** No longer affects: compiz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
Title:
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/mesa
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists
figured it out myself. thanks
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co
hi, im trying to patch mesa with the aforementioned patch, but for arch
linux... it does build correctly, but the patch talks about upgrading
the interfaceswhats that about? anyone got a clue? thanks
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
ok sorry guys. I seem to have this:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Troubleshooting/IntelPerformance#Problem: Huge
performance drop with UXA due to tiled rendering disabled
Sorry for the inconvience...;)
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
ok sorry guys. I seem to have this:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Troubleshooting/IntelPerformance#Problem: Huge
performance drop with UXA due to tiled rendering disabled
Sorry for the inconvience...;)
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Using GMA 950, with direct rendering i'm getting 3 or 4 spf (not a typo)
which is equivalent to 0.3 fps. And with indirect rendering i'm getting
the alpha blending problem. Anyway to fix both these problems ? How are
you guys getting proper speeds with direct rendering ?
--
DRI2: (UXA) white tran
Yep, that solved my problem. For a fix, one could turn off the
--indirect-rendering option in fusion-icon. Although I'm still curious
as to why that causes a problem. Anyone have any thoughts?
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32485
More correctly, it is compiz with --indirect-rendering
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
I managed to find my cause, it is the fusion-icon.
Reproduce:
1.) install fusion-icon
2.) Set window manager to compiz
3.) Reload window manager
Appearently as fusion-icon starts at login, it forces compiz to reload.
Doing metacity --replace && compiz --replace , returns alpha blending
to corr
Can those currently affected by this problem specify what hardware they
are running on? My card is:
$ lspci -nn | grep Graphics
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a2] (rev 03)
00:02.1 Display cont
Tried the Tormod packages and compiled the Eric Anholt fix and still the same
thing.
I'm using kernel 2.6.28 on Intepid with intel driver 2.6.3-0ubuntu.
I'm sure this bug isn't only related to mesa.
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3
I did fresh install on Jaunty and if i wasn't imagining things then i did this:
1.) X running in EXA (in default mode), alpha blending is correct, though
compiz is bit sluggish, glxgears ~195fps (compiz vsync off)
2.) Added AccelMethod UXA to xorg.conf, init.d/gdm stop/start, alpha blending
see
No, I haven't built mesa from source before. I ran "ls -R /usr/local/ |
grep -i mesa" just to be sure, and got no output. Do you know of
anything else that might cause the problem?
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You receive
Well, at least you have the latest version of mesa (the same as I have)
and the bug is supposed to be fixed in this version (and it certainly is
fixed for me using that version). Have you ever built mesa from source
on this machine? I'm thinking maybe you have some junk left in
/usr/local or such?
Output is attached.
** Attachment added: "Output of "dpkg -l | grep mesa""
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25979004/dpkg.txt
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Ongion, if you do "dpkg -l | grep mesa" what does it priint?
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
This bug still affects me. i915 chipset, up-to-date Jaunty with UXA enabled.
gksudo also does not shade the rest of the screen.
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
can anyone confirm it works in mesa 7.4-0ubuntu1, just installed it, rebooted,
and still doesn't work.
Is this the problem you people mean ?
Opacity 100% https://dl.getdropbox.com/u/871134/gedit1.png
Opacity 90% https://dl.getdropbox.com/u/871134/gedit2.png
Or should I open another bug ?
--
DRI
doesn't look like this would need changes in the xserver
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
This bug was fixed in the package mesa - 7.4-0ubuntu1
---
mesa (7.4-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low
* New upstream release, merge from debian-experimental
(LP: #330476, #347171, #349127)
* Drop 103_rs600_support.patch, included in this version.
* Drop 104_swrast_fbconfigs.patc
@taiebot65, portis, : notice that yesterday a new mesa version
was uploaded to Jaunty, fixing a mythtv problem. Because the package
version is 7.3-1ubuntu4, the update will remove your custom-installed
7.3-1ubuntu4~tormod unless you pin the version in Synaptic or otherwise
prevent the update. So wi
The patch is for mesa, not for xserver.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 3:25 PM, taiebot65 wrote:
> I ve uploaded my xserver with the ppa restarted the xserver and i have
> to say it s not fixed for me... :-( I m still getting those white
> artefact
>
> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporat
I ve uploaded my xserver with the ppa restarted the xserver and i have
to say it s not fixed for me... :-( I m still getting those white
artefact
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
I have to say i ve g
Yes, mesa 7.4 might get into Jaunty, but this patch was from the master
branch and needs cherry-picking anyway.
** Attachment added: "mesa_7.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24413114/mesa_7.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff
** Summary changed:
- DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with
>From what I heard, I think it's on the radar at least; but first they
might merge mesa-7.4 (bugfix only release).
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
Yes, these ppa packages seems to fix the issue completely. Are there any
plans to include these fixes into official Ubuntu packages?
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
@Tormod: yes it does.
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.
I have uploaded a mesa 7.3-1ubuntu4~tormod to my PPA
https://launchpad.net/~tormodvolden/+archive/ppa which is the plain
Jaunty version with the addition of Eric Anholt's patch. Please check it
out and verify that it fixes this issue.
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz
https:
Just updated and the problem is fixed for me.
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
Great! I'll test it.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:27 PM, martin wrote:
> Three days ago I filed a bug about the gedit use case I described above:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20707
>
> A few hours ago Eric Anholt fixed that bug by commiting this upstream:
>
> http://cgit.freedeskt
Three days ago I filed a bug about the gedit use case I described above:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20707
A few hours ago Eric Anholt fixed that bug by commiting this upstream:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=66175aac7609ad314f25fbdff0d3958af310dc24
So now, usin
Still repros on 2.6.29-rc8 + xorg-edgers as of today.
My repro steps:
1. start a gnome-terminal with "white text on black background" theme and run
"ls -al" to fill it with some text.
2. do "gedit *.txt" on some files and use color theme "oblivion" (dark
background).
3. repeatedly press the gedi
I found a work around by Peter Clifton. It's a patch to compiz. I'm
using it, everything's ok.
http://osdir.com/ml/ubuntu-x/2009-01/msg00026.html
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a me
The "Session lost on resume from suspend bug":
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-
intel/+bug/322202.
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
There are other problems in uxa, such as that X crashes at resume
after suspend (I don't remember the bug link now)
If it is not resolved, moving to uxa will introduce problems
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug not
EXA in Intel 2.6.1 exposes some significant performance regressions
(across all intel graphics chips as I understand). Running in UXA mode
addresses this and increases performance further.
When this transparency issue is addressed and we move to intel-2.6.3
also, I feel making UXA default for newe
UXA apparently also introduces some problems:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/UxaTesting
However, it would be interesting to get the failure cases retested with
the latest 2.6.3 intel driver, (and after verifying the Ubuntu kernel is
using all the appropriate DRI kernel patches).
Asking in the wrong p
since UXA solves somes bugs, maybe it should be the default ?
See for instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/netbook-remix-launcher/+bug/237731
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Un-Milestoning, since UXA isn't the default. Please give a rationale and
add an assignee if you want to milestone this.
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
Target: jaunty-alpha-6 => None
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
Target: jaunty-alpha-5 => None
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel
2:2.6.1-1ubuntu1
there are compiz issues when runining intel with UXA acceleration method:
- when creating popup windows (the menu items) the background is for 1/10 s
white and yellow
- when running gksudo the s
At least with my GM965 [8086:2a02] is unusable slow with EXA (no matter
if there is compiz activated), but totally snappy while UXA is activated
(#303011). So UXA is of some importance...
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received
I'm hesitant to do that, since I'm not sure if I've got time (or know-
how) to fix it. Since UXA isn't going to be default in Jaunty, it
probably isn't as important as was originally determined though.
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
Please someone assign this bug to you, or we'll remove the milestones.
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
UPDATE:
Eric Anholt has proposed a new Xorg patch which adds many more
combinations of GLXVisuals and XVisuals, to avoid the breakage the above
patches could cause to apps wanting a specific feature-set in their
GLXVisual to do GL rendering. Lets wait to see what happens upstream on
this one.
Quo
** Hold off on the patches for now, there is some upstream discussion as
to whether they are correct or not, including an open bug report for the
change causing problems
(http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19970).
I'm not sure if the Xorg patch is good or not.
--
DRI2: (UXA) white trans
The above patches are not necessaily regression free.. I already
managed to break one of my own naievely coded GL apps with it, since it
means that there are no visuals mis-reported with alpha bits where they
shouldn't have them.
My app's unnecessary request to GtkGlExt for a visual with double-b
I think it would be worth picking these up now, inspite them not
actually fixing the problem, as it will help to isolate any possible
regressions exposed by apps picking the wrong FBconfig amongst the new
selection the patch will offer.
(The Xorg patch fixes a bug of that class which causes lots o
Just spotted your fix milestones... the Xorg server needs to be updated
before / at the same time, as mesa.
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
Three, but combine the two for mesa - as they are just one fix..
They don't actually fix the problem, but we ought to start carrying the
Xorg one anyway, otherwise you'll see breakage against newer mesa
versions which have the upper two included.
I've not yet managed to come up with a satisfactor
Confirmed, I'm seeing both behaviors on 965gm with compiz and UXA.
While they are cosmetic, I also notice that images on some websites
(e.g. cnn.com) are black (tfp issue?)
Peter, do you recommend we pull the two mesa patches listed above and
carry them for jaunty in ubuntu?
** Changed in: xorg-s
Added xorg-server source package, due to the above patch being
necessary.. not sure if it should be in its own bug or not..
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
With the above commits, an xserver fix is noted to be needed, as adding
the 24 bit visuals exposed a bug in the mapping between GLXVisual and
FBconfig:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=5100d829a4d71ce4a9fbc2b81694a1fb90066ccf
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with co
** Summary changed:
- DRI2: (UXA) artifacts with compiz
+ DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz
--
DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
54 matches
Mail list logo
