Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

2010-10-08 Thread Narendra Sisodiya
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Sriranga(78yrsold) withblessi...@gmail.comwrote: Have you tried with wube.exe (installing within the WinxP as part of its software) It is very fast than live/installing which I had experienced long back at the time of installing ubuntu 9.04. On Thu, Oct 7,

Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

2010-10-08 Thread Nitesh Mistry
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 12:03:24PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: Actually, When I made SchoolOS remix, it comes out to be 2.1GB Live DVD. some students reported that they are unable to boot DVD. That is true because LiveDVD need good amount of RAM (don't know exact requirement). So I was

Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

2010-10-08 Thread Narendra Sisodiya
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Nitesh Mistry mail...@mistrynitesh.netwrote: On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 12:03:24PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: Actually, When I made SchoolOS remix, it comes out to be 2.1GB Live DVD. some students reported that they are unable to boot DVD. That is true

Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

2010-10-08 Thread Nitesh Mistry
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 12:33:01PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Nitesh Mistry mail...@mistrynitesh.netwrote: On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 12:03:24PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: Actually, When I made SchoolOS remix, it comes out to be 2.1GB Live DVD.

Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

2010-10-08 Thread Narendra Sisodiya
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Nitesh Mistry mail...@mistrynitesh.netwrote: On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 12:33:01PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: Adding this little bit would have improved the understanding of the question. I should have anyways sensed that you were up to something more

Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

2010-10-08 Thread Nitesh Mistry
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 03:22:23PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Nitesh Mistry mail...@mistrynitesh.netwrote: On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 12:33:01PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: Adding this little bit would have improved the understanding of the

Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

2010-10-08 Thread Raseel Bhagat
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Narendra Sisodiya naren...@narendrasisodiya.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Sriranga(78yrsold) withblessi...@gmail.com wrote: Have you tried with wube.exe (installing within the WinxP as part of its software) It is very fast than live/installing

Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

2010-10-08 Thread Sanjay Bhangar
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Narendra Sisodiya naren...@narendrasisodiya.com wrote: I didn't expressed the exact reason. Hiding lower later of details and giving some abstraction layer is one imp concept in programming. Asking questions on a mailing list != programming.

Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

2010-10-07 Thread Narendra Sisodiya
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Raseel Bhagat raseelbha...@gmail.comwrote: No speed difference. Thanks a lot. I was just asking this. and nothing else. -- ┌─┐ │Narendra Sisodiya │http://narendrasisodiya.com └─┘ -- ubuntu-in mailing

Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

2010-10-07 Thread Sriranga(78yrsold)
Have you tried with wube.exe (installing within the WinxP as part of its software) It is very fast than live/installing which I had experienced long back at the time of installing ubuntu 9.04. On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Narendra Sisodiya naren...@narendrasisodiya.com wrote: On Wed, Oct

Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

2010-10-06 Thread Nitesh Mistry
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 07:09:00PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: When Live CD boots, it give two option, live and directly install What exactly is the difference of speed in booting and working in both options. My concern is about RAM. If we have RAM = 125 MB then what is the speed in

Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

2010-10-06 Thread Narendra Sisodiya
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Nitesh Mistry mail...@mistrynitesh.netwrote: On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 07:09:00PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: When Live CD boots, it give two option, live and directly install Live boot , two options in grub entry. What exactly is the difference of

Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

2010-10-06 Thread Nitesh Mistry
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 07:39:21PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: What exactly is the difference of speed in booting and working in both options. Read speeds of CD drive is obviously slower than that of HDD. Everytime you want to load a program, reading instructions from HDD (ie.

Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

2010-10-06 Thread Narendra Sisodiya
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Nitesh Mistry mail...@mistrynitesh.netwrote: On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 07:39:21PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: What exactly is the difference of speed in booting and working in both options. Read speeds of CD drive is obviously slower than that of

Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

2010-10-06 Thread Raseel Bhagat
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Narendra Sisodiya naren...@narendrasisodiya.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Nitesh Mistry mail...@mistrynitesh.netwrote: On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 07:39:21PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: What exactly is the difference of speed in booting and

Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live

2010-10-06 Thread Nitesh Mistry
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 10:58:39PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: I think your write speed is fast. :P I know You asked about booting and *working* in both options. Hence my answer. I know As for the answer to your real question, even if I know Ubuntu well enough to