[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2021-01-04 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 12.2.13-0ubuntu0.18.04.5~cloud0
---

 ceph (12.2.13-0ubuntu0.18.04.5~cloud0) xenial-queens; urgency=medium
 .
   * New update for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive.
 .
 ceph (12.2.13-0ubuntu0.18.04.5) bionic; urgency=medium
 .
   * d/p/rules: Enable RelWithDebInfo (LP: #1894453).


** Changed in: cloud-archive/queens
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-12-04 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Attachment added: "queens_out.after"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+attachment/5440914/+files/queens_out.after

** Tags removed: verification-queens-needed
** Tags added: verification-queens-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-12-04 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Tested queens-proposed following the same steps noted in #34. Like
others results previously, this shows better results as well. Attached
the test notes.

** Attachment added: "queens_out.beore"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+attachment/5440913/+files/queens_out.beore

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-12-04 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Tested queens-proposed following the same steps noted in #34. Like
others results previously, this shows better results as well. Attached
the test notes.

** Changed in: cloud-archive/queens
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel)

** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Bionic)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-19 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 13.2.9-0ubuntu0.19.04.1~cloud2
---

 ceph (13.2.9-0ubuntu0.19.04.1~cloud2) bionic-stein; urgency=medium
 .
   * d/p/rules: Enable RelWithDebInfo (LP: #1894453).


** Changed in: cloud-archive/stein
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-19 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 14.2.11-0ubuntu0.19.10.1~cloud4
---

 ceph (14.2.11-0ubuntu0.19.10.1~cloud4) bionic-train; urgency=medium
 .
   * d/p/rules: Enable RelWithDebInfo (LP: #1894453).


** Changed in: cloud-archive/train
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-19 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 15.2.5-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0
---

 ceph (15.2.5-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0) bionic-ussuri; urgency=medium
 .
   * New update for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive.
 .
 ceph (15.2.5-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) focal; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Corey Bryant ]
   * d/p/rules: Enable RelWithDebInfo (LP: #1894453).
 .
   [ James Page ]
   * New upstream point release (LP: #1898200).
 - d/p/fix-crash-in-committed-osd-maps.patch: Drop, included upstream.
 - d/libcephfs-dev.install: Drop ceph_statx.h.
 - d/libcephfs-dev.install: Add new header files.


** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 12.2.13-0ubuntu0.18.04.5

---
ceph (12.2.13-0ubuntu0.18.04.5) bionic; urgency=medium

  * d/p/rules: Enable RelWithDebInfo (LP: #1894453).

 -- Corey Bryant   Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:17:19
-0400

** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 15.2.5-0ubuntu0.20.04.1

---
ceph (15.2.5-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) focal; urgency=medium

  [ Corey Bryant ]
  * d/p/rules: Enable RelWithDebInfo (LP: #1894453).

  [ James Page ]
  * New upstream point release (LP: #1898200).
- d/p/fix-crash-in-committed-osd-maps.patch: Drop, included upstream.
- d/libcephfs-dev.install: Drop ceph_statx.h.
- d/libcephfs-dev.install: Add new header files.

 -- James Page   Mon, 02 Nov 2020 15:18:02 +

** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-17 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
James Page has done focal-proposed verification already (comment #43) -
with that, all tests are done and verified. Please let me know if you
have any questions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-17 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Re-run of the regression tests is OK for 12.2.13-0ubuntu0.18.04.5 [0].

Test results for 12.2.13-0ubuntu0.18.04.5 is good. Attached before &
after test results.

[0] https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#ceph

** Attachment added: "bionic_verification.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/train/+bug/1894453/+attachment/5435270/+files/bionic_verification.txt

** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-17 Thread James Page
I just tested focal-proposed - significant increase in iops and
throughput and massive reduction in latency.

** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-16 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Test results for Train.

** Attachment added: "train_verification.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+attachment/5434889/+files/train_verification.txt

** Tags removed: verification-train-needed
** Tags added: verification-train-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-16 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Changed in: cloud-archive/train
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-16 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Performed same as for Ussuri (comment #34) and attached results here.

** Attachment added: "Stein_verification.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+attachment/5434835/+files/Stein_verification.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-16 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
^^ The above is for Stein verification.

** Tags removed: verification-stein-needed
** Tags added: verification-stein-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-16 Thread James Page
verification of this fix on focal is currently blocking 15.2.5 release
into focal, and the release of the same update into the bionic/ussuri
UCA.

@pponnuvel - can you complete the verification work for focal-proposed
as well please?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-11 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Changed in: cloud-archive/stein
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-10 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
The smoke-lxc test failure (reported in comment #37) could be due to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1899180.

LP#1899180 suggests this could be treated as flaky. If it's easy, coud
try re-running the regression tests for 12.2.13-0ubuntu0.18.04.5 to see
if it's indeed a Heisenbug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-09 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Attachment added: "out__ussuri_after.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+attachment/5432709/+files/out__ussuri_after.txt

** Tags removed: verification-ussuri-needed
** Tags added: verification-ussuri-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-09 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
SRU tests are oood for ussuri (observed perf numbers are better). Did a
short rados benchmark and attached the results (before and after
upgrade).

The steps taken are:
- Upgrade the packages on monitor, and OSDs in order.
- Restart monitor, manager and OSDs in order.
- Repeat the same benchmark test.

Attached files have the output of the commands:
 - lsb_release -a
 - dpkg -l | grep ceph
 - ceph versions
 - ceph osd pool create scbench 128 128
 - rados bench -p scbench 10 write

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-09 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Attachment added: "out__ussuri_before.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+attachment/5432708/+files/out__ussuri_before.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-09 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-09 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Ponnuvel, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ceph into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/12.2.13-0ubuntu0.18.04.5 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-02 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Ponnuvel, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ceph into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/15.2.5-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-11-02 Thread Corey Bryant
I've uploaded this change to train-staging, stein-staging and the bionic
unapproved queue. Note, for these versions there is no change to armhf
as enabling RelWithDebInfo for armhf was leading to build timeouts.

** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Incomplete => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-10-30 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
- This is to consider/discuss the possibility of whether the Ceph packages 
(UCA) should be built with RelWithDebInfo build option (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE [0]) 
which can be supplied to the build script do_cmake.sh [1].
+ This is to build the Ceph packages (UCA) with 'RelWithDebInfo' build option 
(CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE [0]) which can be supplied to the build script do_cmake.sh 
[0]. 
  
- Currently, Upstream as well as UCA builds default to 'Debug' [0] builds.
- But is any reason why shouldn't go for RelWithDebInfo (i.e. "Release
- with Debug information")?
+ Currently, UCA builds default to 'Debug' [1] builds. The UCA's build process 
does debug build just for the rocksdb component - because the upstream builds 
(CMakeLists.txt) left it to individual projects using rocksdb. So UCA's build 
used the default (debug build). Upstream has since
+ updated this to do release build (with RelWithDebInfo option) [2].
  
- There's one issue noted with RelWithDebInfo which has a workaround, too
- [2].
- 
- In general, gcc's -O2 [3] build should generate better code as well as
- there's a specific case for Ceph [4] that it improves performance.
+ In general, gcc's -O2 [3] (which will be enabled by RelWithDebInfo)
+ build should generate better code as well as there's a specific case for
+ Ceph [4] that it improves performance.
  
  Building rocksdb with optimizations enabled improves the performance and
  rocksdb being an important part of OSD and MON components of Ceph, this
  enables better performance of Ceph cluster. Comments #17, #18, & #19
  show relevant test results.
  
- [0] https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/variable/CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE.html
+ [Test Case]
+ Standard ceph-backed OpenStack regression will be run, consisting of 
juju-deployed OpenStack+ceph and tempest regression testing against the 
deployment.
  
- [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/do_cmake.sh
+ [Regression Potential]
+ As Ponnuvel mentioned, the size of binaries will be slightly bigger and also 
the build/compilation will be longer.
  
- [2] https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/dev/perf/#common-issues
+ There are no upstream bugs for this. rocksdb is one of the submodules in
+ Ceph and how each of the submodule gets built is left to end-users. The
+ bug [5] where this change was done in upstream is not relevant directly;
+ this change was done as part of a different bug fix.
+ 
+ [0] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/do_cmake.sh
+ 
+ [1] https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/variable/CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE.html
+ 
+ [2] https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5916
  
  [3] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html
  
  [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733316
  
- [Test Case]
- Standard ceph-backed OpenStack regression will be run, consisting of 
juju-deployed OpenStack+ceph and tempest regression testing against the 
deployment.
- 
- [Regression Potential]
- As Ponnuvel mentioned, the size of binaries will be slightly bigger and also 
the build/compilation will be longer.
- There are no upstream bugs for this. rocksdb is one of the submodules in Ceph 
and how each of the submodule gets built is left to end-users.
+ [5] https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/2445

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-10-28 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Hi Brian,

I have updated the description. Does it help?

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:01 PM Brian Murray <1894...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> >From the bug description its not clear to me why this change should be
> SRU'ed to Focal or what the benefit to end users is. Could someone
> please elaborate on that? Thanks!
>
> ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Focal)
>Status: Triaged => Incomplete
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453
>
> Title:
>   Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo
>
> Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive:
>   Invalid
> Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive queens series:
>   Triaged
> Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive stein series:
>   Triaged
> Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive train series:
>   Triaged
> Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive ussuri series:
>   Triaged
> Status in ceph package in Ubuntu:
>   Fix Released
> Status in ceph source package in Bionic:
>   Triaged
> Status in ceph source package in Focal:
>   Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
>   [Impact]
>   This is to consider/discuss the possibility of whether the Ceph packages
> (UCA) should be built with RelWithDebInfo build option (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE
> [0]) which can be supplied to the build script do_cmake.sh [1].
>
>   Currently, Upstream as well as UCA builds default to 'Debug' [0]
>   builds. But is any reason why shouldn't go for RelWithDebInfo (i.e.
>   "Release with Debug information")?
>
>   There's one issue noted with RelWithDebInfo which has a workaround too
>   [2].
>
>   In general, gcc's -O2 [3] build should generate better code as well as
>   there's a specific case for Ceph [4] that it improves performance.
>
>   [0] https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/variable/CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE.html
>
>   [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/do_cmake.sh
>
>   [2] https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/dev/perf/#common-issues
>
>   [3] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html
>
>   [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733316
>
>   [Test Case]
>   Standard ceph-backed OpenStack regression will be run, consisting of
> juju-deployed OpenStack+ceph and tempest regression testing against the
> deployment.
>
>   [Regression Potential]
>   As Ponnuvel mentioned, the size of binaries will be slightly bigger and
> also the build/compilation will be longer.
>   Ponnuvel also did a search of pponnuvel i'd search of upstream bugs at
> https://tracker.ceph.com and didn't find any relevant bugs.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions
>


-- 
Regards,
Ponnuvel


** Bug watch added: Gentoo Bugzilla #733316
   https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733316

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-10-27 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  This is to consider/discuss the possibility of whether the Ceph packages 
(UCA) should be built with RelWithDebInfo build option (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE [0]) 
which can be supplied to the build script do_cmake.sh [1].
  
  Currently, Upstream as well as UCA builds default to 'Debug' [0] builds.
  But is any reason why shouldn't go for RelWithDebInfo (i.e. "Release
  with Debug information")?
  
- There's one issue noted with RelWithDebInfo which has a workaround too
+ There's one issue noted with RelWithDebInfo which has a workaround, too
  [2].
  
  In general, gcc's -O2 [3] build should generate better code as well as
  there's a specific case for Ceph [4] that it improves performance.
+ 
+ Building rocksdb with optimizations enabled improves the performance and
+ rocksdb being an important part of OSD and MON components of Ceph, this
+ enables better performance of Ceph cluster. Comments #17, #18, & #19
+ show relevant test results.
  
  [0] https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/variable/CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE.html
  
  [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/do_cmake.sh
  
  [2] https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/dev/perf/#common-issues
  
  [3] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html
  
  [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733316
  
  [Test Case]
  Standard ceph-backed OpenStack regression will be run, consisting of 
juju-deployed OpenStack+ceph and tempest regression testing against the 
deployment.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  As Ponnuvel mentioned, the size of binaries will be slightly bigger and also 
the build/compilation will be longer.
- Ponnuvel also did a search of pponnuvel i'd search of upstream bugs at 
https://tracker.ceph.com and didn't find any relevant bugs.
+ There are no upstream bugs for this. rocksdb is one of the submodules in Ceph 
and how each of the submodule gets built is left to end-users.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-10-27 Thread Brian Murray
>From the bug description its not clear to me why this change should be
SRU'ed to Focal or what the benefit to end users is. Could someone
please elaborate on that? Thanks!

** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Triaged => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-10-26 Thread Corey Bryant
** Also affects: ceph (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: ceph (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Also affects: cloud-archive
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: cloud-archive/train
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: cloud-archive/queens
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: cloud-archive/ussuri
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: cloud-archive/stein
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: cloud-archive
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: cloud-archive
   Status: Fix Released => Invalid

** Changed in: cloud-archive/queens
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/stein
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: cloud-archive/stein
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: cloud-archive/train
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/queens
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/train
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-10-21 Thread Corey Bryant
** Description changed:

- This is to consider/discuss the possibility of whether the Ceph packages
- (UCA) should be built with RelWithDebInfo build option (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE
- [0]) which can be supplied to the build script do_cmake.sh [1].
+ [Impact]
+ This is to consider/discuss the possibility of whether the Ceph packages 
(UCA) should be built with RelWithDebInfo build option (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE [0]) 
which can be supplied to the build script do_cmake.sh [1].
  
  Currently, Upstream as well as UCA builds default to 'Debug' [0] builds.
  But is any reason why shouldn't go for RelWithDebInfo (i.e. "Release
  with Debug information")?
  
- 
- There's one issue noted with RelWithDebInfo which has a workaround too [2].
+ There's one issue noted with RelWithDebInfo which has a workaround too
+ [2].
  
  In general, gcc's -O2 [3] build should generate better code as well as
  there's a specific case for Ceph [4] that it improves performance.
  
  [0] https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/variable/CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE.html
  
  [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/do_cmake.sh
  
  [2] https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/dev/perf/#common-issues
  
  [3] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html
  
  [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733316
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ Standard ceph-backed OpenStack regression will be run, consisting of 
juju-deployed OpenStack+ceph and tempest regression testing against the 
deployment.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ As Ponnuvel mentioned, the size of binaries will be slightly bigger and also 
the build/compilation will be longer.

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  This is to consider/discuss the possibility of whether the Ceph packages 
(UCA) should be built with RelWithDebInfo build option (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE [0]) 
which can be supplied to the build script do_cmake.sh [1].
  
  Currently, Upstream as well as UCA builds default to 'Debug' [0] builds.
  But is any reason why shouldn't go for RelWithDebInfo (i.e. "Release
  with Debug information")?
  
  There's one issue noted with RelWithDebInfo which has a workaround too
  [2].
  
  In general, gcc's -O2 [3] build should generate better code as well as
  there's a specific case for Ceph [4] that it improves performance.
  
  [0] https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/variable/CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE.html
  
  [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/do_cmake.sh
  
  [2] https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/dev/perf/#common-issues
  
  [3] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html
  
  [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733316
  
  [Test Case]
  Standard ceph-backed OpenStack regression will be run, consisting of 
juju-deployed OpenStack+ceph and tempest regression testing against the 
deployment.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  As Ponnuvel mentioned, the size of binaries will be slightly bigger and also 
the build/compilation will be longer.
+ Ponnuvel also did a search of pponnuvel i'd search of upstream bugs at 
https://tracker.ceph.com and didn't find any relevant bugs.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-10-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 15.2.5-0ubuntu1

---
ceph (15.2.5-0ubuntu1) groovy; urgency=medium

  [ Corey Bryant ]
  * d/control: Remove Breaks/Replaces that are older than Focal (LP: #1878419).
  * d/p/enable-strsignal.patch: Enable HAVE_REENTRANT_STRSIGNAL for groovy
to fix FTBFS with glibc 2.32.
  * d/p/rules: Enable RelWithDebInfo (LP: #1894453).

  [ James Page ]
  * New upstream point release (LP: #1898200).
  * d/p/fix-crash-in-committed-osd-maps.patch: Drop, included upstream.
  * d/p/*: Refresh.
  * d/libcephfs-dev.install: Drop ceph_statx.h.

  [ Dimitri John Ledkov ]
  * d/rules,control: Enable boost context usage on s390x (LP: #1694926).

 -- James Page   Tue, 06 Oct 2020 12:01:52 +0100

** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-10-07 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
@Corey,

Had a discussion with Daniel Hill in SEG, and we think the risk is low.
So, yes, we'd like to backport this to all releases. I am happy to do
SRU (and/or tests) once this is ready.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-29 Thread Corey Bryant
@Ponnuvel, thanks for testing. I've pushed the changes to the
ubuntu/groovy package branch and will ask James to +1 before we upload
to groovy. If this is low risk we can consider backporting via SRU.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-29 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
@Tyler, Indeed it does. My cluster tests were done in a "cloud-on-cloud"
environment, so I didn't want to stress too much on the actual numbers
(whereas rocksdb tests were done locally in a tightly controlled
environment). As a whole, we can definitely say that RelWithDebInfo is
the way to go for rocksdb, too.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-28 Thread Tyler Stachecki
Ponnuvel, don't the fio tests show significantly better write IOPS and
latency in the optimized case?

== rocksdb%20optimized.txt
...
  write: IOPS=1269, BW=5076KiB/s (5198kB/s)(2048MiB/413114msec); 0 zone
...
 | 99.00th=[  180], 99.50th=[  384], 99.90th=[ 1003], 99.95th=[ 1636],
 | 99.99th=[ 3641]
== rocksdb%20UNoptimized.txt
...
  write: IOPS=383, BW=1533KiB/s (1570kB/s)(2048MiB/1367654msec); 0 zone
...
 | 99.00th=[ 1099], 99.50th=[ 1536], 99.90th=[ 3239], 99.95th=[ 4178],
 | 99.99th=[ 6544]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-28 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Attachment added: "Ceph tests on Octopus - rocksdb optimized.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+attachment/5415022/+files/Ceph%20tests%20on%20Octopus%20-%20rocksdb%20optimized.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-28 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Attachment added: "Ceph tests on Octopus - rocksdb UNoptimized.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+attachment/5415021/+files/Ceph%20tests%20on%20Octopus%20-%20rocksdb%20UNoptimized.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-28 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Hi @Corey,

(Ignore my comments as I've managed to setup a cluster without needing
ceph-deploy).

I have installed the packages and setup a cluster. The cluster was
functional and found no issues with the Groovy packages in my tests.

I have done some of the Ceph's benchmarks [0] using the Ceph cluster.
Also did some separate tests on rocksdb with and without those flags.
Overall, the Ceph Cluster tests which were mainly focusing on I/O didn't
show anything out of the ordinary. But the rocksdb benchmarks [1] [2]
showed that the optimized build works better in most cases.

Besides, we already that this has already been enabled in Ceph upstream
as you know -- which we'll get in the future releases. So I am positive
that there are no cause for concern with these packages that you've
built for Groovy.


[0] 
https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/wiki/Benchmark_Ceph_Cluster_Performance
[1] https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Read-Modify-Write-Benchmarks
[2] 
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/RocksDB-In-Memory-Workload-Performance-Benchmarks


** Attachment added: "rocksdb benchmarks.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+attachment/5415020/+files/rocksdb%20benchmarks.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-24 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
@Corey

> The individual building of rocksdb files doesn't give off much
information in the package builds to see compiler flags set.

VERBOSE flag would show full flags - however, that'd need changing rules
& rebuilding again. That we can RelWithDebInfo is sufficient to confirm
that it does pass those flags as I've locally built rocksdb with
UCA/Ceph source using your cherry-picked patch
(https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/YyMVq33BgD/). So this is fine.

I've installed the Ceph packages from your PPA - they install ok.
However, I can't deploy a Ceph cluster as the default ceph-deploy
package conflicts with the packages in your PPA.

This is from a lxd container (ubuntu-daily:groovy):

Unpacking ceph-base (15.2.3-0ubuntu4~ubuntu20.10.1~ppa202009221514) ...
dpkg: error processing archive 
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-3hzpv6/32-ceph-base_15.2.3-0ubuntu4~ubuntu20.10.1~ppa202009221514_amd64.deb
 (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man8/ceph-deploy.8.gz', which is also in 
package ceph-deploy 2.0.1-0ubuntu1
Selecting previously unselected package smartmontools.
Preparing to unpack .../33-smartmontools_7.1-1build1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking smartmontools (7.1-1build1) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-3hzpv6/32-ceph-base_15.2.3-0ubuntu4~ubuntu20.10.1~ppa202009221514_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-23 Thread Corey Bryant
@Ponnuvel,

I have a package built for groovy with RelWithDebInfo enabled. Can you
give it a test?

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:corey.bryant/groovy-victoria

The individual building of rocksdb files doesn't give off much information in 
the package builds to see compiler flags set. For example:
[  0%] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/rocksdb.dir/db/compacted_db_impl.cc.o

But comparing the cmake call shows that we do have RelWithDebInfo set
for rocksdb:

== Before RelWithDebInfo was enabled ==
cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/rocksdb && /usr/bin/cmake 
-DCMAKE_POSITION_INDEPENDENT_CODE=ON -DWITH_GFLAGS=OFF -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH= 
-DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=/usr/bin/c++ -DWITH_SNAPPY=TRUE -DWITH_LZ4=TRUE 
-DLZ4_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/include 
-DLZ4_LIBRARIES=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblz4.so -DWITH_ZLIB=TRUE 
-DPORTABLE=ON -DCMAKE_AR=/usr/bin/ar -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=None 
-DFAIL_ON_WARNINGS=OFF -DUSE_RTTI=1 "-GUnix Makefiles" 
-DCMAKE_C_FLAGS=-Wno-stringop-truncation 
"-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS='-Wno-deprecated-copy -Wno-pessimizing-move'" "-GUnix 
Makefiles" /<>/src/rocksdb

== After RelWithDebInfo was enabled ==
cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/rocksdb && /usr/bin/cmake 
-DCMAKE_POSITION_INDEPENDENT_CODE=ON -DWITH_GFLAGS=OFF -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH= 
-DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=/usr/bin/c++ -DWITH_SNAPPY=TRUE -DWITH_LZ4=TRUE 
-DLZ4_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/include 
-DLZ4_LIBRARIES=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblz4.so -DWITH_ZLIB=TRUE 
-DPORTABLE=ON -DCMAKE_AR=/usr/bin/ar -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo 
-DFAIL_ON_WARNINGS=OFF -DUSE_RTTI=1 "-GUnix Makefiles" 
-DCMAKE_C_FLAGS=-Wno-stringop-truncation 
"-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS='-Wno-deprecated-copy -Wno-pessimizing-move'" "-GUnix 
Makefiles" /<>/src/rocksdb

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-21 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
An update:

I have built rocksdb with & without RelWithDebInfo. Some differences
are:

 - the exact set of additional flags used with RelWithDebInfo are: -O2
-NDEBUG -fno-omit-frame-pointer -momit-leaf-frame-pointer.

 - the size of rocksdb shared library (librocksdb.so): default-build =
156M, with-RelWithDebInfo = 235M (In the case of Ceph binaries, this
shared library isn't used separately but compiled into ceph-osd and
others. Similar comparison of ceph-osd binary size stripped: default-
build = 16M, with-RelWithDebInfo = 25M).

- There are about ~5700 asserts in rocksdb which would disappear with
RelWithDebInfo.


I am doing further performance benchmarks between the two versions and will 
update once done.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-15 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
@Corey, Yes, I am happy to test this for Groovy.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-15 Thread Corey Bryant
@Ponnuvel, if I cherry pick this to the package for groovy can you give
it a test?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-15 Thread Corey Bryant
@Ponnuvel, Thanks for the details.

4c736f177851cbf9fb7a6790282306ffac5065f8 (the current git submodule hash
for octopus) is in origin/ceph-octopus-v5.8-1435.
ac304adf46ff073a943d1ab2f6de0623c8ad6d86 (the RelWithDebInfo patch) is
in origin/ceph-pacific-v6.8.1-1. So it seems we'll pick this fix up
naturally when the ceph  pacific package is uploaded, but pacific isn't
due to release until March 2021.

Ideally we would pick this up from upstream rather than cherry-picking
to the package. I'm not sure what the process is for cherry-picking
patches to the ceph-octopus-v5.8-1435 rocksdb branch is upstream. The
last update is from Apr 2019 so obviously it remains quite stable. I
imagine they have a process for accepting cherry-picks into stable
branches but we'd have to see if this would qualify.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-14 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
@Tyler, Canonical's Ceph builds don't deal with build options as such (like 
-DNDEBUG) but uses the
upstream provided CMakeLists.txt files. So if we build with RelWithDebInfo, it 
should automatically use -DNDEBUG, too. The question was whether our build uses 
RelWithDebInfo -- which turns out to be case for all but rocksdb.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-14 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
@Corey Bryant, I think Ceph simply specifies rocksdb version to be used
in the submodule information.

1. I checked out the tag v15.2.3 (upstream): git checkout tags/v15.2.3 -b 15.2.3
  (which src/rocksdb is an empty directory)

2. Initialize submodule indexes: git submodule update --init

3. The commit HEAD of rocksdb that Ceph 15.2.3 uses:
 $ git submodule status  | grep rocksdb
 4c736f177851cbf9fb7a6790282306ffac5065f8 rocksdb (v5.8-1436-g4c736f177)

I think this is how Ceph upstream "matches" the versions of various
submodules (rocksdb is one of them) for a given Ceph release.

Comparing the above cloned rocksdb matches exactly with UCA's repo. So I
think the UCA's repo is upto date and there's no such problem of using
"older" version of rocksdb as I speculated.

So the question is whether we want to cherry-pick build change from
upstream so as compile rocksdb with RelWithDebInfo or wait until
upstream defaults to a newer rocksdb submodule that does build with
RelWithDebInfo by default.

P.S: One thing I don't know is what mechanism upstream follow before they 
decide to use
a newer version of rocksdb. For example, the rocksdb version 6.8.1 contains the 
change
to use 'RelWithDebInfo' - which was released/tagged on April 17th [0] as part 
of Ceph repo. But the Ceph 15.2.3 release [1] that was done on May 29 didn't 
include that but uses an older version of rocksdb (as noted initially in the 
comment). My guess is that upstream always integrate recent rocksdb commits in 
Ceph master for testing/development purposes. But when it comes to release, 
they choose the one that they think is stable. 


[0] https://github.com/ceph/rocksdb/releases

[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/releases

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-14 Thread Corey Bryant
@Ponnuvel, I'm not fully familiar with how ceph deals with rocksdb code
so this is mostly observations from my end.

Specifically looking at 15.2.4 for groovy. In
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/v15.2.4/src, it appears to pick up
rocksdb from a specific commit (rocksdb @ e24b452) that exists in ceph's
forked rocksdb repo (https://github.com/ceph/rocksdb @ ceph-
octopus-v5.8-1436). The commit for ac304ad doesn't appear to exist in
the forked repo, but does exist in the fb repo at
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/.

I'm not sure what the process is but it seems that ac304ad needs to get
into ceph's forked repo. Perhaps a cherry-pick with a PR is enough.
James probably knows the process.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-14 Thread Tyler Stachecki
Good to know it's just rocksdb!

Has Canonical also considered compiling the source code with -DNDEBUG to
align with what appears to be the upstream default set of RelWithDebInfo
flags?  The Ceph source code is quasi-judicious about its use of
`ceph_assert`, which is effectively compiled out when -DNDEBUG is
specified.

I am unsure of the performance benefit of this in particular.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-14 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Looking some of the recent build logs, most of the Ceph packages are in
fact compiled with -O2 and -g as Trent alluded to. Only rocksdb is
compiled without them as Tyler noted.

However, the upstream rocksdbhas been changed to honour CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE
recently [2]. So it's only the rocksdb in UCA that appear to be old;
src/rocksdb/CMakeLists.txt [3] is different from the one in UCA [5]. So
I believe that source rocksdb needs to be updated to use latest version
and that'd naturally build rocksdb RelWithDebInfo, too, as upstream
already has the changes for that.


[0] 
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/475127725/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-amd64.ceph_15.2.1-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz

[1] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/494025636/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-
amd64.ceph_15.2.3-0ubuntu3_BUILDING.txt.gz

[2] https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5916/files

[3]
https://github.com/ceph/rocksdb/blob/f86d378860f399bf595bd1135f39f03a9eaca59f/CMakeLists.txt

[4]
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/tree/src/rocksdb/CMakeLists.txt

[5]
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/tree/src/rocksdb/CMakeLists.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-10 Thread Tyler Stachecki
Oof - so I hacked up debian/rules a little so that "RelWithDebInfo" is
used instead of "None" for CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE.  I then ^C'd the dpkg-
buildpackage after it started compiling the first few source files and
observed that:

  * When doing make V=1 VERBOSE=1 in obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/rocksdb
*without* any changes, the source is compiled with *neither* -g nor -O2
-DNDEBUG.

  * When doing make V=1 VERBOSE=1 in obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/rocksdb
*with* my changes, rocksdb is built with *both* -g and -O2 -DNDEBUG.

-O2 -DNDEBUG should result in significantly better performance/lower
utilization for metadata operations...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-10 Thread Tyler Stachecki
Checked out ceph-15.2.3 source on a up-to-date focal VM.

When running dpkg-buildpackage, CMakeCache.txt gets generated as
expected.  However, the generated CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE is "None".

A bit odd, but going a step further, one can grep for CMAKE_C_FLAGS in that 
same file and see something to the effect of:
CMAKE_C_FLAGS_DEBUG:STRING=
CMAKE_C_FLAGS_NONE:STRING=
...
...
CMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELWITHDEBINFO:STRING=

It seems, though, that since "None" is used, all of those are actually ignored 
and
CMAKE_C_FLAGS:STRING=
is used

That particular set of flags seems to be missing -DNDEBUG.  It's worth
noting that -DNDEBUG is defined within
CMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELWITHDEBINFO:STRING and including it may result in a
more optimized build.

This is not quite the Gentoo issue as Trent alluded.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-08 Thread Trent Lloyd
Are we sure it's actually building as Debug?

At least 15.2.3 on focal seems to build with RelWithDebugInfo.. I see
-O2 .. only do_cmake.sh had logic for this (it would set Debug if a .git
directory exists) but the debian rules file doesn't seem to use that
script but cmake directly.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-07 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Attaching relevant chat transcript with a Ceph dev on RelWithDebInfo.

** Attachment added: "upstream chat(kefu).txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+attachment/5408399/+files/upstream%20chat%28kefu%29.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-07 Thread James Page
** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => James Page (james-page)

** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-07 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Tags added: sts

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894453] Re: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

2020-09-07 Thread Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
Another thing to note is that the size of binaries will be slightly
bigger and also the build/compilation will be longer.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453

Title:
  Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs