The Developer Membership Board (DMB) has started a restaffing vote for
three vacant seats. The DMB is responsible for reviewing and approving
new Ubuntu developers. It evaluates prospective Ubuntu developers and
decides when to entrust them with developer privileges. There are five
candidates:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:06 PM Robie Basak wrote:
>
> The Developer Membership Board (DMB) has started a restaffing vote for
> three vacant seats. The DMB is responsible for reviewing and approving
> new Ubuntu developers. It evaluates prospective Ubuntu developers and
> decides when to entrust
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:06 PM Robie Basak wrote:
>
> The Developer Membership Board (DMB) has started a restaffing vote for
> three vacant seats. The DMB is responsible for reviewing and approving
> new Ubuntu developers. It evaluates prospective Ubuntu developers and
> decides when to entrust
Please don't. There are many bugs in older compat level that may produce
debs no longer compatible with our OS. Especially around generated
maintainer scripts.
It's best to upgrade packaging to compat level 13. Sounds like a long
overdue packaging upkeep.
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, 14:34 Sebastien
Le 23/03/2022 à 15:58, Dimitri John Ledkov a écrit :
It's best to upgrade packaging to compat level 13. Sounds like a long
overdue packaging upkeep.
Yes it's better, but it requires work, do we have the resources to deal
with those, especially for universe?
Also you claim it produces buggy
Le 23/03/2022 à 16:08, Dimitri John Ledkov a écrit :
Thus yes, there is an explicit
mandate, especially for the universe, to be buildable. It can be
resolved by fixing & upgrading packaging, or via removal of those
packages from the archive. These packages are likely to be
ubuntu-specific and/or
Hey there,
Checking the desktop section of the ongoing archive rebuild we have a
bunch of ftbfs due
> dh: error: Compatibility levels before 7 are no longer supported
(level 5 requested)
That's because the newest debhelper upload removed compatibility for
level 5 and 6
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 15:02, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>
> Le 23/03/2022 à 15:58, Dimitri John Ledkov a écrit :
> > It's best to upgrade packaging to compat level 13. Sounds like a long
> > overdue packaging upkeep.
>
> Yes it's better, but it requires work, do we have the resources to deal
> with
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 02:58:27PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Please don't. There are many bugs in older compat level that may produce
> debs no longer compatible with our OS. Especially around generated
> maintainer scripts.
>
> It's best to upgrade packaging to compat level 13. Sounds
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 18:50, Robie Basak wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 02:58:27PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Please don't. There are many bugs in older compat level that may produce
> > debs no longer compatible with our OS. Especially around generated
> > maintainer scripts.
> >
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 06:50:26PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 02:58:27PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Please don't. There are many bugs in older compat level that may produce
> > debs no longer compatible with our OS. Especially around generated
> > maintainer
Hello everyone!
Gentle reminder about the nearing Beta milestone for 22.04 next week
(along with the usual Beta Freeze on Monday). Make sure to get as much
as possible into the release pocket before that time - the Beta is
usually a great occasion to test how things are looking before the
Hi everyone,
Two years ago, at Ubuntu Studio,we decided switch our default desktop
environment to KDE Plasma. Unfortunately, that is coming back to bite us.
At the time, it seemed like a good idea, as both Plasma and Xfce were around
the
same size in disk space, and we also decided, Ubuntu
Hi everyone,
Two years ago, at Ubuntu Studio,we decided switch our default desktop
environment to KDE Plasma. Unfortunately, that is coming back to bite us.
At the time, it seemed like a good idea, as both Plasma and Xfce were around
the
same size in disk space, and we also decided, Ubuntu
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 03:08:37PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> As part of the release process we perform archive wide rebuilds, and
> fix all FTBFS for the release across the full archive. We can't
> release Ubuntu without fixing those.
This is false, for the record. No Ubuntu release in
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 03:34:24PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Those issues are easy to fix but I would prefer us to focus on spending our
> effort on more user impacting problems so I'm suggesting we revert the
> change for the LTS.
>
> How do other feel like about that?
Thanks for raising
Hey Steve,
Thanks for the reply.
Le 23/03/2022 à 20:16, Steve Langasek a écrit :
- Any package using compat level 5 does not, for example, get automatic
support for default build flags from dpkg-buildflags. This means any
binaries built with compat level 5 should be considered insecure
17 matches
Mail list logo