ere are a
> few images found through a web search for "cat face":
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Here's the relevant TVTropes article:
> http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/CatSmile
>
> (TVTropes, incidentally, is one of the many web forums wh
I'd like to bring to your attention a request, about a common emoticon,
that has apparently no equivalent yet in the Emoji standard.
This was a PR to the Twemoji project:
https://github.com/twitter/twemoji/issues/199
The author also created a proper PDF explaining all the reasons:
Proposal for
, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not a Unicode expert, but I couldn't stop thinking about the following
> comic after reading "I am trying to come up with a sensible sets of
> characters that are considered whitespace&q
I'm not a Unicode expert, but I couldn't stop thinking about the following
comic after reading "I am trying to come up with a sensible sets of
characters that are considered whitespace" https://xkcd.com/927/
Apologies for bringing pretty much nothing to this discussion but I'm
pretty sure there's
Hello everyone,
I've had an interesting request [1] that makes sense to me, but I'd like
to understand Unicode position about it.
The TL;DR version of the request is the following:
There are communities, let's take Scottish people as example, that have
even a domain but not an emoji flag.
Thanks, that was somehow indeed my very first concern. Everyone could claim
an emoji, at that point.
Enough info for me so far, so thanks again.
Best Regards
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Markus Scherer markus@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Andrea Giammarchi
Hello there,
I wonder if it's by accident that 00AE, 00A9, and 2122 are not listed as
standard variant sensitive chars.
OSX seems to threat them as such, so adding FE0F will force them to be an
image, but I know there are few quirks in this behavior and I wonder if
there should be an exception.
use with a non-emoji presentation (typical for
characters that have been in Unicode for a long time).
Mark https://google.com/+MarkDavis
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Mark, I mean
yeahright :D
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Jonathan Rosenne
jonathan.rose...@gmail.com wrote:
To pick a nit, it should be COPYRIGHT rather than COPY RIGHT.
Best Regards,
Jonathan Rosenne
*From:* Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] *On Behalf Of *Andrea
Giammarchi
I'd say highly subjective, generally speaking, but the problem here is that
there are graphics representations of those and it's not clear when these
should be preferred over just plain text representation.
Hence my initial question if it was by accident that those chars got in
(and yeah, maybe
I'd like to thank those that helped me a while ago figuring out variants
and emoji behavior.
Today we are open sourcing a relatively small JS library and 800+ CDN based
assets able to bring unified emoji in every WebView capable device and
browser.
We are also planning to implement the recently
this project. Will spread the
call for contribution!
Please share the URL for open source code + asset repo :-)
Best,
Alolita
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to thank those that helped me a while ago figuring out variants
and emoji
/+MarkDavis
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to thank those that helped me a while ago figuring out variants
and emoji behavior.
Today we are open sourcing a relatively small JS library and 800+ CDN
Dear all,
this is my first email in this channel so apologies in advance if already
discussed.
I am trying to understand the expected behavior when there an unexpected
VS15 after emoji that have not been defined, accordingly with this file
http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/NamesList.txt, as
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
this is my first email in this channel so apologies in advance if
already discussed.
I am trying to understand the expected behavior when there an unexpected
VS15 after emoji that have
://unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/StandardizedVariants.txt
Mark https://google.com/+MarkDavis
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, here the simplified version of my question:
would U+1F21A followed by U+FE0E
richard.wording...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 10:33:17 -0700
Andrea Giammarchi andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to understand the expected behavior when there an
unexpected VS15 after emoji that have not been defined, accordingly
with this file http
Andrea Giammarchi andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
...no keyboard would automatically put such sequence
in a text field since such sequence as it is is meaningless for today
standards.
While perhaps no keyboard would map it to a single keystroke plus
modifiers, direct hex input
18 matches
Mail list logo
