Le mercredi 14 mai 2008 à 18:10 -0400, Phillip Susi a écrit :
Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 02:17 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
Il giorno dom, 11/05/2008 alle 17.32 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan ha scritto:
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 10:40 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote
I wish I
Olá Matthew e a todos.
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 21:03:13 Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
That's a much better explanation than the error message.
Cheers
--
Matthew Paul Thomas
Yes, the message wont explain it in enough detail to the end user.
It even scares him.
--
BUGabundo :o)
(``-_-´´)
Olá Arvind e a todos.
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 13:34:03 Arvind K wrote:
Yesterday I was met, with what I think is one of the most stupid bugs I
ever found.
When I tried to eject a DVDr, either using nautilus tools or the drive
eject button, an error popup showed up, telling me that I wasn't
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Christopher Halse Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
the other hand, I'm don't think that installing programs through yum
is a good idea on an Ubuntu system. I may be wrong here, though. Why
do we even have that package? :)
First thank you to everyone
If you're amenable to extra scripts being suggested, I'll submit a bug
report(s) as and when it's relevant.
You're right about requiring a user choice, but I'm a bit concerned that
users are going to be confronted with a collection of options that they
don't understand, where one of them is known
Hi,
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 01:01:14PM +0800, Peter Teoh wrote:
a. install ubuntu
b. apt-get install yum*
c. apt-get install git
Next I tried git, I got command not found, but reattempted to
apt-get install git will give me:
Try:
apt-cache show git
dpkg -L git
apt-cache search
Olá Markus e a todos.
On Saturday 10 May 2008 16:34:55 Markus Hitter wrote:
How would one notice? Is Hardys hibernating/standby still so flaky
one is forced to shut down the computer more than once a month?
You're lucky. I reboot mine once every 2/3 days... after that, GDM slows down
to a
Olá Mackenzie e a todos.
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 05:14:51 Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
The results of using Bootchart to map the GNOME startup process, for the many
users that did it, consistently showed gnome-panel as the culprit.
How does one use bootchart to map GNOME? mine ends on X11.
--
I'm sorry to bring noise about Hardy, on a list now meant to Intrepid, but
unable to find how to fix this in any other way, so if any dev could lend me an
hand it would be great. I know this is not Ubuntu fault, but manufactors, but
still, I know we can fix this.
I've bough a new laptop (an
Hi,
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 07:06:35PM +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
That's a pretty handy tool - would you be interested in an option to
start the remote recovery that's being discussed in a nearby thread?
The design of friendly-recovery makes it easy to drop-in scripts, I
wasn't following this
Hi Colin,
I presume that you did not instruct the installer to format the old
/home partition? (If you did, then why?)
Actually yes, and I never realised how dumb it was until I read your
message. I just was used to formatting before installing, so I guess I
never gave it any thought.
So,
Hi again,
I should also point out (because I gave out misinformation on IRC in a
moment of inattention) that this only works when you're using the manual
partitioner and select a partition to mount as /, or equivalent. If you
use the automatic partitioner and select use entire disk, then
Peter Teoh wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Christopher Halse Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
the other hand, I'm don't think that installing programs through yum
is a good idea on an Ubuntu system. I may be wrong here, though. Why
do we even have that package? :)
First thank
ke, 2008-05-14 kello 02:11 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan kirjoitti:
Could a list of vendors who make crappy hard drives (ie ones with this
issue) be made so we all can avoid them? I can say my Western Digitals
don't have the issue, though they do have a tendency to die anyway (bad
sectors and dead
Hi,
i'm working on dapper distro and need to install libqt3-mt-dev which depends
on a whole big list of other libraries.
when trying to install some of these libraries I got to a cyclic dependency
which i don't know how to deal with.
x11proto-xext-dev
depends on
libxi-dev
which depends on
On Thu, 15 May 2008 20:29:44 -0400 Evan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which package would this be filed against?
I'd say that if there's a bug it's in Windows. I could see a wishlist bug
against Ubuntu to provide a way to check for this/suggest changes to avoid
problematic filenames, but there is
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd say that if there's a bug it's in Windows. I could see a wishlist bug
against Ubuntu to provide a way to check for this/suggest changes to avoid
problematic filenames, but there is nothing inherently defective with
On Thursday 15 May 2008 21:31, Evan wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd say that if there's a bug it's in Windows. I could see a wishlist
bug against Ubuntu to provide a way to check for this/suggest changes to
avoid problematic filenames,
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 00:06 +0100, Pedro Brito Cruz wrote:
Hi,
i'm working on dapper distro and need to install libqt3-mt-dev which
depends on a whole big list of other libraries.
when trying to install some of these libraries I got to a cyclic
dependency which i don't know how to deal
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 21:14 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
but there is nothing inherently defective with the
current behavior.
I'd agree for any other fs, but the only reason you would use an ntfs
partition is because you want to read this in windows. Thus it makes
little sense to allow
On Fri, 16 May 2008 06:36:54 +0200 Mario Vukelic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
þÿOn Thu, 2008-05-15 at 21:14 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
but there is nothing inherently defective with the
current behavior.
I'd agree for any other fs, but the only reason you would use an ntfs
partition is because
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 00:50 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Doesn't wubi install Ubuntu into an existing Windows partition?
Exactly. And then Ubuntu will happily let you create files that you
can't read in Windows. It's weird.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
On Fri, 16 May 2008 06:53:35 +0200 Mario Vukelic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
þÿOn Fri, 2008-05-16 at 00:50 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Doesn't wubi install Ubuntu into an existing Windows partition?
Exactly. And then Ubuntu will happily let you create files that you
can't read in Windows. It's
23 matches
Mail list logo
