Re: [Ubuntu] Daily builds of GRASS 64 releasebranch

I guess you noticed yoursefl, but it seems to fail to build: configure: error: *** couldn't find swig Try adding swig to you build-depends? Johan On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Tim Michelsen wrote: > Hello, > I have set up a automated daily build of GRASS 64 on Launchpad: > > https://edge.lau

Re: [Ubuntu] Re: Daily builds of GRASS 64 releasebranch

In configure.in around line 1829: # look for the swig program AC_PATH_PROG(SWIG, swig, no) if test "$SWIG" = "no" ; then AC_MSG_ERROR([*** couldn't find swig]) fi this means that ./configure will stop if swig is not found. If swig is no longer needed to build grass, then configure.in

Re: [Ubuntu] Re: qgis-plugin-grass has old dependencies

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Tim Michelsen wrote: >> The current plugin is built against grass 6.4.0. > Yes, but which version? > The one from the official Ubuntu repositories or the Ubuntugis repositories? > > Synaptic says: > > qgis-plugin-grass: >  Depends on : grass640 > > But there is no

[Ubuntu] Daily builds for saga gis

Hi everyone, During the last weekend, I've set up a daily build recipe for saga gis. https://launchpad.net/~johanvdw/+archive/sagacvs So anyone who would like to get the latest version of saga can add this ppa to his sources. Since we are close to releasing version 2.0.6 (release candidate is ou

Re: [Ubuntu] gdal hasnt been compiled with hfd4/5 support

I have gdal from the unstable repository installed, and it contains support for hdf4/5. Are you sure you are running the version from ubuntugis unstable? Can you be more specific and tell which version you actually use: dpkg -s libgdal1-dev On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:26 AM, nikos ves wrote: > Hi

Re: [Ubuntu] Proposal - Cleaning up dependencies/repos

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Alex Mandel wrote: > So I ran into an interesting quagmire of dependencies. > The moral of the story, I would like to propose that RC candidates of > apps stay in "unstable" and not trickle into "stable" and maybe not even > into "testing" (this could be a little

Re: [Ubuntu] Proposal - Cleaning up dependencies/repos

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > > My proposal for 'stable' would be: the version which is in the current > debian testing repository (in times of debian freeze perhaps packages > which are +10 days in debian unstable can be considered a

Re: [Ubuntu] installing predict-gstat

I would recommend posting your problems with gstat to r-sig-...@r-project.org . Much more people who are familiar with gstat, including its author are present on that list. In this particular case, there is no problem with your installation, but the data configuration leads to a singular matrix, w

Re: [Ubuntu] SAGA GIS error

It's a known bug in saga 2.0.5. Not really problematic - it seems that module doesn't work on linux command line. Deleting the file /usr/lib/saga/libta_compound.so will fix saga_cmd. The module is not that interesting anyway (only combines functionality of other modules). I'm planning to update the

Re: [Ubuntu] SAGA GIS error

out the segmentation fault, but I am still > getting an error: > > error: module library > > available module libraries: > ... shows all the available modules > > Thanks for you help > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Johan Van de Wauw > wrote: > > It&#x

Re: [Ubuntu] could not connect to ppa:ubuntugis

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:42 AM, wrote: > > Error reading > https://launchpad.net/api/1.0/~ubuntugis/+archive/ubuntugis-unstable: > > > Maybe the server is unavailable? > If it is a server problem, it should be fixed quickly

Re: [Ubuntu] Re: help creating a build recipie for GRASS 70

A few comments: first of all: disable the automatic building as long as it does not work. It's a waste of resources to continue trying it until you have fixed the issues, which is something you can test locally. The error occurs at: /usr/bin/make real-install make[2]: Entering directory `/build/b

[Ubuntu] Re: [Qgis-user] Re: [Qgis-developer] qgis-saga-python bindings in ubuntu

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Agustin Lobo wrote: > Is it possible to install the python bindings for a saga installation > from binaries friom ubuntugis-unstable? > > I'm currently busy uploading the new versions. After uploading it will take approximately one hour to compile. Once this is do

Re: [Ubuntu] ECW CRS definition

Have you tried specifying the output format? gdal_translate will create geotiff by default. Perhaps that is causing the problem: qgis thinks it is reading a ecw file, where in reality it's a geotiff So gdal_translate in.ecw out.tif -a_srs EPSG:3078 or gdal_translate in.ecw out.ecw -a_srs EPSG:3078

[Ubuntu] libtiff and gdal 1.8

Hello everybody, While checking the osgeo-live dvd I noticed that saga no longer can open geotiff files. I'm adding ubuntugis and debian-gis in cc: as this issue also affects ubuntugis-unstable and debian experimental. The same is true for the orfeo toolbox [1] and most likely other software using

Re: [Ubuntu] Question about packages in Unstable ppa

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Giovanni Manghi wrote: > Hi, > > having enabled both the ubuntugis and the nightly-builds repository is > harmless. The main difference (an important one indeed) is that qgis 1.7 > in the ubuntugis repo is compiled against gdal 1.8 available in the same > repo, whi

Re: [Ubuntu] GDAL compilation

It is not needed to recompile gdal to be able to compile your program. Make sure that the libgdal1-dev package installed and then Antonio gives the right answer: you should run On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Antonio Valentino wrote: > $ gcc -o test gdalprogram.c -I /usr/include/gdal -lgdal1.7.0

Re: [Ubuntu] File geodatabase API

The license [0] certainly does not adhere to the DFSG [1] or ubuntu licensing standards[2] and therefore the API can not be included with the gdal package. I've not read the license in detail, but perhaps an add-on package is a possibility, but bear in mind that creating and supporting packages wit

Re: [Ubuntu] ESRI, Microsoft Access Personal Geodatabase, PGeo and ogrinfo error: ODBC: Invalid install path

A few things you can try: It seems that you have installed a local copy in /usr/local/lib, whereas gdal is looking for mdbtools in /usr/lib Can you tell us where limdb is installed? ls /usr/lib/libmdbodbc* ls /usr/local/lib/libmdbodbc* and which odbcinst you are running: which odbcinst It is usu

Re: [Ubuntu] ubuntugis-unstable should have recent gdal

Gdal 1.9 has been uploaded to debian experimental. Consider building that version on your pc and check if there are any problems. Let's keep our development in one place. http://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/gdal Johan On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Etienne Tourigny wrote: > Alan (an

Re: [Ubuntu] Re: [osgeo4w-dev] Binaries Packaging - A Strategic Investment

>From my own packaging experience (saga gis, some attempts at mapguide) I don't think the major hurdles are in the specific packaging for debian or ubuntu, but rather in the build procedures. Creating a package is easy if: 1) the package builds automatically from source without special intervention

Re: [Ubuntu] Natty proj4 (proj-4.8.0) configure error in config.log

Katie, this error is no proble,. It is part of the configure file to check what error is returned if you try to include a non-existing file. This way the script can recognise it if you try to include non-existing files which you actually need. So: don't worry. Johan On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:11

Re: [Ubuntu] [Live-demo] UbuntuGIS - Google Summer of Code - packaging Java based OSGeo applications

Hamish, can you give some extra info on the JAI tightening? Anyway even without JAI changes we should really consider whether our first focus should not be to get rid of this NON FREE/NON OPENSOURCE library. I don't think people using the live dvd are aware of this problematic license. JAI is in

Re: [Ubuntu] MOTION: Bring UbuntuGIS stable in sync with OSGeoLive

Sounds like a good idea, but I just would like to add that it would be even better if packages found there way to debian unstable. This will make sure they arrive in the standard repositories (universe). I haven't updated saga on ubuntugis for a while because we had a good release in universe. Jo

Re: [Ubuntu] Google Summer of Code Satus

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Jerome Villeneuve Larouche < jlarou...@mapgears.com> wrote: > > Suggestions (Improvement for UbuntuGIS): > > * Make a new SAGA package. > I don't think this is necessary. There is one for 2.1.0 on my ppa ( https://launchpad.net/~johanvdw/+archive/saga-gis ), and

Re: [Ubuntu] Saga GIS packaging

ct adding saga could be considered to make sure that it is build against eg a newer version of gdal, but it will not change saga's core functionality. > > Best regards, > Pedro > > > > > > > > >From: Johan Van de Wauw >

[Ubuntu] proj 4.8.0 in ubuntugis

Hello All, Since the update to version 4.8.0 the proj package no longer contains the file projects.h . (from changelog: ) * Modified libproj-dev.install to remove nad_list.h and projects.h . However this causes problems for eg saga gis and Geo::proj4 which uses this file. See bug report and disc

Re: [Ubuntu] Google Summer of Code Satus

Jerome, First of all thanks for all that was done! Just a remark, not only for you: release 14.04 of ubuntu will be the next LTS version. Any packages that are now in good shape in ubuntugis should find their way to debian unstable as soon as possible. That way, they will be included in ubuntu (

Re: [Ubuntu] proj 4.8.0 in ubuntugis

Nobody reacted so I'd like to raise this again. This error is currently blocking saga from re-entering ubuntugis for versions precise and up. Johan On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > Hello All, > > Since the update to version 4.8.0 the proj package no l

Re: [Ubuntu] My actions after the IRC meeting (Was: Reminder and Agenta for IRC meeting)

Thanks for the report. Unfortunately I forgot to attend... To anyone going to FOSS4G as well: there will be a bird-of feather session for the osgeo live dvd. Since they are basically doing the same (packaging/writing install scripts for debian/ubuntu) it would be nice if you could drop by (no tim

Re: [Ubuntu] Compiling FGDB support for gdal in ubuntugis-unstable

Check that you have all build-dependencies installed. You will find them in the debian/control file. I guess you are missing ruby1.8-dev , but you might be missing others as well. Johan On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Stewart C. Russell wrote: > Hi, > > I know that ESRI FGDB support isn't dis

[Ubuntu] Adding saga 2.1.0 to ubuntugis

Hello, I would like to add saga 2.1.0 to ubuntugis. This would solve the problem for those users who would like to run qgis 2.0 with the last version of saga (which actually is a bug in gdal). See eg [1]. The package already exists and has been tested by quite a number of users on my ppa[2], and

Re: [Ubuntu] Adding saga 2.1.0 to ubuntugis

than wx 2.8. In fact the release of 3.0 is on the roadmap for this month: http://trac.wxwidgets.org/wiki/Roadmap . Johan On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Alex Mandel wrote: > On 09/30/2013 11:36 PM, Alex Mandel wrote: >> On 09/30/2013 11:32 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >>> Hello, &g

Re: [Ubuntu] UbuntuGIS PSC Creation

On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Alex Mandel wrote: > On 11/06/2013 12:41 PM, Ivan Mincik wrote: >> Dear Alan, at first thank You for Your work (and also for work of others in >> this project). +1 >> 1. This project definitely needs a strong leader with experience. >> > Or PSC, I don't think ther

Re: [Ubuntu] QGIS and saga [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

There is a setting in the processing toolbox which says use 2.0.8 compatibility. Make sure that is checked. Johan Op 11 nov. 2013 07:42 schreef "Alex Mandel" : > On 11/10/2013 08:31 PM, Bruce Bannerman wrote: > > Hello, > > > > _Environment_ > > > > Ubuntu: 12.04.03 > > > > UbuntuGIS Repository:

Re: [Ubuntu] UbuntuGIS ppa structure

On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Ivan Mincik wrote: > > I You think about it, my proposal to PPA structure is following: > > * ubuntugis-development - development versions of packages. Package version > changes until they move to 'ubuntugis-staging' > > * ubuntugis-staging - staging versions whic

Re: [Ubuntu] UbuntuGIS PSC Creation

Rather than taking decision, I think the PSC should make sure that decisions are made. Whatever we call them, I think the ideal PSC could learn a lot from the osgeo live project. I think Cameron has done/is doing an excellent job at managing that project, which in fact is quite similar to ubuntugis

Re: [Ubuntu] Adding saga 2.1.0 to ubuntugis

Everyone, I waited a little for the release of wxwidgets 3.0, which happened 2 days ago. Since I see no objection to my plan I will continue and push the updates to testing. If grass still builds fine there I will copy to -unstable. Johan On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote

[Ubuntu] Packaging java gis software for ubuntu/debian

On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > Thanks Jody, > So it seems that JAI (Java Advanced Imaging) is available in Ubuntu > Multiverse [1]? > I assume then that we should be able to package JAI dependant applications > like geoserver into Multiverse too? With jai in multiverse

Re: [Ubuntu] Bug#712688: transition: gdal

At version 1.10 with libgdal1h I mean. On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > Gdal is in trusty already (since tonight). > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdal > > Johan > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ivan Mincik wrote: >> -

Re: [Ubuntu] Bug#712688: transition: gdal

Gdal is in trusty already (since tonight). https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdal Johan On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ivan Mincik wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/22/2013 06:23 PM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:16:50AM +0200,

Re: [Ubuntu] Fwd: [Live-demo] Packaging and project re-organization

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> The third and "difficult" part is the deb packaging itself. Here we have >> several possible paths: >> >> 1. Use all the standard tools in Debian packaging and create/update >> packages on UbuntuGIS ppa. > > I personally would welcome if

Re: [Ubuntu] UbuntuGIS PSC Nominations are Open

Hello everyone, I guess all of us are either too shy to do a first post or subject to a certain form of procrastination, or are we just scared to forget someone while nominating:-) Nevertheless I guess the recent IRC meetings with the osgeo live project and debian gis people will really boost ubu

Re: [Ubuntu] MapServer 6.4 on Ubuntu 12.04

Quick addition concerning mapserver: I've updated all versions in universe (precise,quantal,raring, saucy) to fix security issues [1,2]. I've also updated stable for precise[3]. Concretely this means that quantal, raring and saucy in stable and quantal and raring in unstable are still affected. If

Re: [Ubuntu] MapServer 6.4 on Ubuntu 12.04

Jerome, I think we should not include apache2 in ubuntugis: this is an important server package with an enormous amount of reverse dependencies. Moreover we can not provide the necessary security updates that a package like apache2 requires. Since your package seems to break some existing install

Re: [Ubuntu] UbuntuGIS PSC Nominations are Open

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Ivan Minčík wrote: > Johan, please add also yourself to the nomination list. > > Is anybody planning to visit OSGeo + QGIS sprint in Viena in March 2014 ? > Maybe we could work on final DebianGIS/UbuntuGIS proposal there . I am considering to go a few days (end o

Re: [Ubuntu] UbuntuGIS PSC Nominations are Open

Bas (and any others considering going to FOSDEM), I'll be around at FOSDEM. Best place to catch me will probably be the Osgeo booth or also in the distribution room. It may be hard to catch me on Saturday as I'm also involved in running FOSDEM and saterday (especially before noon) is usually quite

Re: [Ubuntu] Google Summer of Code for OSGeo-Live/UbuntuGIS/DebianGIS?

I think there are already many packaging guides out there, and if packaging guides are missing it should be up to debian/ubuntu soc projects to create them, I don't think this is something osgeo should do. And in fact with dh, dh_make and a proper upstream (which is what matters) packaging really i

Re: [Ubuntu] Google Summer of Code for OSGeo-Live/UbuntuGIS/DebianGIS?

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> I'd also be looking at the future, >> working on the latest git/svn versions of packages rather than trying >> to build the released versions, so changes are picked up in the new >> versions rather than seperately in eg debian gis. > > I a

[Ubuntu] Fwd: [Bug 1355037] [NEW] qgis-plugin-grass and grass-core version mismatch

This is a bug in ubuntugis grass. Johan -- Forwarded message -- From: rnuske <1355...@bugs.launchpad.net> Date: Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:38 AM Subject: [Bug 1355037] [NEW] qgis-plugin-grass and grass-core version mismatch To: johan.vandew...@gmail.com Public bug reported: For tr

Re: [Ubuntu] Question on testing QGIS 2.5

Two things: You get an error because you have not added the key. In that case you can not verify who signed the packages. You can add the key using: gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv DD45F6C3 gpg --export --armor DD45F6C3 | sudo apt-key add - The other warnings about duplicate entries a

Re: [Ubuntu] OTB 4.2

Are these packages based on the debian repository? Can you please tag releases there? ___ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki

Re: [Ubuntu] piuparts gdal

Bas On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Hi Johan, > > On 10/21/2014 10:53 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >> Sebastiaan, > > > I'm not too worried about these failure yet, there is still more to do > for the GDAL 1.11.1 packaging. &

Re: [Ubuntu] gdal 1.9.1 installation

On ubuntu, run "sudo make install" Alternatively, you may wait a few days until gdal 1.11.1 hits ubuntugis-unstable. Johan On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:11 PM, alassane toure wrote: > Group, > I downloaded the gdal version 1.11.1 and followed instructions provided in > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wik

Re: [Ubuntu] gdal 1.9.1 installation

gt; > Any thoughts? > Thanks, > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Johan Van de Wauw > wrote: >> >> On ubuntu, run "sudo make install" >> >> Alternatively, you may wait a few days until gdal 1.11.1 hits >> ubuntugis-unstable. >> >> J

Re: [Ubuntu] gdal 1.9.1 installation

work. This issue started when i > install the latest ubuntu version. > > Again, thanks for your insight! > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Johan Van de Wauw > wrote: >> >> Hello Alassane, >> >> First of all, you should tell us what you actually want to

Re: [Ubuntu] gdal 1.9.1 installation

ing. As such, I followed your instruction by >> > running >> > the version included in ubuntu "sudo apt-get install libgdal-dev" but >> > the >> > compilation of the program test.cpp did not work. This issue started >> > when i >> > i

Re: [Ubuntu] gdal 1.9.1 installation

;> >> >> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:22 PM, alassane toure wrote: >>> >>> No error as a result!!! Thank you very much! >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Johan Van de Wauw >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at

Re: [Ubuntu] QGIS-Mapserver rename

You can add a provides field to the debian/control file. So qgis-server provides qgis-mapserver. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-virtual Johan On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Alex Mandel wrote: > I support the rename of qgis-mapserver to qgis-server. > However i

Re: [Ubuntu] QGIS-Mapserver rename

I should add that you probably want to add a replaces/breaks as well, because upgrading from qgis-mapserver to qgis-server may otherwise give errors (if the old mapserver is still there it will give conflicts when installing the new one). On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote

[Ubuntu] Who will be at FOSDEM?

Hello, I know that at least Bas (Couwenberg) and I will be going to FOSDEM[1] 31 january-1 february in Brussels (Belgium). Since this year there will be both a geospatial devroom [1] and a distributions devroom [2], it may be an ideal timing for having a Debian GIS - OSGeo live meeting. I have al

Re: [Ubuntu] UbuntuGIS Admin

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Alan Boudreault wrote: > Good idea. I'm totally +1 to make some active members admin too. > > Alan > > On 15-01-09 11:23 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> >> On 01/09/2015 05:05 PM, Alan Boudreault wrote: >>> >>> All, what do you think? Feel free to comment :) >>

Re: [Ubuntu] Who will be at FOSDEM?

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:21:40PM +0100, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I know that at least Bas (Couwenberg) and I will be going to FOSDEM[1] >> 31 january-1 february in Brussels (Belgium). Si

Re: [Ubuntu] SAGA update to older Ubuntu releases

Pedro, I just uploaded. However, I have no access to a precise machine so I was unable to test it. Please report whether things work well. Johan On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Pedro Venâncio wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if it is not planned to update SAGA for older Ubuntu > releases, in particu

[Ubuntu] reviving ubuntugis

Hi all, Ubuntugis has seen relatively little attention recently. Partly, this may actually be a good sign: Debian GIS has been improving a lot lately, which means that Ubuntu Trusty (14.04) and Ubuntu Utopic (14.10) were released with many recent libraries/programs out of the box. Personally I be

Re: [Ubuntu] reviving ubuntugis

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > Hi all, > This are my thoughts, but I really want to encourage everyone to say > what should be the priorities. > Adding some statistics to the discussion Both ubuntugis stable and unstable are really used a lot This are t

[Ubuntu] Which debian gis packages in experilmental can go into ubuntu

Hi all, we are now 2 days away from the Debian import freeze for Vivid. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/VividVervet/ReleaseSchedule Due to the freeze a number of packages have been uploaded to experimental instead of unstable. On the other hand we have a number of packages which are in experimental beca

[Ubuntu] Removing oneiric/quantal packages

Hi all, Our ubuntugis repository currently uses 8.3 Gb from 8 Gb available. To make some place I would like to delete all packages from oneiric (11.10) and quantal (11.10). Both are currently unsupported by ubuntu (oneiric since may 2013, quantal since may 2014). That is, unless anyone opposes a

Re: [Ubuntu] Removing oneiric/quantal packages

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Jürgen E. wrote: > Hi Johan, > > On Wed, 25. Feb 2015 at 22:22:38 +0100, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >> To make some place I would like to delete all packages from oneiric >> (11.10) and quantal (11.10). Both are currently unsupported by ubuntu

Re: [Ubuntu] QGIS/GDAL with grass7 support

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> Hi list, >> since grass7 is now stable, there has also been an update of the >> gdal-grass plugin [1]. Would it be possible to reflect this update in >> the Ubuntu packages? > > The Debian package for GDAL 1.11.2 and the accompanyin

Re: [Ubuntu] How to fix the unmet dependencies for grass-gui ?

Carlos, Please report whatever error you got. Maybe it is something different. Luis, I think I found the cause and a solution to the problem: I assume you upgraded to trusty (14.04) from saucy (13.10). You still have proj leftover from saucy. This may give conflicts. Try removing it explicitely:

Re: [Ubuntu] How to fix the unmet dependencies for grass-gui ?

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Carlos Cerdán wrote: > Hi Johan > > Well... I think there isn't error, QGIS doesn't works with GRASS 7.0, > doesn't yet, so, in order to work with QGIS and his GRASS plugin, I think > it's better to have the stable repository and leave ubuntugis for a while > or...

Re: [Ubuntu] How to fix the unmet dependencies for grass-gui ?

César, Until a new package is uploaded, remove the grass-gui package and install it again (you will get grass 6. apt-get remove grass grass-core grass-dev grass-doc grass-dev-doc grass-gui apt-get update apt-get install grass Or wait one day more, I think I'll upload a working version of grass7

Re: [Ubuntu] How to fix the unmet dependencies for grass-gui ?

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, César Augusto Ramírez Franco wrote: > Hello Johan, > > I upgraded the grass packages this morning and I have Grass 7 starting fine > now, thank you. Cool - please report any problems, I am currently not using grass, so I don't encounter them.. > According to the G

Re: [Ubuntu] Installing both Grass 6.4 and Grass 7 on Ubuntu 14.04

Luís, I believe this is possible by using the grass ppa by Martin Landa (cc): https://launchpad.net/~grass/+archive/ubuntu/grass-stable Then install the package grass7. I should add I have not tested this myself. Kind Regards, Johan On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Luís de Sousa wrote: > Dea

Re: [Ubuntu] Installing both Grass 6.4 and Grass 7 on Ubuntu 14.04

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:39 PM, César Augusto Ramírez Franco wrote: > What I'm doing is I have a VirtualBox setup for testing Grass7. A bit more difficult to grasp and slightly more work, but you could also consider using schroot. See eg: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DebootstrapChroot htt

Re: [Ubuntu] How to install nightly build om trusty

Hi Johan, Can you verify your processing options (processing menu, options) Under providers, make sure grass 7 is active and for saga check that the box "Use saga 2.0.8 syntax" is not checked. Does this solve your problem? Kind Regards, Johan VdW On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Johan Nilsson

Re: [Ubuntu] Hardcoded GDAL version in QGIS package

I have no access to a trusty box now, but as a quick solution, try reverting the update of gdal: sudo apt-get install libgdal1h=gdal - 1.11.1+dfsg-1~exp2~trusty Bas: trouble is that with grass7 in ubuntugis qgis is now refusing to build. Should be easy to fix - but it is more work than just bumpi

[Ubuntu] GMT: strange compilation problem on trusty

Hi all, I'm backporting GMT from debian (experimental) to ubuntu. I used a small fix for the makefile (which I added to the git repository [1]) But now I get a problem compiling some of the documentation when compiling on i386. Anyone a clue what could be wrong/what can be done to fix this? [1]

Re: [Ubuntu] GMT: strange compilation problem on trusty

I'll try it. Since I have no access to a trusty box now I'l upload to my ppa and see whether it works ... On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:26 PM, sebastic wrote: > On 2015-07-16 14:29, sebastic wrote: >> >> I'll see if I can reproduce it in an i386 pbuilder chroot. > > > The gmt (5.1.2+dfsg1-1~exp8) bui

Re: [Ubuntu] GMT: strange compilation problem on trusty

3:35 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > I'll try it. Since I have no access to a trusty box now I'l upload to > my ppa and see whether it works ... > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:26 PM, sebastic wrote: >> On 2015-07-16 14:29, sebastic wrote: >>> >>> I'

Re: [Ubuntu] GRASS 7 packages in UbuntuGIS

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Ivan Mincik wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, Johan, > I am playing little bit with joining effort of GRASS 7 packaging and I > see one GRASS 7 package for Trusty in UbuntuGIS. I was looking to Git > repository on Alioth for 'ubun

Re: [Ubuntu] Fwd: GRASS GIS 7 with liblas support

This has been fixed in Debian. I'm uploading a new version to ubuntugis. Kind regards, Johan On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Ignacio Borlaf wrote: > Hi all > > Recently i started working with ubuntu and GRASS, and I noticed that > v.in.lidar is not available without compiling from the scratch (w

Re: [Ubuntu] Fwd: GRASS GIS 7 with liblas support

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > This has been fixed in Debian. > I'm uploading a new version to ubuntugis. I wrongly assumed that the version on osgeolive contained the fixes from Debian. I've uploaded again. Kin

Re: [Ubuntu] Problems with postgis installation

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Mike Farmer wrote: > Hi Guys, > > After much fruitless searching I really find that I need some help. Problem > in a nutshell is this: > > psql -d gis -c 'CREATE EXTENSION postgis' > > > which returns: > > ERROR: could not load library > "/usr/lib/postgresql/9.3/l

Re: [Ubuntu] Problems with postgis installation

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Mike Farmer wrote: > Hi Johan, > > I checked again in Synaptic and it does appear to be on my system. I > reinstalled it and I tried creating the postgis extension again: > > psql -d gis -c 'CREATE EXTENSION postgis' > > > and got a new return: > > ERROR: could n

Re: [Ubuntu] Problems with postgis installation

Mike, Does upgrading gdal help: sudo apt-get install libgdal1h Do you have any other repositories such as the one from postgresql in your sources? If all of this does not help, please share the version and depends you get when running apt-cache show postgis apt-cache show libgdal1h Kind Regard

Re: [Ubuntu] Packaging osm2pgsql releases

Hello Paul, Anything packaged by Debian GIS is a good candidate for UbuntuGIS in my opinion. Our team is currently small, rather than adding the package myself I'd prefer giving you (or someone else) access to upload to UbuntuGIS. Perhaps you can provide packages once in a ppa of your own so we c

Re: [Ubuntu] Packaging osm2pgsql releases

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Since it seems no one from Debian GIS nor UbuntuGIS is willing or able > to maintain osm2pgsql releases for Ubuntu, I'd like to offer my help to > Paul with maintaining osm2psql packaging for Ubuntu if he agrees to > maintain the pack

Re: [Ubuntu] Packaging osm2pgsql releases

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Paul Norman wrote: > With the possible exception of nightly dev builds, I don't want to package > osm2pgsql, but I will if no one else does. I'm willing to guide you through the process if needed. It may well be that just cloning the repository from debian (debc

Re: [Ubuntu] creating GRASS packages for UbuntuGIS

Hello Martin, Great news. You page contains the necessary steps if all you have to do is just a plain backport. In reality you will often have to add patches to support older versions of ubuntu. Perhaps you should tell where exactly you are stuck? Kind Regards, Johan On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 1:2

[Ubuntu] meeting during FOSDEM

Hi all, Last year, we had a meeting with some debian gis members during FOSDEM. As you can probably guess I'll be around again this year. Anyone else attending? Note that like previous year there is a distributions devroom and a geospatial devroom, so enough interesting stuff is happening :-) ht

Re: [Ubuntu] GDAL 2.0, QGIS updates

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > On 2016-02-11 17:32, Alex Mandel wrote: >> >> Can someone remind me. Do we have a timeline for getting newer GDAL and >> QGIS into ubuntugis-unstable? We mostly need people to do it. Currently osgeo live is more up to date than ubuntugis. I

Re: [Ubuntu] Stable update

Thanks Angelos for the work. I'm in favor of removing testing. If we keep it, we should name it experimental. I actually proposed doing so earlier. Kind Regards, Johan On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Micha Silver wrote: > > > > > On 04/25/2016 08:26 PM, Randal Hale wrote: > -- Original Mes

Re: [Ubuntu] Stable update

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Alex M wrote: > Historically we haven't done a great job of keeping stable very > relevant, but people running servers in production really ought to be > using it and not unstable. Maybe a clearer policy on when things should > move to stable needs to be made (it

Re: [Ubuntu] Stable update

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Worth Lutz wrote: > Thanks, > My error on our versions. It's 12 & 14. I typed without thinking. > > I understand dependencies sometimes keep updates from getting to older > systems. I was hoping to jump to 16.04 but will have to wait on php-mapscript. > > Thanks f

Re: [Ubuntu] Handling transitions in UbuntuGIS

On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > Currently only trusty and xenial are checked, precise is not worth the > effort IMNSHO: > > Just one remark: precise is still used a lot, and one important application are travis build scripts which are used by *a lot* of open sour

Re: [Ubuntu] Fwd: [GRASS-dev] ubuntu gis policy

I'm in favor of removing testing and adding "experimental" instead. This is closer to the actual way we use the ppa. On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Randal Hale < rjh...@northrivergeographic.com> wrote: > from my perspective it should be (which will completely break policy on > several fronts)

Re: [Ubuntu] Fixing CVE-2016-9839 for mapserver

Hello Bas, Thanks for you work so far. >> The above also affects the mapservers packages in the UbuntuGIS PPAs. >> >> I've updated the mapserver package to 7.0.3 for xenial & trusty in >> ubuntugis-unstable already, these still need to be copied to -testing & >> -stable though. What about the p

Re: [Ubuntu] GDAL 2.2.0 transition

If I understand correctly, 2.2.1 will be released mid this week, perhaps it is worth waiting for that and save a transition? On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > Hi all, > > Any objections to move the packages to Unstable? > > There was a report in the OTB mailing list about

  1   2   >