Hi Wachín,
On 04/16/2016 01:09 AM, Len Ovens wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Wachín wrote:
>
>> I wonder if possible install UbuntuStudio 16.04 on another partition
>> along side of UbuntuStudio 15.10 (my default now). This would be the
>> only way I have to be able to test the ISO since I do not h
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 20:31:27 -0400, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
>always any log files are looked over by myself prior to posting
That's what I tried to point out. Even using a command line tool to
report a bug would be ok, assumed it's absolutely clear for the user,
what exactly the command lin
In normal usage, poeple send bug reports all the time from production
systems. When I report MATE issues back to the Github sources they
are from a production system that is also a development/hacking system,
made possibly by a total backup partition and rollback root fs images.
Always they are man
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Wachín wrote:
I wonder if possible install UbuntuStudio 16.04 on another partition along
side of UbuntuStudio 15.10 (my default now). This would be the only way I
have to be able to test the ISO since I do not have available a computer with
good resources, sorry, sorry Gre
Hi UbuntuStudii developers, I would like to test the ISO, but my Dell
Inspiron 1750 laptop does not have the resources. It already downloaded
16.04 but I could not install on VirtualBox, it gets very heavy and can
not do anything, this unless I used a light LXQT environment.
I wonder if possib
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 07:33 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 19:23:18 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 07:20 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >> There are still issues regarding log files. Assumed somebody doesn't
> >> use DHCP, but e.g. PPPoE, the password could be pr
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 19:23:18 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 07:20 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> There are still issues regarding log files. Assumed somebody doesn't
>> use DHCP, but e.g. PPPoE, the password could be provided in plain
>> text by a log file and even if you don't dia
On 15/04/16 18:20, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 19:08:21 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:01:56 -0700 (PDT), Len Ovens wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
But the OP should care what is send by this command line tool, most
likely the OP dislike to sen
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 07:20 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> There are still issues regarding log files. Assumed somebody doesn't
> use DHCP, but e.g. PPPoE, the password could be provided in plain text
> by a log file and even if you don't dial up, be careful when filing a
> bug against a MUA.
>
To
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 19:08:21 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:01:56 -0700 (PDT), Len Ovens wrote:
>>On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>
>>> But the OP should care what is send by this command line tool, most
>>> likely the OP dislike to send credit card information and
>
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:01:56 -0700 (PDT), Len Ovens wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> But the OP should care what is send by this command line tool, most
>> likely the OP dislike to send credit card information and
>> passwords.
>
>Creditcard info? passwords? Testing should be
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
But the OP should care what is send by this command line tool, most
likely the OP dislike to send credit card information and passwords.
Creditcard info? passwords? Testing should be done on a clean install. I
suggest a clean install, user name "Joe Bl
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:47:06 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>and so on
What exactly is "and so on"?
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:47:06 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>So, nothing dangerous. But, again, if you can prove me wrong, please
>do. Otherwise, try not to confuse people, please.
I have a better idea, since you recommended to use this tool, you need
to mention what exactly is transmitted. I several t
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:36:11 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 05:33 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 05:21 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> > IMHO nobody should use 'ubuntu-bug ardour' as suggested by Kaj, but
>> > using a browser and logging in and reporting bugs i
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 05:43 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:33:36 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 05:21 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >> IMHO nobody should use 'ubuntu-bug ardour' as suggested by Kaj, but
> >> using a browser and logging in and reporting bugs i
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:33:36 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 05:21 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> IMHO nobody should use 'ubuntu-bug ardour' as suggested by Kaj, but
>> using a browser and logging in and reporting bugs is a good idea, in
>> addition post links to the list.
>>
>
>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 05:21 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> IMHO nobody should use 'ubuntu-bug ardour' as suggested by Kaj, but
> using a browser and logging in and reporting bugs is a good idea, in
> addition post links to the list.
>
Let's just make it clear that this is Ralfs personal opinion, an
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 05:33 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 05:21 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > IMHO nobody should use 'ubuntu-bug ardour' as suggested by Kaj, but
> > using a browser and logging in and reporting bugs is a good idea, in
> > addition post links to the list.
> >
>
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:43:03 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>http://launchpad.net
Shouldn't this read https://bugs.launchpad.net/?
However, at least it anyway would be an Ubuntu One account.
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 08:01:49 -0700 (PDT), Len Ovens wrote:
>"Lot of things wrong"
:D
SICR and I agree with Len, even while I have tendencies to drop Linux
and switch to iPear or a similar iFruit for audio.
IMHO nobody should use 'ubuntu-bug ardour' as suggested by Kaj, but
using a browser and lo
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Grant Frank Burton wrote:
Greetings all
I downloaded xenial and installed it
Was looking pretty good till I got to Ardour Lot of things wrong.
Is anyone working on this?
"Lot of things wrong" does not give any clue at all. I personally have not
have any proble
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 03:23 PM, Grant Frank Burton wrote:
> Greetings all
>
> I downloaded xenial and installed it
>
> Was looking pretty good till I got to Ardour Lot of things wrong.
>
> Is anyone working on this?
>
None of us are specifically working on any application, but if
Greetings all
I downloaded xenial and installed it
Was looking pretty good till I got to Ardour Lot of things wrong.
Is anyone working on this?
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Set Hallstrom wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016, at 05:39 PM, Thomas Pfundt wrote:
> >> Hello Kaj,
> [snip
24 matches
Mail list logo
