Hello, On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:01:35PM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote: > Hello everybody, > > Am 25.07.2011 13:51, schrieb Scott Kitterman: > > On Monday, July 25, 2011 07:45:50 AM Benjamin Drung wrote: > >> Am Montag, den 25.07.2011, 13:01 +0200 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz: > >>> On 22.07.2011 10:41, Daniel Holbach wrote: > >>>> = Development Processes = > >>>> > >>>> (2) developer application docs: > >>>> - too complicated, > >>>> - unclear expectations > [...] > > I think it's a fair point that UCD is confusing. What it means is "Ubuntu > > member that got their membership based on development contribution and not > > some other kind". Do we really need a different name for this? It might > > be > > more clear to just have the DMB grant Ubuntu membership by name rather than > > have a separate name/team that doesn't actually mean anything different. > > I agree that the name is misleading and it's unfortunate that it > confuses applicants. It'd be good to change it something sensible. Even > if we just change it in the documentation.
I just added a discussion item to the next DMB agenda to rename the team to Ubuntu Development Members. This is in line with the other delegated (non RMB) membership names, and I think is much less confusing. Cheers, -- Iain Lane [ [email protected] ] Debian Developer [ [email protected] ] Ubuntu Developer [ [email protected] ] PhD student [ [email protected] ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
