** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
Title:
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
To manage notifications abo
** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Mandriva)
Importance: Unknown => Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
Title:
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
For me, Flash Player sometimes displays a grey box on YouTube, but the
sound is still playing. And often after about 4 seconds of the video, it
restarts it and then just works fine. Weird.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
Found a hint in the fedoraforums. Basically saying that this could be
related because of other video plugins interference.
http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=174927&highlight=npviewer&page=3
In combination with the installation instructions for the native 64bit
flash player of
While listening music on Deezer, firefox becomes unstable after a lot of
time (more than 30 minutes), it becomes slow, then the display freezes,
my screen is full of white / grey. And after a few seconds, the PC
reboots !
I'm using Ubuntu 10.04
Extract of my /var/log/messages :
...
Apr 19 11:19:
mån 2010-04-19 klockan 15:40 + skrev Miro Hadzhiev (Хаджиев):
> > Right, a flash-64 package in the repos isn't going to hurt anyone.
> > No one is speaking about making it the default.
+1
--
Niklas Herder | her...@dsv.su.se | +46(0)8-161438
Department of Computer and Systems Sciences
Stockh
> Right, a flash-64 package in the repos isn't going to hurt anyone.
> No one is speaking about making it the default.
+1
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
Right, a flash-64 package in the repos isn't going to hurt anyone. No
one is speaking about making it the default.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Alas, since I live outside the US, Hulu works perfectly well at
telling me that I can't watch it, so I couldn't confirm that. Maybe I
will in the future.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010, Simon Ruggier wrote:
> I think they should both be in there, so people can choose for
> themselves what sort of problems they want to experience. I've never
> seen any video websites that don't work with the 64-bit plugin, and no
> matter what package is in the repositories, y
I think they should both be in there, so people can choose for
themselves what sort of problems they want to experience. I've never
seen any video websites that don't work with the 64-bit plugin, and no
matter what package is in the repositories, you're not being forced to
run anything.
--
npview
Back to +2 after my -1 for flash 64 in the repos. We would be better off
to have no flash than force an Alpha on AMD64 users. The need for any
plug-in unnecessary soon. Adobe is talking with Google about complete
integration into Chrome. So this bug discussion could be renedered moot
in the near fu
** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
sandy what are you goign to do on pages that do have flash?
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Sandy Harris
wrote:
> Just updated Xubuntu 9.10 to 10.04 beta. Only things running are a few
> terminals, Pidgin & Firefox with many tabs. Plenty of RAM, 4 gigs. No
> flash on page I was browsing. This di
Just updated Xubuntu 9.10 to 10.04 beta. Only things running are a few
terminals, Pidgin & Firefox with many tabs. Plenty of RAM, 4 gigs. No
flash on page I was browsing. This did not take Firefox down.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this
I have deb package of 64bit flash in my ppa:
https://launchpad.net/~pali.rohar/+archive/ppa
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
+3 for flash-64 in the repos.
2010/3/28 eagles051387 :
> +2 for flash-64 in the repos.
>
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:41 PM, giorgio130 wrote:
>
>> +1 for the "flash-64" package in the repos.
>>
>> --
>> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
>> You received t
+2 for flash-64 in the repos.
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:41 PM, giorgio130 wrote:
> +1 for the "flash-64" package in the repos.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bu
+1 for the "flash-64" package in the repos.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lis
This bug applies to nspluginwrapper under Google Chrome too.
I also second using the 64-bit alpha over the 32-bit wrapped version!
More stable, better performance etc.
At least make it available in the repo's as an option! Like with the wine beta
that co-existed with the production one.
--
npvie
64bit flash is not the only problem there are still closed-source codecs
out there that only exist in a 32 bit form.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:35 PM, gushi wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
>> The fix is to move directly to the 64 bit version, and stop worrying
>> about nspluginwrapper. How did a 32-bit stopgap become the only and
>> blessed solution?
>
> No official non-alpha-quality x64 b
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> The fix is to move directly to the 64 bit version, and stop worrying
> about nspluginwrapper. How did a 32-bit stopgap become the only and
> blessed solution?
No official non-alpha-quality x64 bit version from the upstream vendor,
maybe? And yes, w
The fix is to move directly to the 64 bit version, and stop worrying
about nspluginwrapper. How did a 32-bit stopgap become the only and
blessed solution?
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:26 AM, perpetualrabbit
wrote:
> That's not a fix. That is called a workaround.
This is true, but it's a very acceptable workaround. If you have no
philosophical misgivings about running Adobe Flash, this really is the
way to do it on 64-bit systems.
--
npviewer.bin cra
That's not a fix. That is called a workaround.
The fact is, there are still multiple bug in this 32-in-64 wrapper
thing. Because of the severe problems people were having with this,
choking up their linux workstations, I banned it from the network
altogether. I needed it for acroreader and flash. T
This bug is fixed for me, too, with the new 64bit beta 3 flashplugin
from adobe.com (http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html).
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
Are bug 178038 and bug 141613 dupes?
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubun
thank you...works well, doesn't it?
--- On Fri, 2/19/10, iMac wrote:
From: iMac
Subject: [Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
To: nussmaus...@yahoo.com
Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 7:25 AM
This flash npviewer issue has been bugging me for ages (even moreso
since K
This flash npviewer issue has been bugging me for ages (even moreso
since Karmic). It seems the latest 64bit Flash PPA resolves my issues
(for a few days now), avoiding the wrapper completely, and providing
stability on repeated YouTubing (where I easily tripped on this). I
expect similar results
** Attachment removed: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9446705/CoreDump.gz
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai
Mark according to your description you could also be encountering this
well-known bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-
nonfree/+bug/410407.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
: mark
Subject: [Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
To: nussmaus...@yahoo.com
Date: Thursday, November 5, 2009, 2:02 PM
Not sure if this is related- in addition to the npviewer.bin crashed
with SIGSEGV, I have this phenotype: ever since Karmic upgrade I cannot
view any flash videos in
Not sure if this is related- in addition to the npviewer.bin crashed
with SIGSEGV, I have this phenotype: ever since Karmic upgrade I cannot
view any flash videos in firefox at all ever, specifically: The first
frame with the big arrow in the middle of it comes on, the play/pause in
the bottom le
any fixez in sight?
--- On Sun, 11/1/09, matism wrote:
From: matism
Subject: Re: [Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
To: nussmaus...@yahoo.com
Date: Sunday, November 1, 2009, 12:37 PM
I clearly made a mistake in reporting this
problem and subscribing. How does one unsubscribe
I clearly made a mistake in reporting this
problem and subscribing. How does one unsubscribe?
--Mark Matis
At 08:25 PM 11/1/2009 +, Vortex wrote:
>This sounds like the error I got, except I just upgraded from Ubuntu
>AMD64 9.04 to 9.10. Sorry, I don't know where to find the log file for
>t
This sounds like the error I got, except I just upgraded from Ubuntu
AMD64 9.04 to 9.10. Sorry, I don't know where to find the log file for
this to post here...
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I add 64 bit version of adobe flash plugin to my ppa
https://launchpad.net/~pali.rohar/+archive/ppa
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bu
** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jason Smith (jassmith) => (unassigned)
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
I am running the 64bit Karmic Beta on an Intel i5.
This message appears almost randomly every few hours.
Happy to supply further information if requested.
MG
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jason Smith (jassmith)
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
OK, I got it. I was just curious. Then that's probably something else. I
hope you can find what uses the npviewer and replace with the 64 bit version
of it if available.
Regards,
Kevin
2009/10/9 krutoileshii
> that's the message that gets reported. i don't use the 32 bit flash for
> sure. maybe
that's the message that gets reported. i don't use the 32 bit flash for
sure. maybe some other plugin that uses it
2009/10/8 Blade II
> Hello, krutoileshii
>
> I'm sorry but I don't get what you mean by the same problem. The 64 bit
> flash player does not use npviewer. How can you possibly have
Hello, krutoileshii
I'm sorry but I don't get what you mean by the same problem. The 64 bit
flash player does not use npviewer. How can you possibly have "npviewer.bin
crashed with SIGSEGV" problem with the 64 bit one?
Are you sure you removed the 32 bit flash player before installing the 64
bit o
Already have that. still the same problem
2009/10/5 Blade II
> Installing 64 bit flash and GPU acceleration.
>
> http://blog.lckymn.com/2009/06/07/installing-64bit-flash-player-in-ubuntu-linux/
>
> As far as I know, the alpha version of 64 bit flash has been available
> for almost one year (or l
Installing 64 bit flash and GPU acceleration.
http://blog.lckymn.com/2009/06/07/installing-64bit-flash-player-in-ubuntu-linux/
As far as I know, the alpha version of 64 bit flash has been available
for almost one year (or longer than one year), but Adobe hasn't released
any GA version yet. Anyway,
** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Confirmed
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
I agree with vnieto. Simon's route is fine too. I installed the native
amd64 flashplugin and had minor hiccups. Removing nspluginwrapper fixed
any residual issues for me.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:32 PM, vnieto wrote:
> The only way to sove it is install the native 64 bit flash
The cleanest way to do this is to use Debian's flashplugin-nonfree
package:
http://packages.debian.org/testing/flashplugin-nonfree
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.laun
http://queleimporta.com/en/finally-adobe-releases-native-64-bit-flash-10
-for-linux/
The only way to sove it is install the native 64 bit flash
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I get this every now and then too. I'm running 64 bit karmic (upgraded
from jaunty). It never takes firefox out, and the flash element in
firefox always stays fine too.
It doesn't really bug me, but this error message popping up occasionally
does kinda get annoying.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with
** Description changed:
LATEST VERSION TESTED:
nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling
me that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I
didn't even notice fir
Hello,
I've just update to Karmic, 64 bit, and I confirm the crash, and no
sound and few crash using Youtube, but I realised:
- before upgrading, I had installed the adobe 64 bits beta plugin 10,0,22,87
manually and it worked, without npviewer
- so, I removed the flash paquet in Synaptic : A err
Same bug as all here.
I've uploaded the logfile from
sudo valgrind --trace-children=yes --log-file=valgrind.txt
--tool=memcheck /usr/bin/firefox
// Ubuntu 9.04 x64 BETA
** Attachment added: "valgrind.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25171963/valgrind.txt
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSE
** Description changed:
LATEST VERSION TESTED:
nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
Hum, I can't add much information here. I got an apport window telling
me that npviewer.bin segfaulted. It didn't take firefox with it so I
didn't even notice fir
The system is updated to 180.44 and yet I still have no sound in Flash
and the error message comes up almost regularly. Sounds works everywhere
else but in online flash animations.
Firefox 3.08
AMD 64 9.04
S3 Unichrom Pro Igp
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Belay my last message, a bit too hasty I'm afraid. My system has just
hung running 180.44. Required hardware restart to escape.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
180.44 now in Jaunty repository (may be in others) and it runs fine. I
have stable flash playing with 180.44.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I'm running on Jaunty-amd64, and nvidia-glx-180 works without problems. All
installed from the main repository, not a specific mirror like cl.ubuntu.com
.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Vadim Peretokin wrote:
> I'm pretty sure 180.44 got uploaded to jaunty already. Try refreshing the
> package
I'm pretty sure 180.44 got uploaded to jaunty already. Try refreshing the
package list in synaptic and see if it's available (if not, switch to the
main ubuntu mirror)
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a
Thanks for the steer Noel. I wasn't aware that the official repo issue
was duff. This is what I have been running on:
b...@bob-desktop:~$ dpkg --list | grep nvidia
ii nvidia-173-modaliases 173.14.16-0ubuntu1
Modaliases for the NVIDIA binary
> If I run with nVidia accelerated graphics driver (version 180) FF
hangs completely as soon as flash media is started.
Which 180.___ --- the currently available one in the standard
repository, or the one that works (see Bug 348852)?
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7700
GPU: nVidia Corporation Q
Further insight:
If I run with nVidia accelerated graphics driver (version 180) FF hangs
completely as soon as flash media is started.
If I run with the standard vesa driver the system is very stable.
Repeatable at will.
nspluginwrapper and flashplugin-nonfree have been removed
libflashplayer.s
Hi Blake
Just to say I'm not running as root all the time in answer to your
enquiry...but I am very pleased to report that the 64-bit flash alpha
plugin has been working without fault for me.
I have removed nspluginwrapper and flashplugin-nonfree. However the last
thing I did to get up and runnin
Hi, Blake,
on 64 bit Ubuntu I have ONLY 64 bit Flash Player. There are no any
directories or mounted drives, where 32 bit version could have been found.
So, the problem is still open.
Best regars,
Alexander
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Blake Munro
wrote:
> If you are running the Adobe Al
I put it in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/, e.g.,
$ sudo find / -name "libflashplayer.so"
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so
where it lives as:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 9543400 2009-02-02 23:03
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so
rather than in a per-user plugins directory. And,
If you needed to move it to /root/.mozilla/plugins then you must be logging
into your system as root.
If you are any other user then you'd be using
/home/username/.mozilla/plugins for sure.
Not sure what is going on there but glad you got it working... I'm just a
little puzzled that you might be lo
Blake Munro said "The file needs to go in
/home/username/.mozilla/plugins"
I tried that and it didn't work. However I put libflashplayer.so into
root/.mozilla/plugins and it did work. I used 'sudo nautilus' to move
the libflashplayer.so from the Desktop to root/.mozilla/plugins. The
.mozilla fold
If you are running the Adobe Alpha 64 bit Flash Player then make sure you
have removed the 32bit flashplugin-nonfree package and or disabled the
plugin in Firefox, so that only the native 64 bit version is allowed to run.
It's a temorary workaround.
Blake
2009/3/31 torro
> Hi,
>
> I have Flash-
Hi,
I have Flash-Plugin 10.0.22 from 24.02.09. The Problem is still there.
Ubuntu 8.10 x64, Intel.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Vadim Peretokin
wrote:
> Try downloading the latest one (they released it feb 24th, while yours is
> feb 3)
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://b
Try downloading the latest one (they released it feb 24th, while yours is
feb 3)
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
>The file needs to go in /home/username/.mozilla/plugins
That's what the instructions say right enough but I just get a blank
window where the flash movie should be.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-plugins - File Browser.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24493326/Screenshot-plugins%20-%20Fi
... kernel: [ 1522.128178] npviewer.bin[7117]: segfault at 2000 ip
f69ac28d sp ffd05060 error 4 in
libflashplayer.so[f686e000+96d000]
Occurred on Kernel 2.6.27-11, x86_64.
Shockwave Flash 10.0 r22
File: /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
Size: 10131640
--
npvie
The file needs to go in /home/username/.mozilla/plugins
Note that the "plugins" directory does not exist by default. You need to
create it first before moving the plugin there.
Same goes for the new Sun Java 64 bit plugin, you can copy a .so file into
that same plugin folder to get access to the
I have removed all versions of Flash and downloaded the 64-bit
libflashplayer.so. It currently sits on my Desktop. Where should I put
it please?
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I can confirm that this is still a bug in the current build of Jaunty
beta 64-bit.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
Since the amd64 native alpha plugin from Adobe fix this bug, could
someone distribute a flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.22.87ubuntu1 package that
download the amd64 plugin from
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer10/libflashplayer-10.0.22.87.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz
and that does not depend o
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I can confirm that running the native (alpha version) of the Adobe Flash
plugin on an amd64 system makes this error go away. So by removing the
flashplugin-nonfree package and installing the Adobe 64bit alpha version
(with Firefox) I am no longer receiving this error.
Cheers
Blake Munro
2009/3/27
I have flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.22.87ubuntu1 installed on my 64-bit
jaunty and I get this npviewer.bin maybe once per two days. It's
absolutely not fixed.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
npviewer.bin used to crash frequently until I switched over to the 64
bit Flash 10 plugin (I've been using the alpha released on Feb 24). The
64 bit plugin hasn't segfaulted at all in over a month.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug n
Running Jaunty development 64bit.
Crash occured viewing Accuweather website Flash Video window.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
fresh install of jaunty alpha6, amd64, ext4. crash in firefox when
displaying a timesonline.com page with flash adverts.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
jaunty alpha6 amd64 (atom 330) and ext4, flash 10.0 r22 (don't know if
its 64bit version)
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Jaunty Alpha 4, PentiumD and ext4...
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubun
Same here... Also Jaunty Alpha 4, AMD64 and ext4...
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
htt
I'm not sure this is the same bug but I have a crash on Jaunty alpha 4
amd64 (ext4) when tried to open the downloaded with firefox pdf document
in Okular.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 22:50 +, Slug71 wrote:
> This crash is solved with the official 64bit Alpha of Adobe Flash.
How can this be fixed if Intrepid still uses the 32 bit wrapper
version?
Setting up nspluginwrapper (1.1.2-0ubuntu1) ...
Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (10.0.15.3ubuntu1~intrep
Just imagine how the anti-fanboys would go nuts though if Ubuntu shipped an
alpha of Flash - when they raised a hell of a storm after it shipped a beta
of Firefox ;)
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a me
This crash is solved with the official 64bit Alpha of Adobe Flash.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists
FWIW, I got 10.0.15.3ubuntu3 from jaunty and I just got another one of these
npviewer.bin crashes. My bug report here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/328551
However, in general Flash works _GREAT_ for me in jaunty compared to
intrepid though. I can play sound from
You dont quite understand me.
The latest release of flash doesnt support 64-bit, and the ubuntu repos will
reflect this.
If you remove the flash plugin and nsplugin wrapper through synaptic and
install the alpha version of 64 bit flash from adobe labs:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashpla
Dan that is not my experience on 64 bit 10.0.15.3, The 64bit revision
will still segfault. With the 64bit flash install, jaunty still gives
the user 32bit libs as per the changes Alexander Slack made.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bu
This crash is caused by flash.
If you install the 64-bit version of flash (very new and still in alpha
testing) this crash goes away.
You also need to remove nsplugginwrapper and the previous version of flash
otherwise it still loads and crashes even though you are using the 64-bit
version of fl
Confirming that the newish revision that hit the repos of the flash
plugin, 10.0.15.3 has sadly not fixed the crash.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
I have found in forosuse:
http://www.forosuse.org/forosuse/showthread.php?t=17529
a workaround for the cpu usage, in my case I'm running Intrepid amd64, and FF,
and npviewer was consuming 75% of CPU, after aplying the following:
$ sudo nspluginwrapper -v -a -u
The usage decreased to 4 %, incredibl
I have found in forosuse:
http://www.forosuse.org/forosuse/showthread.php?t=17529
a workaround for the cpu usage, in my case I'm running Intrepid amd64, and FF,
and npviewer was consuming 75% of CPU, after aplying the following:
$ sudo nspluginwrapper -v -a -u
The usage decreased to 4 %, incredibl
I have it as well in 9.04, EXT4 all patches applied at Alpha 3 stage
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lis
Confirming that it is the same bug from my post first on 2009-01-11.
Using Jaunty AMD64 Alpha-3 all updates applied. On Ext4 FS.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
1 - 100 of 275 matches
Mail list logo