could someone else take over the meeting scheduled for this sunday?
otherwise we could reschedule..
--
MH
mikeholstein.info http://www.mikeholstein.info/
--
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 11:15:48AM -0400, Mike Holstein wrote:
could someone else take over the meeting scheduled for this sunday?
otherwise we could reschedule..
As already agreed over IRC, I can do that. Seems like you already planted the
upcoming one on the wiki, so there's not much I need
Hello Benjamin,
Benjamin Drung [2011-07-25 16:56 +0200]:
+E: control-files-weird-files: control-file-has-bad-permissions triggers 0664
!= 0644
This is most likely because in oneiric the standard umask for
non-system users is 002 now, for users which are in a private user
group. I. e. new
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 03:25:34PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello Benjamin,
Benjamin Drung [2011-07-25 16:56 +0200]:
+E: control-files-weird-files: control-file-has-bad-permissions triggers
0664 != 0644
This is most likely because in oneiric the standard umask for
non-system users is
Am Mittwoch, den 03.08.2011, 14:35 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 03:25:34PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello Benjamin,
Benjamin Drung [2011-07-25 16:56 +0200]:
+E: control-files-weird-files: control-file-has-bad-permissions triggers
0664 != 0644
This is most
On 08/02/2011 06:46 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 04:04:31 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/02/2011 12:43 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Bryce Harrington br...@canonical.com
wrote:
Sounds like a good idea to me. It makes it analogous to
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Chase Douglas
chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
The issue with the email voting is two-fold:
1. It's not advertised anywhere. I didn't know it was possible until it
was mentioned yesterday. This is easy to fix.
2. As mentioned yesterday, there's the
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 11:37:54 AM Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/02/2011 06:46 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 04:04:31 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/02/2011 12:43 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Bryce Harrington br...@canonical.com
hi,
Am Dienstag, den 02.08.2011, 09:33 -0700 schrieb Chase Douglas:
Hi all,
Yesterday I attempted to attend a DMB meeting, but unfortunately only
two members showed so there wasn't a quorum. I think I've been to about
an equal number of meetings where quorum has and has not been reached
:(.
On 08/03/2011 09:18 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
hi,
Am Dienstag, den 02.08.2011, 09:33 -0700 schrieb Chase Douglas:
Hi all,
Yesterday I attempted to attend a DMB meeting, but unfortunately only
two members showed so there wasn't a quorum. I think I've been to about
an equal number of meetings
On 08/02/2011 09:33 AM, Chase Douglas wrote:
My proposal would be to do away with formal meetings, at least for
evaluating typical applications, and move them to Launchpad. Create a
project (maybe ubuntu-developer-membership) and then have people open
bugs when they have something to bring up
On 08/03/2011 11:43 AM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Chase Douglas
chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
I don't think the DMB process is an important piece of community
socialization at all. I doubt many people pay attention to it if they
don't have a specific need
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Chase Douglas
chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
What is the policy for email applications? Can anyone apply this way, or
is it only under specific circumstances?
Split votes go to the mailing list to try to find enough +1s after a meeting.
Board members can
On 08/03/2011 12:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Chase Douglas
chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
What is the policy for email applications? Can anyone apply this way, or
is it only under specific circumstances?
Split votes go to the mailing list to try to
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011, Nathan Handler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Chase Douglas
chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
True, but progress sometimes means change. I think this system would
work better, and if proven right it could be a model for other boards to
adopt. If it's worse,
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Chase Douglas
chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Chase Douglas
chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
What is the policy for email applications? Can anyone apply this way, or
is it only
On 08/03/2011 12:30 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Chase Douglas
chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Chase Douglas
chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
What is the policy for email
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Scott Moser smo...@ubuntu.com wrote:
With no further digging, only looking at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/Logs , 4 out of the last
11 meetings scheduled did not happen. 3 of those were due to lack of
quorum. At least one other meeting not
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Chase Douglas
chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:30 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Chase Douglas
Ok, that's evidence of what's been done in the past, but what is the
policy? Can I do it myself? I'm asking because I
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 03:04:14 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/02/2011 09:33 AM, Chase Douglas wrote:
My proposal would be to do away with formal meetings, at least for
evaluating typical applications, and move them to Launchpad. Create a
project (maybe ubuntu-developer-membership)
On 08/03/2011 12:35 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Scott Moser smo...@ubuntu.com wrote:
At very least, this issue needs to be fixed. Meetings need to happen at
scheduled times, or be postponed/rescheduled at least 24 hours in advance.
Believe I already said
On 08/03/2011 03:51 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I think the message isn't that there aren't unforeseen circumstances.
It's that they need to be handled in a better fashion. Custom courtesy
(where I'm from at least :) says that meetings that are cancelled or
postponed have advance notice of at
So, there are a couple merge proposals right now for control file
description typo fixes for natty:
https://code.launchpad.net/~bones/ubuntu/oneiric/gnomebaker/fix-for-818364/+merge/70234
https://code.launchpad.net/~bones/ubuntu/natty/radiotray/fix-for-722886/+merge/70107
The package has either
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Scott Moser smo...@ubuntu.com wrote:
With no further digging, only looking at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/Logs , 4 out of the last
11 meetings scheduled did not happen. 3 of those were due to
On 08/03/2011 12:44 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 03:04:14 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/02/2011 09:33 AM, Chase Douglas wrote:
My proposal would be to do away with formal meetings, at least for
evaluating typical applications, and move them to Launchpad. Create a
On 08/03/2011 12:23 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Chase Douglas
chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
What is the policy for email applications? Can anyone apply this way, or
is it only under specific circumstances?
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Scott Moser smo...@ubuntu.com wrote:
2011-06-20 [1] ended in a discussion about Whats a Quorum
2011-02-14 [2] was postponed, maybe that is what I had seen. I admit to
possibly getting lost trying to quickly scan the logs.
#1 had quorum just dandy. The
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 03:46:55 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:35 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Scott Moser smo...@ubuntu.com wrote:
At very least, this issue needs to be fixed. Meetings need to happen at
scheduled times, or be
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan maco...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Scott Moser smo...@ubuntu.com wrote:
2011-06-20 [1] ended in a discussion about Whats a Quorum
2011-02-14 [2] was postponed, maybe that is what I had seen. I admit to
possibly getting
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan maco...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Scott Moser smo...@ubuntu.com wrote:
2011-06-20 [1] ended in a discussion about Whats a Quorum
And if you read it, it's not what's quorum? We KNOW that. It's 4.
The question was whether
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Mackenzie Morgan maco...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Chase Douglas
chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
I don't think the DMB process is an important piece of community
socialization at all. I doubt many people pay attention to it if they
On 08/03/2011 12:50 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:23 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Chase Douglas
chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
What is the policy for email applications? Can anyone apply this way, or
On 08/03/2011 01:45 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/03/2011 04:36 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:50 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:23 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Wed,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:45:09PM -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
[...]
Personally, as a member of the DMB, I definitely want to keep having
live meetings with the applicants.
E-mail can be fine in very specific cases where live IRC meeting can't
be achieved and should only be something the
On 08/03/2011 02:05 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 04:06:26 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:44 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 03:04:14 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/02/2011 09:33 AM, Chase Douglas wrote:
I think it's really up to
On 08/03/2011 02:01 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/03/2011 01:45 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/03/2011 04:36 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:50 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:23 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/03/2011
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 02:34:31PM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/03/2011 02:01 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/03/2011 01:45 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/03/2011 04:36 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:50 PM, Allison
Excerpts from Micah Gersten's message of Wed Aug 03 12:55:09 -0700 2011:
So, there are a couple merge proposals right now for control file
description typo fixes for natty:
https://code.launchpad.net/~bones/ubuntu/oneiric/gnomebaker/fix-for-818364/+merge/70234
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 05:29:07 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/03/2011 02:05 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 04:06:26 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:44 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 03:04:14 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
On
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 17:46, Clint Byrum cl...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I think peoples' time is better spent elsewhere.. but if somebody in
the community wants to spend time correcting the spelling mistakes,
our policy is not really clear as to whether or not this is ok.
But beyond just spending
dear boost progamers:
when I tried to compile from my g++4.5.2 a simple file which include
#include boost/thread/read_write_mutex.hpp
---
root_at_eric-laptop:/home/eric/cppcookbook/ch12# g++ -lboost_thread
Example12-3.cpp
Example12-3.cpp:3:45: fatal error:
On 08/03/2011 09:55 PM, eric wrote:
dear boost progamers:
when I tried to compile from my g++4.5.2 a simple file which include
#includeboost/thread/read_write_mutex.hpp
---
root_at_eric-laptop:/home/eric/cppcookbook/ch12# g++ -lboost_thread
Example12-3.cpp
Example12-3.cpp:3:45: fatal
On 08/03/2011 10:59 PM, scott wrote:
On 08/03/2011 09:55 PM, eric wrote:
dear boost progamers:
when I tried to compile from my g++4.5.2 a simple file which include
#includeboost/thread/read_write_mutex.hpp
---
root_at_eric-laptop:/home/eric/cppcookbook/ch12# g++ -lboost_thread
43 matches
Mail list logo
