Sorry Jordan for the late reply. I been quite busy during the last few
weeks and I haven't been able to keep up with the recent discussions
about the guide.
I just would like to say that I am strongly in favor for moving the
guide to the wiki. Working solely with patches is a pain, always
require
Hi Phil,
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 02:05:24PM +0100, Phil Bull wrote:
The wiki doesn't have to be editable to everyone. You can define an ACL
on a per-page basis [1], although this may need to be turned on in the
Moin configuration. It would also require the wiki administrator to
maintain the
Daniel Holbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Freitag, den 14.09.2007, 16:24 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
My fear with having that piece of documentation in a wiki is that we
won't be able to deal with people asking for comments/clarification or
just discussing things about certain parts.
Hi Jordan,
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 11:10 -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
[...]
* since the wiki is editable to anyone ( usually a good thing) there
is the possibility of people doing bad things, either accidentally or
maliciously, to the packaging guide.
The wiki doesn't have to be editable to
Am Donnerstag, den 13.09.2007, 09:38 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
1. move the packaging guide to a bzr branch hosted in launchpad in the
ubuntu-dev team.
I have mixed feelings about this. I think having it in bzr on LP would
be much better than in the ubuntu-docs SVN, as it's more
Daniel Holbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's more complicated to write things in docbook and everybody of us
knows how to use a Wiki. We have Wiki notifications of changes we want
to stay on top on and it's just more natural to work with it.
[...]
I personally feel that the wiki is a much
On 9/14/07, Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Holbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's more complicated to write things in docbook and everybody of us
knows how to use a Wiki. We have Wiki notifications of changes we want
to stay on top on and it's just more natural to work
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 08:58:41AM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
1. The Packaging Guide is the only developer documentation not on the
wiki. We have all our process documentation, policies, release
schedule, etc. on the wiki. If quality and vandalism were a problem
then I be more worried
Hi,
Am Donnerstag 13 September 2007 09:38:06 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Jordan Mantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 9/12/07, Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you considered moving the Ubuntu Packaging Guide to a debian
package? They are using a docbook variant called
Stefan Potyra wrote:
Nonetheless, as written in the thread already, the wiki has the big advantage
to have a lower entry barrier. OTOH the wiki is (and probably always will be)
a kind of dumping place. As an example, I wanted to remove [1] once, which I
started, but never finished (and
Jordan Mantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 9/12/07, Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you considered moving the Ubuntu Packaging Guide to a debian
package? They are using a docbook variant called 'DebianDoc', which
seems to work for them. Would that work perhaps for us as well,
Am Mittwoch, den 12.09.2007, 11:10 -0700 schrieb Jordan Mantha:
After some discussion with Daniel Holbach and Matthew East I would
like to propose that the Ubuntu Packaging Guide be moved from the Doc
Team repo/website to the wiki.
I appreciate that initiative. Reviewing the MOTU wiki pages I
Daniel Holbach ha scritto:
Once we find out how we can convert moin wiki to docbook (and I believe
there's a tool for that), we can package that by a script quite easily.
MoinMoin supports DocBook conversion on the fly since 1.3.5, see
http://moinmoin.wikiwikiweb.de/DocBook for further
Hi,
On 13/09/2007, Daniel Holbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 12.09.2007, 11:10 -0700 schrieb Jordan Mantha:
After some discussion with Daniel Holbach and Matthew East I would
like to propose that the Ubuntu Packaging Guide be moved from the Doc
Team repo/website to the wiki.
Hi all!
After some discussion with Daniel Holbach and Matthew East I would
like to propose that the Ubuntu Packaging Guide be moved from the Doc
Team repo/website to the wiki.
Here are some reasons for doing so:
* the packaging guide has been essentially unmaintained for a couple
releases now.
Jordan,
Well perhaps if we set up a moin moin PDF exporting plugin, this could turn
into a nice setup that still won't lose the advantages of doing it in
docbook format.
Something like this: http://moinmoin.wikiwikiweb.de/ActionMarket/PdfAction
Alternatively, if you are worried about malicious
Jordan Mantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After some discussion with Daniel Holbach and Matthew East I would
like to propose that the Ubuntu Packaging Guide be moved from the Doc
Team repo/website to the wiki.
Have you considered moving the Ubuntu Packaging Guide to a debian
package? They are
Jordan Mantha wrote:
Hi all!
After some discussion with Daniel Holbach and Matthew East I would
like to propose that the Ubuntu Packaging Guide be moved from the Doc
Team repo/website to the wiki.
Here are some reasons for doing so:
* the packaging guide has been essentially
On 9/12/07, Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jordan Mantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After some discussion with Daniel Holbach and Matthew East I would
like to propose that the Ubuntu Packaging Guide be moved from the Doc
Team repo/website to the wiki.
Have you considered moving
Ola,
Sorry to hijack this thread but i wondered how you were going to do this:
automatic docbook-moin conversion
and on a related subject do you know of some way of doing docbook -
ReStructuredText conversion.??
Concerning your idea I think it will definitely give easier access to people
for
20 matches
Mail list logo
