Re: +1 maintenance report

bian and Ubuntu. Basically, a bug watch will monitor the upstream bug report (status and comments depending on the bug tracker) in the remote tracker and update the bug task's status in Launchpad. This makes it much easier for future travellers to see what is going on with the bug in other bug trackers. [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Watches Happy Friday! -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Requesting autopkgtests

Cheers, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Migrating to deb822 sources on upgrade to Mantic

> > > to > > > PPA management in 23.10) > > > > Yes! PPAs and third party sources work fine as deb822 .sources files > > add-apt-repository works but ppa-purge does not. Is there a bug report about that? It is something which we'd want to keep track of and

PSA: Error Tracker maintenance

downtime will be resent. Cheers, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Retention period for autopkgtest test logs

to automatically remove test results for PPAs which ran more than 8 weeks ago. Does 8 weeks seem like too short of a period to anybody? Thanks! -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo

Early upgrades to Ubuntu 23.10

://snapcraft.io/firmware-updater Cheers, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Is there a good solution for this: release-upgrade with dependency moved to universe

appropriate meta-release file indicates. However, you could build the package locally put and extract the tarball on the system to be upgraded and run "sudo ./noble" to test your changes. It is important to note that "do-release-upgrade" does pass some environment variabl

Re: Bumping apt RSA key length requirements to 3072-bit (2048 w/ warning) for 24.04

tation > mechanism(s) [4][5] have been implemented. I think there is a word missing in the above paragraph. What specifically will happen to PPAs owned by user accounts created prior to 2014-03-11? Thanks, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify sett

PSA: proposed-migration for arm64

to run on the big flavor to see if the hint is still necessary. Have a great weekend! -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: PSA: proposed-migration for arm64

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 03:11:06AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 09.02.24 18:51, Brian Murray wrote: > > Additionally, we've increased the default instance size from 1 CPU and > > 1536MB to 2 CPUs and 4096MB. Subsequently, the Ubuntu QA team will also > > be testing

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

404 you encountered is a consequence of us only copying forward neutral and passing autopkgtest results when opening the archive for a development release of Ubuntu. However, britney (which generates update_excuses) is not aware of this and produces a non-existent link for the log file. Regardless, retry-autopkgtest-regressions should not crash just because one log file is not available and I've fixed that now[1]. [1] https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-archive-tools/commit/?id=3fc993e971fcbcb9ebb5729a30e56eed72514b5f Cheers, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

taking an extraordinarily long period of time to be provisioned in PS6. This has been reported in RT 164415 and is documented at our autopkgtest service page[1]. [1] https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/autopkgtest-service/34490 -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.

PSA: autopkgtests on ppc64el and s390x

l was - I added the package to big_packages to get consistent results. [3] https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs/ Have a great weekend! -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscri

Re: $HOME changed by sudo

an/listinfo/ubuntu-devel > > > > > -- > ubuntu-devel mailing list > ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel -- Brian Murray Ubuntu Bug Master signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Can we fix apport to stop reporting all upgrade bugs against dpkg?

also filed about the wrong package? I've been looking at some apport-package bug reports recently and think there are quite a few improvements that could be made to reduce the quantity of them being reported and increase their quality. Thanks, -- Brian Murray Ubuntu Bug Master signature

Natty apport-crash reports

n crash reports coming in? Thanks! -- Brian Murray signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

mass tagging of some bug reports

ning up existing apport-package bug reports and when creating tests for package installation failures. Barring any strenuous objections I plan on doing this on Friday, July 22nd so you might want filter bug mail from me with the body: "** Tags added: dist-upgrade" to somewhere special - b

New information in bugs reported by apport

you more information about how bug reporters are using your software and help spot configuration errors more quickly. [1] http://launchpad.net/bugs/803977 -- Brian Murray signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify

Re: SRUs for typo fixes in descriptions

ith high impact fixes. The following > exceptions are made to the high impact rule explicitly: > > * ... LTS hardware > > * ... Commercial partner software > > * ... FTBFS This should also be modified to include: * ... Apport package hook additions Due to the fact that the vol

Re: SRUs for typo fixes in descriptions

On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 07:28:24PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > On jeu., 2011-08-04 at 07:36 -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > > This should also be modified to include: > > > > * ... Apport package hook additions > > Could be not? Or could we move those out of

Re: SRUs for typo fixes in descriptions

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:43:05AM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Robert Collins > wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Brian Murray wrote: > >> With regards to the volume of bug reports - since Maverick has been > >> rel

Re: SRUs for typo fixes in descriptions

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 04:42:31PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:47:51PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 07:28:24PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > > On jeu., 2011-08-04 at 07:36 -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > > > Do

Package conflicts

and also tagged them 'package-conflict' where appropriate. -- Brian Murray Ubuntu Bug Master signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

The future of migration-assistant

/+spec/foundations-q-testing-migration-assistant You can find some of the bugs that need fixing here too. [2] https://launchpad.net/migration-assistant -- Brian Murray Ubuntu Bug Master -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https

Re: Early release upgrade notifications

apture the processes running when the dialog is presented. -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Monthly Updates versus Monthly Images

-security pocket and deal with the annoyance of a > > pocket that doesn't have a stable base to depend on. > > Pardon my ignorance, but what does a "P-U-P value over 100" mean? Phased Update Percentage, I believe. -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Mysterious Python pyc file corruption problems

n3.3: http://launchpad.net/bugs/1178599 This looks to be a fresh install of Raring so the apport data seems trustworthy. (There are some apport issues with delayed reporting and distribution upgrades.) I'll be doing a full search of Launchpad bugs shortly. -- Brian Murray signature.asc Descri

Re: Mysterious Python pyc file corruption problems

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:15:05PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 04:36:56PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > Hello Developers, > > > > I am trying to debug and fix a particularly vexing problem in Python that > > manifests on Ubuntu in severa

Phasing of Stable Release Updates

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PhasedUpdates Thanks! -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Error Tracker retracing armhf crashes

which it has been allocated, this is possible by querying the database, so just ask me. Additionally, one can always search for bugs about a particular package which may appear on phone images by specifying the package e.g.: http://errors.ubuntu.com/?package=whoopsie -- Brian Murray -- ubu

Re: errors.ubuntu.com and upgrade crashes

ee that the UpgradeStatus is "No upgrade log present", so your initial suspicion about this happening during a release upgrade may be incorrect. I also went ahead and ran a query of 100 of the crash instances for UpgradeStatus and found the following. 100 examined. 39 upgraded. 61 fresh i

Re: errors.ubuntu.com and upgrade crashes

ooking at -- but then again this has to be expected when there are different > versions affected by the same crash (Im blissfully ignorant about how apport > matches those as "the same" though anyway). I'm interested in seeing an example of the problem. -- Brian Murray --

Re: errors.ubuntu.com and upgrade crashes

absolute, but normalized in a way[1] that is making > > them uncomparable > > Frequency is an absolute count. (Perhaps we should call it "Count" > instead?) If it was being normalized in any way, it would often be > fractional, but it never is. It seems far more likely to

Re: errors.ubuntu.com and upgrade crashes

pened regulary/statistically significant in > earlier > versions b/ have no good reproduction scenario. http://errors.ubuntu.com/bug/1219245 This will work for any Launchpad bug report that is a crash reported by apport (tagged apport-crash). I've also written a greasemonkey scrip

Re: errors.ubuntu.com and upgrade crashes

nteresting if there are more > cases like that. As Matthew mentioned earlier there is a database migration that is still pending and it is likely that this issue would show more 13.10 occurrences when that migration is complete. -- Brian Murray signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Ubuntu Error Tracker

sit a crash page that you know used to exist. Again as we receive more crashes the same problem identifiers will appear in the new database. In the coming months we intend to restore the old data into one cassandra database. -- Brian Murray signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-

Re: Obsolete packages request for removal

o Ubuntu 14.04 failing which seems to have impacted a lot of users and these reports continue to trickle in. Can anything be done for these users? -- Brian Murray signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Ease of enabling -proposed

I might have made for leaving the checkbox would be to make it easier for people to participate in the SRU verification process, but I don't having people unintentionally enable it is worth that. Are there any objections to removing the "Pre-released updates" checkbox from

Re: Ubuntu ddebs $distro-security Problems

Ubuntu Error Tracker does not use -security so feel free to completely remove their indexes. -- Brian Murray signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Ubuntu Error Tracker retraces

et me know. [1] An example of a successful retrace that's uninformative https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/46cdc799549ce925789dda64598d44de62337f13 [2] These should only be from Wily or Xenial since we previously used a Vivid version of gdb. Thanks! -- Brian Murray signature.asc Descriptio

PSA: Merge-o-Matic changes

/bugs/252420 -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: changelogs.ubuntu.com questions/issues?

been an issue with that update indeed > > and the service is on changelogs.u.c (unsure who is having access/is > maintaining it though) I have access to the server and the user. I will take a look at it later this week. -- Brian Murray signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- u

Re: changelogs.ubuntu.com questions/issues?

report. On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 03:37:05AM +, Robert Ancell wrote: > For the record, Seb opened bug 1555266 to track this. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555266 > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:09 AM Brian Murray wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:48:3

Ubuntu Error Tracker is read-only

I'll send another announcement when we are up and running with the new database. Thanks! -- Brian Murray signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Ubuntu Error Tracker is read-only

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 09:37:01AM -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > Some of you might remember that the Ubuntu Error Tracker had problems > with the size of its database when it first came into service and that > we had to use a fresh database a couple of times. We've always wanted >

Re: SRU never reviewed, why/how do we avoid that next time?

ms rude to reject an upload and throw away someones work just because a bug is missing information, if we then give the uploader two weeks(?) we may end up in the situation where have a long messy queue again. -- Brian Murray signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Promote adobe-flashplugin over flashplugin-installer

vided by update-notifier-common actually does the downloading and installing of flashplugin-installer, and it internally uses apt-helper. -- Brian Murray signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: The sponsorship queue

> ubuntu-sponsors isn't subscribed, so apparently nobody was aware of this > issue. > see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess Looking at the activity log for the bug we can see that we were subscribed in August of 2016, unfortunately it doesn't show when the team was

Re: The sponsorship queue

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:35:46AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:10:29AM -0800, Brian Murray wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:22:36AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > ubuntu-sponsors isn't subscribed, so apparently nobody was aware of this

PSA: Pending Stable Release Updates

d see what you should help verify. [1] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html Thanks, -- Brian Murray signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ma

Changes to do-release-upgrade and meta-release files

ase-lts-development is currently empty and meta-release-development only contains information about Ubuntu 17.04 and Artful Aadrvark which will become Ubuntu 17.10. I hope this makes things a bit clearer! [1] http://launchpad.net/bugs/1497024 [2] http://launchpad.net/bugs/1700829 -- B

Re: linting wrapper for dput

; > (it also checks that for SRU bugs the listed bugs have open tasks for the > appropriate distro / source packages). One problem the SRU team sometimes encounters is bugs linked in SRUs being private, perhaps you could also check for those? Thanks! -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel maili

Re: "sponsorhip for retrying dep8 tests"

who made the change and if it is different than the package_signer then you know package_creator is the sponsoree. -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

the end-user. I would welcome 'silent' > crash-reporting for such use cases. If you install the package apport-noui the crash reports should be reported 'silently'. I haven't worked on in a bit but if you run into any issues please let me know. Thanks, -- Brian Murray -

Re: Bugs reports should include syslog warnings or not?

always ask the bug reporter to run the same command, 'journalctl -b --priority=warning --lines=1000', and add that to their regular bug reports if necessary. -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

[ubuntu/bionic-proposed] update-manager 1:18.04.11 (Accepted)

plate Thanks, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: [ubuntu/bionic-proposed] update-manager 1:18.04.11 (Accepted)

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 02:53:13PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Brian Murray wrote: > > Why is it necessary to modify individual packages so that GNOME > > Software won't uninstall them? > > > > Is update-manager being a dependency

Re: Proposal: Let's drop i386

you elaborate on the methodology you used to create these Error Tracker statistics? I'm not certain engrampa was a representative choice given that it is also part of the xubuntu-desktop and ubuntu-mate-desktop tasks. -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

ubuntu-release-upgrader and postgresql

rce/update-manager/+bug/871893 Thanks! -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

A checklist for the new release cycle process

feedback about using Trello for this please let us know. [1] https://trello.com/b/4aAGzJJu/ubuntu-release-opening-checklist [2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NewReleaseCycleProcess [3] It was the best thing I could come up with. [4] Contact me for access Cheers! -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel maili

mlocate - what is it good for?

bugs/1823518 Thanks, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Sponsorship Queue needs some love

ts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/). I don't > know what I'm doing wrong, but these packages need sponsoring: > > https://launchpad.net/bugs/1829562 > https://launchpad.net/bugs/1831154 I see both of these in the sponsorship report which was last updated on "Fri, 3

Re: Sponsorship Queue needs some love

On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 08:11:29AM -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > Hi Brian, > > On Thu, 2019-05-30 at 17:50 -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > > > > I see both of these in the sponsorship report which was last updated > > on > > "Fri, 31 May 2019 00:41:07 -

Re: mlocate - what is it good for?

we would still want to address the bugs so I'd just assume it > stay in standard. I'm not sure I understand the distinction between it staying in standard versus it being in main but unseeded. The support for the package doesn't change if it is part of standard as far as

Re: mlocate - what is it good for?

a step missing here - you also need to run updatedb after installing mlocate and that isn't obvious. Setting up mlocate (0.26-2ubuntu3.1) ... update-alternatives: using /usr/bin/mlocate to provide /usr/bin/locate (locate) in auto mode (disco-amd64)root@impulse:/tmp# locate ubuntu.py locate: can not

Re: RFC: baseline requirements for Ubuntu rootfs: xattrs and fscaps

umentation for which I have submitted some patches to clarify the behavior of --xattrs-include. [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2019-06/msg2.html -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

mlocate package seeding

, however this package is still in main and will continue to be supported at the same level that it was. [1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2019-May/040685.html [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=880507 Cheers, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu

Re: Supporting LZ4 as initramfs compressor

they > > > >need updating, update this back to 18.04) > > > > - document this issue in the release notes > > > > > > > ubuntu-release-upgrader is dynamically calculated, but I have now > > proposed to bump/update the fallback guestimate. &

PSA: crash retracing for 19.10

ilar crash signatures to 19.10 crashes and could provide us some useful information. [1] The Contents-amd64.gz file is empty for the release pocket in 19.10. Thanks, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.

Re: PSA: crash retracing for 19.10

The Contents files have been created and the retracing system for the Ubuntu Error Tracker is working as normal. On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 02:23:17PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > We used to be in the habit of sending Public Service Announcements (PSA) > to this mailing list when there were

Re: archive openings are not always fun (not forwarded issues, and ftbfs left over from the previous series)

ward-bug-to-debian python script in ubuntu-qa-tools[2] which should forward a Launchpad bug to reportbug which you can then submit to Debian. [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/ReportingToDebian [2] https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol/ubuntu-qa-tools/+git/ubuntu-qa-tools/+ref/master Happy

Re: Defaulting to verify the image integrity before installing on desktop?

unction with FEC, could avoid a large range of installer bug reports > and support requests we see constantly in IRC #ubuntu due to data > corruption. > > The aim would be: > > 1. Enable FEC in kernel > 2. Adapt live-build to create the verity images > 3. Create user

Server installer plans for 20.04 LTS

I wanted to let you know that a post has been made to discourse[1] regarding our plans for the server installation method for the next release of Ubuntu. We invite you to join the discussion there. [1] https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/server-installer-plans-for-20-04-lts/13631 Thanks! -- Brian

PSA: Retracing backlog

I wanted to let everyone know that the Error Tracker retracers are currently working through a backlog of about 15k crash reports. I expect it to be sorted out by the end of the week though. Thanks, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or

Langpacks on the desktop ISOs

well translated languages that can be added to the ISOs. While the release team and Foundations team have discussed this issue I don't think either of them is well positioned to actually work on this. Is there a team or individual willing to take this on? Thanks! -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-dev

Focal Fossa Beta candidate builds ready to test

/milestones/411/builds Thanks! -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu

I created a new branch of ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu for focal[1] so that I could land some changes (so we don't lose them) to trunk that would break translations. [1] https://code.launchpad.net/~ubiquity-slideshow/ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/focal Happy Friday! -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-

Re: Staging changes for future SRU landings

. Are there any edge cases I > haven't considered? Alternative suggestions appreciated. As far as I can tell this wasn't implemented. Were there objections or edge cases found where this would not be the correct course of action? -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubu

Re: +1 maintenance status − June 18-19

ce them locally, I asked for retries with various triggers, but > no luck I'm curious how you ran the python-cogent autopkgtests as I was able to recreate the failure using qemu as the virtualization server during one of my previous +1 shifts. Thanks! -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing l

+1 maintenance report

24_ecf51@/log.gz [2] autopkgtest -B python3-scipy_1.4.1-2_ppc64el.deb scipy-1.4.1/ -- lxd autopkgtest/ubuntu/groovy/ppc64el [3] https://git.launchpad.net/autopkgtest-cloud/commit/?id=fc21a96fffc7cfac43c23150440d2a9b64c6518d -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.co

Re: +1 maintenance status − June 18-19

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 05:33:43PM +0200, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 7:59 PM Brian Murray wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 08:03:56PM +0200, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > I was on +1 maintenance shift this

Paused releasing of packages to -updates

y see a delay in packages moving, however if there is something that you feel is critical to release feel free to contact me. On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubunt

Re: nodejs in groovy-proposed? (Re: +1 maintenance report)

for arm64 only. Their test histories look like they mostly fail with > scattered random passes. Maybe a flaky test? Maybe re-running it a few > times will resolve them? I'm running the tests for one of these packages, node-redis, with a longer timeout value and if that passes we c

Re: nodejs in groovy-proposed? (Re: +1 maintenance report)

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 04:21:24PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 02:13:40PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 01:02:27PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 09:55:16AM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > >

PPAs and autopkgtests

Cheers, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Proposal: Enabling DMESG_RESTRICT for Groovy Onward

ovy onward. > > FTR: This change breaks kernel error reporting in apport, see > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1896095 > > for more information - as apport now can't read dmesg, and hence > can't attach it to bugs. There's a trivial fix wh

systemd PathExists triggers

hExists or PathExistsGlob. Briefly scanning the list the following packages should probably be looked at: mandos-client ostree python-diskimage-builder ubuntu-report [1] http://launchpad.net/bugs/1891657 [2] https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/k5Gj7rQ9FX/ Cheers, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel

ubiquity git repository

pull requests as I'm not very familiar with ubiquity but at least this way the reviewer could approve the change and I could do the actual merge and upload. [1] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-installer/+members Thanks, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.

Re: ubiquity git repository

On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 09:39:00AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 09:17:46AM -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > > Only the Ubuntu Installer Team[1] can push to the branch at > > https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-installer/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+ref/master. > >

Re: ubiquity git repository

On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 07:50:13PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 07:34:05AM -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 09:39:00AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > ~canonical-foundations already has (force-)push access to that > > > re

Re: Hirsute opening status?

ing. I saw something about this mentioned in #ubuntu-release the other day. https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/10/26/%23ubuntu-release.html#t18:05 -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: helping golang-golang-x-sys to migrate

; > I'd appreciate some thoughts/comments on helping golang-golang-x-sys > >> migrate to hirsute. > >> > > >> > Thanks! > >> > > >> > -- > >> > regards, > >> > Reinhard > >> > -- > >> > ubuntu-devel mailing list > >> > ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > >> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak > >> Foundations Team > >> lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com > >> www.canonical.com > >> > > > > > > -- > > regards, > > Reinhard > > > > > -- > regards, > Reinhard > -- > ubuntu-devel mailing list > ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: +1 maintenance report (dogtag-pki vs 389-ds-base)

d with 389-ds-base/1.4.4.4-1: > > sqlite> SELECT test.package, result.version, result.triggers, > result.exitcode FROM result INNER JOIN test ON test.id = result.test_id where > test.package = 'dogtag-pki' and result.triggers LIKE '%389-ds-base%'; I find your querying of the SQLite database pretty interesting. Is there any documentation about the structure of the database and queries that might be useful? Cheers, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Call for testing: 20.04.2 release candidate images ready!

m" and it should refer to "SHA256 checksum". Could you report a bug about that for the corresponding project[1]? [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website Thanks for testing! -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or u

Re: Setting NotAutomatic for hirsute+1-proposed

us release, where we could have had tools > disable -proposed for them, but also people who have explicitly turned > it on after installing a daily out of an attempt to help test the > upcoming release. Just as a reminder ubuntu-release-upgrader does disable -proposed during the upgrade t

Improvements for hardware support in Ubuntu Desktop installation media

://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/improvements-for-hardware-support-in-ubuntu-desktop-installation-media/20606 On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Updating SRU docs

at wiki page to clarify that it should be in a comment, thanks for bringing this up. > QATeam docs? > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Verification Dimitri this link is the same as the previous one, did you mean to send a different one? Cheers, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-d

Re: Updating SRU docs

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:18:47AM -0700, Heather Lemon wrote: > this one? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification Well that has an Include pointing at the main StableReleaseUpdates page so I guess I updated that too! Brian > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:10 AM Brian Murray

PSA: Sponsoring Report update

which also includes some HTML 5 changes from Simon Quigley. The point being please let me know if you notice anything wrong with it! http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/ Cheers, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe

Upgrades to Ubuntu 21.04

him signed will make it available in Ubuntu 21.04 and then enable upgrades. [1] https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/hirsute-hippo-release-notes/19221#heading-release-upgrades [2] http://launchpad.net/bugs/1925010 Cheers, -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Mod

  1   2   >