Easynet announced this recently..
http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2013/05/uk-isp-easynet-launch-business-320mbps-bonded-fttc-broadband.html?utm_content=buffer25dd8&utm_source=buffer&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Buffer
--
Martin Hepworth, CISSP
Oxford, UK
On 11 May 2013 15:02, Paul Mans
On 14/05/13 23:47, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
I see a lot of operators are already selling FTTC
as "uncontended"
I've only noticed unlimited.
Googling FTTC and uncontended definitely yields results!
Can FTTC really be claimed as uncontended when
People stopped implementing a specific cotn
> I see a lot of operators are already selling FTTC
> as "uncontended"
I've only noticed unlimited.
> Can FTTC really be claimed as uncontended when
People stopped implementing a specific cotnention long
ago and at BTs backhaul rates why would they contend you,
there's money to be made on letti
As a side note to this discussion (and vaguely related to FTTC as a
replacement for EFM), I see a lot of operators are already selling FTTC
as "uncontended". Can FTTC really be claimed as uncontended when
operators have zero control or monitoring of the fibre circuit from the
exchange to the
We only use FireBricks, and I have no idea on cisco boxes - don't have
any :-)
I didn't expect anything less!
Presumably you could make an LAG on two ports, and have those cabled to
ports that are each untagged on a VLAN that then routes through to the
FTTC lines at the far end. That should work,
On 14/05/13 08:20, Charlie Boisseau wrote:
> Adrian,
>
> Is that with the magic help of a Firebrick, or would it be possible with
> a Cisco or Juniper device? I've done a bit of googling and it would
> seem there's little if any material on how to do it. As far as I can
> tell LAGs are only poss
On 14/05/13 08:20, Charlie Boisseau wrote:
> Adrian,
>
> Is that with the magic help of a Firebrick, or would it be possible with
> a Cisco or Juniper device? I've done a bit of googling and it would
> seem there's little if any material on how to do it. As far as I can
> tell LAGs are only poss
Adrian,
Is that with the magic help of a Firebrick, or would it be possible with a
Cisco or Juniper device? I've done a bit of googling and it would seem there's
little if any material on how to do it. As far as I can tell LAGs are only
possible on a per-port basis (at least on Cisco switches
On 2013-05-13 18:02, Charlie Boisseau wrote:
>
> This sounds really mucky; but has anyone thought of EVC bonding?
> Something like a LAG but with VLANs instead of physical ports. This
> could supersede the likes of EFM if done right.
We have FTTC Etherways, but not sure I have any bonded yet,
I wonder if there's a way to do it at the Ethernet level (when buying GEA
instead of via WBC/L2TP)? Openreach handoff raw FTTx circuits to us as a VLAN
on an interconnect in each exchange, and we get similar delivery on our
interconnects with BTWholesale and TalkTalk for accessing exchanges we
We will offering it at a DSLAM level on all of our SLU cabinets shortly.
Sent from my iPhone
On 11 May 2013, at 22:05, Paul Mansfield wrote:
> are there any ISPs planning to offer FTTC circuit bonding?
>
> I would guess that if they can already do it with ADSL/ADSL2+ then it
> must be possible
I believe Goscomb (http://www.goscomb.net/connectivity/broadband/fttc) will do
ML-PPP on their FTTC lines.
Edward Dore
Freethought Internet
On 11 May 2013, at 15:02, Paul Mansfield wrote:
> are there any ISPs planning to offer FTTC circuit bonding?
>
> I would guess that if they can already
On Sat, 11 May 2013, Paul Mansfield wrote:
are there any ISPs planning to offer FTTC circuit bonding?
I would guess that if they can already do it with ADSL/ADSL2+ then it
must be possible with FTTC?
I think plenty do it - AAISP, ADSL24, Goscomb etc etc
Thread from a while back:
http://for
Pretty sure Andrews & Arnold offer it on all their offerings.
http://www.aa.net.uk/
On 11 May 2013, at 15:09, "Paul Mansfield"
mailto:paul+uk...@mansfield.co.uk>> wrote:
are there any ISPs planning to offer FTTC circuit bonding?
I would guess that if they can already do it with ADSL/ADSL2+ then
are there any ISPs planning to offer FTTC circuit bonding?
I would guess that if they can already do it with ADSL/ADSL2+ then it
must be possible with FTTC?
15 matches
Mail list logo
