Re: New tzdata release for ubuntu 20.04 lts (and higher)

tzdata should be updated in legacy releases via Ubuntu Pro, which you should be able to gain access to via ubuntu.com/pro On Mon, 19 Feb 2024, 17:19 Dauren Sarsenov, wrote: > Hi, guys. > > Good news, I can see that an updated version of tzdata has been released > for Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. > > Can

Re: Request for Update: NVIDIA Driver Version 535.146.02 for APT

Hi, This version of this driver has been available in the proposed pocket since 2023-12-15 and is undergoing testing. It will be released to updates once regression and certification testing is completed. Note we do not release routine updates like these over the winter holidays period which was

Re: Choice of the openssl version for 23.10 and 24.04

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 12:34, Adrien Nader wrote: > > (stripping the quotes a bit) > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 09:28, Adrien Nader wrote: > > > The issue is that we do not know when will be the next openssl LTS. We

Re: Choice of the openssl version for 23.10 and 24.04

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 12:34, Adrien Nader wrote: > > (stripping the quotes a bit) > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 09:28, Adrien Nader wrote: > > > The issue is that we do not know when will be the next openssl LTS. We

Re: Choice of the openssl version for 23.10 and 24.04

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 09:28, Adrien Nader wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 15:35, Adrien Nader wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023, Adrien Nader wrote: > > > > Hi, > >

Re: Choice of the openssl version for 23.10 and 24.04

Hi, On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 15:35, Adrien Nader wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023, Adrien Nader wrote: > > Hi, > > > > A few weeks ago, openssl maintainers announced moving to a time-based > > release (April and October): > > > > https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2023/09/29/OpenSSL-Update-ICMC23/ >

Re: Intermittent superblock checksum mismatch during resize2fs

This was causing us headaches like since forever. Our reproducers were very intermittent to catch it. I think we might want to backport this everywhere we can. On Thu, 5 Oct 2023, 17:50 Krister Johansen, wrote: > Hi, > My team runs Ubuntu 20.04 on EC2. We use the cloud images that > Canonical

Re: Open-SSH server

On Sat, 10 Jun 2023, 19:39 Matthew Wilson, wrote: > Hi there, > > > > Do you have an update as to when the repository for Ubuntu 22.04.2 package > Open-SSH will be upgraded from 8.9 to 9.3 to patch the security issues as > it means our server is currently non-compliant. > Non complaint with

Re: Choice of the openssl version for 23.10 and 24.04

We had similar dilemma around focal release. And I did SRU one off upgrade from 1.1.0 to 1.1.1. it was a minor disaster. (As in like the sad depressing songs in A minor scale). It is best to stick to one openssl version in a release. It is best to stick to longer supported one. It is best not

Re: linux-headers-5.15.0-1028-gke for Ubuntu 22.04

a container\other > machine. > Now I see the same for linux-headers-5.15.0-1030-gke version. > Thanks > ________ > From: Dimitri John Ledkov > Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2023 03:03 > To: Elad Gabay > Cc: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > >

Re: linux-headers-5.15.0-1028-gke for Ubuntu 22.04

Please see this discussion over here https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2023-May/139336.html and the emails before/later in the thread. tl;dr Note you have access to headers on the host that you can bind mount in the container, you are using obsolete out-of-date kernel ABI. You can use

Re: Building grub2-unsigned from sources on bionic

Hi, On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 22:52, Vishwanath Pai wrote: > > Hi All, > > I noticed that with the latest update to grub2-unsigned, one of the build > dependencies is gcc-10. > But gcc-10 is not available on bionic. We build ubuntu packages in our build > system from source but > unfortunately we

Re: any reason for CONFIG_FUSE_FS=y

On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 18:29, Bernd Schubert wrote: > > > > On 8/9/22 18:38, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > >> We are in the process to upstream out changes. We got disrupted by other > >> work for our main product but will continue to send new patches soon.

Re: Ubuntu initramfs (Was: Re: any reason for CONFIG_FUSE_FS=y)

Hi, On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 18:20, Aaron Rainbolt wrote: > > On my system, if the initrd isn't readable by the kernel, it results > in a kernel panic. Is that to be expected despite inird-less boot? Or > is that an indicator that at least Lubuntu (and probably Ubuntu > Desktop) does use an initrd?

Re: Ubuntu initramfs (Was: Re: any reason for CONFIG_FUSE_FS=y)

Hi, On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 17:53, Richard Laager wrote: > > On 8/9/22 11:38, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > The fast majority of Ubuntu installations boot without initramfs at > > all. > > What makes you say this? Every Ubuntu system I've ever installed has an > initrd.

Re: any reason for CONFIG_FUSE_FS=y

On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 16:24, Bernd Schubert wrote: > > Hi Dimitri, > > On 8/9/22 15:54, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 14:22, Bernd Schubert > > wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > &

Re: About Upstream version choice

Heya, On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 15:30, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm not directly involved with this in general, but if I understand > the question and some processes correctly: > > The package versions in a given Ubuntu release are (usually) a result > of a Time Based Release

Re: any reason for CONFIG_FUSE_FS=y

Hi, On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 14:22, Bernd Schubert wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to ask if there is a good reason Ubuntu builds fuse as > statically into the kernel instead of using a module? > > Reason I'm asking is that we are currently working on a couple of fuse > improvements and > > a) A

Re: package docker.io is broken

It says right in the installation log why it is incompatible with your system: """ The aufs storage-driver is no longer supported. Please ensure that none of your containers are using the aufs storage driver, remove the directory /var/lib/docker/aufs and try again. """ The package prevents

Re: Feature Request: Remove fwupd in future versions of Ubuntu

Hi, I sympathize with your experience. The firmware updates delivered via fwupd come directly from the OEM of your hardware. In this case Dell. The application of dell updates via fwupd, remote management consoles, or via manually downloaded firmware updates images from their website are

Re: gnutls plans for focal LTS?

On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 7:02 PM John Cummings wrote: > > Hello, does anyone know what the plans are for gnutls in Ubuntu 20.04.03 LTS > (focal fossa)? It is currently at 3.6.13, and I don't see an update in > focal-backports. The recent expiration of a root certificate used in older > Let's

Re: autoinstall 20.04 with grub

This mailing list is not appropriate for your questions. This mailing list is for developing the next release of Ubuntu itself. Not support or discussions around the stable series. Please join discourse.ubuntu.com to discuss Ubuntu Server installation options in the server topic -

Re: Ubuntu 20.04 kickstart

live supports autoinstall with simple yaml files to describe the install which are a lot more simple than either kickstart or preseed. Have you looked into https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/install/autoinstall and does that at all fit your needs? Alternatively if you have more than 3 servers to

Re: Should one be able to install with only release + -security enabled?

On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2:59 PM Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > Hi! > > I have been testing a network-isolated Ubuntu mirror inside our network and I > am trying to understand if what I envision should work or not. > > In particular, I am trying to minimize how much review is needed for package >

Re: Private home directories for hirsute onwards

On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 2:31 AM Alex Murray wrote: > > setfacl -m u:libvirt-qemu:rx $HOME > Similar to above for qemu are there similar setfacl commands, would something similar be also needed for: - sshd user to access ~/.ssh/authorized_keys , or nothing needed there? - in GNOME making ~/Public

Re: Compiling system for Ubuntu

Hi, May I ask you why are you trying to rebuild systemd? Note that CVE-2020-1712 is fixed in Ubuntu, in all series that it affects, including 18.04 see https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2020/CVE-2020-1712.html On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 18:15, rafi Moor wrote: > > > > > > Hello, >

Re: Ubuntu 18.04 and "sig_hashalgo: md4"

Hey, linux kernel upstream has changed how signatures look like in v5.2-rc1, and only kmod 27 learned how to parse them. But bionic ships kmod 24, meaning with hwe / cloud kernels, the information printed by e.g. modinfo is incomplete. Normally bug reports should be opened in launchpad, i have

Re: Dependencies of ubuntu-desktop

On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 21:23, Andrei Rybak wrote: > > Hello, > > I like to use apt and aptitude for my Ubuntu installation. I was > surprised to find out today, that the packages ubuntu-desktop and > ubuntu-desktop-minimal do _not_ depend on the package ubuntu-minimal. > Description of the

Re: Installing python-is-python3 should affect pip as well.

On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 00:14, Boris Verkhovskiy wrote: > > When I install python-is-python3, python becomes python3 but I still > have to type pip3. I think either python-is-python3 should make pip > into pip3 (which might be surprising to some, since pip3 is installed > separately) or I would

Re: default algorithm in package zram-config 0.5

On Mon, 8 Jun 2020, 20:42 Mitch 74, wrote: > Hello, > > Considering that now lz4 is by default enabled in kernel, wouldn't it be > better to use it as a compression algorithm in zram instead of lzo? > Can you benchmark the performance? When changing initrd compression we have done extensive

Re: Ubuntu Focal Fossa hangs while systemd is setting up on ARM64

On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 01:56, Suniel Mahesh wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have a board based on Rockchip RK3399 64-bit SOC based on ARMv8A. > The board can boot from the following devices: Micro SD, EMMC, USB, NVMe SSD. > I have installed Ubuntu focal fossa with LXDE Display manager(built a > headless

Re: Desktop installer is outdated

On Sun, 3 May 2020 at 07:34, Haug Bürger wrote: > > Hi, > > I just tested the latest 20.04 release in the hope that the installer > improved. It did not improve. The desktop installer really needs work. > > It prefers plain text vs encryption which is not appropriate these days > and makes Ubuntu

Re: nvidia-340 incapable of single user mode in 20.04

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 20:53, Jack Howarth wrote: > > I am finding on a 2008 MacPro with GTX680 that the installation of the > nvidia-340 package under Ubuntu 20.04 prevents single user mode boots from > working. While the nvidia-340 driver works fine from a normal boot, when > 'single'

Re: UBUNTU ARM64 DEB PACKAGES on DEBIAN RELATED VERSION

All of Ubuntu is available for arm64 & armhf Why bother with Debian, if all of Ubuntu is available anyway?! On Mon, 23 Mar 2020, 19:28 Onur GURSOY, wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > First of all you're great team. you done great jobs. > I'm lovers of arm and you're supporting arm platform. > I'm

Re: Some ideas about APT functionality

Hi, On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 at 21:37, Mike wrote: > > Today, to properly install rpm-packages on my laptops, I'm running Which rpm packages are they? For which architectures? Is .deb available? Or snap? If not, have you tried reaching out to the vendor to provide snap/deb? Do you want us to reach

Re: Re: ask for support packages for nfs-kernel-server

hose options to sbuild to cleanly crossbuild the packages. > @Nish > > Thanks for you answer! > > Best regards > Chenghao > > > > - Original Message - > From: Dimitri John Ledkov > To: wangchenghao2...@sina.com > Cc: ubuntu-devel-discuss > Subje

Re: ask for support packages for nfs-kernel-server

On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 18:31, wrote: > > Dear, > > I'm trying to install the package nfs-kernel-server on my Ubuntu 10.04. > > By the apt-get command, the following package are needed: > libgssglue1_0.1-4_i386.deb > libnfsidmap2_0.23-2_i386.deb > librpcsecgss3_0.19-2_i386.deb >

Re: biosdevname package in Universe is severely downlevel

On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 20:47, Jeffrey Lane wrote: > > Hi. I've been in touch with Mellanox who had filed this bug [1] > against the biosdevname[2] package in Universe. Somehow, this package > ended up in Universe, with someone named Rudy Gevaert > listed as the Original Maintainer and Ubuntu >

Re: Right way to submit patches for Ubuntu packages

Hi, On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 22:26, Jonathan Behrens wrote: > > I've been trying to get a two line patch merged for `gdb-multiarch`. Debian > accepted it almost right away, but subsequent releases for Ubuntu haven't > included it. About a month ago I tried submitting directly on Launchpad but >

Re: anyone still use 'import-bug-from-debian'?

On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 13:42, Dan Streetman wrote: > > As far as I can tell, this hasn't been used by anyone in a long time, > or at least only a small number of times. > > Can anyone who uses it let me know? > I used to use it, but last few times I have tried to do it, it either failed to open

Re: g++-multilib omissions

On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 at 23:36, Daniel Llewellyn wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been looking through the g++-multilib package, and I _think_ there is an > accidental omission or misconfiguration. It seems that none of the packages > produced target the arm64 or ppc64el architectures which Ubuntu

Re: Cosmic Cuttlefish (18.10) Final Freeze

Hi, On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 19:04, Liviu Beraru wrote: > > Hi, > > I get these email since years although I have tried many times to unsubscribe. > Can you do something to delete me from all ubuntu mail lists? > It's impossible for us to know which email address you have signed up with, and to

Re: An question about default opened option "-fstack-protector-strong"

On 14 June 2018 at 08:03, Shao, Ting wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to enable the “stack smashing protection” for node.js(issue > 20928). And I switched it on using “-fstack-protector” > And made a benchmark test, while the result is quite strange. Then I found > on my Ubuntu 16.04, the

Re: About the Ubuntu Server in the Azure virtual machine gallery

Hi, On 27 May 2018 at 20:52, Tong Sun wrote: > Hi, > > I see that in the Azure virtual machine gallery, it lists: > > Ubuntu Server > https://azuremarketplace.microsoft.com/en-us/marketplace/apps/Canonical.UbuntuServer?tab=Overview > Canonical > > Does it means that Canonical is responsible for

Re: Proposal: Let's drop i386

On 13 May 2018 at 21:13, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > Am Sonntag, den 13.05.2018, 14:33 -0400 schrieb Jeremy Bicha: >> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Colin Watson >> wrote: >> > >> > IIRC Steam is also relevant, and I guess that would involve talking >> > to >> > Valve? >> I think our users

Re: Proposal: Let's drop i386

On 11 May 2018 at 16:32, Fiedler Roman wrote: > > > Von: ubuntu-devel [mailto:ubuntu-devel-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] Im > > > > Hello, > > > > Less and less non-amd64-compatible i386 hardware is available for > > consumers to buy today from anything but computer part

Re: [Artful Aardvark] Security issue in the packaged version OCaml

On 7 October 2017 at 16:56, Benjamin wrote: > Hello, > > I am Ubuntu user working with OCaml. I am glad to see that the Artful > Aardvark release of Ubuntu comes with the 4.04.0 release of the OCaml > compiler. However, it appears that the 4.04.0 (and the 4.04.1)

Re: Launchpad builder changes: schroot and LXD

On 6 September 2017 at 12:36, Colin Watson wrote: > > As of launchpad-buildd 149, deployed to production on 2017-09-04, the > following changes are effective on Launchpad's build farm: > > * sbuild (used to build .debs from source packages) uses its schroot >mode to

Re: liblangtag 0.5.8 in LTS 16.04

On 2 July 2017 at 08:25, Andre Matzke wrote: > > Hello Dearest Repo Maintainers, > > would it be possible to consider integrating version 0.5.8 in LTS 16.04? > > meanwhile using openoffice-support in owncloud a permanent code > integrity check problem - warning is displayed

Re: btrfs tools patch for quiet output from send

Hello, On 28 May 2017 at 20:21, Lucas wrote: > Any chance we can get this patch backported to Xenial? > > https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/commit/09c052a8b4dcaa96fe5e6c28b12ce24729e827a4 > > At the moment, people are doing clunky work-arounds to suppress unwanted "At >

Re: Upcoming Vacant Developer Membership Board seats: Second call for nominations

On 20 May 2017 at 03:25, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Brian Murray wrote: >> The DMB is responsible for reviewing and approving new Ubuntu developers >> [1], meeting for about an hour once a fortnight. Candidates should be >> Ubuntu

Re: Keyboard layout switching in modern Ubuntus

On 1 May 2017 at 22:40, Nrbrtx wrote: > Dear Ubuntu developers! > > I have just upgraded my machines from 12.04 to 14.04. > > After upgrades I discovered that there are some issues with keyboard layout > switching. > I have two keyboard layouts - English and Russian. > I prefer

Re: request for update pkg

Hello, On 24 January 2017 at 07:47, Василий Петрович wrote: > > Hello! In 2.11 version of Pidgin many security bugs fixed > https://pidgin.im/news/security/ Can you update pidgin in ubuntu repository? > Regards. > in Ubuntu we cherry-pick individual patches to fix security

Re: canonical livepatch

vepatches too Regards, Dimitri. > Regards, > > Kall > > > Στις 1:29 μ.μ. Παρασκευή, 4 Νοεμβρίου 2016, ο/η Dimitri John Ledkov > <x...@ubuntu.com> έγραψε: > > > Hello, > > On 4 November 2016 at 09:00, Christian Ehrhardt > <christian.ehrha...@c

Re: canonical livepatch

Hello, On 4 November 2016 at 09:00, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Hi, > just checked, with the same kernel mine still looks today like yours did > initially. > If run the status command with --verbose it will list the status it is in, > which might help seeing

Bug#834718: choreonoid: maintainer address bounces

Hello, On 1 November 2016 at 04:01, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:21:27AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > Source: choreonoid > > Version: 1.5.0+dfsg-0.1 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: Policy §3.3 > > > > I tried to report a bug against this package, and

Re: Generating a new ubuntu-keyring .deb to sign ISO CD

On 25 October 2016 at 21:56, Stefani Seibold <stef...@seibold.net> wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 25.10.2016, 14:35 +0100 schrieb Dimitri John Ledkov: >> On 25 October 2016 at 14:15, Stefani Seibold <stef...@seibold.net> >> wrote: >> > >> > On 25

Re: Generating a new ubuntu-keyring .deb to sign ISO CD

eyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian- >> > keyring.gpg --decrypt SHA512SUMS.txt.asc | sha512sum -c - >> > gpg: Signature made Mon Sep 19 19:22:17 2016 CEST >> > gpg:using RSA key CAC2D8B9CD2CA5F9 >> > keyrings/ubuntu-archive-keyring.gpg: OK >>

Re: Generating a new ubuntu-keyring .deb to sign ISO CD

untu-archive-keyring.gpg: OK > keyrings/ubuntu-archive-removed-keys.gpg: OK > keyrings/ubuntu-keyring-2004-archive.gpg: OK > keyrings/ubuntu-keyring-2004-cdimage.gpg: OK > keyrings/ubuntu-keyring-2012-archive.gpg: OK > keyrings/ubuntu-keyring-2012-cdimage.gpg: OK > keyring

Re: Installation Media and supportability of i386 in 18.04 LTS Re: Ubuntu Desktop on i386

Hello Mark, On 29 June 2016 at 14:37, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > > Folks, I think we need to understand whether i386 won't be widely used > for very small IoT devices and hence be important for developers > targeting those. I accept i386 i no longer relevant for PC's and >

Re: Installation Media and supportability of i386 in 18.04 LTS Re: Ubuntu Desktop on i386

Hello, On 28 June 2016 at 21:08, Seth Arnold wrote: >> 18.04 LTS: >> * continue to provide i386 port to run legacy applications on amd64 >> * stop producing i386 d-i / netboot installer >> * stop producing i386 kernel >> * stop producing i386 cloud-images >> * stop

Installation Media and supportability of i386 in 18.04 LTS Re: Ubuntu Desktop on i386

; [2] https://bryanquigley.com/crazy-ideas/32-bit-usage-survey-results > [3] > http://summit.ubuntu.com/uos-1411/meeting/22353/when-should-we-stop-making-32-bit-images/ > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >>

Re: Support status of nginx in Ubuntu 14.04LTS expired in Feburary 2015?

Hi, On 25 April 2016 at 19:45, Andreas Wundsam wrote: > Hello Ubuntu Maintainers, > > I was surprised to see that ubuntu-support-status shows the support of > package nginx expired in February 2015? > > --- > $ ubuntu-support-status --show-all > [] > Supported

Re: Unblock p7zip 9.20.1~dfsg.1-5 from xenial-proposed

It is not an SRU build, the build is for yakkety release. I simply did it before we had a yakkety name. On 22 April 2016 at 09:46, Amr Ibrahim wrote: > Now it builds, but it is still in xenial-proposed! Does it need to be > approved by the SRU Verification team? > --

Re: Can we include HWE in the release version?

On 6 April 2016 at 22:25, Xen wrote: > Bryan Quigley schreef op 06-04-16 22:35: >> Hi all, >> >> The naming scheme of just "Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS" is no longer >> meaningful when it comes to determining what kernel/mesa/xorg you are >> on. It's also confusing to many users

Re: Can we include HWE in the release version?

On 6 April 2016 at 21:35, Bryan Quigley wrote: > Hi all, > > The naming scheme of just "Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS" is no longer > meaningful when it comes to determining what kernel/mesa/xorg you are > on. It's also confusing to many users what 14.04.4 actually means >

Re: gpg 2

On 27 February 2016 at 12:15, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, while this works beautifully (and thanks for that), upgrading > stuff in a stable release, breaking something like gpg encryption for > end users it so

Archive Reorg Episode VII: Follow Build-Depends

tl;dr - xnox wants to remove 1 344 (35%) source packages from main Google Doc for suggestions & comments: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dJBtLLCppH2yt664S8G2jB_tK-iWi_D7wqaN6S4ddwI/edit Sample old/new germinate output is at: http://people.canonical.com/~xnox/germinate-output/ --- =

Re: Archive Reorg Episode VII: Follow Build-Depends

On 10 February 2016 at 21:14, Marc Deslauriers <marc.deslauri...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 2016-02-10 03:32 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> tl;dr - xnox wants to remove 1 344 (35%) source packages from main > > What did you use to calculate that? I get 1 344 packages

Re: kmod package

On 4 February 2016 at 03:26, Stan Wong wrote: > Hi, > > I just realize kmod package are not compile with --xz and --zlib option. > > > Reason is new kernel > 3.18 now support module compression and kmod need to > know how to detect it in order to generate working module deps

Re: Ubuntu Desktop on i386

Hi, could you please drop the HWE enablement stack out of this? HWE kernels were long provided before we started doing X/graphics stack. And they are there to enable new/latest hardware only. HWE kernels are needed on servers & clouds, it's not just desktop =) Also, whilst there are still tiny

Re: Ubuntu Desktop on i386

be modified at point release time. Regards, Dimitri. On 2 February 2016 at 19:03, Bryan Quigley <bryan.quig...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> could you please drop the HWE enablement

Re: Ubuntu Desktop on i386

bit-usage-survey-results > [3] > http://summit.ubuntu.com/uos-1411/meeting/22353/when-should-we-stop-making-32-bit-images/ > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Ubuntu has an i386 port which is fully su

Re: Wishes for +Xenial

RC bug would be one: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749661 On 28 January 2016 at 20:31, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > BTW, do you know why ifuse was removed from Debian testing? > > On 28 January 2016 at 18:30, Martinx - ジェームズ

Re: Disabling deb-src by default

Hello, On 28 January 2016 at 10:49, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Usama Akkad wrote on 28/01/16 08:38: >> >> Source packages are enabled by default. I've commented the deb-src >> line from my sources.list file and that saved

Re: Disabling deb-src by default

On 28 January 2016 at 20:48, Bryan Quigley wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Martin Pitt wrote: >> Usama Akkad [2016-01-28 10:38 +0200]: >>> Source packages are enabled by default. >> >> We don't enable them by default on cloud images,

Re: Re: about upstart

Hi, You have asked a lot of questions already. Could you maybe elaborate what are you investigating overall? Or what are you trying to achieve? Answering questions one by one is not very productive. UPSTART_SESSION variable points at private unix socket that one can use to communicate with a

Re: systemd-fsck@.service

On 2 December 2015 at 13:14, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 05:29:35PM +0200, Tom H wrote: >> 1) How does the unit now what "%f" is? > > See the "SPECIFIERS" section of the systemd.unit(5) manual page. > >> 2) "%i" is, in the case that I set up a few weeks ago,

Re: Ubuntu : developing Android native apps!

Hello, I do not provide end-user / end-developer support. It is best to ask these questions elsewhere e.g. in ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list, where multiple people can answer your question, and both questions and answers are archived and are discoverable with search engines. Have you trying

Re: Wubi

On 25 August 2015 at 09:27, Alan Pope alan.p...@canonical.com wrote: Hi, On 21 August 2015 at 14:01, Dimitri John Ledkov x...@ubuntu.com wrote: On 21 August 2015 at 13:53, Alan Pope alan.p...@canonical.com wrote: On 21 August 2015 at 13:45, Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com wrote: Modern

Re: Wubi

On 21 August 2015 at 13:53, Alan Pope alan.p...@canonical.com wrote: On 21 August 2015 at 13:45, Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com wrote: Modern Windows releases broke Wubi, so we stopped shipping and supporting it a while back. As far as I know it's a dead-end now. We didn't stop shipping

Re: equivalent of chkconfig

On 4 August 2015 at 23:28, Luis Mondesi lem...@gmail.com wrote: Exactly for those reasons. What we probably would like to see is update-service which would wrap all init services into one umbrella. update-service --list # shows all services and init running it: runit, upstart, systemd,

Re: DPDK for Ubuntu / Debian, let's do it?

Heya, On 11 July 2015 at 05:06, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Hey guys, Any plans to package Intel DPDK for Ubuntu? Also, what about integrating Open vSwitch with DPDK (after package ready)? I'd be interested in doing this in Debian (and thus in Ubuntu). My networking

Re: btrfs plans for 15.10/16.04?

On 21 Apr 2015 2:07 pm, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: On 21 April 2015 at 16:36, Bryan Quigley bryan.quig...@canonical.com wrote: Hi there, I'm just wondering if there are any plans to revisit btrfs as the default filesystem before the next LTS? So on Suse, btrfs is used

Re: pidgin package update...

On 17 February 2015 at 22:32, Anonymous anonym...@hoi-polloi.org wrote: Hi there! There is a Pidgin update from pidgin.im with some security fixes in October that are not currently in the Ubuntu Pidgin package. Ubuntu has us at Pidgin 2.10.9, and Pidgin 2.10.10 is out with some security

Re: Bug Triage Beginner question about package dependencies for file-roller

On 24 January 2015 at 08:04, Gunnar Hjalmarsson gunna...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hi Dave! On 2015-01-24 01:21, Dave Kokandy wrote: I am getting started with bug management in Lubuntu, and one bug seems like it would be fixed by making the package file-roller depend on yelp (currently recommended,

Re: Updater can't update kernel due to disk space

On 15 January 2015 at 21:04, Adam Conrad adcon...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:49:42AM -0600, Dustin Kirkland wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Adam Conrad adcon...@ubuntu.com wrote: I can see several ways power users can shoot themselves in the foot with autoremove,

Re: Devuan

On 2 December 2014 at 10:11, Stephen P. Villano stephen.p.vill...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/2/14 2:59 AM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: On 02.12.2014 08:27, Martin Pitt wrote: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult [2014-12-02 7:55 +0100]: By the way: is it then be mandatory ? Yes, it will

Re: Devuan

Heya, On 2 December 2014 at 11:57, Diego Germán Gonzalez diegogermangonza...@gmail.com wrote: El 02/12/14 a las 08:12, Tom H escibió: Why would Ubuntu give its users a choice of init now when it hasn't in the past? -- Why use Unity when we always use Gnome? Why use LibreOffice when we

Re: The fate of Upstart

On 28 November 2014 at 12:41, Ben Tinner bentin...@yahoo.com.sg wrote: Hello Recently, the developers of Ubuntu have decided to migrate the init system from upstart to systemd. So, I would like to find out what will happen to upstart after Ubuntu complete its transition to systemd. Will

Re: Thoughts about software-properties

Heya, On 2 August 2010 14:04, Mohammed Amine IL Idrissi ilidrissiam...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I was discussing with Michael Vogt about an idea I've had for a long time, and he recommended me to share my thoughts here. So, here goes nothing: Software-properties is one of the few applications

Re: root and capabilities list

On 15 October 2014 02:11, ds 1000hz.radiow...@gmail.com wrote: On 15.10.2014 04:54, Colin Watson wrote: Martin's right - CAP_SYS_MODULE is functionally equivalent to root. I see. Anyway, there is another part, reading the msr and cpuid. For that, it seems to be really beneficial, to make

Re: sudoers

On 17 May 2014 06:53, Charl Wentzel charl.went...@vodamail.co.za wrote: On 17/05/2014 01:35, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: On 16 May 2014 07:26, Charl Wentzel charl.went...@vodamail.co.za wrote: I wanted do to debugging in Eclipse which required me to let Eclipse run gdb with sudo. However

Re: sudoers

On 16 May 2014 07:26, Charl Wentzel charl.went...@vodamail.co.za wrote: Hi Guys I recently struggled with an issue for quite a few days because of the way the /etc/sudoers file is laid out. I would like to make a suggestion to change it that would hopefully save others the same hassle. I

Re: Our Networking Story

On 6 March 2014 21:32, Benjamin Kerensa bkere...@ubuntu.com wrote: Why was it necessary to have discussions internally when they could have been open by default? Eh... this particular bug is public and well known in both Debian and Ubuntu for a long time now. As you can see in that email, he

Re: Full disk encryption for multiple disks

On 2 February 2014 14:47, Haug Bürger pi...@dokom.net wrote: Hi, I just tried to set up a secure system with multiple disks and found the Ubuntu installer more or less useless. It works for a single disk solution only. If you have a SSD and a harddisk and want all it all encrypted, you are

Re: NetworkManager cleartext config files vs home folder encryption

On 25 December 2013 02:07, Per Guth mailingl...@perguth.de wrote: Hello, I recently stumbled over the fact, that NetworkManager by default stores Wifi profiles *including clear text passwords* under `/etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/`. It's stored there because All users may connect

Re: NetworkManager cleartext config files vs home folder encryption

On 25 December 2013 10:31, Per Guth m...@perguth.de wrote: On 25.12.2013 10:36, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: It's stored there because All users may connect to this network ticked on that Wifi connection point. Open network indicator - Edit connections ... - Select network - Click edit

Re: NetworkManager cleartext config files vs home folder encryption

On 25 December 2013 20:20, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote: Dimitri John Ledkov [2013-12-25 14:15 +]: I don't remember, but i thought it was not the default. Until lucid or natty it indeed wasn't, it defaulted to per-user connections. But this is highly unfriendly with multiple

Re: Including VirtualBox guest drivers in trusty iso.

Hello, On 20 December 2013 10:04, Robie Basak robie.ba...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 02:55:11PM +0530, staticd wrote: The drivers (virtualbox-guest-dkms, virtualbox-guest-x11, virtualbox-guest-utils) are in debian and ubuntu repos (universe) and total to only 1.8MB. What

  1   2   >