On 12/07/2010 12:33 PM, Asmo Koskinen wrote:
r...@ubuntu-studio:/home/studio# apt-get install linux-lowlatency
Näillä paketeilla on tyydyttämättömiä riippuvuuksia:
linux-lowlatency : Riippuvuudet: linux-image-lowlatency (=
2.6.36.8.10~ppa1) mutta ei ole merkitty asennettavaksi
Interesting. I installed mine in a Virtual Box as well on x86_64.
I did have a studio font package corruption but I cleared the cache and
re-downloaded everything and it worked fine.
--Tim
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 13:56 +0100, ailo wrote:
On 12/07/2010 12:33 PM, Asmo Koskinen wrote:
On 12/07/2010 02:05 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:02 -0200, Tim Cook wrote:
Interesting. I installed mine in a Virtual Box as well on x86_64.
I did have a studio font package corruption but I cleared the cache and
re-downloaded everything and it worked fine.
BTW: I started
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 14:15 +0100, ailo wrote:
I had problems choosing ubuntustudio tasksels during installation
(audio, video, plugins etc) Cant' remember which worked and which did not.
Is there a version error for the x86 meta-packages?
I'm not sure what you mean here.
I installed
On 12/07/2010 02:24 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 14:15 +0100, ailo wrote:
I had problems choosing ubuntustudio tasksels during installation
(audio, video, plugins etc) Cant' remember which worked and which did not.
Is there a version error for the x86 meta-packages?
I'm not
On 12/07/2010 02:40 PM, ailo wrote:
On 12/07/2010 02:24 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 14:15 +0100, ailo wrote:
I had problems choosing ubuntustudio tasksels during installation
(audio, video, plugins etc) Cant' remember which worked and which did
not.
Is there a version error
Hello everybody,
I'm sure this happened to all of us already: you start work on something
and notice that somebody else had already done the work. If a lot of
work was involved, it's quite a waste of time and if work from new
contributors is ignored that's a bit discouraging. Of course nobody
in
README.Debian. You are following the process here, which is good. In
looking at the comments in the bug[1] and the debdiff for
2:0.24.0+fixes.20101207.d3d2640-0ubuntu1 the issue is resolved for me
AFAIC. Thanks for tending to it.
Lastly, this isn't nearly as strictly enforced with other packages
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 07:05:03 pm Matthias Klose wrote:
Tomorrow, Wednesday December 8, we'll change the default Python version in
Natty from 2.6 to 2.7.
Where did we do the assessment of the rebuilds done over the weekend that was
decided on at the Release Team meeting?
Scott K
--
On 08.12.2010 01:30, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 07:05:03 pm Matthias Klose wrote:
Tomorrow, Wednesday December 8, we'll change the default Python version in
Natty from 2.6 to 2.7.
Where did we do the assessment of the rebuilds done over the weekend that was
decided
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 07:51:24 pm Matthias Klose wrote:
On 08.12.2010 01:30, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 07:05:03 pm Matthias Klose wrote:
Tomorrow, Wednesday December 8, we'll change the default Python version
in Natty from 2.6 to 2.7.
Where did we do
11 matches
Mail list logo
