[Bug 374230] Re: topercent2 test fail on i386 and lpia causing FTBFS

2009-06-07 Thread Olly Betts
Oops, misread the test log - thanks for pointing out my error. The patch looks good to me as a workaround, assuming it fixes the FTBFS (I would expect it to). I'll try to sort out a better fix for the next upstream release. -- topercent2 test fail on i386 and lpia causing FTBFS https://bugs.lau

[Bug 374230] Re: topercent2 test fail on i386 and lpia causing FTBFS

2009-06-13 Thread Olly Betts
I've just uploaded xapian-core 1.0.13-2 to Debian unstable, which should fix this issue. I'd suggest just syncing this version to karmic (at least if it does OK on the debian buildds for the archs Ubuntu supports), but FYI this is the patch I added (which also addresses another testsuite bug - the

[Bug 374171] Re: Please sync xapian-omega (1.0.12-1) from Debian unstable

2009-06-25 Thread Olly Betts
Just to note that xapian-core 1.0.13-3 has now been synced from debian and built successfully for all archs, so xapian-omega can now be synced (currently debian has 1.0.13-1). -- Please sync xapian-omega (1.0.12-1) from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374171 You received this bug

[Bug 374230] Re: topercent2 test fail on i386 and lpia causing FTBFS

2009-05-09 Thread Olly Betts
This testcase is also failing for hurd-i386 on Debian, though with a different backend (your failures are for flint, the hurd-i386 is for remote-prog): http://buildd.debian-ports.org/fetch.php?pkg=xapian- core&arch=hurd-i386&ver=1.0.12-2&stamp=1241429577&file=log&as=raw I haven't investigated thi

[Bug 374230] Re: topercent2 test fail on i386 and lpia causing FTBFS

2009-05-11 Thread Olly Betts
Thanks. It seems that max_possible is out by a factor of almost exactly (1 + DBL_EPSILON), and everything else is the same, so this doesn't seem to indicate a real problem. I'll try to find a fix for this, but I'd suggest just adding this to the top of the testcase topercent2 for now: SKIP_T

[Bug 69455] Re: [SRU] for oprofile, edgy-updates: bashism in oprofile's opcontrol script prevents user from setting any events

2009-04-29 Thread Olly Betts
gutsy has now reached end of life, so there's no point at all this staying open. ** Changed in: oprofile (Ubuntu Gutsy) Status: New => Invalid -- [SRU] for oprofile, edgy-updates: bashism in oprofile's opcontrol script prevents user from setting any events https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 258491] Re: link_all_deplibs=no patch no longer working well

2008-10-16 Thread Olly Betts
wlx: That bug doesn't look connected to me. This bug is that the patch Debian apply to libtool to stop it explicitly linking with a library's dependencies hasn't been correctly updated to work with libtool >= 2.2. The effect is that more libraries are linked against than would be if the patch wor

[Bug 258491] Re: link_all_deplibs=no patch no longer working well

2008-10-11 Thread Olly Betts
Luca Falavigna has already uploaded a xapian-omega package with a workaround: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xapian-omega But this is a regression in the debian version of libtool which is likely to make some other packages in intrepid FTBFS in a similar way (if they've not been updated sin

[Bug 282961] Re: Please consider syncing xapian-core 1.0.7-4 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-10-13 Thread Olly Betts
** Attachment added: "Patch added in 1.0.7-4" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18515424/xapian-core-elite-set-excess-precision.patch -- Please consider syncing xapian-core 1.0.7-4 (main) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282961 You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 282961] [NEW] Please consider syncing xapian-core 1.0.7-4 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-10-13 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: I've recently uploaded xapian-core 1.0.7-4 to Debian unstable and it's been accepted for lenny. It adds one small safe patch over 1.0.7-3 which intrepid currently has, and I felt I should highlight it for consideration for intrepid too, even at this late stage. In a nutshel

[Bug 291342] [NEW] free disk space check could actually carry out suggested ways to clear space

2008-10-30 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Starting the upgrade from hardy to intrepid I get an error dialog: Not enough free disk space The upgrade aborts now. The upgrade needs a total of 1260M free space on disk '/'. Please free at least an additional 308M of disk space

[Bug 189454] Re: distribution upgrade tool reports "kb/s" but is measuring "kB/s"

2008-07-20 Thread Olly Betts
It would be good to get this trivial fix into intrepid though... -- distribution upgrade tool reports "kb/s" but is measuring "kB/s" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189454 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs m

[Bug 257755] Re: xapian-omega 1.0.7-3 FTBFS in intrepid

2008-10-03 Thread Olly Betts
I believe 1.0.3-3ubuntu1 fixed this bug (by adding zlib1g-dev to "Build- Depends"): http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/x/xapian-omega /xapian-omega_1.0.7-3ubuntu1/changelog I would mark this as closed, but it was just triaged by Luca Falavigna who also made the upload above, so

[Bug 256759] [NEW] Please sync xapian-core 1.0.7-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-08-10 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: 1.0.7-3 includes a backported fix from upstream SVN for a database corruption bug. It's not a bug which everyone will hit, but it has affected several users independently. The upstream bug report is: http://trac.xapian.org/ticket/287 Other than this, there are several less

[Bug 256915] [NEW] Please sync xapian-bindings 1.0.7-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-08-11 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: 1.0.7-3 fixes the following packaging-related Debian bugs which were all present in 1.0.5-1 (the version currently in intrepid): 462106 [python-xapian] python-xapian: Laxist Depends: on libxapian15 493941 [php5-xapian] php5-xapian does not work out of the box, php config file

[Bug 256915] Re: Please sync xapian-bindings 1.0.7-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-08-11 Thread Olly Betts
Just to note, xapian-bindings has a build dependency on libxapian-dev (>= 1.0.7); libxapian-dev comes from xapian-core and xapian-core 1.0.7-3 was synced earlier today (LP#256759). -- Please sync xapian-bindings 1.0.7-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256915

[Bug 200238] Re: Hardy's hardening-wrapper incorrectly creates symlinks for gcc-4.3 and g++-4.3

2008-06-18 Thread Olly Betts
Just to note a side-effect of creating these symlinks is that the command-not-found package gives a somewhat suprising answer for gcc-4.3 and g++-4.3: $ g++-4.3 The program 'g++-4.3' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing: sudo apt-get install hardening-wrapper bash: g++-4.3: co

[Bug 257172] [NEW] Please sync xapian-omega 1.0.7-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-08-11 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xapian-omega 1.0.7-3 fixes the following Debian bug which is present in 1.0.5-1 (the version currently in intrepid): 484456 [xapian-omega] black on dark blue in search results can be hard to read Updating would also update the debian packaging to standa

[Bug 257173] [NEW] Please sync libsearch-xapian-perl 1.0.7.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-08-11 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libsearch-xapian-perl Updating would fix this Debian bug: 486138 crashes hard when asked to generate a stemmer for an unsupported locale Updating would also update the debian packaging to standards-version 3.8.0. The upstream changes from 1.0.5.0-1 are

[Bug 257479] [NEW] Table cloth and cushions are black except for "fB" logo

2008-08-12 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: foobillard On hardy (8.04.1) on my laptop, foobillard 3.0a-3ubuntu1 always colours the table cloth and cushions black, except for the "fB" logo in the centre of the the cloth, which is correctly coloured according to the current choice of table colour. I

[Bug 257755] [NEW] xapian-omega 1.0.7-3 FTBFS in intrepid

2008-08-13 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xapian-omega For example: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16745494/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-lpia .xapian-omega_1.0.7-3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz A quick glance suggests to me that the issue is that the libtool 2.2.x package in intrepid doesn't have the "don't

[Bug 257173] Re: Please sync libsearch-xapian-perl 1.0.7.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-08-15 Thread Olly Betts
Sorry - will include changelog entries in future. -- Please sync libsearch-xapian-perl 1.0.7.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bu

[Bug 257755] Re: xapian-omega 1.0.7-3 FTBFS in intrepid

2008-08-15 Thread Olly Betts
It does appear to be a bug in the "link_all_deplibs=no" patch in the 2.2.x libtool package. I have a patch which corrects the behaviour for this case, though I don't know if it's the right fix. Anyway, I'll open a separate bug for that. Meanwhile, the attached patch for xapian-omega's debian/rul

[Bug 258491] [NEW] link_all_deplibs=no patch no longer working well

2008-08-15 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libtool It appears that the link_all_deplibs=no patch hasn't been correctly updated for libtool 2.2.x. The binaries in xapian-omega link against libxapian which has a dependency on libz, but the binaries don't require libz themselves. So to avoid explic

[Bug 258491] Re: link_all_deplibs=no patch no longer working well

2008-08-15 Thread Olly Betts
** Attachment added: "Patch to fix link_all_deplibs=no" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16866050/ltmain.sh.patch -- link_all_deplibs=no patch no longer working well https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258491 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 258491] Re: link_all_deplibs=no patch no longer working well

2008-08-15 Thread Olly Betts
The xapian-omega FTBFS bug is LP257755. -- link_all_deplibs=no patch no longer working well https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258491 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 258491] Re: link_all_deplibs=no patch no longer working well

2008-08-15 Thread Olly Betts
Hmm, that didn't create a link automatically. See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xapian-omega/+bug/257755 -- link_all_deplibs=no patch no longer working well https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258491 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 257755] Re: xapian-omega 1.0.7-3 FTBFS in intrepid

2008-08-15 Thread Olly Betts
OK, the libtool bug is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtool/+bug/258491 -- xapian-omega 1.0.7-3 FTBFS in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257755 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs maili

[Bug 320756] Re: update-apt-xapian-index crashed with SIGSEGV in Xapian::Stem::Internal::find_among_b()

2009-02-17 Thread Olly Betts
Looks likely to be a bug in xapian-core, but without knowing the parameters being passed in it's hard to see what's going wrong. Is this repeatable if you rerun by hand from the command line: sudo /usr/sbin/update-apt-xapian-index -- update-apt-xapian-index crashed with SIGSEGV in Xapian::Stem

[Bug 291342] Re: free disk space check could actually carry out suggested ways to clear space

2009-04-16 Thread Olly Betts
That really has no connection with this ticket. Please don't hijack a bug report with unrelated issues - open a new ticket instead. -- free disk space check could actually carry out suggested ways to clear space https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291342 You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 257479] Re: Table cloth and cushions are black except for "fB" logo

2009-06-09 Thread Olly Betts
Marking as "Fix Released" which doesn't quite fit, but I don't see a better option. ** Changed in: foobillard (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- Table cloth and cushions are black except for "fB" logo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257479 You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 257479] Re: Table cloth and cushions are black except for "fB" logo

2009-06-09 Thread Olly Betts
Just tried to reproduce this on the same machine, now upgraded to jaunty, and I no longer see it. -- Table cloth and cushions are black except for "fB" logo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257479 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 57469] Sync request: xapian-omega 0.9.6-5 and xapian-bindings 0.9.6-5

2006-08-23 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: xapian-core was recently sync-ed from debian: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+bug/52885 Could you also sync xapian-omega (a web search frontend build on Xapian) and xapian-bindings (which allows use of Xapian from Python, PHP, Ruby, and Tcl)? Neither is currently in U

[Bug 70315] /etc/ld.so.conf and /etc/ld.so.conf.d/* mismatch

2006-11-04 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libc6 I'm running Ubuntu edgy on x86_64, upgraded from dapper (and before that from breezy). I've noticed that /etc/ld.so.conf contains: /lib32 /usr/lib32 /usr/X11R6/lib32 include /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf But the only file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d

[Bug 64032] Re: rpmstrap using /bin/sh when it should use /bin/bash

2007-10-22 Thread Olly Betts
Looking at your log, some of the RPM URLs are no longer valid. I suspect if you look at the downloaded RPM files, some probably actually contain HTML 404 pages, or perhaps are just zero size. I'll try one of the newer supported distros (suse10.0) and see if that works, but it looks like the scrip

[Bug 64032] Re: rpmstrap using /bin/sh when it should use /bin/bash

2007-10-22 Thread Olly Betts
I've just successfully created a chroot for i686 suse10.0. Looking at /usr/share/doc/rpmstrap/TODO, I think the problem you are seeing is just this: * The x86_64 (and other archs) are buggy or not yet supported. Right now, only i[3456]86 is. These archs should be added. -- rpmstrap using /bin/s

[Bug 64032] Re: rpmstrap using /bin/sh when it should use /bin/bash

2007-10-22 Thread Olly Betts
I think "dead" is overstating the case. The original author is no longer interested in maintaining rpmstrap, and it would certainly benefit from updating to support newer RPM-based distros, but that doesn't mean that someone else can't take on the role of maintainer. The page Cesare linked to indi

[Bug 64032] Re: rpmstrap using /bin/sh when it should use /bin/bash

2007-10-23 Thread Olly Betts
It occurred to me to check if there are any similar tools to rpmstrap, but which are still actively supported upstream, and I quickly found "mach": http://thomas.apestaart.org/projects/mach/ This covers most of the distributions which rpmstrap does, and a few others. The main comparative omissio

[Bug 69455] Re: [SRU] for oprofile, edgy-updates: bashism in oprofile's opcontrol script prevents user from setting any events

2007-10-23 Thread Olly Betts
I've just run into this on gutsy. I'm really just commenting to note that until the proposed fix gets to the repository you can workaround the problem quite easily by running explicitly using bash, like so: sudo bash opcontrol --start --no-vmlinux -- [SRU] for oprofile, edgy-updates: bashism in

[Bug 64032] Re: rpmstrap using /bin/sh when it should use /bin/bash

2007-10-17 Thread Olly Betts
It's not fixed in the gutsy RC. I imagine it should qualify for an incremental update - rpmstrap currently just doesn't work if your /bin/sh is dash, which is the Ubuntu default since edgy. Changing the #! line to #!/bin/bash is pretty safe as the package would have been running with /bin/bash on

[Bug 64032] Re: rpmstrap using /bin/sh when it should use /bin/bash

2007-10-17 Thread Olly Betts
I've just resubscribed ubuntu-universe-sponsors. There's a debdiff in comment#6 which fixes this bug. If there's more you need, please say! -- rpmstrap using /bin/sh when it should use /bin/bash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64032 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 70315] Re: /etc/ld.so.conf and /etc/ld.so.conf.d/* mismatch

2007-10-20 Thread Olly Betts
I've just tried bootstrapping chroots for gutsy i386 and amd64 (using debootstrap --variant=buildd). In both cases, this mismatch still occurs. -- /etc/ld.so.conf and /etc/ld.so.conf.d/* mismatch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/70315 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 64032] Re: rpmstrap using /bin/sh when it should use /bin/bash

2007-10-21 Thread Olly Betts
I added the line to sources.list and upgraded rpmstrap (but not the other unrelated update from there). This fixes this problem for me. -- rpmstrap using /bin/sh when it should use /bin/bash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64032 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 211621] Re: build dependencies not satisfied in hardy

2008-04-08 Thread Olly Betts
** Tags added: ftbfs -- build dependencies not satisfied in hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/m

[Bug 140993] advansys SCSI driver works on x86_64 but is disabled

2007-09-19 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: In drivers/scsi/Kconfig: config SCSI_ADVANSYS is marked as: depends on BROKEN || X86_32 I have a card which uses this driver - lspci reports it as: 01:07.0 SCSI storage controller: Advanced System Products, Inc ABP940-U / ABP960-U (rev 03) My machine is x86_64 (a

[Bug 140993] Re: advansys SCSI driver works on x86_64 but is disabled

2007-12-09 Thread Olly Betts
I've tested with linux-image-2.6.24-1-generic and I can successfully use my scanner with the advansys module. Excellent - thank you for sorting this out. -- advansys SCSI driver works on x86_64 but is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140993 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 140993] Re: advansys SCSI driver works on x86_64 but is disabled

2007-11-26 Thread Olly Betts
** Also affects: linux-source-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- advansys SCSI driver works on x86_64 but is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140993 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

[Bug 140993] Re: advansys SCSI driver works on x86_64 but is disabled

2007-11-26 Thread Olly Betts
Reenabling and rebuilding the advansys module also works for me with gutsy (kernel 2.6.22-14-generic). -- advansys SCSI driver works on x86_64 but is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140993 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contac

[Bug 140993] Re: advansys SCSI driver works on x86_64 but is disabled

2007-11-29 Thread Olly Betts
Thanks for looking at this. I'm happy to test a fix. Should it work OK to just install the hardy kernel package on gutsy and reboot to use that kernel for testing? If not, any suggestions for how best to go about this? -- advansys SCSI driver works on x86_64 but is disabled https://bugs.launch

[Bug 140993] Re: advansys SCSI driver works on x86_64 but is disabled

2007-12-05 Thread Olly Betts
Thanks for letting me know - I hope I'll be able to test it this coming weekend. -- advansys SCSI driver works on x86_64 but is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140993 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 204895] Re: Packages failed archive rebuild test possibly due to python-central transition

2008-03-21 Thread Olly Betts
I don't see where this is hardcoded in xapian-bindings - the only match for a grep for pycentral is where we call "dh_pycentral". If there is an error, please point out where it is and I will fix it in the debian packages I'll be preparing shortly. The buildd failure is due to you trying to build

[Bug 204895] Re: Packages failed archive rebuild test possibly due to python-central transition

2008-03-21 Thread Olly Betts
Is it possible to unsubscribe xapian-developers from this bug, now that it's acknowledged as not being a xapian bug? I can't see how to do it for myself. I'm getting rather a lot of irrelevant email from this bug right now (and apologies to everyone else subscribed for this irrelevant email!) --

[Bug 204959] Re: Please sync xapian-bindings 1.0.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

2008-03-21 Thread Olly Betts
> ScottK2: there are two rdepends... did the API change? > (in an incompatible way) Just to clarify (as debian packager and an upstream Xapian developer), xapian-core 1.0.4 and 1.0.5 are both API and ABI compatible (in general, Xapian 1.X.Y and 1.X.Z should be both ABI and API compatible, althou

[Bug 211621] [NEW] build dependencies not satisfied in hardy

2008-04-03 Thread Olly Betts
d be avoided. * debian/xapian-omega.prerm,debian/xapian-omega.postrm: prerm doesn't get the "purge" action, so replace the prerm with a postrm so templates get removed on purge. Closes: #455103 * debian/control.in: The "Homepage:" header is now official, so con

[Bug 189454] Re: distribution upgrade tool reports "kb/s" but is measuring "kB/s"

2008-03-24 Thread Olly Betts
Just to add a confirmation, I just noticed this on a gutsy -> hardy beta upgrade. -- distribution upgrade tool reports "kb/s" but is measuring "kB/s" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189454 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 174148] Re: Error on startup: “Elem ent not allowed ”

2008-03-24 Thread Olly Betts
Just noticed this upgrading from gutsy to hardy beta. -- Error on startup: “Element not allowed” https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt

[Bug 121557] Need to sync xapian-bindings 1.0.1-1 from Debian

2007-06-21 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: xapian-core and xapian-omega have been automatically synced from Debian, but xapian-bindings wasn't (perhaps because it's patched to drop php4 support). So xapian-bindings is still 0.9.9-1, which will FTBFS against xapian- core 1.0.1-1 (some deprecated features have been remo

[Bug 64032] Re: rpmstrap using /bin/sh when it should use /bin/bash

2007-06-21 Thread Olly Betts
Dan: I don't think Steve saw your last comment - he said: "please resubscribe us where there is" and looking at the subscribers, I don't see him or Ubuntu-universe-sponsors there currently... I'm tempted to readd them myself, but I'm not sure what the etiquette is here. -- rpmstrap using /bin/sh

[Bug 64032] Re: rpmstrap using /bin/sh when it should use /bin/bash

2007-03-31 Thread Olly Betts
Indeed - it's just fallout from Ubuntu edgy making /bin/sh invoke dash rather than bash. Linux distros have traditionally always used bash, and coders have either just assumed that would always be true, or accidentally used bash extensions without realising they weren't portable (because they work

[Bug 70315] Re: /etc/ld.so.conf and /etc/ld.so.conf.d/* mismatch

2007-03-20 Thread Olly Betts
I wasn't really worrying about the lib32 directories (though now I think about it, that's rather odd too), but rather suggesting that either the include line in /etc/ld.so.conf should read: include /etc/ld.so.conf.d/* Or probably better, that /etc/ld.so.conf.d/x86_64-linux-gnu should instead be n

[Bug 64032] Re: rpmstrap using /bin/sh when it should use /bin/bash

2006-12-23 Thread Olly Betts
I've just run into this too, and can also confirm that using bash instead seems to allow rpmstrap to work correctly (I made a copy earlier on my path than /usr/bin and changed the #! line to "#!/bin/bash"). -- rpmstrap using /bin/sh when it should use /bin/bash https://launchpad.net/bugs/64032 -

[Bug 519613] Re: synaptic crashes on " AND" quicksearch

2010-02-17 Thread Olly Betts
Yes, this isn't a bug in xapian-core - you need to catch QueryParserError, and you can call get_msg() on it to get an error message to report to the user. You'll want to run the message through i18n as it's always in English currently. The possible errors are: Unknown range operation parse error

[Bug 282995] Re: [quicksearch] New 'quick search' is unable to search for dashes '-'

2010-02-24 Thread Olly Betts
Xapian ticket #22 is not related to this bug. This is not a bug in Xapian, but in how it is being used. ** Changed in: xapian Importance: Unknown => Undecided ** Changed in: xapian Status: Confirmed => New ** Changed in: xapian Remote watch: trac.xapian.org/ #22 => None ** Changed i

[Bug 282995] Re: [quicksearch] New 'quick search' is unable to search for dashes '-'

2010-02-24 Thread Olly Betts
Sorry, your bug link is wrong, so I've removed it as it just confuses the real issue. It's great to see people actively triaging tickets in Launchpad, but please resist the temptation to latch onto likely sounding upstream tickets without reading them carefully to see if they are actually related.

[Bug 422493] [NEW] Fix xapian-core 1.0.15-2 FTBFS

2009-09-01 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: Builds failed on ia64, armel, and sparc due to the same issue - the testsuite fails due to running out of fds. The testsuite harness deliberately limits the number of fds available to catch leaks, but such leaks shouldn't be platform dependent, so this seems almost certain to

[Bug 422493] Re: Fix xapian-core 1.0.15-2 FTBFS

2009-09-01 Thread Olly Betts
** Attachment added: "replacement patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31116997/kill-ulimit-for-testsuite.patch -- Fix xapian-core 1.0.15-2 FTBFS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422493 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 522005] [NEW] Feature freeze exception request for xapian-core 1.0.18-1

2010-02-14 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: Please consider syncing xapian-core 1.0.18-1 from Debian unstable to Ubuntu lucid. I'm recommending this as an upstream Xapian developer and the Debian maintainer of this package. The main benefit of doing this is that 1.0.18 includes a fix which dramatically speeds up addi

[Bug 421306] [NEW] xapian-core: request for FF exception for karmic

2009-08-29 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: Ubuntu karmic has 1.0.14-1ubuntu1, Debian unstable has xapian-core 1.0.15-2. The upstream microrelease incorporates the Ubuntu-specific changes, fixes a bug (http://trac.xapian.org/ticket/392), allows the testsuite to work with the latest valgrind release, and improves docu

[Bug 421306] Re: xapian-core: request for FF exception for karmic

2009-08-29 Thread Olly Betts
** Attachment added: "Prined diff from current version to proposed version" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30995419/xapian-core-ubuntu-to-debian-pruned.diff -- xapian-core: request for FF exception for karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421306 You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 421306] Re: xapian-core: request for FF exception for karmic

2009-08-29 Thread Olly Betts
Oh, I failed to mention that 1.0.15-2 changes the build to use -g, which means the -dbg package is a lot more useful... -- xapian-core: request for FF exception for karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421306 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 421306] Re: sync xapian-core from Debian

2009-08-30 Thread Olly Betts
Thanks. I was indeed trying to suggest a sync from Debian - sorry for not saying so more explicitly. -- sync xapian-core from Debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421306 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 50006] Toolbar preference "Text beside icons" doesn't show the text for some icons

2006-06-16 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: On Dapper, set to UK English: System -> Preferences -> Menus & Toolbars brings up a dialog which has a picker labelled "Toolbar button labels". If I set this to "Text beside icons", the Preview shows: [Document icon] New [Folder icon] [Floppy icon] I would expect it to

[Bug 1906117] Re: program 'wx-config' missing from wx-common

2021-05-13 Thread Olly Betts
Indeed. And the wx-config man page is shipped in wx-common because wx-config is managed by the alternatives system, and can be provided by libwxbase3.0-dev or libwxgtk3.0-gtk3-dev (or by other versions of those at times when we have more than one wxwidgets release series packaged). So closing as

[Bug 1130751] Re: readpst reports success on crash

2019-12-10 Thread Olly Betts
** Changed in: libpst (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1130751 Title: readpst reports success on crash To manage notifications abo

[Bug 1667550] Re: Edit line context menu does nothing

2018-03-21 Thread Olly Betts
This was fixed upstream in 5.4.1, which is in artful. ** Changed in: therion (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667550 Title: Edit line

[Bug 745243] Re: [dash] wrong search result of Unity in Chinese

2019-05-24 Thread Olly Betts
This was fixed years ago in Xapian, but launchpad's bug watch on the upstream ticket fails to pick up the status. I tried deleting the link, but I still can't change the status of the ticket... ** Changed in: xapian Importance: Unknown => Undecided ** Changed in: xapian Status: Confirm

[Bug 361122] Re: wammu crashed with SIGSEGV in PyErr_SetString()

2019-05-24 Thread Olly Betts
Fixed long ago. ** Changed in: wxwidgets2.8 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361122 Title: wammu crashed with SIGSEGV in PyErr_SetStri

[Bug 1304953] Re: ntlm_auth reports Broken Helper: BH NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL

2019-05-24 Thread Olly Betts
Package was removed after xenial, so closing ("Fix released" seems the least inappropriate resolution of the options available). ** Changed in: apache-mod-auth-ntlm-winbind (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 745243] Re: [dash] wrong search result of Unity in Chinese

2019-05-24 Thread Olly Betts
** Changed in: xapian Importance: Undecided => Unknown ** Changed in: xapian Status: New => Unknown ** Changed in: xapian Remote watch: None => trac.xapian.org #180 ** No longer affects: xapian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 1387990] Re: Please backport python-wxgtk3.0

2019-09-11 Thread Olly Betts
Trusty reach EOL several months ago, so closing this as it is no longer actionable. There doesn't seem to be an entirely suitable status for such a case though. ** Changed in: trusty-backports Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: wxpython3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix

[Bug 486724] Re: DFArc contains confusing references to other operating systems

2019-09-16 Thread Olly Betts
Not sure when this was fixed, but 3.14-2 says " Quick quit to system" ** Changed in: freedink-dfarc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486724 T

[Bug 1573764] Re: Cannot install both 32 and 64 bit versions of libwxGTK3

2016-11-28 Thread Olly Betts
** Changed in: wxwidgets3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573764 Title: Cannot install both 32 and 64 bit versions of libwxGTK3 To manage

Re: [Bug 1720953] Re: libwxgtk-webview3.0-dev unmet dependencies in artful

2017-10-03 Thread Olly Betts
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 07:56:42AM -, slodki wrote: > > libwxgtk-webview3.0-dev : Depends: wx3.0-headers (= 3.0.3.1+dfsg-1) but > 3.0.3.1+dfsg2-1 is to be installed > > Depends: libwxgtk3.0-dev (= 3.0.3.1+dfsg-1) but > 3.0.3.1+dfsg2-1 is to be installed > + > +

[Bug 1249161] Re: package libwxgtk-media2.8-0 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libwx_gtk2u_media-2.8.so.0.8.0', which is also in package libwxgtk

2013-11-12 Thread Olly Betts
. (Closes: #719250) [...] -- Olly Betts Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:25:35 +1200 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249161 Title: package libwxgtk-media2.8-0 (not installed) failed to install

[Bug 1660216] [NEW] Package is obsolete and should be removed

2017-01-29 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: This package is obsolete now that xapian-bindings 1.4 has been synced from Debian, and should be removed. It's a development snapshot of upstream code so won't get any sort of upstream support. ** Affects: xapian1.3-bindings (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Sta

[Bug 1660218] [NEW] Package is obsolete and should be removed

2017-01-29 Thread Olly Betts
Public bug reported: This package is obsolete now that xapian-core 1.4 has been synced from Debian, and should be removed. It's a development snapshot of upstream code so won't get any sort of upstream support. ** Affects: xapian1.3-core (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New

[Bug 1660216] Re: Package is obsolete and should be removed

2017-04-02 Thread Olly Betts
I've not looked at how it was packaged, but the upstream code looks to be compatible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660216 Title: Package is obsolete and should be removed To manag

[Bug 1660216] Re: Package is obsolete and should be removed

2017-04-02 Thread Olly Betts
Incidentally, please note that although launchpad lists me as "maintainer" of this package, I had nothing to do with creating it - I guess I'm listed there as it was forked from a package I maintain in Debian, and someone was too slack to update the metadata properly. -- You received this bug not

[Bug 587739] Re: CVE-2009-2947 fix not applied

2016-10-23 Thread Olly Betts
Hmm, there's no "outdated" or similar status available - the closest seems to be "won't fix", but I can't select that (I guess it requires an "Ubuntu Developer" bit) - can someone else please do the honours? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 587739] Re: CVE-2009-2947 fix not applied

2016-10-23 Thread Olly Betts
The Ubuntu releases with vulnerable versions are all EOL, so making this bug public and closing. I find the lack of actual security support for the majority of packages in Ubuntu rather disturbing - I don't run Ubuntu myself currently so providing a tested debdiff isn't easy, but I did provide lin

[Bug 823227] Re: Please support python3

2016-10-23 Thread Olly Betts
** Changed in: xapian Importance: Unknown => Undecided ** Changed in: xapian Status: Confirmed => New ** Changed in: xapian Remote watch: trac.xapian.org #346 => None ** No longer affects: xapian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 930442] Re: python2.7 crashed with SIGSEGV in Xapian_MSetIterator_get_docid()

2012-04-04 Thread Olly Betts
It's a bug in that example script, but that script is shipped in the documentation in the python-xapian package, so it is still a bug in the package. I've applied a fix upstream - here it is if you want to backport it: http://trac.xapian.org/changeset/16480/branches/1.2/xapian- bindings/python/do

[Bug 645023] Re: libwv2 release package compiled with DEBUG flag

2010-11-17 Thread Olly Betts
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #603871 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603871 ** Also affects: wv2 (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603871 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- libwv2 release package compiled with DEBUG flag

[Bug 645023] Re: libwv2 release package compiled with DEBUG flag

2010-11-17 Thread Olly Betts
This patch (which I've just submitted to Debian too) fixes the issue. -- libwv2 release package compiled with DEBUG flag https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645023 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 645023] Re: libwv2 release package compiled with DEBUG flag

2010-11-17 Thread Olly Betts
Gah - the first attempt to attach the patch timed out, and when I hit back and resubmitted, the patch was no longer attached. So let's try that again... ** Patch added: "Patch to build with -DNDEBUG" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wv2/+bug/645023/+attachment/1736744/+files/wv2-buil

[Bug 1419584] Re: no icon for PyCrust .desktop file is wrong

2015-05-24 Thread Olly Betts
In 3.0.2.0+dfsg-1 in Debian I switched the package to use the .desktop files upstream provides (presumably added more recently), which don't have this issue, so syncing that version should fix this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1419584] Re: no icon for PyCrust .desktop file is wrong

2015-08-27 Thread Olly Betts
wily has 3.0.2.0+dfsg-1build1 ** Changed in: wxpython3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1419584 Title: no icon for PyCrust .desktop file i

[Bug 1419584] Re: no icon for PyCrust .desktop file is wrong

2015-05-19 Thread Olly Betts
wxPython 3.0 is in source package wxpython3.0 - wxwidgets3.0 is just the C++ library (for wx 2.8, both were in wxwidgets2.8). ** Package changed: wxwidgets3.0 (Ubuntu) => wxpython3.0 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 1338206] Re: wx3.0-doc does not exist

2015-05-20 Thread Olly Betts
This is fixed in Debian by wxwidgets3.0 3.0.2-2 which I uploaded yesterday, though it's currently in NEW (due to the new wx3.0-doc binary package) and there's quite a backlog there so it may take a while to be approved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs

[Bug 1329779] Re: Migrate to gstreamer 1.0

2015-05-21 Thread Olly Betts
Changing the BD might be trivial, but isn't enough as it fails to compile due to API changes between gstreamer 0.10 and 1.0. There's a patch from mandriva on trac.wxwidgets.org, but I've not yet tried it. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #785924 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c

  1   2   >