[Ugnet] Mulindwa's Article

2005-08-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I have not seen or read Munini's article and so cannot say anything about it. I read Mulindwa's article and at first had doubt about it aims or message but on further reading i understood that i could no more information than what was written; that we should respect the president and that even in Canada a broadcast station's license would be 'yanked' if you did what Mwenda on the KFM station in Uganda. Presumably the law about respecting the president or prime minister is written so that it has emergency authority to yank licenses as soon as disrespect occurs. Otherwise the case would have to be investigated and a a charged proffered then depending on the outcome, actions would be taken against the radio station or culprit.
I say that this case would not arise in Canada for several reasons: 1) No Canadian leader has stayed in power the way Museveni has stayed in power in Uganda. Hence, the likelihood of such a leader losing the respect of the media would be very low if not nil. 2) No Canadian leader would have made such statement as Museveni has made after the fatal crash of the presidential helicopter in which a neighboring leader has lost his life. 3) In event that the leader involved himself in a controversial issues as Museveni did, a talk show host can be within his right to challenge his administration through his aides as has happened in Mwenda's case. It was a case in which each side was daring the other one way or another. And the listeners would understand the flow and turn of conversation.
So,I think Mulindwa was not clearin his mind when he decided to write the article. It just did not make the kind of sense he was trying to parley to the readers. The conditions in Canada cannot be compared to the conditions in Uganda at this time.
Onegi pa Obol
We all use freedom of speech but we respect the law. I read the transcript of Andrew Mwenda and some of the statements he made  in that program, Dr Mulera can not make them in Canada waves if he wants  to have a license. I have to be very careful here for Andrew Mwenda's case is soon going to  be before a judge so I cannot debate any of his statements. But I would ask Dr Muniini Mulera to go back and read the transcript of  that program, and wonder if he had a radio station in Canada if he would  make such statements on a prime Minister of Canada and see if the CRTC  would not yank his license. Freedom of speech does not empower us to disrespect our leaders, and I  happen to be one of the people who have opposed the Movement for a very  long time, but like it or no
 t Yoweri Museveni is a president of Uganda  today, and we owe him that respect.
___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

[Ugnet] Re: Ugandanet Digest, Vol 13, Issue 123

2005-08-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sharangabo

I am surprised you have omitted Uganda from your lineage. Well, to you being Rwandese is not alright: you have to be Congolese also. Even then you are not satisfied with that. You have to be an African more than any other else. That to you is the most important thing to be. Can you tell us why that is better than being Rwandese? Because unless i know why you have made those statements and then went ahead to speak with authority and conviction on a Uganda matter simply indicates some faulty major logic. It could be the "break" we are waiting "to crack the case wide open."
Onegi pa ObolMessage:2Date:Sat,13Aug200522:16:44-0400(EDT)From:sharangaborufagari<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject:[Ugnet]]MUSEVENIISRIGHTONCRACKINGDOWNTHESUBVRESIVEPRESS!To:ugandanet@kym.net,[EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Content-Type:text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"OmwamiEdwardMulindwa,AsIstated,IamalwayshonoredtobeinvitedtotalkwithmyAfricanbrotherswhoweverthemaybe.DearMulindwa,IamaRwandanbymybirthright
 sp;butalsoIamacongolesebymybirthrightalso..TherearenotaneedtogotroughhistorytodeterminatewhoamI.ThemostimportantthingistoknowthatIamanAfrican!AltoughIknowthetorchoftheLIGHTfortheREBIRTHofofourcontinenthasbeenlightUpfromKIGALI.ThisanothermatterIwillbeexplainingtoourfellowsbrothersinthedayscoming!AsforMrMWENDAfromtheMonitorbeingdetained.IfeelthestateofUGANDAisfulfilingitsprimarydutyan
 dthatmeanPROTECTINGthesecurityoftheNATION.OmwamiMulimdwa.YouwillbesurprisedtolearnthatMWENDA,OBBOandtheMONITORrepresentthebestoftheUgandanMediaforme!ThosearetheonlyIreadfromwhenIwanttolearnaboutwhatgoingoninUganda.Intheotheraspect,IunderstandMuseveniposition.TherewasdefinitelywhatIwillcalltheMismanagementofthefreedomofpressinUganda,fromthebeginning!TheNRM,justgaveawaysomeverysensitiveissuesawayfromthebeginning
 .Andnowitmaylivetofeelsorrowsaboutit,ThePresshastoberegulated.OnehasnottolookortoimitateWESTERNERS(Americans,French,English)tobeaDEMOCRAT.Africahasit'sownrealityandwehavetolivebyit!Orotherwisetheywillbesommoretragediesaheadoftime.SharangaboEdwardMulindwa<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:SharangaboRufagariYesit
 isgoodyouhavejoinedUgandanetbutyouaremissingoneimportantfactherethatUgandanethascriticalthinkers,soafterIreadyourRwandeseMumbojumboletmeaskforaverysimpleclarification.IfMwendaasareporteroraprogramoperatormadestatementsthatthreateningthesecurityofUganda,whywastheradiostationclosed?Mwendawasjustanemployeeofaradiostation.Kindlyexplaintomewhythestationwasclosed.EmTorontoTheMulindwasCommunicationGroup"WithYoweriMuseveni,Ugandais
 inanarchy"GroupedecommunicationMulindwas"avecYoweriMuseveni,l'Ougandaestdansl'anarchie"-OriginalMessage-From:sharangaborufagariTo:ugandanet@kym.netSent:Saturday,August13,20058:44PMSubject:[Ugnet]MUSEVENIISRIGHTONCRACKINGDOWNTHESUBRESIVEPRESS!sharangaborufagari<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:Dearnetters,dearAfricans,IwouldlikefirsttothankourUgandanbrotherstohaveextendedmetheinvitationtojointthe&
 nbsp;wonderfulUGANDANETforumwhichisisquotedonGOOGLE.Iusuallyadresstoover10.000nettersovertheworldondailybasisandtheyareusualyfromRwandaandDRC.ButthistimeIfeelveryprivilegedtobewithourUGANDANbrothersaswesharethesamebackgroundasaPeopleandmostlyasBROTHERS.Brothersfromthesamegeograpicarea,brothersfromourcomonhistoryandmostlybrothersboundtoacomondestiny.MUSEVENIISRIGHTONCRACKINGDOWNTHESUBRESIVEPRESS!.Dearfriends,
 bsp;WeAfricanshavetoberealistical!Therearenowaywecanextrapolatethewesternvaluesinourcontinent.Againifwewishtodothat,weshouldthattherightway!IamtalkingaboutthefreedomofPress.Themassmediacommunication.AndIamcomingfromtowhathappenedinRWANDAduringthe94Genocide.ThishumantragedyhappenedprimordialybecausetheMEDIAtools(Radio,newspapers,etc..)DuringthattimethekillerswereguidedbyRadiotothepotentialtarget.
 ;Havingthisfactinmind.IbelievethatanyresponsiblegovernmentinourcontinenthasnotonlytheRIGHTbutalsotheOBLIGATIONtointerveneasquicklyasitcantopreventtheWORSTtohappentohispeople.Thenationalsecuritymatterisveryimportant.Thisisnotajoke!NotevenintheMIGHTYand"Democratic"USA,theywillallowthepresstoactasitwishwhenthenationalsecurityaffairsareconcerned.OnehastolookbackattherelationbetweentheUSgovernementandthepressinIRAK.
 ;Finaly,IamconvincedthatthePresidentofUgandaisactingonthefullrightofhismandateandfulfillinghisdutieswhichbestowedtohimbythepeoplesofUganda.RegardsSharangaboRufagari&
 nbsp;Montreal,Canada.
___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

[Ugnet] Fw: [ngomrom] Museveni Bares His Teeth

2005-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
They have eyes but see not: they have ears but they hear not. This country, 
Uganda, is in big trouble for it is being lead by liars and thieves!

Onegi pa Obol

Please note: forwarded message attached


---BeginMessage---

 
Museveni has clearly told the people of Uganda in no uncertain language that the Movement (a code name for Museveni) will continue ruling Uganda irrespective of the referendum. The referendum is his way of ferreting out the opposition with bait for political pluralism then liquidating them. At the same time he is ensuring that anyone that remains in the NRM must follow what he Museveni wants. Anytime you disagree with him, Museveni, you will be kicked out the NRM, and subsequently out of political power. You will then be subjected to the machination of the NRM who are dubbed 'the people' in the referendum exercise. To choose a side in the referendum, there are two symbols: The Tree and the Hut with a closed door. Museveni is leading the team campaigning for the Tree and other Movement supporters or die-hard are campaigning for the Hut. So, if you vote for the Tree, you vote for Museveni. If you vote for the Hut, then you vote for maintaining the current system, which is being lead by Museveni himself. That is why so many people find the exercise meaningless.In a newspaper report: Museveni said that the referendum is not a contest between political parties and the Movement insisting that it was important to free those who feel conscripted into the Movement, disarm those that have been spreading damaging propaganda against his government in the international community and to allow the minority that have refused to embrace the Movement ideology to belong to their own home."We are not asking you to vote on what is better between the Movement and political parties; that one we decided a long time ago. The Movement wants to rid itself of those people," Museveni said. "There is nothing wrong with the Movement; it is the best. The question is how long should we wrestle with people who have persistently refused to join us for the last 19 years?" he said. End of newspaper report.Looking at it another way, political parties have already been registered by an act of Parliament. So, if the notion that the majority of Ugandans are already NRM members is true, why waste money on a referendum that makes no sense anyway? The majority will simply vote for the NRM and save the 22 billion for other urgent projects.Last month MPs backed a controversial amendment to the draft constitution, which would scrap limit on presidential terms. And now the referendum is going to be used to stifle multiparty and entrench the NRM as the only political system. And Museveni will rule as long as his system stands. There you have it, ladies and gentlemen. No Change or Kisanja wins. --Posted by kaladima to ngomrom at 7/27/2005 09:57:00 AM
---End Message---
___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

Re: [Ugnet] Re: [Ugandacom] UPDF lower ranks neglected

2005-07-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is the direction of this sarcasm, Mulindwa?

Onegi pa Obol

Please note: message attached





Did you vote for Museveni to be in power? 



You will not vote for him SO WHAT?

Em
Toronto

The Mulindwas Communication Group"With 
Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in 
anarchy" 
Groupe de communication Mulindwas "avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans 
l'anarchie"

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Matek 
  Opoko 
  To: ugandanet@kym.net ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 4:13 
  PM
  Subject: [Ugandacom] UPDF lower ranks 
  neglected
  
  
  
  UPDF lower ranks neglected 
  I have served in this institution since 1985. My last promotion was in 1988 
  to the rank of corporal. Since then, I have been fighting Kony with no chance 
  of apprehending him. I have done nothing for myself since then because my 
  monthly salary is a paltry Shs140, 000.
  When shall I ever build a house for myself like the top army brass that own 
  plush houses in Kampala? We were promised bank loans but the top brass have 
  blocked the plan. We are tired of this injustice and the army commander should 
  do something about this. Or else I will not vote Museveni. 
  Name withheld on request,Gulu. 
  
  
  Start 
  your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
  
Visit your group "Ugandacom" on the 
web. 
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 

  
  
  
___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

Re: [Ugnet] RE: [FedsNet] Re: the 1966 crisis II

2005-07-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Kasangwawo
If all your reasoning and explanation end up in What an asshole ! how do you 
think this is going to convince people to see what a brilliant historian you 
are?
Tell us what you think about the constitution as it affects the current people 
in Uganda and what you will do to protect it and how you will do it. Also tell 
us what you expect from us your listeners so we can respond approriately.
What you claim to be history or facts seem to be your wishes and expectations. 
It does not absolve you from being an ordinary Ugandan subject to the 
constitution. History may be good but now is better. Are you trying to relive 
history? If so, how can your reader or contributors to your message become 
assholes? It is because of such people like you that Uganda is going astray! 
You have the guns and you can not talk development but history and everymorning 
your are borrowing money from overseas to prevent Obote from returning to 
Uganda.
Yours is too much Kasangwawo.

Onegi pa obol


-- jonah kasangwawo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Onegi pa Obol,

I don't know how you came to the conclusion that my intention is to create 
grounds for great upheavals in the country ! All I am attempting to do is 
to give you the facts of our History, so we can all learn from it. I am not 
encouraging dictators to use the same mean tricks Obote used then, on the 
contrary I abhor them. But as the situation stands today, it seems we 
haven't learnt from that History.

You may think that Obote is infallible but the fact is that he set the 
example for taking over power using the military which was the beginning of 
the troubles we are still experiencing today.
If you can't see the glaring similarities - Congo, messing with the 
Constitution, etc. - I'm sorry I can't simplify for you farther than that.

What an asshole !

Kasangwawo

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ugandanet@kym.net
To: ugandanet@kym.net
Subject: Re: [Ugnet] RE: [FedsNet] Re: the 1966 crisis II
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 04:41:07 GMT


I must thank all those learned or educated or informed persons who have 
lead us to believe that Uganda is about Obote and Mutesa.
Thank you for having a mind that allows other dictators to emerge in Uganda 
using the same protocol and procedures. And thank you for creating grounds 
for great upheavals in the country.

Onegi pa Obol

-- jonah kasangwawo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
contd.

The President's Secretary responded to Obote's accusations on 4th March 
1966
and questioned why the Prime Minister did not specify which foreign
diplomats had been asked to send troops. He reminded the Prime Minister 
that
while on his Northern tour, serious allegations concerning plans to
overthrow the Constitution had been made in Parliament and that on his
return, the Prime Minister himself had acknowledged the great alarm,
especially in Kampala, caused by the movement of troops which Obote himself
had authorized earlier without informing the President. Connection was made
between this illegal training of troops and the truck loads of arms and
ammunition impounded by the Kenyan government the year before.

The response further stated that In the circumstances, precautionary
requests had to be made should the situation get out of hand. The safety of
the nation was at stake. The President did not invite foreign troops to
invade this country. The precautionary requests were conditional and did
not precipitate anything. The answer further reminded the Prime Minister
that during the army mutiny in 1964, he had called in British troops 
without
informing the President who was both Head of State and Commander-in-Chief
until Sir Edward demanded to be given the necessary information.

Concerning the dereliction of duty accusations, the Secretary to the
President stated, and I quote:

As to failure to sign the two Acts, section 67 of the Constitution
provides, in part, that if the President declines to perform an act as
required by the Constitution, the Prime Minister may himself perform that
act. In his capacity as Kabaka of Buganda and President of Uganda, Sir
Edward Mutesa was put in a most invidious position over the question of the
Referendum. The two Counties, the subject of the Referendum, formed part of
the Kingdom of Buganda. The Prime Minister was quite aware of this quandary
himself and he agreed to follow the procedures laid down in section 67 and
signed the Acts. The section envisaged such a situation. It was
constitutional for the President to have declined as he did.

The same was true for the official opening of the session of Parliament. 
The
Constitution did not provide that the President MUST (emphasis mine) 
perform
the opening of each and every session. It envisaged occasions where the
Vice-President could perform functions should the President be unable to do
so. This was one such occasion. All of this shows that Obote was just 
trying
to find petty reasons for carrying out his unconstitutional acts.

Another problem

Re: [Ugnet] RE: [FedsNet] Re: the 1966 crisis II

2005-07-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I must thank all those learned or educated or informed persons who have lead us 
to believe that Uganda is about Obote and Mutesa. 
Thank you for having a mind that allows other dictators to emerge in Uganda 
using the same protocol and procedures. And thank you for creating grounds for 
great upheavals in the country.

Onegi pa Obol

-- jonah kasangwawo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
contd.

The President's Secretary responded to Obote's accusations on 4th March 1966 
and questioned why the Prime Minister did not specify which foreign 
diplomats had been asked to send troops. He reminded the Prime Minister that 
while on his Northern tour, serious allegations concerning plans to 
overthrow the Constitution had been made in Parliament and that on his 
return, the Prime Minister himself had acknowledged the great alarm, 
especially in Kampala, caused by the movement of troops which Obote himself 
had authorized earlier without informing the President. Connection was made 
between this illegal training of troops and the truck loads of arms and 
ammunition impounded by the Kenyan government the year before.

The response further stated that In the circumstances, precautionary 
requests had to be made should the situation get out of hand. The safety of 
the nation was at stake. The President did not invite foreign troops to 
invade this country. The precautionary requests were conditional and did 
not precipitate anything. The answer further reminded the Prime Minister 
that during the army mutiny in 1964, he had called in British troops without 
informing the President who was both Head of State and Commander-in-Chief 
until Sir Edward demanded to be given the necessary information.

Concerning the dereliction of duty accusations, the Secretary to the 
President stated, and I quote:

As to failure to sign the two Acts, section 67 of the Constitution 
provides, in part, that if the President declines to perform an act as 
required by the Constitution, the Prime Minister may himself perform that 
act. In his capacity as Kabaka of Buganda and President of Uganda, Sir 
Edward Mutesa was put in a most invidious position over the question of the 
Referendum. The two Counties, the subject of the Referendum, formed part of 
the Kingdom of Buganda. The Prime Minister was quite aware of this quandary 
himself and he agreed to follow the procedures laid down in section 67 and 
signed the Acts. The section envisaged such a situation. It was 
constitutional for the President to have declined as he did.

The same was true for the official opening of the session of Parliament. The 
Constitution did not provide that the President MUST (emphasis mine) perform 
the opening of each and every session. It envisaged occasions where the 
Vice-President could perform functions should the President be unable to do 
so. This was one such occasion. All of this shows that Obote was just trying 
to find petty reasons for carrying out his unconstitutional acts.

Another problem was that the President had no access to the mass media which 
was a monopoly of Obote and his government. So while Obote could reach a lot 
of people, Sir Edward could only depend on the mercy of the press which was 
also not quite free. But on 4th March 1966 the President managed to break 
his silence and published two letters he had written to the Prime Minister 
on 28th February 1966 and 3rd March 1966. The first one read in part:

This is to inform you that your public statements of 22nd and 24th 
February, 1966, have caused me much anxiety especially as you have not 
informed me of them as you are required by the Constitution.

He goes on to inform Obote that his taking over of all powers of the 
Government of Uganda was contrary to the Constitution, which is the supreme 
law of the land and that the suspension of the Constitution was 
unconstitutional.

I'll quote the rest of it in full in order to do full justice to the 
message:

I have allowed plenty of time to elapse before writing to you in the hope 
that after careful thought you would find your way to retracting these 
unconstitutional acts. I had hoped that your advisers would point it out to 
you that the course you were pursuing might cause instability in the 
country, a situation which we are all striving to avoid. Now that the dark 
clouds continue to mount in the very lives of the people of this country, I 
feel I am in duty bound to ask you to stay your hand, and to desist from 
continuing with the procedures against Government personnel, especially 
those who are commissioned to serve me.
Our first duty is to the people of this country. The people decided in their 
great wisdom that the best way to serve them is through the means laid down 
in the Constitution which they themselves made.
Once again, I earnestly appeal to you to adhere strictly to the Constitution 
in order to remove this overhanging uneasiness which cannot be conducive to 
peace, good order and the counrty's prosperity

[Ugnet] Our Fellow Ugandans in so Called Danger Zone Iraq

2005-06-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-Original-Nachricht als Anlage beigefügt BeginMessage---
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Delivery to the following recipients failed.

   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reporting-MTA: dns;tele-ex3.uk.informa.com
Received-From-MTA: dns;uksmtp3.uk.informa.com
Arrival-Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:10:51 +0100

Final-Recipient: rfc822;kym@pjbpubs.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
---BeginMessage---
Let us pray for our fellow ugandans to return home safely!

Betreff: Ugandans go to Iraq



Ugandan graduates leave for Iraq

Recruits undergo selection
 A TOTAL of 100 Ugandan graduates and S6 leavers on Thursday evening
left the country for Iraq in spite of protests from Members of
Parliament.
The recruits left Entebbe Airport at around 10:20pm aboard Emirates
Airways and had landed in Dubai by midday Friday, sources said



A Kampala lawyer, Bob Kasango of Hall Partners, contracted by an
international security firm to recruit Ugandans, yesterday said, “They
left on Thursday evening and I think they should be in Dubai by this
time.”
“I am in touch with SOC-SMG and we are waiting for them to reach Iraq. I
can assure you that they will be safe,” Kasango said, declining to give
details.
Special Operations Consulting Security Management Group (SOC-SMG), a
Nevada-based security firm, engaged Kasango to recruit people for
non-combat security jobs in Iraq and other countries.
Kasango sub-contracted Askar Security Services to carry out the
recruitment exercise. He told journalists in Kampala last week that the
recruits would be given accommodation, health insurance and a salary of
between US$700-$1,000.

“Money will be sent to their accounts in Uganda and the firm provides
insurance for the employees. In case of injury, a person is entitled to
$300,000. In case of death, the next of kin gets $1m,” he said.
Kasango’s company, Hall Partners, was contacted by an American agency to
recruit Ugandans to work in Iraq. Hall and Partners subcontracted Askar
Security Services to carry out the recruitment drive.

“They (MPs) have failed to address the issue of joblessness. I was
contacted by SOC-SMG and in the spirit of patriotism, I thought it worth
trying out. The problem is that some MPs think they have a monopoly of
reason,” he said.

Internal affairs state minister Kezimbira Miyingo told Parliament that
the Government knew about the recruitment but told the two foreign firms
involved that it would not play any role in the deal.

Last week  Presidential Legal Assistant Fox Odoi on Friday said State
House was aware of the recruitment but was not involved.

The Chieftaincy of Military Intelligence chief, Lt. Col. James Mugira,
and Internal Security Organisation acting Director-General, Dr. Amos
Mukumbi, also approved the exercise after consulting State House.

Kasango’s company, Hall Partners, was contacted by an American agency to
recruit Ugandans to work in Iraq. Hall and Partners subcontracted Askar
Security Services to carry out the recruitment drive.

“The recruitment was approved by the internal affairs minister and the
security agencies. I have information that Kasango met these people and
they were convinced that there was nothing wrong,” Odoi said. He said
the exercise was a private matter but had been cleared by relevant
organs.







---End Message---
---End Message---
___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

[Ugnet] Our Fellow Ugandans in so Called Danger Zone Iraq

2005-06-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Ugandans go to Iraq   
 
   
 
Ugandan graduates leave for Iraq 

Recruits undergo selection 
 A TOTAL of 100 Ugandan graduates and S6 leavers on Thursday evening
left the country for Iraq in spite of protests from Members of
Parliament.
The recruits left Entebbe Airport at around 10:20pm aboard Emirates
Airways and had landed in Dubai by midday Friday, sources said 

 

A Kampala lawyer, Bob Kasango of Hall Partners, contracted by an
international security firm to recruit Ugandans, yesterday said, “They
left on Thursday evening and I think they should be in Dubai by this
time.”
“I am in touch with SOC-SMG and we are waiting for them to reach Iraq. I
can assure you that they will be safe,” Kasango said, declining to give
details.
Special Operations Consulting Security Management Group (SOC-SMG), a
Nevada-based security firm, engaged Kasango to recruit people for
non-combat security jobs in Iraq and other countries.
Kasango sub-contracted Askar Security Services to carry out the
recruitment exercise. He told journalists in Kampala last week that the
recruits would be given accommodation, health insurance and a salary of
between US$700-$1,000.

“Money will be sent to their accounts in Uganda and the firm provides
insurance for the employees. In case of injury, a person is entitled to
$300,000. In case of death, the next of kin gets $1m,” he said.
Kasango’s company, Hall Partners, was contacted by an American agency to
recruit Ugandans to work in Iraq. Hall and Partners subcontracted Askar
Security Services to carry out the recruitment drive. 

“They (MPs) have failed to address the issue of joblessness. I was
contacted by SOC-SMG and in the spirit of patriotism, I thought it worth
trying out. The problem is that some MPs think they have a monopoly of
reason,” he said. 

Internal affairs state minister Kezimbira Miyingo told Parliament that
the Government knew about the recruitment but told the two foreign firms
involved that it would not play any role in the deal. 

Last week  Presidential Legal Assistant Fox Odoi on Friday said State
House was aware of the recruitment but was not involved. 

The Chieftaincy of Military Intelligence chief, Lt. Col. James Mugira,
and Internal Security Organisation acting Director-General, Dr. Amos
Mukumbi, also approved the exercise after consulting State House. 

Kasango’s company, Hall Partners, was contacted by an American agency to
recruit Ugandans to work in Iraq. Hall and Partners subcontracted Askar
Security Services to carry out the recruitment drive. 

“The recruitment was approved by the internal affairs minister and the
security agencies. I have information that Kasango met these people and
they were convinced that there was nothing wrong,” Odoi said. He said
the exercise was a private matter but had been cleared by relevant
organs. 

 
 



___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/


Re: [Ugnet] Kabaka Mutebi a Pipe fitter!..Now that I did NOT KNOW!

2005-04-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is wrong with being a pipe fitter?

onegi

Please note: message attached


Jonah

Has Mulindwa ever met anyone privately educated in the UK ?
Someone should tellhim that ANYONE who can afford to go to a private schooland on to Cambridge has to have enough money and connections NOT to be a pipe fitter.

Numejonah kasangwawo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see that you intentionally fail to mention that Kabaka Mutebi studied law at Cambridge and that he wrote for reknowned publications such as 'The economist' !You don't sound like you've seen the inside of a lecture room, so you might not know this. But students do all sorts of jobs during their holidays. For example Prince William of England has worked on construction in S. America and so has his brother Harry in S. Africa. I don't see you calling them builders.Ssabasajja did not go to UK to become a pipe fitter. I'm challenging you to produce the evidence that he did. So many times you have failed to provide proof after making such wild allegations.KasangwawoFrom: "Edward Mulindwa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Reply-To: ugandanet@kym.netTo: <UGANDANET@KYM.NET>CC:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Ugnet] Kabaka Mutebi a Pipe fitter!..Now that I did NOT KNOW!Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:47:27 -0400MOSsabasajja is a well qualified pipe fitter, he did the course in UK.Buganda's politics is so silly that it runs under the blanket of secrecy that many of these facts are not mentioned any where, and the Kasangwawo's only preach Obote is bad, and who ever does not agree with Buganda stand as a Rwandese, but facts always remain facts. Mutebi is a pipe fitter and I challenge any one to tell other wise, and I will post where he qualified.If I post it I know it is true and verifiable.EmToronto The Mulindwas Communication Group"With Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in anarchy" Groupe de communication Mulindwas"avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans l'anarchie"
  -
 Original Message - From: Matek Opoko To: ugandanet@kym.net Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 8:19 PM Subject: [Ugnet] Kabaka Mutebi a Pipe fitter!..Now that I did NOT KNOW! revoke that order from the bank of Uganda books. Obote left power the second time and the family remained taking the money from Uganda government. It is that same money, why people like Kabaka Mutebi managed to go to school in UK and become pipe fitters. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com-- ___ Ugandanet mailing list Ugandanet@kym.net
 http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet % UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/___Ugandanet mailing listUgandanet@kym.nethttp://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/_FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/___Ugandanet mailing listUgandanet@kym.nethttp://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

Re: [Ugnet] Buturo knows Luweero killers, says UPC

2005-04-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Paul

Is there any paricular reason why Obote could not have been tried in a court of 
law up to this time? In case where he is going to be tried, should not he be 
presumed innocent until proven guilty, or has he already been tried and already 
found guilt by some private court you know of? You know there is a name for 
this kind of behavior even there was a case for Obote to answer, it is call 
miscarriage of justice. The case can bedimissed outright because of the 
sensasionalisation in the media.

Onegi
Y

-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mw. Mulindwa,
Ssebirumbi, was charged and convicted with murder. Museveni on the other hand 
has not been sued by anybody and convicted of murder. If he is ever charged, 
convicted and not killed the same way Ssebirumbi was killed, I will join you in 
cry out about the injustice.

As to whether killing somebody who has been proven to have killed another is 
justified, I personally do not think it is right. But that is what the law 
provides as of now. I can join you in advocating for the change of that law.

On the other hand, the likes of Ssebirumbi were even lucky that they got 
somebody to listen to their side of the story. There are many who were not 
allowed that privilege when the Ssebirumbis had the power to do so. They were 
simply assumed guilty and killed.

Paul 
Quoting Edward Mulindwa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Paul Njoki
 
 So If Ssebirumbi killed the old and the infirm it justifies society to
 kill 
 him as well? And the same society yet agrees Museveni to be its leader,
 a 
 Museveni we all know has killed more people in Uganda than all previous
 
 leaders combined including the colonialists?
 And you have no idea how sorry I am to have been born into that zoo, I
 might 
 have turned out a better person. You really have no idea how sorry I
 am.
 
 Em
 Toronto
  The Mulindwas Communication Group
 With Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in anarchy
 Groupe de communication Mulindwas
 avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans l'anarchie
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ugandanet@kym.net
 Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 5:26 AM
 Subject: Re: [Ugnet] Buturo knows Luweero killers, says UPC
 
 
 Mr. Mulindwa,
 To begin with, I have a name. If you had bothered to check at the end of
 the
 mail, you would have clearly seen my name and address. But for the
 record, 
 I'm
 Paul Njoki.
 
 All Ugandans are movementists indeed even after parties like U.P.C.
 NRM-O, 
 CP
 ect have registered and recruited members!!
 
 About Hajji Sebirumbi, a man who was sick. He should have thought about
 that 
 at
 the time he commited the crimes for which he was sentenced. I'm sure
 among 
 the
 people he was accused and convicted of killing or either the killing
 were 
 the
 sick and the old.
 
 And yes, in Mukono, the likes of Keffa Ssemapngi have defected.
 
 As for Uganda being a zoo, you are entaitled to your opinion. It is just
 a 
 pity
 you were also brought up in a zoo!
 
 Nice day
 
 PAUL NJOKI
 
 Quoting Edward Mulindwa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  First of all no one defects to movement because all Ugandans are
  Movementists. Isn't that the old school of thoughts? Secondly I have
  lived
  here long enough to know the American system of it is okay we will
 take
  him
  to a trial then we will kill him. Third, how has Rwakasiisi's being
 in
  jail
  this long changed Uganda for better?
 
  No wonder you have no name for it all makes sense to you including
 the
 
  murdering of Haji Musa Ssebirumbi, a man who was clearly very sick
 and
 
  disabled.
 
  Again I insist Uganda is a ZOO let us just learn to move on with out
 it
  for
  this kind of reasoning just baffles me.
 
  Em
  Toronto
   The Mulindwas Communication Group
  With Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in anarchy
  Groupe de communication Mulindwas
  avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans l'anarchie
 
  - Original Message - 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: ugandanet@kym.net
  Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 5:35 PM
  Subject: Re: [Ugnet] Buturo knows Luweero killers, says UPC
 
 
  Mw. Mulindwa,
  One thing that we seem to agree on here is that we want Obote like
  anyone
  else
  who thinks it is not a zoo to get back to Uganda if they so with.
  The
  disagreement is the on whether or not there should be a blanket
 amnesty.
  I
  say
  no amnesty to Dr. Obote or anybody else who may have been
 responsible
  for
  any
  killings in Uganda. No one is about to drag any of them to prison
 before
  a
  hearing. They will have to earn their places there if they can not
  defend
  themselves.
 
  Fortunately Dr. Obote is so popular that Mukono (Never mind the
  massive
  defection to the Mvnt there) has raised 25 cows for his welcome. Such
 a
 
  person
  should not find it hard to get back and correct the wrong impression
  that
  has
  been created about him.
 
  Yes there some former Obote ministers in government and nothing has
 been
 
  done
  about them, but lets also remind

Re: [Ugnet] Buturo knows Luweero killers, says UPC

2005-04-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Even you know who the killer is but will not admit it. Museveni is the one 
responsible for all those death in Luwero. Propaganda to the contrary simply 
defeats itself because it was Museveni who started an unpopular war and trying 
to connect it to Buganda popular wishes and mistaken hatred for Obote( hatred 
that Obote is very smart intelligent and convincing speaker) NRA would commit 
atrocities at night and in the morning turn up to commiserate with the hapless 
citizens.
That is briefly what has been going on.
Now that Obote's plan to come back back has become certain, Museveni and his 
supporters are exteremely worried of losing and semblance of legality in 
office. They feel like the houseboy who took over the master's bed room would 
feel on hearing of the master's return. That is your problem. I guess you 
already want to go back to the bush, isn't that so? That is where your type of 
people feel comfortable in. 

Onegi

-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since, according to UPC,  Obote and his government are not responsible for the 
atrocities in Luwero and other parts of the country during his regime, why 
doesn't he come back and prove this before a court of law. His coming back may 
be an opportunity for him to tell all Ugandans, other than just the UPC members 
who already seem to know, who exactly was responsible for the deaths in Luwero 
and elsewhere in the country.

Quoting Matek Opoko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 
 Buturo knows Luweero killers, says UPC
 
 THE Uganda People’s Congress (UPC) has said information state minister
 Nsaba Buturo, who was a Luweero district commissioner, knows the people
 who massacred residents, reports Hillary Kiirya. 
 
 Speaking on phone, UPC’s defacto leader, Hajji Badru Wegulo, yesterday
 said, “I do not think Buturo believes in what he is saying other than
 protecting the buttered side of the bread. He knows the people who threw
 the grenades and butchered people in Luweero and not Dr. Milton Obote as
 he said. Obote is not a killer. 
 
 “That was a very unfortunate statement though we expected it from the
 government. We know they have sinister plans for the party president.
 They thought his return was a simple thing but after knowing the
 public’s opinion, they got scared and used this as the only way of
 stopping him from coming back,” Wegulo said. 
 
 He was reacting to Buturo’s warning on Luweero massacres in which he
 said exiled former president Obote should answer for the atrocities. 
 
 Wegulo said they were studying the situation before they come out openly
 on Obote’s return. 
 “This is a man whose father and mother were murdered by the government.
 So when the government says such things about him, we have to be very
 careful,” Wegulo said.
 
 Published on: Saturday, 9th April, 2005
 
 
   
 -
 Do you Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! 



\\\Always be a first rate version of yourself instead of a second rate 
version of someone else.\

Njoki Paul 
University of Pretoria 
___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/


[Ugnet] Fw: [ngomrom] Confused Editorial from the Monitor of April 7 2005

2005-04-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The Monitor editorial of the 7th April 2005 is one of the weakest and most 
confusing pieces to have been written for readers at time when the country is 
bordering a crisis. It is almost equivalent to the “Irresistible Force and 
the Immovable Object case where no meaningful action can be taken. It would 
have been good to know that there is going to be no more secret voting in 
parliament. But this open voting is only for the constitutional amendment, 
because it is so important that posterity should see how our representatives 
voted. This is yet again one example of the NRM/Museveni junta manipulating 
parliament to get what they want!

The Editorial says:

Amending the Constitution is no small matter. The men and women who have the 
power to represent or quash our aspirations should be ready to stand up and be 
counted. But we also know that the reasons for the push for open voting were 
not entirely altruistic. The government and proponents of this method appear to 
want to send a message to MPs that “We are watching you.”

The editor was addressing the removal of secret voting from parliament in the 
pending amendment of the constitution. The NRM has been in power for more than 
seventeen years now. And now when it is facing a stiff resistance to changing 
the constitution to allow Museveni further term to rule Uganda, it wants to get 
it with a threat.
In other words, if the members of parliament refuse to amend the constitution 
they the NRM would have no one to go after if it is a secret ballot. But they 
will certainly go back to the bush. So, on the other hand if you vote against 
it and the amendment is defeated, they can come after you first and put a good 
example for people to see so they should not try to defy the NRM. The good part 
is that the people will have seen and will not support the NRM this time 
around. Still it is the last gamble that they can play without going into their 
usual routine (Luwero, skulls, Mucholi, Obote, back to power)

Take a stand! This is a time for specific action. We do not have time for this 
kind of classroom logic. I am not against taking into consideration or looking 
at all possible scenarios before making a decision. But after doing so, 
specific action should be taken or definite side should be chosen. This is what 
makes a difference between a good leadership and a bad one. That editorial of 
April 7 2005 is incomplete because it leaves us in confusion and should not 
have been written. Editorial should be clear-cut and represent a strong stand 
that the editor is taking; a moral suation and not classroom logic.

The Editorial is apended below.

MPs should stand up and be counted
As expected, Parliament on Wednesday voted to do away with secret voting on the 
Constitution Amendment Bill. The government and the Movement majority supported 
a motion providing for open voting on constitutional amendments. Supporters of 
open voting argue that it is a transparent method that forces people’s 
representatives to account to their constituents. Opponents argue that many 
Members of Parliament would be easily intimidated into voting for the 
government’s proposal to remove term limits and such related controversial 
amendments if voting were to be conducted in the open. They add that those who 
oppose the government’s proposals would be subjected to harassment later.If 
the voting were by secret ballot, it is argued, many MPs who would have feared 
to vote openly against the government position would do so because of the 
protection that secrecy would afford them. Both sides have a point. While there 
is a legitimate case to be made about how voting by secret ballot
  protects MPs from intimidation by ruling governments, there is an equally 
compelling case to be made for the principle of open voting in the legislature. 
Members of Parliament should be accountable to their constituents. The easiest 
and most reliable way for voters to establish whether their representative is 
in fact representing their interests in Parliament is if they are able to 
follow his or her votes on the major issues before the House. Amending the 
Constitution is no small matter. The men and women who have the power to 
represent or quash our aspirations should be ready to stand up and be counted. 
But we also know that the reasons for the push for open voting were not 
entirely altruistic. The government and proponents of this method appear to 
want to send a message to MPs that “We are watching you.” Whatever the 
motives of the proponents and opponents of open voting, not all is lost. 
Members of Parliament can still go into division lobby and record their votes. T
 he country should know where MPs stood on the third term, on the regional tier 
system, on dual citizenship, on giving the president powers to dissolve 
Parliament, in fact on all the proposed constitutional amendments. Let our 
representatives show us, and posterity, where they stand. 

--
Posted by kaladima to 

[Ugnet] Fw: [ngomrom] Prelude to Disintegration

2005-03-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While successful party registration and ability to stage a peaceful 
demonstration in Kampala do not mean the NRM has become a tolerant government, 
it shows that it has become irrelevant as a vehicle of carrying Ugandans’ 
aspiration forward. The backdrop under which the demonstration occurred was the 
fact that the NRM, a few days earlier, took to the street in protest against a 
remark by Irish rock star Sir Bob Geldof. The UPC demonstration was, therefore, 
an answer to the NRM earlier demonstration. As such, the NRM/NRA could not take 
any repressive action without it getting completely out of hand and possibly 
precipitating a chaos that could prove their undoing.

Museveni and his NRM has failed to unite Uganda and create condition for 
peaceful coexistence.

Onegi

Please note: forwarded message attached


---BeginMessage---

 
Everything that is happening in Uganda indicates that the corrupt regime of Museveni is gaining momentum for final disintegration. There is going to be no guns fired. This is simply the peoples power at work. There will be some unscrupulous people who will attempt to hijack it but they will be crushed because the people have had enough suffering in the hands of various opportunists. So, if you are an opportunist, my advice to you at this time is to wait on the side until sanity has returned.The Museveni empire/rule was built on chaos and misguided tribal sentiments and a horde of dissonant ideas: That the north versus south was the issue War in Acholi was keeping peace in Buganda and so on. That Acholis and Lugbaras were banyanyas and biological substances That only the NRA/NRM/Museveni could assure Ugandans of peace It was divide and rule pure and simple.The constitution was manipulated and doctored to suit the NRM but even then, it was pure brute force that kept Museveni in power all these years. And Ugandans, in their ways, have been tolerant of Museveni for various reasons, one of which is that they simply wish to get on with their lives. This is always mistaken for support for the existing regime.Museveni missed many chances of becoming a truly great Ugandan leader in spite of the utter use of the military for his political purposes. People begged him and showed him the way, but he refused.That many of the Museveni supporters in the army were from the west does not detract from the fact that those very same people are independent nationally oriented individuals who for one reason or another followed or joined the NRM. However, the sycophants like Bantariza wake up make their usual cry of LRA in the morning, herd people in the north to the concentration camp withouth means for survival, and call that a development program. A day's worth of work has been done. They then get rewarded by adoring soldiers who have no idea these leeches are the bane of Uganda and the reason why he is carrying a gun against his fellow countrymen.The Bugandans have agitated for various forms of special treatment, but their messages never get through clearly. Opportunists jump in and confuse the issues that should be looked at, and in the end the central government is able to garner more support to the detriment of Ugandans and Bagandans in particular. Now we are moving towards that conditions in which a regime is suddenly going to be forced out of power and very soon, too. This should be the time for sanity and respect for all sections and communities in Uganda. We need no army to ensure peace in Uganda if the people are to remain supreme. We do need police power for civil purposes so that other political activities can be undertaken to establish the framework of Uganda government.Museveni and his cronies are not going to take this lying down. As a matter of fact they are going to inject as much confusion as they can in the opposition parties. Messages of discord will be propagated. I dare say that the speech by Gilbert Bukenya telling Catholics that they will be the next president is very much in line with a Museveni tactic. It serve no useful purpose in ridding Uganda of NRM hegemony and can very well weaken any political party aligned with Catholics. Do you see where things are going?I hope that the people of Uganda will not chose this path of divisionism but instead embark on creating a framework for a robust participatory and lawful administration.Thanks be to God  --Posted by kaladima to ngomrom at 3/27/2005 02:12:00 PM
---End Message---
___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

Re: [Ugnet] Kenya to Export 30 Mw to Uganda (Is this supposed to be th eother way round?)

2005-03-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is quite surprising to hear that Uganda now imports electricity from Kenya. 
Could this be a form of cheating? 
We sell to Kenya so much electricity, and ask them not to pay us directly. Then 
we ask them instead to export what we have exported to them. Now this time we 
pay to Kenya the same amount they should have paid us. This money crosses the 
border where Kenya knows they owe Uganda. So Money in effect is exported out of 
Uganda twice.
In plain language, it is a scam to launder money out of Uganda.

That is what I believe is going on

Onegi

Please note: message attached


The Loading shedding in Uganda has been going on close to 10 years now.
Why should the reason for low output from Owen Falls dam be blamed on shortage
of rainfall last year?
What about the past 9 years load shedding has been going on?
This is a sign of a Government whose bankrupt ideologies coupled with the massive 
thieving is catching up with it.
Uganda indeed went to the real dogs in January 1986!.
This is the price we shall all live with for the rest of our lives.
The only idea Mu7 and his Cohorts introduced in Uganda is Theft and Violence and that is 
why he often outsources them to the neighbouring countries.
KipenjiEdward Mulindwa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




Let record show that even under Iddi Amin, Uganda was ezporting power to Kenya.

Em
Toronto

The Mulindwas Communication Group"With Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in anarchy" Groupe de communication Mulindwas "avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans l'anarchie"

- Original Message - 
From: musamize 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; ugandanet@kym.net 
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 9:29 PM
Subject: [Ugnet] Kenya to Export 30 Mw to Uganda (Is this supposed to be theother way round?)


Kenya to Export 30 Mw to Uganda The East African (Nairobi) NEWSMarch 21, 2005 Posted to the web March 23, 2005 By Peter MunaitaNairobi 
PETER MUNAITA writes that Uganda will buy from the Kenya Power and Lighting Company (KPLC) between 20 and 30 Megawatts In a reversal of fortunes, Kenya, will export 30 megawatts of power to Uganda, once trials that started early last month are complete. 
Top officials of the Uganda transmission company said last week that negotiations for the imports were almost complete. Kenya has been importing power from Uganda since the commissioning of the Owen Falls dam in 1954. 
William Osanda, a technician, at the control room of Olkaria 1 Geothermo Station Picture: Anthony Kamau 
Uganda is expected to pay between $750,000 and $1 million per month for the supplies, the same amount Kenya has been paying. The supply is meant to ease load shedding during the off peak hours between 11 pm and 6 pm. 
Energy Minister Syda Bbumba said the Uganda Electricity Transmission Company (UETC) had formalised negotiations with the Kenya Power and Lighting Company (KPLC) to buy between 20 and 30 megawatts. Export of more power is also possible since KPLC is understood to have a surplus of 250 megawatts during off-peak hours. 
Uganda is facing a power shortage in excess of 130 megawatts during the peak hours between 6 pm and 11 pm. The government blames the shortage on a 2 metre fall in the water level at the Owen Falls dam in Jinja, 80 kilometres east of Kampala. The water level has been low since October last year due to poor rains. The peak demand is 347 megawatts against a supply of 220 megawatts. 
The operations and maintenance manager at UETC Engineering, William Kiryakiha, said that many customers had already benefited from the trials, whose outcome will inform the transmission of power from Kenya. 
"We are using the same pipes we used while exporting power to Kenya, so when we are satisfied with the trials, transmission will begin, probably in a few days," Mr Kiryakiha told The EastAfrican. Negotiations on the trial phase were completed on February 15 this year. 
Mrs Bbumba also said that UETC would commission a 50 megawatt thermal plant by May this year. 
"We are still in the procurement stage but the problem is being addressed," said Uganda's energy Permanent Secretary, Kabagambe Kaliisa. Alternative renewable energy sources, including garbage and sewage at the Kampala City Council's Kiteezi dumping site, were also being considered. 
Critics counter the official expla- nations for the shortage, saying the Uganda government ignored warnings against building a second dam next to the old one and warn that the country's power problems may escalate since the 50-year-old Nalubale Power Station needs to be closed for reconstruction. 
The power imports by Uganda coupled with KPLC's increasing profitability and the proposed public listing of the Kenya Electricity Generating Company (KenGen) suggests that Kenya's power sector is coming out of the woods. 
Only four years ago, Kenya was grappling with a load shedding programme caused by a lengthy drought, a situation that was not helped by lack of investments in new production 

[Ugnet] SLOW DEATH

2005-03-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fellow netters:

Under the NRM/ Museveni regime Uganda is dying a slow painful death. There is 
no difference with a cow fattened for slaughter.
I do remember how oxen used to be castrated so that they could be used better 
for ploughing the field. We always ate  the testacles and the ox went about it 
job of pulling the ploughs. When they were finally slaughtered, we ate some 
more of the same animals. 
The so call progress is but a fattening waiting for the final knife which the 
NRA/Museveni has now pulled out. If Uganda ox still has life, it had better 
kick the knife out of NRA's hand. And to ensure it does not come back, give it 
a hefty kick in the jaw.

Onegi

Check out this blog: http://ngomrom.blogspot.com
___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/


Re: [Ugnet] 'Museveni Wants Peace to Retire'

2005-03-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

En Engoli fodi tiye kawake ku? Cengi gi KOLO Mendi..Ka Iming!!

MK

'Museveni Wants Peace to Retire'



You said it as if yu read my mind!

Man dong ope ba!


OJ



Please note: message attached



En Engoli fodi tiye kawake ku? Cengi gi KOLO Mendi..Ka Iming!!
MK
'Museveni Wants Peace to Retire'














Email This Page Print This Page VisitThePublisher'sSite 







The Monitor (Kampala)
March 16, 2005 Posted to the web March 16, 2005 
Hudson ApunyoLira 
The district Movement chairman, Mr Sam Engola, has said President Yoweri Museveni will retire after he has achieved total peace for the country.
"Museveni wants to make sure that there is total peace in Uganda and then step down from power," Engola said. Engola was speaking on a talk show on Rhino FM on Saturday. He was hosted together with Apac woman MP, Ms Betty Amongi Ochwa.











 
When Amongi asked Engola why Museveni had not achieved peace in the last 19 years, Engola said the opposition had been fighting him.
Amongi dismissed Engola's claim that the opposition had hindered peace. She said Museveni and Joseph Kony were responsible for the insecurity in northern Uganda. She said Museveni wants to stay in power to continue to loot the wealth of the country.











Relevant Links





East Africa Legal and Judicial Affairs Uganda Peacekeeping and Conflict Resolution 
Amongi said peace talks should continue because they had made top LRA commanders to surrender making Kony weaker.
Engola blamed Lango MPs for not presenting the problems of the people to the government. But Amongi said Lango MPs were the most respected in Parliament.
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Make Yahoo! your home page 
 
 
___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

[Ugnet] Girls Talk

2004-12-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uganda Weekly Observer, 23rd December 2004

Size does matter!

Girls Recline

At the Makerere University Guest House, the girls are lounging in the
sofas
in the lobby, where Joanna, 23, is scheduled to interview a former
lecturer
before the girls continue to Wandegeya. The lecturer arrives, goes to
the
restaurant with Joanna, leaving Elle, 25, Stella, 29 and Lorna, 27,
waiting
in the lobby. Joanna returns shortly after and the lecturer jumps into
his
car…

Joanna: He forgot a document he has to give me. He is collecting it from
Lincoln flats…

Stella: Eh! But those bowed legs that even show through jeans! He must
be
quite endowed! Is he married?

Giggles Joanna: You should know by now that size doesn’t matter!

Elle: Oh, dear, oh dear, here I was thinking that I was liberated and
all,
and can stand up and declare with a straight face that for me size does
not
matter as far as a man’s penis goes! If I did that, I would be telling a
big, fat lie.

Lorna: But I hear that those big d**ks are weak. I don’t really know how
small ones feel. The small ones are for Chinese and Japanese so I don’t
expect our men here to be that small.

Joanna: Lorna, please, stop calling it that! It sounds dirty. Just call
it a
penis. Ok? And leave the Orientals out of this. You don’t have to rub it
in.

Stella: So Lorna you agree with Elle and I that at the end of the day,
size
does matter!

Lorna: You know what, when I am in my Namboole, I want to feel the ball
kick
here and there. So medium, strong and sharp is good for me.

(Namboole ist das Fußballstadion zwischen Jinja und Kampala, wo die
Länderspiele stattfinden)

Joanna: So Elle likes it big, you like it medium. I will take it anyway
it
comes as long as the presenter knows how to put it to good use.

Elle: Count me out as far as that talk of “size does not matter, but the
way
he uses what he has” is concerned. Jeez, men with tiny ones really have
a
problem now that I talk about it. I want my man endowed.

Stella: Depends on how you define ‘endowed’ for me. I am sure if [a
Kampala
contractor] reputed to carry a tonne in his pants so much as winked my
way,
I would take off faster than Akii Bua!

(Akii Bua ist der berühmteste ugandische Kurzstreckenläufer, er hat eine
Goldmedaiille im 200 m Lauf bei den olympischen Spielen in München
geholt)

Lorna: I have heard about him too, hahahaha… I hear that big d**ks can’t
go
through without being supported. And I imagine you may not enjoy kissing
it...

Joanna: Aha! Elle what if you get a really big one and he splits you up?
You
spend the whole time pleading that he stops. That is not making love; it
is
called torture.

Elle: I, Elle cannot deal with little ones, so help me God.
Medium-sized,
uh maybe, but big is fine. I need the real thing, not a cocktail
cucumber. You know those cucumbers they cut into tiny bits at cocktail
parties that you dip in sauce and chew at?

Joanna: Even those cocktail cucumbers; with the right sauce, they are
delectable. And I have heard tales about how arrogant the endowed guys
are;
that they lie back and hope the size works the magic.

Stella: Eh! You’re really on the defensive here…

Joanna: No, I just don’t see how I can pass up on a nice guy with
husband
material just because his gizmo is petite. And don’t bring up Danny. I
don’t
kiss and tell.

Elle: Anyway, I am not a charity case and will not take what other women
will not have. He either has something I can see, touch and feel, or he
takes his “cigarette” elsewhere it can be accommodated. I am not one for
small boys.

Stella: Bannange Elle…! Your ka-driver could be eavesdropping.

Elle: Good. Just as well he knows the stakes in case he starts getting
ideas.One of these days I should give Stella a reason not to call me
‘ka’
again!

At least now I know what boss harbours under all those Agbada outfits
from
his home in Lagos!

Here comes the lecturer with the documents now…




___
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/


[Ugnet] Lugnda Vs Kiswahili, make your national language choice

2004-12-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Luganda Vs Kiswahili; make your national language choice

By Bamuturaki Musinguzi

Dec 26 - Jan 2, 2004

As Parliament starts debating the White Paper, one other proposal,
beyond
the one on presidential term limits, is likely to excite much debate and
emotion. It’s the proposal on national language.
Although the authorities appear determined to adopt Swahili, which would
put
Uganda in line with key neighbours Kenya and Tanzania, the issue of a
national language remains a sticking point.
The question of “official” and “national” language started during
British
colonial rule and 42 years of independence have not resolved it.

The debate has mainly featured Swahili and Luganda, or put differently,
Swahili versus Luganda. Failure to settle for one or the other has given
English an upper hand. On several occasions attempts have been made to
forge
a common language, which would serve as a national language, only to be
sacrificed at the altar of political expediency.

Dr Ruth Mukama, a linguist at Makerere University, attributes it to
tribalism and linguistic prejudice.
“We may now ask ourselves whether, in fact, there is any likelihood that
any
one language will ever rise to be truly the national language of
Uganda,”
Mukama writes in her paper, Uganda’s Quest for a National Language.

Some history

Some language analysts have listed factors that favour the adoption of
Swahili for a national.

Swahili was first introduced into Uganda as the language of religion and
trade in the second half of the 19th century. Later on it featured
prominently as the lingua franca (common language) among the
multi-racial
builders of the Kenya-Uganda railway.

In the period 1900 to 1912 Swahili was the official local language.
Until
1952, it was one of the recognised vernaculars in Ugandan schools and
was
the official language of the armed forces.

The colonialists found Swahili a well-established language in the
different
kingdoms and chiefdoms in East Africa in terms of trade and
communication.
By 1879 even prayers were conducted in Swahili.

However, the British colonisers depended greatly on Baganda agents to
administer other parts of the country leading to the imposition of
Luganda
on the then Eastern Province and Ankole.

When Bishop Tucker arrived on the scene in 1891, he ordered the
translation
of the Bible into Luganda. Luganda had powerful protagonists in the
Christian Missionary Society (CMS) mission and that is how it came to be
the
first indigenous language to be written both for literacy and religious
purposes.

And when it came to the need to link the political and ecclesiastical
arenas
in the country the CMS mission was solidly in support of Luganda as the
language that would be appropriate for the unification of the country.

“The CMS mission considered the employment of a single language to be
the
best method of unifying the Church and integrating the various parts of
the
protectorate. And its longer-term aim was to promote Luganda as the
primary
language of the protectorate,” H.B. Hansen writes in Mission, Church and
State in a Colonial Setting: Uganda 1890-1925.

The mission exerted maximum efforts to promote Luganda and succeeded in
having it replace Swahili as the official language of the protectorate
from
1912 to around 1924.

Hansen argues that the rise of anti-Luganda feelings in the western
kingdoms
and in the Northern Province, which led to significant concessions being
made to recognise other indigenous languages, prevented the proponents
of
Luganda from realising their goal.

The result was that the mission was split into two contending groups:
those
opposed to making any concessions to sub-nationalist demands as that
“would
mean the virtual abandonment of the policy of making Luganda the primary
language in the protectorate”; and the others who realised that “the
strong
feelings against Buganda dominance” could not be disregarded and “that a
policy of integration based on Ganda hegemony was no longer tenable.”

Writes Hansen: “Neither side could win its case under the prevailing
circumstances, in the longer term; however, English was available as a
possible way out of the stalemate.”

In any event, the Bible was translated into other local languages,
starting
with Runyoro and the languages were also used as “the medium of
instruction”. The widespread preference for individual vernaculars,
combined
with opposition to the spread of Ganda influence through Luganda, was
one of
the major contributing factors to the failure of making Luganda a
universal
language of the Protectorate.

According to Hansen, the persisting Swahili/Luganda controversy has been
a
hindrance to Luganda gaining the status of universal language. While the
mission was torn between Luganda and the various vernaculars, it was
largely
united in opposition to Swahili.

“Although it was ousted from the official status in 1912, [Swahili] had
already imprinted its mark in the country and loaned to the indigenous
languages a big assortment of 

ugnet_: HAVE YOU BEEN TO TORONTO?

2004-05-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]



To those who have ever been to Toronto, I am sure you know the big store on
Bathurst and Bloor known as Honest Ed's. 
The owner of this store, Ed Marvish has passed away few hour ago. I surely
know that many of our people have been his customers.

Edward Mulindwa
Toronto


mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .





This service is hosted on the Infocom network
http://www.infocom.co.ug