Re: Generics for UIMA interfaces

2009-05-12 Thread Jörn Kottmann
Thilo Goetz wrote: Jörn Kottmann wrote: Can I commit my changes ? The patch can be reviewed in UIMA1341. +1. I have reviewed the patch, applied it to my workspace and run some tests. I think this is a big usability improvement. The change to FS iterators alone is worth it :-) T

Re: Generics for UIMA interfaces

2009-05-12 Thread Thilo Goetz
Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Can I commit my changes ? The patch can be reviewed in UIMA1341. +1. I have reviewed the patch, applied it to my workspace and run some tests. I think this is a big usability improvement. The change to FS iterators alone is worth it :-) --Thilo > > All changes seem saf

Re: Next release

2009-05-12 Thread Thilo Goetz
Jörn Kottmann wrote: >> * We have had some earlier discussions about changing >> our release packaging a bit. This concerns the sandbox >> in particular, as there are things in there that are >> quite stable enough to graduate from there to a place >> still to be created. This needs to be discuss

Re: Next release

2009-05-12 Thread Thilo Goetz
Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Thilo Goetz wrote: >> * Getting releases approved by the incubator PMC is >> intensely painful. > > I should be able to help with that. That would be great :-) > >> * The version number: we could go with 2.3, or 2.2.3. >> Argumen

Re: Next release

2009-05-12 Thread Jörn Kottmann
* We have had some earlier discussions about changing our release packaging a bit. This concerns the sandbox in particular, as there are things in there that are quite stable enough to graduate from there to a place still to be created. This needs to be discussed, I don't have a concrete proposa

Re: Generics for UIMA interfaces

2009-05-12 Thread Jörn Kottmann
Can I commit my changes ? The patch can be reviewed in UIMA1341. All changes seem safe to me, after I committed it we may can start a discussion about changes which break backward compatibility. In some cases this may not hurt our users, e.g. if it breaks the implementation of interfaces wh

Re: Next release

2009-05-12 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Thilo Goetz wrote: > * Getting releases approved by the incubator PMC is > intensely painful. I should be able to help with that. > * The version number: we could go with 2.3, or 2.2.3. > Arguments could be found for each, I don't have a strong > opinion. T

Next release

2009-05-12 Thread Thilo Goetz
All, I think it's time we started thinking about the next release. We haven't had a release in a year, and while there haven't been any major changes, we have fixed a whole host of bugs, and we have acquired new items in the sandbox. Also there has been major progress in UIMA-AS, which needs a n

[jira] Closed: (UIMA-1344) XCAS Serialization doesn't handle StringArrays with null elements

2009-05-12 Thread Adam Lally (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Lally closed UIMA-1344. Resolution: Fixed Fixed to write empty array element to XCAS instead of throwing NPE. > XCAS Serialization