Setting up mysql-server-5.1 (5.1.54-1ubuntu4) ...
120312 12:54:32 [Note] Plugin 'FEDERATED' is disabled.
120312 12:54:32 InnoDB: Initializing buffer pool, size = 8.0M
120312 12:54:32 InnoDB: Completed initialization of buffer pool
120312 12:54:32 InnoDB: Started; log sequence number 0 44233
Public bug reported:
unable to install mysql server 5.1
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: mysql-server-5.1 5.1.61-0ubuntu0.11.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-13.56-generic 2.6.38.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-13-generic i686
AptOrdering:
mysql-server-5.1: Install
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986085
Title:
package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.61-0ubuntu0.11.04.1 failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation
Public bug reported:
My config :
Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release:12.04
Package:
munin-node:
Installé : 1.4.6-3ubuntu3.1
Candidat : 1.4.6-3ubuntu3.1
Table de version :
*** 1.4.6-3ubuntu3.1 0
500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main i386
Well, this is good news ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027538
Title:
Bad handle of # for comments in munin-node config file
To manage notifications about this
Public bug reported:
When I try to create a read-only guest share in nautilus the share is appearing
in the network but it is not accessible (access denied). In the samba log there
is following statement:
---
[2012/09/03 09:10:07.162628, 0] param/loadparm.c:8843(check_usershare_stat)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045194
Title:
usershares created in nautilus not working
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
I had to put following into the smb.conf to get it work (see below). The
core problem is that nautilus does not check these options like it does
in other cases to get something to work. Probably the whole problem is
related to nautilus-share then but I am not sure.
---
security = share
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820743
Title:
package bind9 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script
Public bug reported:
You are using Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
- the Lucid Lynx - released in April 2010 and supported until
April 2013.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: bind9 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-33.71-generic
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
Description:Ubuntu 8.10
Release:8.10
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.27-7-generic
Errors were encountered while processing:
samba-common
smbclient
ubuntu-desktop
winbind
samba
ProblemType: Package
Architecture:
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19970472/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19970473/DpkgTerminalLog.gz
--
upgrade from 8.04 to 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302542
You received this bug
apt-get install snmp-mibs-downloader
Fixed it for me in 12.04.
I'll spare everyone the deluge of obscenities I'm currently spewing at
everyone within earshot of my brain.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in
Public bug reported:
I Installed vsftpd normally but after a few weeks removed ist, but there
is an error schown while the remove is in progress
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: vsftpd 2.3.5-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-54.82-generic 3.2.50
Uname: Linux
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bind9
/etc/apache2/conf.d$ sudo apt-get install upgrade-system
[sudo] password for buzz:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
upgrade-system is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727293
Title:
/usr/sbin/postconf: fatal: open /etc/postfix/main.cf: No such file or
directory cp: `/etc/resolv.conf' and
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mysql-client-5.0
Ubuntu 8.04.1
mysql-client-5.0.51a-3ubuntu5.1
/usr/bin/mysqldump doesn't read /etc/mysql/my.cnf - it tries to read
/etc/my.cnf and $HOMEDIR/.my.cnf, but thats it. An upstream, i.e.
debian fellow told me that the debian package does
Hrm... weird enough, this is what my strace tells me (a symlink from
/etc/my.cnf to /etc/mysql/my.cnf exists):
$ strace mysqldump 21 | grep my.cnf
stat64(/etc/my.cnf, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=3959, ...}) = 0
open(/etc/my.cnf, O_RDONLY) = 3
stat64(/home/tkeller/.my.cnf, 0xbf8ccdb4)
side to issue a
warning, but hey, at least you're now aware of the issue ;)
Thanks again for your time,
Thomas.
--
mysqldump doesn't pick up /etc/mysql/my.cnf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342578
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tomcat6
Tomcat 6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04. I have tried both sudo
/etc/init.d/tomcat6 stop and sudo
/usr/share/tomcat6/bin/./shutdown.sh an still when I go to either
localhost or 127.0.0.1 I get the tomcat It Works! pagein FireFox.
Tomcat 6 used
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50762972/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50762973/ExtensionSummary.txt
** Attachment added: default_profile_pluginreg.dat.txt
o...@obi:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/tomcat6 start
[sudo] password for obi:
* invalid CATALINA_BASE: /var/lib/tomcat6
o...@obi:~$ ps -ef | grep tomcat6
obi 8271 7943 0 10:21 pts/000:00:00 grep --color=auto tomcat6
o...@obi:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/tomcat6 stop
* Stopping Tomcat servlet engine
I didn't manually remove tomcat 6 but I did uninstall OpenJDK so I could
install SUNJDK. I noticed when I uninstalled OpenJDK it also uninstalled
tomcat 6 and some other things. Which I had to reinstall afterwords. I
used the Ubuntu software center to reinstall the programs and I had used
apt to
I ran sudo apt-get purge tomcat6 tomcat6-common and tomcat is still
running. There is nothing at /usr/share/tomcat6/bin or
/etc/init.d/tomcat6 , so I'am not sure what is going on. This is a
Ubuntu upgrade to 10.04 and I used to be able to run sudo
/etc/init.d/tomcat6 stop and tomcat would
I had another problem with my Ubuntu 10.04 installation bug #610455. So,
I just reinstalled Ubuntu 10.04 in a separate partition and now in the
process of reinstalling all my applications and transferring over my
files.
--
tomcat6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nmap
Installed using apt-get from terminal (sudo apt-get install nmap)
It gets stuck at this point:
Preparing to replace nmap 5.00-3 (using .../archives/nmap_5.00-3_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement nmap ..
I already tried sudo killall apt-get,
** Attachment added: Df.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643477/+attachment/1613039/+files/Df.txt
** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643477/+attachment/1613040/+files/Dmesg.txt
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
Thanks for the quick reply,
I found out that it was some kind of hard drive issue: while installing
nmap there was a rsync job copying over 200 GB from one drive to
another. It somehow froze the apt-get install nmap command at the
point of unpacking. Strange this is that I could use the computer
Confirmed with 14.04 (x86) and latest updates.
Fresh install with minimal iso; afterwards in tasksel selected Basic Ubuntu
Server, OpenSSH server, Mail-Server and Samba file server.
When sudo-ing the first time after running tasksel, the error occured.
Fix:
run pam-auth-update and remove SMB
** Package changed: openssh (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1498229
Title:
Oops during every suspend on Gateway NV570P laptop
To manage
Public bug reported:
Every time I close the lid or suspend the system from the menu, the
screen goes dark, but the machine does not enter suspend. I have to
hold the power button to kill it and reboot. I did not have this
problem until a recent kernel package update that was automatically
** Attachment added: "susres.2015-09-21_16:54:33.468646.crash"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1498229/+attachment/4470785/+files/susres.2015-09-21_16%3A54%3A33.468646.crash
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
What are the possible values for this option? The example file from the
installation documentation doesn't have connection_type or libvirt_type:
http://docs.openstack.org/folsom/basic-install/content/basic-
install_controller.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1014044 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014044
Can anyone confirm if this exists in Quantal and Raring as well, or if
it was fixed in Raring?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
** Summary changed:
- PHP5-FPM not reporting errors to web server (nginx)
+ PHP5-FPM not reporting errors to web servers (fastcgi clients, such as nginx)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1014044 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014044
Actually, you know what, I already SRU'd this. This bug evaded me, but
I caught the fix as part of Bug #1014044, and SRU'd the fix in,
alongside a segfault fix. That was included in 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.3 for
Yes, I'd say that wontfix is appropriate unless someone comes forward
with a reason why ntpd *should* listen at 127.0.1.1.
P.S. I earlier wrote the following.
It appears that bind9 operates in the same way.
I added a virtual interface eth0:0 with a bogus address
and named started listening
** No longer affects: bind
** Also affects: bind9 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=483098
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
Link to similar upstream bug report with title Please default to
RESOLVCONF=no (Upstream bug report #483098 is now being tracked in
Launchpad by wishlist bug #1091602 with title Please add resolvconf
hook script to generate dynamic forwarders list.)
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker
** Description changed:
- This is a wish. It is requested that the bind9 package include a
- resolvconf hook script /etc/resolvconf/update.d/bind9 which writes a
- forwarders{} statement to /var/run/named/forwarders based on the
- nameserver information in resolvconf's database. Then in order
** Description changed:
It is requested that the bind9 package be enhanced such that named uses
forwarder addresses obtained from resolvconf's database.
Such a feature would normally be implemented by means of a resolvconf
update hook script, in this case
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #687507
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687507
** Also affects: resolvconf (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687507
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
\*`
(which will tell us which version of etckeeper you are using) to your
bug as a comment?
--
Thomas Ward
BugSquad Member
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed
Stéphane?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003842
Title:
dnsmasq sometimes fails to resolve private names in networks with non-
equivalent nameservers
To manage
To anyone else who wants this feature: You are cordially invited to add
your voice here. :-) Please explain how you intend to use the feature.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
a bug:
ubuntu-bug [package]
This will add important information such as the release you're using,
the version of the package, and other information that could be useful
for triagers and developers.
--
Thomas Ward
Ubuntu BugSquad Member
** Tags added: precise
** Description changed:
bash
Okay, so I spun up a VM for Lubuntu 12.04, and dropped it into tty mode.
After installing etckeeper (sudo apt-get install etckeeper) after
updating the packages, I can confirm this issue happens on Precise.
I can also reproduce this with Quantal.
But there's specific information here that I
Also confirmed in Raring. Although, the same Additional details I
added in Comment #5 are still valid. Perhaps this is an issue with how
'sudo' affects bash completion?
Adding 'raring' tags, and nominating against Precise and Quantal.
** Tags added: raring
** Description changed:
David T wrote in comment #8:
- Loaded Ubuntu 12.04
- Tried to install [a package]
- couldn't resolve dns
Possibly this is just another instance of bug #1000244.
David T, can you reproduce the failure?
** Description changed:
ARGH! Every release causes new problems :(
If you have:
David, I suggest you get a Linux expert to help you at your location.
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
** Also affects: bash-completion (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1095180
Title:
incorrect bash-completion
To
Tested 0.6.3-0ubuntu1.3 on precise and 0.7.0-0ubuntu2.2 on quantal, both
working great.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
Tested 0.6.3-0ubuntu1.3 on precise and 0.7.0-0ubuntu2.2 on quantal, both
working great.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
@tombert: Probably not the same issue, since the issue being discussed
here is not fixed by restarting. Please file a new bug report against
dnsmasq with a detailed description of your problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Not a NM problem; probably a dupe of #933723.
** Package changed: network-manager (Ubuntu) = bind9 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098152
Title:
DNS resolve
newly-provided information, that is
provided in the bug (or at the most, set it back to New). If it can
be confirmed by someone else with the new information you have provided,
then they can set it as Confirmed.
Thanks!
--
Thomas Ward
Ubuntu Bug Squad Member
Ubuntu Server Team Member
Oops, contrary to my last comment, to the original bug poster: If you
provide more information when the bug is Incomplete set it back to
new status. I made a mistake in saying you should leave it as
Incomplete if you provide more information :)
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Summary changed:
- dnsmasq 2.6.1 package update required for precise
+ Please backport dnsmasq 2.6.1 or later to Precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103357
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1006898 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
** Description changed:
Ubuntu Precise currently ships with dnsmasq 2.59, but due to the issue
- reported in https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg11696.html we
- require that to be updated in Precise
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 933723 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933723
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 933723
bind9 registers itself with resolvconf even though it's unable to provide
name service
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Compare bug #113417.
** Summary changed:
- host crashed with SIGSEGV in start_thread()
+ host crashed with SIGSEGV in start_thread() on login
** Summary changed:
- host crashed with SIGSEGV in start_thread() on login
+ host -t soa local. SIGSEGV in start_thread() on login
--
You received
** Summary changed:
- [apport] host crashed with SIGSEGV
+ [apport] host -t soa local crashed after resume from suspend
** Summary changed:
- [apport] host -t soa local crashed after resume from suspend
+ [apport] host -t soa local SIGSEGV after resume from suspend
--
You received this bug
Importance: Low.
Reason: not really a bug that prevents operation, more rather a bug that
addresses minor housekeeping of the default configs.
Requested via IRC, by bluefoxxx. Processed by myself (TheLordOfTime):
[15:13:33] bluefoxxx That should be a very low importance but I can't triage
my
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #698967
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698967
** Also affects: apache2 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698967
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
Marked invalid per email response from original poster.
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1105411
Title:
** Description changed:
- The system dnsmasq is preventing nameservice from working with
- NetworkManager. By setting /etc/deafault/dnsmasq ENABLED=1 to ENABLED=0,
- nameservice started working again.
+ The standalone Dnsmasq (from the dnsmasq package) is preventing the
+
Robie is right. In the failure case the resolver is contacting
127.0.1.1, where the NetworkManager-controlled dnsmasq process listens,
rather than 127.0.0.1, where BIND named is listening.
Robie is right, too, in saying that the instructions you followed have
to be reinterpreted for Ubuntu. In
there's still the unresolved question
of whether re-enabling --strict-order
will suffice as a workaround, since
12.10 relies on DBus to populate the
nameservers. Is there any extra
information on this?
Please try it and report back. :-)
(Put strict-order in a file in
Simon in #49:
It doesn't work [...] the order of servers given to the DBus
interface isn't preserved internally
Aha, so the answer to my question
Will switching on strict-order have the same effect
now that nameserver addresses are sent over D-Bus?
(in comment #42) is No. So switching
Hi Simon.
Before I forget to ask: can you please update dnsmasq(8) to include
under --strict-order a description of what happens when nameserver
addresses are passed in via D-Bus instead of via a file?
You wrote,
you can very easily provide the same behaviour - only pass the first
nameserver
[...cont'd after in order to fix...] bug #1072899, dnsmasq will have
to be enhanced such that proposition #1 is true. But we can discuss the
details of that in bug #1072899.
parenthesis
There is a close analogy between the problem here (bug #1003842) and a problem
we have with avahi. Avahi
Simon wrote:
Consider
[...]
server=/google.com/3.3.3.3
server=/google.com/4.4.4.4
[...]
Queries sent to *google.com will be sent 3.3.3.3 or 4.4.4.4 in the
same way as if strict order was set, ie, to 3.3.3.3 first, and only to
4.4.4.4 if 3.3.3.3 returns a SERVFAIL or REFUSED error, or doesn't
Earlier there was some dispute about what the RFCs say about multiple
nameservers.
I found the following RFC which does have something to say about these
issues.
http://www.zoneedit.com/doc/rfc/rfc2182.txt
Here are a couple of passages...
Request for Comments: 2182
Category: Best Current
The target milestone should be adjusted, I guess.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003842
Title:
dnsmasq sometimes fails to resolve private names in networks with
Public bug reported:
here is what I can see when trying to start (from root account)
4init: ureadahead main process (5) terminated with status 5
mount: block device none is write-protected, mounting read-only
mount: cannot mount block device none read-only
mountall: mount
Works for me ..
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1117589
Title:
Ubuntu containers fails to start on UEFI-enabled hosts
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
when I try to restart or reload dovecot I only get
stop: Unknown instance:
dovecot start/running, process 10642
or
reload: Unknown instance:
but dovecot is still running.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: dovecot-core 1:2.0.19-0ubuntu2
** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224828
Title:
NIS demon fails during startup if the roaming mode is turned off
Put a line into /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf like so:
prepend domain-name-servers 192.168.122.1;
The following doesn't address the main issue but does seem to me to be
worth mentioning.
Since the introduction of resolvconf in Ubuntu 12.04 it is more
advisable to configure nameserver addresses
Where did you get the uvt program?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1163147
Title:
can't resolve lan hosts (regression)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
The instructions say you should comment out dns=dnsmasq in order to
disable the system dnsmasq. But commenting out that line (and
restarting network-manager) will only disable the NetworkManager-
controlled dnsmasq instance (which listens at 127.0.1.1 in Quantal and
higher, at 127.0.0.1 in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1126488 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1126488
I guess this is the same as bug #1126488.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1126488
libvirt instance of dnsmasq in raring fails to forward DNS requests
--
You received this bug
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1126488
libvirt instance of dnsmasq in raring fails to forward DNS requests
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1163147
For the record, please say which version of the uvt script you are
using.
In the description you say:
This configuration worked for 12.04 LTS, 12.10, but does not work for Raring.
In comment #6 you say:
I don't think this is a duplicate of bug #1126488 since I made the
conscious decision to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1126488 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1126488
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1126488
libvirt instance of dnsmasq in raring fails to forward DNS requests
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired = Confirmed
** Description changed:
- dnsmasq does not resolve DNS names correcty.
+ Dnsmasq sometimes does not resolve DNS names correcty.
- Applications like Thunderbird or tools like ssh rely on working name
- resolution. However, if
Arno,
Does disabling NetworkManager-controlled dnsmasq fix the problem? (To
disable NetworkManager-controlled dnsmasq, comment out dns=dnsmasq in
/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf and then restart network-
manager.)
Hypothesis: dnsmasq is given two nameserver addresses. The first
-headers-amd64
| linux-headers-generic | linux-headers, linux-image
which I think is fine. What do you guys have in Ubuntu?
Thomas
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
The feature was dropped from the resolvconf package in Ubuntu 13.04. The
bind9 maintainers have been invited to add a similar feature to support
BIND 9. Your contribution may help to convince them to take action.
Until this feature actually appears in bind9 you will have to implement
it locally
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61619
Title:
ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative
To manage
** Description changed:
First, apologies for the complicated configuration.
I use the 'uvt' front-end to libvirt-managed kvm guest machines. I also
have a LAN with a router that does local dynamic DNS configuration with
the client-provided dhcp hostnames.
I would like to resolve
Hi Seth,
Just read your bug report again.
It appears that you have two nameservers, neither of which has complete
DNS information. You need to configure things such that each nameserver
listed in resolv.conf can resolve all names you want resolved.
On a LAN, for example, there is sometimes a
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Invalid
** Summary changed:
- Validate DNSSEC by default
+ Please enhance NetworkManager such that DNSSEC validation is done whenever
possible
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which
** Summary changed:
- dnsmasq should not register 127.0.0.1 with resolvconf if it's not listening
on lo
+ Please enhance dnsmasq to talk directly to resolvconf and to register only
its actual listening address(es)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
The dnsmasq package is still not included on the Server ISO in 13.04.
The dnsmasq package is about 15KiB in size.
** Summary changed:
- The dnsmasq package isn't available on the server ISO
+ Please include the dnsmasq package on the Server ISO
--
You received this bug notification because
** Package changed: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) = ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661599
Title:
Please include the dnsmasq package on the Server ISO
To
** Package changed: network-manager (Ubuntu) = dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
** Summary changed:
- NetworkManager uses dnsmasq with negative DNS cache enabled
+ Dnsmasq caches negative results if it starts before the network is up
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Stéphane wrote:
Can you confirm that you have the dnsmasq package installed and not only
dnsmasq-base?
If so, then that bug is invalid as when you install dnsmasq on your system,
that'll bypass NetworkManager's own instance and so will run with the
default dnsmasq settings (including
What do you think, Simon?
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1172467
Title:
Dnsmasq caches negative
1 - 100 of 1324 matches
Mail list logo
