Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: qemu-kvm
If I can't access qemu proper anymore whats the use of having kqemu-*
still available? Many users don't have VT enabled processors - having
qemu proper and kqemu was a very good method of emulating hosts using
the very popular qemu system.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 498107 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498107
This bug is nothing like the duplicate you've assigned to it.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Dustin Kirkland
dustin.kirkl...@gmail.com wrote:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 498107 ***
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: qemu-kvm
If I can't access qemu proper anymore whats the use of having kqemu-*
still available? Many users don't have VT enabled processors - having
qemu proper and kqemu was a very good method of emulating hosts using
the very popular qemu system.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 498107 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498107
This bug is nothing like the duplicate you've assigned to it.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Dustin Kirkland
dustin.kirkl...@gmail.com wrote:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 498107 ***
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=lucidkeywords=vz
No packages still
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Jeremy Foshee
jeremy.fos...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi whardier,
This bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in
it recently. We were wondering if this is still
Same here.. and it appears some of the postinst/postrm for zabbix-agent
packages relies on /var/run/zabbix-server as well.
Issues:
debian/zabbix-agent.init:DIR=/var/run/zabbix-server
debian/zabbix-agent.postinst:--home /var/run/zabbix-server/
--no-create-home \
--
zabbix-agent
I submished a patch for this on the debian side of things.. but i'd love
to see an official version based on the openssh tarballs and it's own
package full fledged packages.
Josh Ellis wrote:
Ditto. It's got my vote - this is the number one thing on my wishlist!
--
openssh: want hpn-ssh for
I submished a patch for this on the debian side of things.. but i'd love
to see an official version based on the openssh tarballs and it's own
package full fledged packages.
Josh Ellis wrote:
Ditto. It's got my vote - this is the number one thing on my wishlist!
--
openssh: want hpn-ssh for
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: flashybrid
I've had a bugger of a time dealing with /var/run/network/initialized
and all associated state files with the newer ifupdown functions.
/var/run/network/* is accessed quite a bit in init.d/* and rcS.d/*
For some reason /var/run/network is
Public bug reported:
Is there a status or mailing list reference anywhere as to why this
package is not supported under Intrepid?
** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
OpenVZ pre-compiled packages not available in Intrepid?
What are the differences between the debian sid 1.0 version and this
one?
Scott Kitterman wrote:
No, it's debdiff from the current Debian revision.
.. Original Message ...
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 05:15:15 - Eddy Mulyono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@Scott:
Are you close to a final
Is this targetted toward intrepid as well as hardy-backports? I know
libjs-jquery is becoming somewhat of a dependency for django developers
and it may need to hit hardy-backports if Django 1.0.1 will find a home
there as well. I know libjs-jscript depends on javascript-common and
there is some
1.0-1 was released to sid.. It's bandwagon time!
http://packages.debian.org/sid/python-django
--
python-django FFe for 1.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264191
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
I am, probably along with others, concerned with what happens to 0.96
code that has completely depreciated in 1.0. Don't get me wrong, I want
1.0 to be in hardy-backports. Can we make python-django-0.96 and
python-django-1.0 packages with a python-django meta-package pointing to
the latest? I'd
Asciidoc 8.2.7 is in Sid.. It has a version of a2x that uses dblatex by
default. Go get it tiger! Can we get Asciidoc 8.2.7 into
intrepid/hardy?
--
a2x depends on fop.sh
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72297
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Sigh.. I was assuming the changelog link on the packages website pointed
to the most recent changelog. Instead I was looking at an older
changelog that didn't contain that message.
It stinks that it's gone from upstream.. Time to salmon up and see whats
going on @ debian.
Mathias Gug wrote:
I compiled it, it segfaulted a lot.. probably a reason it's abandoned...
Now I just need somebody to swig up python-smbclient :)
Shane
Mathias Gug wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 04:17:15PM -, whardier wrote:
It stinks that it's gone from upstream.. Time to salmon up and see whats
going
Sigh.. I was assuming the changelog link on the packages website pointed
to the most recent changelog. Instead I was looking at an older
changelog that didn't contain that message.
It stinks that it's gone from upstream.. Time to salmon up and see whats
going on @ debian.
Mathias Gug wrote:
I compiled it, it segfaulted a lot.. probably a reason it's abandoned...
Now I just need somebody to swig up python-smbclient :)
Shane
Mathias Gug wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 04:17:15PM -, whardier wrote:
It stinks that it's gone from upstream.. Time to salmon up and see whats
going
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
Where did packages for python-samba go?
** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
python-samba - where did it go?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249273
You received this bug notification because you are a
I use the compbrain PPA for these kernels. I left the Compbrain PPA
kernels for 2.6.24-18 dist kernels and discovered this bug. This of
course stops the network up/down scripts from functioning properly as
well.
Sample Error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# cp /etc/hosts /etc/hosts2
cp: skipping
I'm wondering if newer versions of synergy don't sanitize the data it
transmits and recieves very well. I'd venture to guess it's either
expecting data that no longer exists or popping bad data into use. This
is pretty common with any server/client that isn't very strict with how
data is
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: cdebootstrap
need to add
Suite: hardy
Config: generic-ubuntu
Keyring: ubuntu-archive-keyring.gpg
to the end of /usr/share/cdebootstrap/suites
Works fine with -f minimal
** Affects: cdebootstrap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
I experience this as well, this bug is screwing with my ability to use a
stock hardy install as a firewall/gateway with QoS.
--
tc crashed with SIGSEGV in prio_print_opt()won
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200479
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: partman-auto
With Hardy Alpha 6 Alternate Installer:
I don't believe this is a partman-auto-lvm issue since it has to deal
with general rationing of partitions. I'd think that would be handled
by a more generic function.
Root partition super tiny when
** Attachment added: Hardy/Sid HPN-SSH Patch (kitchen sink)
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11994600/openssh-4.7p1-hpn13v1-hardy.diff.gz
--
Create new packages for (HPN-SSH) Multi Threaded SSH
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192208
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Public bug reported:
Based on the work here: http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/
I've created a sample patch - however it may be better to include these
patches from the ala-carte patches and place in debian/patches
Works well, I really enjoy having access to the None cipher, and
Daniel,
Whats worth waiting for? 0.4.8 in sid is quite stable and contains most
of the patches applied to 0.4.9. The differences between 0.4.3 and
0.4.8 are immense and quite valuable! Near as I can tell pretty
backwards compatible too.
Please push 0.4.8 into Hardy if possible.
--
[UFVe]
This of course includes a request for librsync right? The package
builds both I presume.
--
[UFVe] Please sync duplicity from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
err, nevermind. I thought for some reason librsync meant python-rsync
which doesn't even exist. I'm insane after all.
--
[UFVe] Please sync duplicity from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Please sync to new lenny/sid packages. 0.4.8 ads a very vital mode
called 'remove-all-but-n-full' as well as a backup option called
'--full-if-older-than'.. These changes make writing a daily backup
script incredibly easy, and can insure that all incremental backups are
always *after* a full
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: zoneminder
Unless zoneminder specifically uses features only available in apache2,
please remove libapache2-mod-php* dependencies. If you require a
webserver to be used, please use the httpd meta-package. This could be
complicated for this package,
if irqpoll doesn't work for others, turn back on the RAID in your bios.
and set up your disks as not in an array. This worked for me.
--
[feisty] boot stalls on starting kernel event manager
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81164
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I too of course have issues with this in edgy only. I was hoping for a
patch at some point, or even a method of editing the keyring manually.
I copied a feisty keyring to an edgy keyring, that worked fine as well.
--
smb password not being saved in gnome keyring
Enabling SATA Raid in the bios allowed the adaptac bios to offer the
right configuration to the kernel. new lsmod and dmesg in the
attachement.
I now have sda/sdb vs broken/broken.
** Attachment added: dmesg/lsmod/lshw
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6580369/bug2.txt
--
Unusual Boot
I am having the same issue. I am attaching lshw/lsmod/dmesg reports.
The lshw is from edgy.
This is a Dell Precision 670 with a defaulted bios (Rev A07) and
hyperthreading turned on. No SATA raid enabled in bios.
For some reason it is trying to probe each SATA port as PATA with a
master and
36 matches
Mail list logo
