Hi,
Were there any plans for a 0.9.30 release before the NPTL merge?
What is the status of the 0.9.30 release?
Thanks!
-nc
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2008 08:03:03 you wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 06:56:44PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
Fiddling with menuconfig:
DOPIC (Create only position independent code)
Does not say why you would or
Hello,
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 13:14 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Cristi Magherusan wrote:
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 08:34 +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Cristi Magherusan wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone tell which revision of the NPTL branch is tested and
confirmed to work well on x86?
None,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:58:50PM +0300, Cristi Magherusan wrote:
Said that, I don't think addign TLS support for i386 is difficult, but
we need someone having time to spend on it.
Do you mean adding TLS support for the old linuxthreads branch on x86?
Perhaps it would be better to update
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Will Newton wrote:
LINUXTHREADS_OLD:
Ok, what does this currently mean? This selects the old libpthreads
implementation from the dawn of time, but what's the alternative? The
new NPTL stuff hasn't been merged yet, so this intermediate version is...
what?
OLD
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:32:30AM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
Hi,
Were there any plans for a 0.9.30 release before the NPTL merge?
What is the status of the 0.9.30 release?
vapier would know, ISTR that he was the designated RM.
What are the outstanding regressions versus 0.9.29 on your arch?
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:39:44PM +0200, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
Yes, I use it and it works.
Any idea what is wrong with the !old version, in that it seems not to be
recommended for use?
IIRC the old is the fallback if you encounter problems in the !old.
Since the !old is, by now, supposedly
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:39:44PM +0200, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
Yes, I use it and it works.
Any idea what is wrong with the !old version, in that it seems not to be
recommended for use?
IIRC the old is the
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 01:38:54PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bernds
Date: 2008-06-08 13:38:53 -0700 (Sun, 08 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 22271
Log:
In string.h, move libc_hidden_proto next to the corresponding declaration.
Filter them out when installing headers.
Tested by building up
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 04:29:57PM +0200, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
Yeah, should have split this into one 'follow-up-the-thread' and one
actual patch. So, resending the patch with correct subject. Sorry for the
confusion.
Here's a patch to move ifaddrs.h from libc/inet/ to include/ . It is
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Will Newton wrote:
Any idea what is wrong with the !old version, in that it seems not to be
recommended for use?
No, I'm not sure. There were a few small issues with Makefiles but I
think these are all fixed now. Certainly we are shipping it in a product
that will
gcc-4.3.1 seems to need fenv.h, or more specifically information from
within bits/fenv.h.
Because bits/fenv.h should not be directly included a stub fenv.h
needs to be created so that '#include fenv.h' works.
Currently, no fenv.h exists as far as I can find.
(Looking under uClibc-0.8.28.3 and
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:17:39AM -0500, Kevin Day wrote:
gcc-4.3.1 seems to need fenv.h, or more specifically information from
within bits/fenv.h.
Because bits/fenv.h should not be directly included a stub fenv.h
needs to be created so that '#include fenv.h' works.
Currently, no fenv.h exists
Ricard, Bernhard,
All,
On Wednesday 27 August 2008 16:29:57 Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
Here's a patch to move ifaddrs.h from libc/inet/ to include/ . It is also
removed from the installed include files if UCLIBC_SUPPORT_AI_ADDRCONFIG
is not enabled. It's largely the same as what Bernhard and Yann
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 18:53 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:17:39AM -0500, Kevin Day wrote:
gcc-4.3.1 seems to need fenv.h, or more specifically information from
within bits/fenv.h.
Because bits/fenv.h should not be directly included a stub fenv.h
needs to
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:40:43PM +0300, Cristi Magherusan wrote:
fenv.h was missing from 0.9.29 but got committed to current in r20880
and it has nothing to do with gcc-4.3.
well libdecnumber can be configured to use fenv(3) and libdecnumber is
in gcc, so it is in fact related (a little bit, if
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 03:53:18PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Takashi Yoshii wrote:
For SH, init/fini function prologue is defined in
libc/sysdeps/linux/sh/crti.S
as follows.
| (frame entry)
|#ifndef __HAVE_SHARED__
| (GOT pointer initialization)
|#endif
I think this should be
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Hi Paul, All
attached a little fix in clone asm code for SH to use a delayed branch
instead of a normal branch.
Let me know so I can commit it.
Regards,
Carmelo
Please hold on. After a discussion with a colleague of mine, really sh4
architectural expert, we are
18 matches
Mail list logo
