time 130 us, min 1073, max 1079, scanline start 1072, end 1081 Apr 30 08:04:40 breath-mint kernel: i915 :00:02.0: GPU HANG: ecode 9:0:0x, hang on rcs0 Apr 30 08:04:40 breath-mint kernel: i915 :00:02.0: Resetting rcs0 for hang on rcs0 Apr 30 08:04:48 breath-mint kernel: i915 :00:02.0: Resetting rcs0 for hang on rcs0 Apr 30 08:04:56 breath-mint kernel: i915 :00:02.0: Resetting rcs0 for hang on rcs0 My temporary work around is to downgrade my kernel to 5.0. I do not experience the problem there. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872001 Title: 5.3.0-46-generic - i915 - frequent GPU hangs / resets rcs0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1872001/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1874830] [NEW] install fails on grub install
Public bug reported: wont install on any partition. attempts to install on /dev/sda even though the install is going to /dev/sdb for info, sdb is an ssd drive that I had 18.04 on previously. /dev/sdb checks out as OK. this is an install of 20.04 LTS ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: ubiquity 20.04.15 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-26.30-generic 5.4.30 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-26-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.445 Date: Fri Apr 24 07:55:33 2020 InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed initrd=/casper/initrd quiet splash --- LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423) SourcePackage: grub-installer UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ubiquity-20.04.15 ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874830 Title: install fails on grub install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1874830/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1008197] Re: Cinnamon desktop freeze - no mouse actions, keyboard atl, ctrl, del works
It happened to me again just now. I ssh'ed to the computer and did a reboot, but even after the ssh service had shut down, the computer was still hung with a frozen screen saver, and I still had to do a hardware reset in order to get it going again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008197 Title: Cinnamon desktop freeze - no mouse actions, keyboard atl,ctrl, del works To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1008197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869632] Re: AppArmor profile denied access to /etc/mdns.allow
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1869629 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869629 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1869629 please add /etc/mdns.allow to /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mdns -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869632 Title: AppArmor profile denied access to /etc/mdns.allow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-filters/+bug/1869632/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869629] Re: please add /etc/mdns.allow to /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mdns
This problem is indeed somewhat pervasive, I also filed bug 1869632 on cups-browsed doing the same thing, for the same reason. I suspect more will pop up. I don't think libnss_mdns is too widely used, most people would use libnss_mdns_minimal. I only have to use libnss_mdns because my ISP is insane. If this bug were fixed by adding /etc/mdns.allow to /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mdns bug 1869632 would be fixed as well (I've verified this by patching it on my system.) Not sure why /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mdns contains /etc/nss_mdns.conf, though: libnss_mdns.so.2 doesn't refer to that file (it appears to be used in the NetBSD implementation?) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869629 Title: please add /etc/mdns.allow to /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mdns To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1869629/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869632] Re: AppArmor profile denied access to /etc/mdns.allow
Bug also exists in package version 1.27.3-1 (current version in focal) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869632 Title: AppArmor profile denied access to /etc/mdns.allow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-filters/+bug/1869632/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869632] [NEW] AppArmor profile denied access to /etc/mdns.allow
Public bug reported: Many messages in syslog audit: type=1400 audit(1585521672.468:40): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed" name="/etc/mdns.allow" pid=1323 comm="cups-browsed" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0 This is caused by configuring libnss-mdns to resolve local names, with /etc/nsswitch.conf containing hosts: files mdns [NOTFOUND=return] dns myhostname libnss-mnds reads /etc/mdns.allow to find which domains to resolve, but /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cups-browsed does not allow access. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10 Package: cups-browsed 1.25.11-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-42.34-generic 5.3.18 Uname: Linux 5.3.0-42-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8.6 Architecture: amd64 CupsErrorLog: CurrentDesktop: XFCE Date: Sun Mar 29 15:48:11 2020 InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-10-24 (157 days ago) InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017) Lpstat: Error: command ['lpstat', '-v'] failed with exit code 1: lpstat: No destinations added. Lsusb: Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 002 Device 003: ID 80ee:0021 VirtualBox USB Tablet Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub MachineType: innotek GmbH VirtualBox Papersize: letter ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/BOOT/ubuntu_c53lph@/vmlinuz-5.3.0-42-generic root=ZFS=rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_c53lph ro quiet splash SourcePackage: cups-filters UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 12/01/2006 dmi.bios.vendor: innotek GmbH dmi.bios.version: VirtualBox dmi.board.name: VirtualBox dmi.board.vendor: Oracle Corporation dmi.board.version: 1.2 dmi.chassis.type: 1 dmi.chassis.vendor: Oracle Corporation dmi.modalias: dmi:bvninnotekGmbH:bvrVirtualBox:bd12/01/2006:svninnotekGmbH:pnVirtualBox:pvr1.2:rvnOracleCorporation:rnVirtualBox:rvr1.2:cvnOracleCorporation:ct1:cvr: dmi.product.family: Virtual Machine dmi.product.name: VirtualBox dmi.product.version: 1.2 dmi.sys.vendor: innotek GmbH ** Affects: cups-filters (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug eoan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869632 Title: AppArmor profile denied access to /etc/mdns.allow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-filters/+bug/1869632/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869629] Re: AppArmor denied access to /etc/mdns.allow to cronyd
As a workaround, hanging /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.chronyd to include /etc/mdns.allow r, and reloading with sudo apparmor_parser -r /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.chronyd made it shut up. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869629 Title: AppArmor denied access to /etc/mdns.allow to cronyd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chrony/+bug/1869629/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869629] [NEW] AppArmor denied access to /etc/mdns.allow to cronyd
Public bug reported: Many repetitions of audit: type=1400 audit(1585517168.705:63): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="/usr/sbin/chronyd" name="/etc/mdns.allow" pid=1983815 comm="chronyd" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=123 ouid=0 in log. I use libnss-mdns for .local name resolution, so /etc/nsswitch.conf contains hosts: files mdns [NOTFOUND=return] myhostname dns and /etc/mnds.allow contains the domains to resolve with mDNS (in may case, "local." and "local"; see /usr/share/doc/libnss-mdns/README.html.) Presumably cronyd calls a gethostbyX() somewhere, thus eventually trickling down through the name service switch and opening /etc/mdns.allow, which the AppArmor profile in the chrony package does not allow. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: chrony 3.5-6ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-18.22-generic 5.4.24 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-18-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu21 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Mar 29 15:02:39 2020 InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-26 (3 days ago) InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20200326) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: chrony UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: chrony (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ** Summary changed: - AppArmor denied accss to /etc/mdns.allow to cronyd + AppArmor denied access to /etc/mdns.allow to cronyd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869629 Title: AppArmor denied access to /etc/mdns.allow to cronyd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chrony/+bug/1869629/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1867036] Re: Focal Fossa : chronyd unable to sync system clock
Looking into this, it seems the problem is that /usr/lib/systemd/scripts /chronyd-starter.sh expects to be able to check for the cap_sys_time capability by grepping the output of "capsh --print" for "^Current.*cap_sys_time". However, in Focal the output of "capsh --print" for a root process is just "Current: =ep". I suspect this is a linux kernel tools change, as on an eoan system with linux 5.3.0, "sudo capsh --print" has all the capabilities listed in Current:, which is what the starter script expects. andol's dropin makes capsh output "Current: =ep cap_sys_time+i" which the grep matches so all is fine. Not sure that's the right fix, though. (It would help if I knew what "Current: =ep" is supposed to mean. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867036 Title: Focal Fossa : chronyd unable to sync system clock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chrony/+bug/1867036/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1867971] [NEW] gsettings dependency is problematic
Public bug reported: A current discussion on orca-list indicates that some blind users are finding Orca's use of gsettings to be problematic: The most accessible Linux version to use with Orca? https://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2020-March/msg00233.html Here are some relevant snippets: > ubuntu certainly fails here, the developers locked down orca configuration attaching it to gsettings and making it impossible to configure inside orca. > You can't modify orca configuration settings in ubuntu-mate and save those modifications. You have to use gsettings to get at orca configuration and change them so they're saved. Garden variety ubuntu in 19.10 does the same thing. In earlier versions of ubuntu this was not the case, you could make your changes inside orca and save those changes. > You never heard of gsettings before since using it is about as complex as editing a windows registry. The gsettings along with dconf-editor controls the configuration on graphical user interface systems other configuration files you might find in certain directories does not. In the case of ubuntu 19.10 orca got strait jacketed into gsettings. This was not the case in earlier ubuntu versions though. > I tried installing ubuntu 19.10 a few minutes ago the desktop version since I couldn't get a download url for ubuntu-mate.org and couldn't even bring up orca and this was after I verified the download. That cured me of ubuntu I'm pretty sure permanently. running alt-super-s didn't work and alt-f2 orca also failed and even alt-f2 screen-reader failed as well. I waited until all disk action had stopped to run those commands too. ** Affects: orca (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867971 Title: gsettings dependency is problematic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/orca/+bug/1867971/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1854589] Re: Windows move to different monitor when multiple monitors turned off and back on
Noting once again that I am still having this problem. I am worried because no one seems to be working on it or have any idea how to work around it (other than by disconnecting the cable from my computer to the back of my TV when I'm not playing something on the TV screen). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854589 Title: Windows move to different monitor when multiple monitors turned off and back on To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1854589/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1008197] Re: Cinnamon desktop freeze - no mouse actions, keyboard atl, ctrl, del works
I am still occasionally experiencing this problem (or something that looks just like it) in 2020. In my case, the freezing happens only when the Cinnamon screen saver is active -- the date/time on the screen saver stops advancing, and no keys or mouse clicks will revive it -- even selectively killing processes on the computer via a remote login (ssh) doesn't work -- I end up with no choice but to do a hardware reset. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008197 Title: Cinnamon desktop freeze - no mouse actions, keyboard atl,ctrl, del works To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1008197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1854589] Re: Windows move to different monitor when multiple monitors turned off and back on
Still having this problem. I'm temporarily working around it by disconnecting the HDMI cable from the computer to the back of the TV when I'm not actually playing something on the larger screen, but this is clearly not acceptable as a long-term solution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854589 Title: Windows move to different monitor when multiple monitors turned off and back on To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1854589/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1855477] Re: gnome-control-center will not let me paste in a password from my password manger
I'm using Xorg. And the password manager is xkeepass ( and keepass2 ) On 12/9/19 11:49 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > Thank you for using Ubuntu and reporting a bug. > > Are you using wayland or Xorg for your desktop session? What password > manager are you using? > > ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855477 Title: gnome-control-center will not let me paste in a password from my password manger To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1855477/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1854589] Re: Windows move to different monitor when multiple monitors turned off and back on
I don't think Compiz is relevant here. My computer isn't running Compiz — its display manager is GDM3 as best I can tell. (ri...@richw.org, the original reporter of this bug) ** Package changed: compiz (Ubuntu) => gdm3 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854589 Title: Windows move to different monitor when multiple monitors turned off and back on To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1854589/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1854589] Re: Windows move to different monitor when multiple monitors turned off and back on
I note this bug has been classified as affecting Compiz. However, as best I can tell, Compiz is not running on my computer. /etc/X11 /default-display-manager on my computer contains the value "/usr/sbin/gdm3". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854589 Title: Windows move to different monitor when multiple monitors turned off and back on To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1854589/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1854589] [NEW] Windows move to different monitor when multiple monitors turned off and back on
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 19.10, gdm3 3.34.1-1ubuntu1, cinnamon 4.0.10-2, cinnamon- screensaver 4.0.3-1, nvidia-driver 435.21-0ubuntu2. I have a TV set connected to my computer as a second monitor (for displaying YouTube videos, etc.). When I turn off both my main monitor and the TV for the night, and turn them back on in the morning, I often find that the windows I had left open on the main monitor (email, browser, xterm, etc.) have moved from the main monitor to the TV and need to be moved back individually to the main monitor (via the "move to the other monitor" function on the taskbar icons). This doesn't always happen -- sometimes the windows show up on the main monitor where I left them the night before, and sometimes not. Maybe 50-50, one way or the other. The main monitor is configured (in the Display settings) as the primary monitor, and the taskbar panel remains on the main monitor -- and when I wake up the screen saver to unlock it, the password dialogue always shows up on the main monitor -- but the windows may end up on either device after I've unlocked. It doesn't appear to make any difference what order I turn the monitor and the TV off/on. In particular, I've conscientiously turned off the TV before locking the screen and turning off the monitor, and then turned on the monitor and unlocked the screen before turning the TV back on, but the windows frequently still end up on the TV instead of the main monitor. I would like to somehow flag the windows so that they will stay put on my main monitor when I turn things off at night and turn them back on in the morning -- or, even better, I would like the windows to remain associated with the same device and not move around on their own. ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854589 Title: Windows move to different monitor when multiple monitors turned off and back on To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1854589/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: drm fails to accept edid version 2.4
As I wrote earlier, the EDID file I used came from edid-generator github and it is called 1920x1080.bin . You want me to google that for you? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: drm fails to accept edid version 2.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1821533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: drm fails to accept edid version 2.4
I'm not sure this is a Linux problem. It may be that the panel is reporting bad EDID data. I haven't investigated enough to say for sure. In any case none of the more recent Linux releases fixed the problem in my tests. Also no other open source OSs were able to deal with the onboard LCD panel either. (That may have changed since I tested.) If you were interested, you might be able to patch the firmware on the onboard panel to provide different EDID information. I looked into doing this and there are some tutorials out there. However, it's possible you could do something wrong and end up worse than you were before. If you learn something new, please post it here. In particular if you find some open source OS that can configure this display properly at full resolution without resorting to forcing EDID information please say so here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: drm fails to accept edid version 2.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1821533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: drm fails to accept edid version 2.4
I was able to display on an external monitor, or the internal monitor, but not both simultaneously. I didn't spend too much time trying to solve the problem and now the laptop is with a family member at another location. If you work on this issue and find a solution please post it here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: drm fails to accept edid version 2.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1821533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1825690] [NEW] Settings Panel _> Application Style -> Windows Decorations is Non-Usable
Public bug reported: Settings Panel -> Application Style -> Windows Decorations is Non-Usable and has been bugged since beta. Upgrade from beta to release Kubuntu 19.04. Panel looks like this when selected: https://i.imgur.com/jLSysQS.jpg rich@tworobots:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 19.04 Release:19.04 rich@tworobots:~$ apt-cache policy systemsettings systemsettings: Installed: 4:5.15.4-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 4:5.15.4-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 4:5.15.4-0ubuntu1 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu disco/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Expected to see the panel, received the screenshot above instead. ** Affects: kde-systemsettings (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825690 Title: Settings Panel _> Application Style -> Windows Decorations is Non- Usable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kde-systemsettings/+bug/1825690/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1790966] Re: Electron apps segfault on glibc 2.28 (cosmic)
@aM, your solution worked for me too. I now have Crashplan working. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790966 Title: Electron apps segfault on glibc 2.28 (cosmic) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1790966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1457400] Re: reduce 90s session kill timeout if the session does not shutdown cleanly
I also experienced "A stop job is running for Session c2 ... / 1min 30 s)". Newbies (like me) might need to know that in a fresh install of Ubuntu 16.04, the file /etc/systemd/system.conf has (almost) all lines commented out with a # . So, in addition to changing the number in the line #DefaultTimeoutStopSec=90 , one must also remove the # at the beginning of the line, to uncomment it. Also, before I changed the conf file, I had fast restarts sometimes by logging out before I restarted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1457400 Title: reduce 90s session kill timeout if the session does not shutdown cleanly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+bug/1457400/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: drm fails to accept edid version 2.4
** Summary changed: - failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0 + drm fails to accept edid version 2.4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: drm fails to accept edid version 2.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1821533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0
I was able to get the onboard LCD panel working, finally, as follows: First I extracted the edid file from the LCD panel using get-edid and putting that in /lib/firmware/edid/ncp.bin, and then forcing the kernel to take that using the kernel boot option drm.edid_firmware=edid/ncp.bin. This failed, and dmesg said that the ncp.bin file had a "bad block 0". Possibly that means that nothing within Linux can accept edid version 2.4? Then I grabbed a generic 1920x1080.bin edid file from edid-generator github and put that one in /lib/firmware/edid/ and used that one with drm.edid_firmware and the display worked for the first time! I am still unsure why Linux couldn't accept the version 2.4 edid data from the LCD panel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1821533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0
Below is the EDID information from the onboard panel. Why can't drm/i915 deal with it? guest@guest-ZenBook-UX431FA:~$ sudo get-edid | parse-edid This is read-edid version 3.0.2. Prepare for some fun. Attempting to use i2c interface No EDID on bus 0 No EDID on bus 1 No EDID on bus 2 No EDID on bus 3 No EDID on bus 4 1 potential busses found: 5 128-byte EDID successfully retrieved from i2c bus 5 Looks like i2c was successful. Have a good day. Checksum Correct Section "Monitor" Identifier "" ModelName "" VendorName "NCP" # Monitor Manufactured week 1 of 2018 # EDID version 2.4 # Digital Display DisplaySize 310 170 Gamma 2.20 Option "DPMS" "false" Modeline"Mode 0" 138.50 1920 1968 2000 2080 1080 1083 1088 +hsync -vsync EndSection -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1821533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0
Correction: last message should read "Why is the driver/module expecting EDID major version *1* and getting *2*? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1821533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0
I think the problem is that the laptop's onboard LCD panel is reporting EDID data with version 2 and the i915 driver can only deal with version 1 at the moment. How can this be fixed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1821533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0
Progress! Based on information in dmesg, pasted in at the end of this message, I thought maybe the graphics device was found OK but the laptop was trying to drive an external monitor instead of the onboard display. Sure enough, when I boot without nomodeset option and with an external HDMI monitor attached the system does display to the external monitor with proper 1920x1080 resolution. What does the "EDID is invalid:" message mean? Why is the driver/module expecting EDID major version 2 and getting 1? Does this have to do with the version of kbl_dmc firmware loaded to the graphics device? guest@guest-ZenBook-UX431FA:~$ dmesg | egrep "drm|i915" [3.196687] fb: switching to inteldrmfb from EFI VGA [3.196881] [drm] Replacing VGA console driver [3.210304] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013). [3.210306] [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query. [3.212814] i915 :00:02.0: vgaarb: changed VGA decodes: olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=io+mem:owns=io+mem [3.214857] [drm] Finished loading DMC firmware i915/kbl_dmc_ver1_04.bin (v1.4) [3.228865] [drm] EDID has major version 2, instead of 1 [3.236620] [drm] EDID has major version 2, instead of 1 [3.240878] [drm] EDID has major version 2, instead of 1 [3.244590] [drm] EDID has major version 2, instead of 1 [3.244595] i915 :00:02.0: eDP-1: EDID is invalid: [3.244597] [drm] EDID has major version 2, instead of 1 [3.290049] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20180514 for :00:02.0 on minor 0 [3.326674] snd_hda_intel :00:1f.3: bound :00:02.0 (ops i915_audio_component_bind_ops [i915]) [3.356268] fbcon: inteldrmfb (fb0) is primary device [4.724973] i915 :00:02.0: fb0: inteldrmfb frame buffer device -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1821533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0
Is it known whether any machines with Intel Graphics 620 with pci id 0x3ea0 have functioning graphics with any version of Ubuntu? This is relatively new hardware, but it seems unlikely that I am the only one in the world who has tried this combination, and if other people with different machines with the same 0x3ea0 pci id do have working graphics then that would suggest that the problem is some quirk of my particular ASUS UX431FA (perhaps some initialization timing quirk or hardware/design bug that is worked-around for the Windows 10 installation that came with the system). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1821533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0
I tried booting 4.18.0-16-generic (which i believe is the hwe kernel) with kernel option drm.debug=0xff. When the system came up of course it had no video but I could ssh in and grab the dmesg output, which is attached to this message. dmesg had many drm-related debugging messages and i915-related messages, but none of it was particularly helpful to me yet. ** Attachment added: "dmesg-drm.debug.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1821533/+attachment/5249204/+files/dmesg-drm.debug.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1821533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0
Just in case my addition of i915 to initramfs was causing a problem with drm-intel-next, I removed i915 from initramfs and repeated the test. The result was the same, no video after a certain point in the boot process with nomodeset using the drm-intel-next kernel as in #8. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1821533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0
I installed kernel and modules and headers from https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/drm-intel-next/current/ and rebooted without nomodeset option. Same behavior: after the "loading initramfs" message the screen blanks and never comes back. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1821533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0
Based on a lead from an Arch Linux blog post, I tried adding the i915 module to the initramfs. This could possibly lead to earlier initialization of the graphics device and it also seems consistent with the DragonFlyBSD "probe early" patch I linked to in my initial bug report which may have fixed the graphics problem in DragonFlyBSD (I cannot tell for certain if the graphics problem was fixed there due to another, unrelated problem, but the fix definitely allowed the boot to proceed further and the text did seem to switch to full screen resolution). The update-initramfs operation failed on the v5.1-rc2 kernel because of two missing firmware files. The update-initramfs operation succeeded on the 4.x kernels I had installed, one of which is the hwe kernel (I believe). I verified the presence of the i915 module in the initramfs for those kernels using lsinitramfs. Unfortunately, booting with i915 in the initramfs on the 4.x kernels and without nomodeset did not solve the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1821533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0
Also: booting without nomodeset kernel option for v5.1-rc2 kernel leads to black screen, just as before. At that point the system cannot even be switched to text console with ctrl-alt-Fn. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1821533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0
Thanks for your help. Unfortunately, no change after installing v5.1-rc2: Still stuck in 800x600 after booting with nomodeset kernel option. Added kernel-bug-exists-upstream and marked confirmed. dmesg output attached. ** Attachment added: "dmesg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1821533/+attachment/5249132/+files/dmesg ** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream ** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: linux-hwe (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1821533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821533] Re: failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0
** Description changed: Booting very new laptop hardware (ASUS Zenbook UX431FA) from 18.04 usb install (also 18.10, also 19.04 daily) leads to black screen. Adding "nomodeset" to kernel boot parameter gives 800x600 video only and permits installing OS to disk. Applying updates and hardware enablement packages does not solve problem: the system will still only boot with nomodeset kernel option, and X is limited to using fbdev module at 800x600 resolution. The "modesetting" driver appears to be loaded and then unloaded during X startup. Trying to force intel module from xserver-xorg-video-intel by setting up 20-intel.conf file in /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/ does not help. The PCI id for the graphics device appears to be 3ea0 and the place where that might be relevant is the i915 module. This problem occurs with every other Linux release I have tried including Fedora 29, Elementary OS latest, Mint 19.1, Manjaro latest. The one open source OS that I have found where it might be fixed is - DragonFlyBSD (see bug report 3167 here - https://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/3167). I have verified that the - patch referenced in that bug report does make DragonFlyBSD boot past the - video problem which I think is the same problem I experience with every - Linux OS I have tried including Ubuntu. + DragonFlyBSD (see https://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/3167). I have + verified that the patch referenced in that bug report does make + DragonFlyBSD boot past the video problem which I think is the same + problem I experience with every Linux OS I have tried including Ubuntu. guest@guest-ZenBook-UX431FA:~$ lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS Release: 18.04 guest@guest-ZenBook-UX431FA:~$ dpkg -l | grep hwe | egrep "linux|fbdev" ii linux-generic-hwe-18.044.18.0.16.66 amd64Complete Generic Linux kernel and headers ii linux-headers-generic-hwe-18.044.18.0.16.66 amd64Generic Linux kernel headers ii linux-image-generic-hwe-18.04 4.18.0.16.66 amd64Generic Linux kernel image ii linux-signed-generic-hwe-18.04 4.18.0.16.66 amd64Complete Signed Generic Linux kernel and headers (dummy transitional package) ii xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-hwe-18.04 1:0.5.0-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 amd64X.Org X server -- fbdev display driver Expected result: Video at 1920x1080 Actual result: Video limited to 800x600 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-16.17~18.04.1-generic 4.18.20 Uname: Linux 4.18.0-16-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.6 Architecture: amd64 BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log' CompositorRunning: None CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun Mar 24 10:36:51 2019 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: bionic DistroVariant: ubuntu ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, including running git bisection searches GraphicsCard: - Intel Corporation Device [8086:3ea0] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) -Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:17d1] + Intel Corporation Device [8086:3ea0] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) + Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:17d1] InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-03-24 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20190210) MachineType: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ZenBook UX431FA ProcEnviron: - TERM=xterm-256color - PATH=(custom, no user) - XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= - LANG=en_US.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + TERM=xterm-256color + PATH=(custom, no user) + XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.18.0-16-generic root=UUID=e6ae272a-49f0-491b-99b6-2a3785a7679e ro nomodeset vt.handoff=1 SourcePackage: xorg Symptom: display UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 12/14/2018 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: UX431FA.205 dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.board.name: UX431FA dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. dmi.chassis.version: 1.0 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrUX431FA.205:bd12/14/2018:svnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:pnZenBookUX431FA:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnUX431FA:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:ct10:cvr1.0: dmi.product.family: ZenBook dmi.product.name: ZenBook UX431FA dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. version.compiz: compiz N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.95-1~18.04.1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 18.2.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.2
[Bug 1821533] [NEW] failure to detect and use Intel 620 graphics pci id 3ea0
Public bug reported: Booting very new laptop hardware (ASUS Zenbook UX431FA) from 18.04 usb install (also 18.10, also 19.04 daily) leads to black screen. Adding "nomodeset" to kernel boot parameter gives 800x600 video only and permits installing OS to disk. Applying updates and hardware enablement packages does not solve problem: the system will still only boot with nomodeset kernel option, and X is limited to using fbdev module at 800x600 resolution. The "modesetting" driver appears to be loaded and then unloaded during X startup. Trying to force intel module from xserver-xorg-video-intel by setting up 20-intel.conf file in /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/ does not help. The PCI id for the graphics device appears to be 3ea0 and the place where that might be relevant is the i915 module. This problem occurs with every other Linux release I have tried including Fedora 29, Elementary OS latest, Mint 19.1, Manjaro latest. The one open source OS that I have found where it might be fixed is DragonFlyBSD (see bug report 3167 here https://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/3167). I have verified that the patch referenced in that bug report does make DragonFlyBSD boot past the video problem which I think is the same problem I experience with every Linux OS I have tried including Ubuntu. guest@guest-ZenBook-UX431FA:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS Release:18.04 guest@guest-ZenBook-UX431FA:~$ dpkg -l | grep hwe | egrep "linux|fbdev" ii linux-generic-hwe-18.044.18.0.16.66 amd64Complete Generic Linux kernel and headers ii linux-headers-generic-hwe-18.044.18.0.16.66 amd64Generic Linux kernel headers ii linux-image-generic-hwe-18.04 4.18.0.16.66 amd64Generic Linux kernel image ii linux-signed-generic-hwe-18.04 4.18.0.16.66 amd64Complete Signed Generic Linux kernel and headers (dummy transitional package) ii xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-hwe-18.04 1:0.5.0-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 amd64X.Org X server -- fbdev display driver Expected result: Video at 1920x1080 Actual result: Video limited to 800x600 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-16.17~18.04.1-generic 4.18.20 Uname: Linux 4.18.0-16-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.6 Architecture: amd64 BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log' CompositorRunning: None CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun Mar 24 10:36:51 2019 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: bionic DistroVariant: ubuntu ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, including running git bisection searches GraphicsCard: Intel Corporation Device [8086:3ea0] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:17d1] InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-03-24 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20190210) MachineType: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ZenBook UX431FA ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.18.0-16-generic root=UUID=e6ae272a-49f0-491b-99b6-2a3785a7679e ro nomodeset vt.handoff=1 SourcePackage: xorg Symptom: display UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 12/14/2018 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: UX431FA.205 dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.board.name: UX431FA dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. dmi.chassis.version: 1.0 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrUX431FA.205:bd12/14/2018:svnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:pnZenBookUX431FA:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnUX431FA:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:ct10:cvr1.0: dmi.product.family: ZenBook dmi.product.name: ZenBook UX431FA dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. version.compiz: compiz N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.95-1~18.04.1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 18.2.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.2 version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 18.2.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.2 version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core N/A version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati N/A version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel N/A version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau N/A ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic resolution ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821533 Title: failure to detect and use Intel 620
[Bug 1611945] Re: /dev/disk/by-path not properly populated for (e)SATA port multiplier disks
I have this same problem for some time and on the latest update too. all of the discs affected are used in a zfs zpool. uname -a Linux PEI-Server 4.15.0-45-generic #48~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 29 18:03:48 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux cat /sys/module/zfs/version 0.7.5-1ubuntu16.4 I have a total of 6 discs split equally across 2 esata port multipliers. All are part a a single raidz2 pool. Zillions of these errors: Mar 3 22:04:48 PEI-Server systemd[1]: dev-disk-by\x2dpath-pci\x2d:07:00.0\x2data\x2d1\x2dpart1.device: Dev dev-disk-by\x2dpath-pci\x2d:07:00.0\x2data\x2d1\x2dpart1.device appeared twice with different sysfs paths /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1c.2/:07:00.0/ata3/host2/target2:0:0/2:0:0:0/block/sdd/sdd1 and /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1c.2/:07:00.0/ata3/host2/target2:1:0/2:1:0:0/block/sde/sde1 I have lots of detailed data if anyone wants to see it. It would REALLY be nice if a fix trickled down soon... thanks rich -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611945 Title: /dev/disk/by-path not properly populated for (e)SATA port multiplier disks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1611945/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1817308] Re: GhostScript Update causes Blue Background
Update Manager came through with the update a couple of hours ago - Fixed the blue background on HP Photosmart B210. Thanks for quick work Guys -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817308 Title: GhostScript Update causes Blue Background To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1817308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1806067] Re: package samba 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.5 failed to install/upgrade: installed samba package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Interesting. I never manually changed the configuration. If any conversion was done, it was by the installation. There may be a bug after all. Thanks Rich On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 4:45 AM Karl Stenerud wrote: > Hi Rich, > > Thanks for reporting this. It looks from the logs to be a configuration > issue. I'm guessing the netmask and IP address got mixed up in the > config? > > bind failed on port 137 socket_addr = 192.255.255.255. > Failed to open nmb bcast socket on interface 192.255.255.255 for port > 137. Error was Cannot assign requested address > STATUS=daemon failed to start: NMBD failed when creating subnet lists, > error code 13 > > > ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) >Status: New => Invalid > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806067 > > Title: > package samba 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.5 failed to > install/upgrade: installed samba package post-installation script > subprocess returned error exit status 1 > > Status in samba package in Ubuntu: > Invalid > > Bug description: >I was able to partially mitigate the bug by replacing smb.conf with > the pre-upgrade version. That allowed access to drives and printers > from a Windows 7 computer, but did not help with a file share attached > from a fully patched Windows 10 computer. The Win 10 upgrade may be at > fault for that, however. > > ProblemType: Package > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 > Package: samba 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.5 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-39.42-generic 4.15.18 > Uname: Linux 4.15.0-39-generic x86_64 > ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.5 > Architecture: amd64 > Date: Tue Nov 27 09:20:07 2018 > ErrorMessage: installed samba package post-installation script > subprocess returned error exit status 1 > InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-11-23 (371 days ago) > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 > (20170801) > Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.7, python3-minimal, > 3.6.7-1~18.04 > PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.15rc1, python-minimal, > 2.7.15~rc1-1 > RelatedPackageVersions: >dpkg 1.19.0.5ubuntu2.1 >apt 1.6.6 > SambaServerRegression: Yes > SmbConfIncluded: Yes > SmbLog: > > SourcePackage: samba > TestparmExitCode: 0 > Title: package samba 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.5 failed to > install/upgrade: installed samba package post-installation script > subprocess returned error exit status 1 > UbuntuFailedConnect: Yes > UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-09-12 (78 days ago) > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1806067/+subscriptions > > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806067 Title: package samba 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.5 failed to install/upgrade: installed samba package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1806067/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1806067] [NEW] package samba 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.5 failed to install/upgrade: installed samba package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: I was able to partially mitigate the bug by replacing smb.conf with the pre-upgrade version. That allowed access to drives and printers from a Windows 7 computer, but did not help with a file share attached from a fully patched Windows 10 computer. The Win 10 upgrade may be at fault for that, however. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: samba 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-39.42-generic 4.15.18 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-39-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.5 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Nov 27 09:20:07 2018 ErrorMessage: installed samba package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-11-23 (371 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20170801) Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.7, python3-minimal, 3.6.7-1~18.04 PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.15rc1, python-minimal, 2.7.15~rc1-1 RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.0.5ubuntu2.1 apt 1.6.6 SambaServerRegression: Yes SmbConfIncluded: Yes SmbLog: SourcePackage: samba TestparmExitCode: 0 Title: package samba 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.5 failed to install/upgrade: installed samba package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 UbuntuFailedConnect: Yes UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-09-12 (78 days ago) ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806067 Title: package samba 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.5 failed to install/upgrade: installed samba package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1806067/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1579580] Re: ureadahead reports relative path errors in journalctl output
ExecStart twice is what I meant (this is the way to replace the command from the base definition instead of adding another command to the list, see the systemd.unit man page for details.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579580 Title: ureadahead reports relative path errors in journalctl output To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ureadahead/+bug/1579580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1579580] Re: ureadahead reports relative path errors in journalctl output
No, ExecStart twice is correct. This is the way systemd overrides work; normally a value for a keyword adds to the list of values from the base .service definition. I don't want that, I want to replace it. The special ExecStart= with no value tells systemd to reset the base value to empty, then the second one starts a new list thus replacing the old command. (This is all explained in the systemd.unit man page.) I should tell you that I no longer use this workaround, since after a fair amount of working with and investigating ureadahead (I thought I might actually contribute a permanent fix) I decided that ureadahead is useless in my configuration, since I only reboot after a kernel update anyway, and ureadahead only can ever help on the second and subsequent boots of the same config (most any changes to /etc will cause ureadahead to rescan at the the next boot.) So I have just purged ureadahead on all my systems. On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 5:39 AM midenok <1579...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > > Why it contains ExecStart 2 times? > > [Service] > ExecStart= > ExecStart=/sbin/ureadahead -q > > Did you mean ExecStop? > > [Service] > ExecStop= > ExecStart=/sbin/ureadahead -q > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579580 > > Title: > ureadahead reports relative path errors in journalctl output > > Status in ureadahead package in Ubuntu: > Confirmed > > Bug description: > ureadahead reports relative path errors in my journalctl output. > > This is currently 4368 lines of useless annoyances in my logs. > > To see if you have this problem, run: journalctl -b | grep ureadahead > | grep relative | wc -l > > Thanks > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 > Package: ureadahead 0.100.0-19 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-22.39-generic 4.4.8 > Uname: Linux 4.4.0-22-generic x86_64 > NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zcommon znvpair zavl > ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2 > Architecture: amd64 > Date: Sun May 8 15:55:18 2016 > InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-04 (34 days ago) > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Beta amd64 > (20160325) > ProcEnviron: >TERM=linux >PATH=(custom, no user) >LANG=en_US.UTF-8 >SHELL=/bin/bash > SourcePackage: ureadahead > UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ureadahead/+bug/1579580/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579580 Title: ureadahead reports relative path errors in journalctl output To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ureadahead/+bug/1579580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786910] Re: Latest patch breaks command line 'restart all'
This is also affecting my company. We use monit on all boxes for process management and have had to pin on a downrev version. Do we know if the package maintainer knows that this is an issue? Can we get some confirmation of that? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786910 Title: Latest patch breaks command line 'restart all' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/monit/+bug/1786910/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1579580] Re: ureadahead reports relative path errors in journalctl output
Be aware the messages will come back next time you boot after upgrading a package that touches something in /etc, which will trigger another scan by ureadahead. Better is the workaround I gave back in #9, but really what I recommend is just purge ureadahead. ureadahead only ever can help the second (and subsequent) time one boots after updating the system, and these days I never reboot unless I have updated, since suspend works for desktops/laptops and who reboots servers if you don't have to? Rich On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 8:54 AM Anders Hall wrote: > > Thanks, workaround in #19 seem to have removed (thousands of) these > messages. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579580 > > Title: > ureadahead reports relative path errors in journalctl output > > Status in ureadahead package in Ubuntu: > Confirmed > > Bug description: > ureadahead reports relative path errors in my journalctl output. > > This is currently 4368 lines of useless annoyances in my logs. > > To see if you have this problem, run: journalctl -b | grep ureadahead > | grep relative | wc -l > > Thanks > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 > Package: ureadahead 0.100.0-19 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-22.39-generic 4.4.8 > Uname: Linux 4.4.0-22-generic x86_64 > NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zcommon znvpair zavl > ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2 > Architecture: amd64 > Date: Sun May 8 15:55:18 2016 > InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-04 (34 days ago) > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Beta amd64 > (20160325) > ProcEnviron: >TERM=linux >PATH=(custom, no user) >LANG=en_US.UTF-8 >SHELL=/bin/bash > SourcePackage: ureadahead > UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ureadahead/+bug/1579580/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579580 Title: ureadahead reports relative path errors in journalctl output To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ureadahead/+bug/1579580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1792938] Re: PHP 7.2.7 contains various security issues.
** Package changed: ubuntu => php-defaults (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1792938 Title: PHP 7.2.7 contains various security issues. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php-defaults/+bug/1792938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1587204] Re: Spams motd with "proxy ... looks invalid"
Similarly, I have set in apt.conf.d Acquire::https::Proxy "DIRECT"; (because apt-cacher-ng can't cache https) and I get proxy 'DIRECT' looks invalid The regexp definitely needs to be broadened. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1587204 Title: Spams motd with "proxy ... looks invalid" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1587204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1779401] [NEW] Cacti 1.1.38 fails to display graphs and acts erratically
Public bug reported: Cacti fails to show many graphs, and also has problems reindexing. The error given is: sizeof(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /usr/share/cacti/site/lib/utility.php on line 541 Fix is by patch: diff --git a/lib/utility.php b/tmp/utility.php index 6488d98..306e6e4 100644 --- a/lib/utility.php +++ b/tmp/utility.php @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ function push_out_data_input_method($data_input_id) { */ function poller_update_poller_cache_from_buffer($local_data_ids, &$poller_items) { /* set all fields present value to 0, to mark the outliers when we are all done */ - $ids = array(); + $ids = ''; if (sizeof($local_data_ids)) { $count = 0; foreach($local_data_ids as $id) { @@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ function poller_update_poller_cache_from_buffer($local_data_ids, &$poller_items) } /* remove stale records FROM the poller cache */ - if (sizeof($ids)) { + if (strlen($ids)) { db_execute("DELETE FROM poller_item WHERE present=0 AND local_data_id IN ($ids)"); } else { /* only handle explicitely given local_data_ids */ ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779401 Title: Cacti 1.1.38 fails to display graphs and acts erratically To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1779401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1776931] Re: ruby-rails 2:4.2.10 does not utilise PGSQL 10 sequence model
** Also affects: redmine (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - ruby-rails 2:4.2.10 does not utilise PGSQL 10 sequence model + ruby-rails 2:4.2.10 is not compatible with PostgreSQL 10 (sequence handling changed since 9.x) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1776931 Title: ruby-rails 2:4.2.10 is not compatible with PostgreSQL 10 (sequence handling changed since 9.x) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rails/+bug/1776931/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1776931] Re: ruby-rails 2:4.2.10 does not utilise PGSQL 10 sequence model
Cleaner details found at: https://help.heroku.com/WKJ027JH/rails-error- after-upgrading-to-postgres-10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1776931 Title: ruby-rails 2:4.2.10 does not utilise PGSQL 10 sequence model To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rails/+bug/1776931/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1776931] [NEW] ruby-rails 2:4.2.10 does not utilise PGSQL 10 sequence model
Public bug reported: >From PostgreSQL v10, the sequence object has altered, moving attributes such >as "increment_by" and "min_value" to the pg_sequences catalog, rather than >holding them in the sequence itself. The rails package on Ubuntu 18.04 does not seem to have caught up with this. The error was encountered using the community supported script to migrate Trac projects to Redmine. Error text given was: ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: PG::UndefinedColumn: ERROR: column "increment_by" does not exist LINE 1: ...sues_id_seq"', (SELECT COALESCE(MAX("id")+(SELECT increment_... ^ : SELECT setval('"public"."issues_id_seq"', (SELECT COALESCE(MAX("id")+(SELECT increment_by FROM "public"."issues_id_seq"), (SELECT min_value FROM "public"."issues_id_seq")) FROM "issues"), false) /usr/share/redmine/lib/tasks/migrate_from_trac.initial.rake:561:in `migrate' /usr/share/redmine/lib/tasks/migrate_from_trac.initial.rake:782:in `block (2 levels) in ' Caused by: PG::UndefinedColumn: ERROR: column "increment_by" does not exist LINE 1: ...sues_id_seq"', (SELECT COALESCE(MAX("id")+(SELECT increment_... ^ /usr/share/redmine/lib/tasks/migrate_from_trac.initial.rake:561:in `migrate' /usr/share/redmine/lib/tasks/migrate_from_trac.initial.rake:782:in `block (2 levels) in ' Tasks: TOP => redmine:migrate_from_trac ** Affects: rails (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: postgresql rails ruby -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1776931 Title: ruby-rails 2:4.2.10 does not utilise PGSQL 10 sequence model To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rails/+bug/1776931/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 571356] Re: gdbtui shows "dl-debug.c:77: No such file or directory."
STILL not fixed. 4.4.0-124-generic #148~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu May 3 07:26:53 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux GNU gdb (Ubuntu 7.7.1-0ubuntu5~14.04.3) 7.7.1 any c program compiled with -g and then gdb -tui program set a breakpoint run multiple dl-debug.c:74: No such file or directory. will be produced. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571356 Title: gdbtui shows "dl-debug.c:77: No such file or directory." To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/+bug/571356/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1666166] Re: openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.15-1ubuntu1: openafs kernel module failed to build
The ppa:openafs/stable workaround restored AFS client service to my machine (which had been lost after I switched to the HWE kernel in early January 2018). Currently running openafs-client 1.6.22-3~ppa0~ubuntu16.04.1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1666166 Title: openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.15-1ubuntu1: openafs kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1666166/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1744946] Re: Special characters change the width of trailing/leading space character in Gedit (and medit)
I filed a bug report with GNOME: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792832 I added the link to: Also affects project. ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #792832 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792832 ** Also affects: gedit via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792832 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744946 Title: Special characters change the width of trailing/leading space character in Gedit (and medit) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gedit/+bug/1744946/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1744946] Re: Special characters change the width of trailing/leading space character in Gedit (and medit)
** Description changed: If I paste a special character - say from the Character Map - into Gedit or medit in Ubuntu 16.04 into the middle of a line, then the space characters directly after the special character display with a - "compressed" character spacing/display until the behaviour is - "interrupted" by a standard text character. + "compressed" character spacing until the behaviour is "interrupted" by a + standard text character. So the basic problem result is that the uniform monospacing of characters gets out of alignment on lines above and below the lines with the special character problem. I posted a detailed question on AskUbuntu and the prevailing opinion was that I should log a bug report. Another user with different versions was easily able to reproduce the same issue . https://askubuntu.com/questions/986258/why-do-special-characters-change- spacing-following-space-character-in-gedit-or-m Please see that post for full details, worked example, and screenshots. Additional comments: * As stated above: - running Ubuntu 16.04 * This affects: - Gedit 3.18.3 - medit 1.2.0 I am aware that it is thus not strictly a gedit issue, and probably - affects multiple Gnome editor under multiple Linux variants but Gedit is - my favourite text editor and Ubuntu is my favourite Linux so I thought I - would start here. + affects multiple Gnome editors under multiple Linux variants - but Gedit + is my favourite text editor and Ubuntu is my favourite Linux so I + thought I would start here. $ lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS Release: 16.04 $ apt-cache policy gedit gedit: - Installed: 3.18.3-0ubuntu4 - Candidate: 3.18.3-0ubuntu4 - Version table: - *** 3.18.3-0ubuntu4 500 - 500 http://za.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages - 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status + Installed: 3.18.3-0ubuntu4 + Candidate: 3.18.3-0ubuntu4 + Version table: + *** 3.18.3-0ubuntu4 500 + 500 http://za.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages + 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ apt-cache policy medit medit: - Installed: 1.2.0-2 - Candidate: 1.2.0-2 - Version table: - *** 1.2.0-2 500 - 500 http://za.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe amd64 Packages - 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status + Installed: 1.2.0-2 + Candidate: 1.2.0-2 + Version table: + *** 1.2.0-2 500 + 500 http://za.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe amd64 Packages + 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744946 Title: Special characters change the width of trailing/leading space character in Gedit (and medit) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1744946/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1744946] Re: Special characters change the width of trailing/leading space character in Gedit (and medit)
** Tags added: ui -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744946 Title: Special characters change the width of trailing/leading space character in Gedit (and medit) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1744946/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1744946] [NEW] Special characters change the width of trailing/leading space character in Gedit (and medit)
Public bug reported: If I paste a special character - say from the Character Map - into Gedit or medit in Ubuntu 16.04 into the middle of a line, then the space characters directly after the special character display with a "compressed" character spacing/display until the behaviour is "interrupted" by a standard text character. So the basic problem result is that the uniform monospacing of characters gets out of alignment on lines above and below the lines with the special character problem. I posted a detailed question on AskUbuntu and the prevailing opinion was that I should log a bug report. Another user with different versions was easily able to reproduce the same issue . https://askubuntu.com/questions/986258/why-do-special-characters-change- spacing-following-space-character-in-gedit-or-m Please see that post for full details, worked example, and screenshots. Additional comments: * As stated above: - running Ubuntu 16.04 * This affects: - Gedit 3.18.3 - medit 1.2.0 I am aware that it is thus not strictly a gedit issue, and probably affects multiple Gnome editor under multiple Linux variants but Gedit is my favourite text editor and Ubuntu is my favourite Linux so I thought I would start here. $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS Release:16.04 $ apt-cache policy gedit gedit: Installed: 3.18.3-0ubuntu4 Candidate: 3.18.3-0ubuntu4 Version table: *** 3.18.3-0ubuntu4 500 500 http://za.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ apt-cache policy medit medit: Installed: 1.2.0-2 Candidate: 1.2.0-2 Version table: *** 1.2.0-2 500 500 http://za.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: gedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744946 Title: Special characters change the width of trailing/leading space character in Gedit (and medit) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1744946/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1739878] [NEW] package network-manager-config-connectivity-hostname 1.8.4-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1736838 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1736838 Public bug reported: I am using a Hyper-V virtual machine on Windows 10 Pro (1709 build 16299.125), and have received the error in the summary following the first update after install. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: network-manager-config-connectivity-ubuntu 1.8.4-1ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-generic 4.13.4 Uname: Linux 4.13.0-16-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Dec 23 21:40:50 2017 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-12-23 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Release amd64 (20171017.1) IpRoute: default via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0 proto dhcp src 192.168.1.163 metric 100 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.163 192.168.1.1 dev eth0 proto dhcp scope link src 192.168.1.163 metric 100 IwConfig: lono wireless extensions. eth0 no wireless extensions. PackageArchitecture: all PciNetwork: Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.3, python3-minimal, 3.6.3-0ubuntu2 PythonDetails: /root/Error: command ['which', 'python'] failed with exit code 1:, Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: "/root/Error: command ['which', 'python'] failed with exit code 1:": "/root/Error: command ['which', 'python'] failed with exit code 1:", unpackaged RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.18.24ubuntu1 apt 1.5.1 RfKill: SourcePackage: network-manager Title: package network-manager-config-connectivity-hostname 1.8.4-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) nmcli-con: NAME UUID TYPE TIMESTAMP TIMESTAMP-REAL AUTOCONNECT AUTOCONNECT-PRIORITY READONLY DBUS-PATH ACTIVE DEVICE STATE ACTIVE-PATH SLAVE nmcli-dev: DEVICE TYPE STATE DBUS-PATH CONNECTION CON-UUID CON-PATH eth0ethernet unmanaged /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/2 -- ---- lo loopback unmanaged /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/1 -- ---- nmcli-nm: RUNNING VERSION STATE STARTUP CONNECTIVITY NETWORKING WIFI-HW WIFI WWAN-HW WWAN running 1.8.4disconnected started unknown enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package artful -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1739878 Title: package network-manager-config-connectivity-hostname 1.8.4-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1739878/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 536766] Re: Personal file sharing preferences dialog does not offer to install needed packages
:-O! It only took eight years, but we did it folks! Hooray! R On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Jeremy Bichawrote: > This is finally "fixed" in Ubuntu 18.04 Alpha by having gnome-user-share > depend on the packages it needs. The depends are not a fully functional > Apache install but just an Apache binary and a WebDav server. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a > duplicate bug report (645391). > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536766 > > Title: > Personal file sharing preferences dialog does not offer to install > needed packages > > Status in Ayatana Design: > Fix Committed > Status in gnome-user-share package in Ubuntu: > Fix Released > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: nautilus > > What happens -> I open the Personal file sharing preferences dialog via > system-preferences or via nautilus, and Im told that the network sharing > feature can not be enabled because the required packages are not on your pc. > I, as a tech user, went to synaptic, found the package, looked for its > recommends and got the functionality. > A normal user wont be able to do so, and so a button to install those > packages is needed for usabilty's sake. > > -- > > Desired resolution: > > - Change the "Sharing Options" text in them Nautilus right click folder > menu to "Local network share" > - Change the 'Share' tab title text in the Nautilus 'Properties' window > to "Local network share" > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/536766/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536766 Title: Personal file sharing preferences dialog does not offer to install needed packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/536766/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1733260] [NEW] package linux-image-4.4.0-98-generic 4.4.0-98.121~14.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: package linux-image-4.4.0-98-generic is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current s
Public bug reported: I have had problems sent i tried bilbop. I can.t reset any of BILIBOPS PERMISSIONS SENT I TRIED IT. I HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO GET INSTRUCTIONS AS TO HOW USE IT . I WANT HELP OR LEST OUT LAW THE SOFT WARE ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: linux-image-4.4.0-98-generic 4.4.0-98.121~14.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-135.184-generic 3.13.11-ckt39 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-135-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.27 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Nov 19 20:41:28 2017 DuplicateSignature: package:linux-image-4.4.0-98-generic:4.4.0-98.121~14.04.1:package linux-image-4.4.0-98-generic is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') ErrorMessage: package linux-image-4.4.0-98-generic is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-11-05 (14 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20160803) RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.17.5ubuntu5.7 apt 1.0.1ubuntu2.17 SourcePackage: linux-lts-xenial Title: package linux-image-4.4.0-98-generic 4.4.0-98.121~14.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: package linux-image-4.4.0-98-generic is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2017-11-20 (0 days ago) ** Affects: linux-lts-xenial (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1733260 Title: package linux-image-4.4.0-98-generic 4.4.0-98.121~14.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: package linux-image-4.4.0-98-generic is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-xenial/+bug/1733260/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1065400] Re: Support for loading Broadcom bluetooth firmware
no secure boot. the lenovo t530 is configured for UEFI booting and it works fine. i dont use unity I hate it. I have always used gnome classic (3). before the attempt to fix the bluetooth yesterday the bluetooth menu from the wifi icon on the upper right task bar on Ubuntu 14 gnome 3 at least showed bluetooth. i could also start the applications->systems settings-> bluetooth and get the gnome app and it would at least say there were previous pairing listed on the left (even tho they would not allow data to be exchanged). now in that left list it just says "bluetooth is disabled". I go thru the usual rfkill stuff and all seems OK. the "new driver from github" reports it is good now in dmesg. but I cant find any way to "enable" any ideas? thanks rich On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Cruz Fernandez <cruz.fernan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Another one, do you have Secure Boot enabled? > > Le ven. 5 mai 2017 à 18:55, Cruz Fernandez <cruz.fernan...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > Have you tried to use Unity instead of Gnome? > > Le ven. 5 mai 2017 à 18:49, rich painter <paintere...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > >> I did this morning. unfortunately some strange side effect has > completely > >> disabled the bluetooth. I dont even see the Ubuntu bluetooth item on the > >> wifi drop down menu at the upper right on the Gnome desktop. I have > tried > >> everything to "enable" bluetooth but to no avail. > >> > >> it seems the problem is now worse. > >> > >> any ideas? > >> > >> thanks > >> rich > >> > >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Cruz Fernandez < > cruz.fernan...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > @painterengr have you tried to download the file from somewhere else? > >> > https://github.com/winterheart/broadcom-bt-firmware/blob/master/brcm/ > >> > BCM20702A1-0a5c-21e6.hcd > >> > > >> > Hope this is not infringing any legal issues > >> > > >> > Le ven. 5 mai 2017 à 04:49, Jesse Sung <1065...@bugs.launchpad.net> a > >> > écrit : > >> > > >> > > @painterengr, sorry #165 is not a reply to your comment. It's just > >> > > another related bug for lp:1065400 and I added it here for record. > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the > >> bug > >> > > report. > >> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065400 > >> > > > >> > > Title: > >> > > Support for loading Broadcom bluetooth firmware > >> > > > >> > > Status in linux package in Ubuntu: > >> > > Fix Released > >> > > Status in linux source package in Precise: > >> > > Fix Released > >> > > Status in linux source package in Quantal: > >> > > Fix Released > >> > > Status in linux source package in Raring: > >> > > Fix Released > >> > > Status in linux source package in Saucy: > >> > > Fix Released > >> > > Status in linux source package in Trusty: > >> > > Confirmed > >> > > > >> > > Bug description: > >> > > Broadcom bluetooth chips require a tool called patchram uploader > [1] > >> > > to load firmware. This applies to at least BCM20702 and BCM43142. > >> > > Although some of the devices have an OTPROM that contains required > >> > > firmware, but it is found that these devices would not have > HFP/HSP > >> > > support unless a upgraded firmware is loaded via patchram > uploader. > >> > > > >> > > This tool requires hci device to do the firmware loading, but this > >> may > >> > > cause some race condition between patchram tool and bluetoothd or > >> > > something that also works on hci interface. > >> > > > >> > > Also it needs some hooks to make firmware loads after bootup, s3, > >> s4, > >> > > rfkill, and device hotplug events. Implement this loader in kernel > >> > > module would make things more easier. > >> > > > >> > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth=132039175324993=2 > >> > > > >> > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > >> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/ > >> > 1065400/+subscript
Re: [Bug 1065400] Re: Support for loading Broadcom bluetooth firmware
I did this morning. unfortunately some strange side effect has completely disabled the bluetooth. I dont even see the Ubuntu bluetooth item on the wifi drop down menu at the upper right on the Gnome desktop. I have tried everything to "enable" bluetooth but to no avail. it seems the problem is now worse. any ideas? thanks rich On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Cruz Fernandez <cruz.fernan...@gmail.com> wrote: > @painterengr have you tried to download the file from somewhere else? > https://github.com/winterheart/broadcom-bt-firmware/blob/master/brcm/ > BCM20702A1-0a5c-21e6.hcd > > Hope this is not infringing any legal issues > > Le ven. 5 mai 2017 à 04:49, Jesse Sung <1065...@bugs.launchpad.net> a > écrit : > > > @painterengr, sorry #165 is not a reply to your comment. It's just > > another related bug for lp:1065400 and I added it here for record. > > > > -- > > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > > report. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065400 > > > > Title: > > Support for loading Broadcom bluetooth firmware > > > > Status in linux package in Ubuntu: > > Fix Released > > Status in linux source package in Precise: > > Fix Released > > Status in linux source package in Quantal: > > Fix Released > > Status in linux source package in Raring: > > Fix Released > > Status in linux source package in Saucy: > > Fix Released > > Status in linux source package in Trusty: > > Confirmed > > > > Bug description: > > Broadcom bluetooth chips require a tool called patchram uploader [1] > > to load firmware. This applies to at least BCM20702 and BCM43142. > > Although some of the devices have an OTPROM that contains required > > firmware, but it is found that these devices would not have HFP/HSP > > support unless a upgraded firmware is loaded via patchram uploader. > > > > This tool requires hci device to do the firmware loading, but this may > > cause some race condition between patchram tool and bluetoothd or > > something that also works on hci interface. > > > > Also it needs some hooks to make firmware loads after bootup, s3, s4, > > rfkill, and device hotplug events. Implement this loader in kernel > > module would make things more easier. > > > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth=132039175324993=2 > > > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/ > 1065400/+subscriptions > > > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065400 > > Title: > Support for loading Broadcom bluetooth firmware > > Status in linux package in Ubuntu: > Fix Released > Status in linux source package in Precise: > Fix Released > Status in linux source package in Quantal: > Fix Released > Status in linux source package in Raring: > Fix Released > Status in linux source package in Saucy: > Fix Released > Status in linux source package in Trusty: > Confirmed > > Bug description: > Broadcom bluetooth chips require a tool called patchram uploader [1] > to load firmware. This applies to at least BCM20702 and BCM43142. > Although some of the devices have an OTPROM that contains required > firmware, but it is found that these devices would not have HFP/HSP > support unless a upgraded firmware is loaded via patchram uploader. > > This tool requires hci device to do the firmware loading, but this may > cause some race condition between patchram tool and bluetoothd or > something that also works on hci interface. > > Also it needs some hooks to make firmware loads after bootup, s3, s4, > rfkill, and device hotplug events. Implement this loader in kernel > module would make things more easier. > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth=132039175324993=2 > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/ > 1065400/+subscriptions > -- Richard A. Painter, P.E. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065400 Title: Support for loading Broadcom bluetooth firmware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1065400/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1065400] Re: Support for loading Broadcom bluetooth firmware
Unfortunately this is a linux system and not a windows system. The references to the procedures to "obtain the windows version file and convert it to linux" does not work and the links are no good. I don't understand your reply for a "413c" or "x/y/z". The chip the T530 has is 20702A1. I followed your link to 1166113 but could not find any link to a firmware file. How does this help us? I have filed a report with Lenovo forums here https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/Linux-Discussion/T530-Ubuntu-14-04-3-LTS- Broadcom-Bluetooth-BCM20702A1-doesn-t/td-p/3662951 but history has shown Lenovo has not been responsive... Thanks for trying but not any help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065400 Title: Support for loading Broadcom bluetooth firmware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1065400/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs