=== Developer Membership Board meeting, 2011-04-25 ===
Chair: Iain Lane
Present: Cody Somerville, Benjamin Drung, Mackenzie Morgan, Stéphane
Graber, Michael Bienia
Review of previous action items
* Laney to update delegated teams to allow members to renew their
memberships
Hi there,
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:08:49AM -0400, Etienne Goyer wrote:
Hi guys,
Even though I am not involved in the SRU process, I systematically skim
the patch pilot report in case an upcoming SRU would be of interest to
me. The important bit for me is to know which package is about to get
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:20:08PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Didier Raboud writes ("Re: Color Management in Debian"):
Given that Debian is currently not frozen (and that the Oneiric
release will very probably happen before Wheezy's), I really think
that not uploading those packages to Debian fir
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:54:37PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
[...]
Hrm. So syncpackage generates a .changes for uploading to ubuntu from
the .dsc (which presumably came out of the Debian build). That does
mean though that the Ubuntu target suite is not visible in the
changelog of the ultimate U
Hello there,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:00:31PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During the desktop team meeting today we discussed deprecated libs and
> CD space, tomboy is keeping libgnome, libgnomeui, libbonobo,
> libbonoboui, libgnomecanvas on the CD in oneiric and will until upstream
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:16:45PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 05:43:23 PM Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> > [...] And then I guess you could add "should
> > Canonical-sponsored upstream projects be treated differently than
> > other upstream projects for purposes of Ubunt
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:40:44AM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 07/21/2011 11:17 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 21, 2011 01:09:46 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
> >> On 07/20/2011 04:02 PM, Iain Lane wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 03:32:39PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, July 21, 2011 03:05:04 PM Iain Lane wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:40:44AM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
> > > On 07/21/2011 11:17 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> &g
for, it is rare for applications to be
accepted from people contributing for less than 6 months.
The DMB also applies these tests when granting membership. Please be
mindful of these when you (even implicitly and without naming specific
occasions, which invariably is what happens) criticise our a
ev):
Per-package uploaders [...] are implicitly considered Ubuntu Members
from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers#PerPackage
I just updated that page a bit. It's probably not clear enough that UCD
is 'just' Ubuntu Membership granted by the DMB. Please help me out by
fin
got it.
> Just to understand that what I really needed was 'Per Package Uploader'
> level. So it edited my wiki page and applied again. Today I would
> totally skip first phase as from my perspective it was useless waste of
> time.
That is unfortunate. Could you help to
omething sensible. Even
> if we just change it in the documentation.
I just added a discussion item to the next DMB agenda to rename the team
to Ubuntu Development Members. This is in line with the other delegated
(non RMB) membership names, and I think is much less confusing.
Cheers,
--
Iain La
part of) and I think
> that's correct. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard does not
> discuss how the DMB is formed (perhaps it should).
I share your interpretation too. Backed up by this page
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CommunityCouncil/Restaffing
Cheers,
--
Iain L
recognition of
past good work. If people don't think membership is a thing worth
getting then that is another issue.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:54:00PM +0200, Michael Bienia wrote:
> On 2011-07-25 16:11:43 +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:01:35PM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> > > I agree that the name is misleading and it's unfortunate that it
> > > conf
uidelines, at least as much as can be written
down
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/ApplicationProcess
Please help to improve.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@d
umask, I suggest
> running the tests with an "umask 022" statement.
I believe this is fixed by
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commit;h=f5b9b28a55b6a786fd6192b9fde06bef19206e30
but I haven't tested it. If someone has time, they could
eved and should only be something the DMB can choose to fallback
> to on a case by case basis and not offered as a general way of applying.
+1. I'm sorry everyone finds it so terrible currently.
Regards,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@oranges
mean to badger with
> >>> questions on the list, it's only because I can't find any information
> >>> on how else to interact with the board.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> -- Chase
> >>
> >> Hi,
&g
urce builds the
> new libgwibber2 binary. As far as I'm aware libgwibber1 has a single
> rdepend: the obsolete indicator-me. This looks like a candidate for
> removal rather than sync?
Yeah, that's right. See #811185. Closing the other one now, thanks!
Cheers,
--
Iain L
requirement to go through any other.
Remember, the page linked above is on a wiki so please be bold and make
improvememnts when you can see opportunity to do so. Concrete
suggestions for improvements are preferred. :-)
Regards,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk
Hey,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 12:57:36PM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am 05.10.2011 12:40, schrieb Iain Lane:
> > Please visit the page
> >
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers#Ubuntu_Contributing_Developers
> >
> > to see our cur
be run through them first, in a
similar-but-not-as-complicated role to that played by the Debian release
team.
As we rely quite heavily on Debian for QA anyway, we can probably only
care for those transitions happening in Ubuntu first (as you said).
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:21:05PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 04:17:43PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 03:55:54PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > […]
> > > > All three cases have in common that th
to not
further break things. Saying “I have broken your software with my new
library and if you want it in Ubuntu then you must port to the new API
in a small number of weeks” is very disappointing.
Regards,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Develo
id=100127&atid=413115
and FWIW there is also this bug which is relevant to deprecating REVU
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=313345&group_id=100127&atid=413115
If there are any other features that debexpo should take from REVU then
please fil
15
413 different people uploaded packages to the archive (using
Changed-By).
The source package uploaded the most times was … drumroll …
gnome-settings-daemon with 46 uploads! Followed closely by livecd-rootfs
with 45.
:-)
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquas
is and links into our guide. The first paragraph of the
guide should also explain its scope.
Regards,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer
** stgraber to create desktop-extra set
== People present (lines said) ==
* Laney (70)
* tumbleweed (22)
* micahg (21)
* bdrung (19)
* meetingology (15)
* stgraber (10)
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer
u.com/reports/sponsoring/
I'll try and make myself available for sponsorship and release questions
in #ubuntu-motu over the course of today and tomorrow. I hope others
will join me.
YEAH.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian
ommunication glitch
30/04 14:26:05 I was intending to run syncs from testing
until UDS
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer
Voting for friendly-recovery, libnih, mountall, upstart
Voting: +1 barry laney tumbleweed stgraber micahg bdrung
The application is accepted.
ACTION: stgraber to add permissions
=== AOB ===
Chair for next meeting: micahg
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk
Ubuntun Contributing Developer
For: 0 Against: 3 Abstained: 0
== Action items ==
* micahg document the zentyal packageset
* everyone try and be at CC meeting July 5th 17:00 UTC
* micahg to start a discussion on dmb@ about whether PPU should confer
membership
--
Iain Lane
ny at that moment in time. Most of the actual /development/
takes place in Debian, under pkg-haskell. It's a good idea to join the
lists over there if you want to get more involved.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer
aney to contact menesis about schooltool packageset
* laney to contact TB to see if netbook/unr/mobile packagesets are still needed
* stgraber to add ppu for lexical to fwts
* next chair cody-somerville (tumbleweed)
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
De
conduit for "non-platform" software.
Creating two almost entirely separate tiers of software distribution is
something that requires a very large amount of thought and careful
deliberation. We absolutely must not rush into anything.
Thanks for readin
load bug fix releases to other packages, which the
release team will consider on a case-by-case basis. We may hold
uploads in the queue until after the beta, if the fixes are not
necessary for the beta.
Have a happy β², cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@oranges
not)? There are quite a number of those
in the queue. I suspect they distort the numbers somewhat. (Not wishing
to rehash the debate on whether these things should be in the queue,
just addressing the current situation)
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
x27;
It's always possible to improve. I hope and believe that we can continue
to recognise and act on opportunities to do so, and that the rest of you
will continue to support the DMB (and other governance bodies) in their
efforts which are being carried out in good faith and with the right
i
s they
seek (sometimes they are granted even broader permissions if that seems
appropriate). I feel pleased and proud when I look back on the excellent
developers that have been approved during my time on the DMB.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
details to me or
developer-membership-board@l.u.c and I/we will follow up with them. I
don't want the process to be seen as such a huge burden that puts people
who should be given uploads rights off from even applying, and I'm keen
to work to change this.
Cheers,
a further application. We all
know how RL can get in the way of our volunteer community work from time
to time.
Let's step back from the attacks please.
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@
e of any such constraints.
Ho hum. This mail has fewer answers than I had hoped when I started it.
Sorry for rambling. This kind of discussion can be had next week.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer
o haven't noticed yet (since I didn't see it
elsewhere in mail), it seems from [0] that the times have changed to
14:00 - 22:00 UTC.
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 04:53:58PM -0500, Michael Hall wrote:
> 14:00 - 20:00 UTC actually
Right - it got updated for a third time after I posted. I think the
canonical location is http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-1303/
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org
the more egregious of the problems, or replacing it with something more
> stable.
> Time permitting, I'd be willing to work with others to help improve it.
Yeah, me too. There's also indicator-china-weather which I don't think
is a fork but perhaps could be folded back into
ore and I think it'll make me a happier
reviewer and consumer. We can revisit the MP thing in time, if
necessary.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer
, I
never did. There would be some other work needed too before it could be
enabled, like getting buildds to ignore the flag. It still seems to me
that this is the right thing to do. If anyone wants to pick it up and
push it over the line then please do.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane
lease to make your case if you think your upload needs to go
into the beta.
[0]
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer
taking a look at a bug.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital
've been broken since the DC move. So, that's on the radar
> and once it's fixed it'll address the most serious problem.
It's only one reason packages fail to migrate, so it only partially
solves the problem.
--
Iain Lane
Downloading all of that data isn't
something which is done all of the time for every user.
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [ la
two (or if, say, there's some data
loss) then we'll extend the voting deadline. In any event, there will be
another CfV which should remind folks if they've been unable to vote due
to this.
Apologies for the problems.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane
make this harder. I'm
not sure about the tradeoff here.
If this is a line of thought worth carrying on with, I could probably
recreate some brain state from back then and try to finish the feature.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian
run in the production environment and so you'd get
accurate results.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.
here's also this one too but I don't know if we need it. Do we?
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-transition-trackers/ubuntu-transition-tracker/configs/view/head:/monitor/old/python3.4_all_dev.ben
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@oran
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 06:11:54PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 09:48:16AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > […]
> > My understanding is that Matthias has asked Iain to help set this up. I
> > don't know the status of this yet - Matthias? Iain?
&g
s
includes transitions that will prevent seeded packages reaching the
release pocket.
We're not planning on freezing the archive for the alpha this time, to
minimise disruption, but we ask for you to be considerate in return.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.
ask the release team in #ubuntu-release and we can allow it
through.
Otherwise, your patience is appreciated. I expect the freeze to last no
longer than 36 hours.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:08:31AM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> […]
> Otherwise, your patience is appreciated. I expect the freeze to last no
> longer than 36 hours.
^^ 60 - off by one day.
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian
notice that it contains more items now. This is because we
now look at merge proposals which uploading teams have to review -
team-owned packaging branches have these as reviewer by default but they
were quite easy to miss before.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:36:27AM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/laney-test/kubuntu-dev.html
http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/kubuntu-dev.html
:)
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Develo
in Debian (pkg-gnome, pkg-evolution,
pkg-vala and friends) I'd prefer to do it immediately there. Feel free
to file a bug with patch in the BTS and X-Debbugs-CC me.
As Seb says, probably at first concentrate on the things that help you
to achieve a goal (e.g. cross-building some pa
every 2 weeks for the next 2
years (all the '2's...)? Without a properly functioning board there is
no path for new contributors to get upload rights or developer
membership.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane
That would be for the new members to work out. Of course that
might be difficult if there is one member with a wildly different
timezone to the rest - not sure what to say there... (that member could
primarily contribute by email?)
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@o
-Qt dependency is
> libdbusmenu-qt4) so probably it can be a recommendation of libqtgui4 too.
Please do this one too.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer
please *please* find some time to sponsor a few things.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ]
signature.asc
De
x27;m not yet convinced
that creating more classes of developer is required. Not that I need to
be convinced. :)
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer
release specifically, as
well as demonstrating an understanding of its process, then you probably
do want to create a new class that doesn't require this. That would
certainly be acceptable. I'm saying that I don't set the bar high enough
to see the required level of understanding
rbose output if you wanted to.
I agree that it would be better if our aptdaemon backend were dropped in
favour of using packagekit, but if somebody has time to work on this
then it is the task for the start of a cycle, not the end.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@or
be
fixed to enable more developer autonomy. That said, I don't have a new
proposal to make right now but I would be interested in trying to work
one out.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ l
posal, but I think that this extreme level of
paranoia should be removed from the process one way or another and be
replaced with some much simpler to comply with rules and appropriate
safety warnings. Debian manages to get by without being so prescriptive,
and we should be able to as well.
C
stem, but in that case we can release note /
document the way to switch back.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubu
> work in this case?
I should think that this would continue to work, as the migration will
be a one time operation on upgrades only.
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Develop
d do this anyway, but please be extra kind on the resources
when uploading and especially when retrying tests. Please do not retry
tests speculatively - try to reproduce problems on your own system
first.
Happy uploading,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
De
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:14:13PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> Hi developers,
>
> Canonical IS are performing maintenance on one of the two clouds we use
> for running amd64 & i386 tests. For those architectures we are running
> at 50% of our usual capacity. As a result you wil
are on i386 on a previous release will be able to upgrade to 17.10
and 18.04 when they are released and they'll continue to be supported as
normal.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer
. Currently there's a
small backlog to get through, but this means that arm64 tests are
on par with all other arches and will block migration if they
regress.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Deve
gt; d/t/control file.
-U is the same as --apt-upgrade. You can see the exact commandline that
was run near the top of the log file - so yes, it's there.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer
ch attached here which fixes the problem for me. I'm not
sure if there's a better way to do this - basically it starts
network-online.target and waits for it to become active, with a timeout.
Review appreciated.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 09:55:47PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Iain, all,
>
> Iain Lane [2018-02-15 18:48 +]:
> > There's a patch attached here which fixes the problem for me. I'm not
> > sure if there's a better way to do this - basically it starts
something to get started, but
in this case it's not so we do the same thing in code. It's like this so
you don't end up blocking the boot unnecessarily waiting for the network
to be "up" when nothing needs it to be.
Doesn't matter any more though for this case. :
#x27;d
also need an apt.conf.d snippet to cause it to be downloaded.
FAOD I don't plan to work on this, but I could discuss & review a
change.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer
list of known test restrictions. I've pasted
the diff of README.package-tests.rst below.
I don't currently expect any breakage to result from this, but if you
notice anything weird please reply here or come to #ubuntu-release and
we'll take a look.
Ch
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:16:26PM -0200, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:11 AM Iain Lane wrote:
> >
> > +skippable
> > +The test might need to be skipped for reasons that cannot be
> > +described by an existing restriction such as isolation
n if at all possible.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
oes both of those things.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
s like it's all green now.
Don't think that's the right analysis, but I think it is the right fix
nevertheless.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Deve
take place, which I'm currently expecting to be in the
week of 2020-01-27. I will follow up with the exact day closer to the
time. There will be no* user visible changes so you can expect
everything to function as it did before, including the keeping of
existing results.
Cheers,
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 05:36:36PM +, Iain Lane wrote:
> which I'm currently expecting to be in the week of 2020-01-27. I will
> follow up with the exact day closer to the time.
I was travelling last week and I'm afraid I didn't get enough time to
line up all of the prep
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:51:49AM +, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 05:36:36PM +0000, Iain Lane wrote:
> > which I'm currently expecting to be in the week of 2020-01-27. I will
> > follow up with the exact day closer to the time.
>
> I was travelling
s an energised one then this wouldn't happen so much.
Was that just me or do other DMBers feel the same? The procedural parts
of this are within the power of the board to fix if it thinks that it is
a problem: none of it is set in stone and you can devise new ways of
working
is in the archive opening checklist. We just hadn't gotten that far
down it yet. I already did it this morning before seeing this email, so
it should appear soon. Huzzah!
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer
ace to hide based on
mount options and how to set the default. (Personally I agree with Seth
that the systemd style is a nice way to do it, if upstream are up for
that.) But this warrants consideration, I think.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@
ttps://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/laney/proposed-migration/update_excuses.yaml
and ideally adapt them as necessary.
Providing no issues crop up, I'll be looking to deploy this next week.
Code is here
https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/britney2-ubuntu/+ref/ub
ff of the candidates, and then people can
manually go back and inspect why something does or does not migrate when
it didn't/did before.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debi
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 07:49:18PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> I could maybe make a diff of subsets of the yaml, if that would be
> helpful. Perhaps even just a diff of the candidates, and then people
> can manually go back and inspect why something does or does not
> migrate when i
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 06:07:09PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> Over the last few weeks, I've been working on rebasing our extensive
> delta to proposed-migration. It's now at a state where it's ready for
> others to take a look at. Please check out the output from a dry-run
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:20:18AM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> I'm thinking that I'll make the cut over on Thursday UK time, so
> please have a look at the output before then and check your
> .yaml-parsing scripts against the new output (location changed since
> my init
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:53:48PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> Just looking into that, but it will delay the rollout into next week.
All done, this is now live. Do let me know if anything looks wrong.
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Develo
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
