instead.
Therefore you should complain by Microsoft, not here.
Supposing that Microsoft choose not to implement U+2060 WJ
Then you should probably choose another operating system which does...
Petr Tomasek
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 01:00:59AM +0200, Philippe Verdy wrote:
2015-05-23 20:50 GMT+02:00 Petr Tomasek toma...@etf.cuni.cz:
Hm, it seems that there is much more to be encoded in Unicode than just
the quarter-tone signs..
Clearly not a valid arguments against encoding a character
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:07:38AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
That’s quite some variety. There are also the three-quarter flat and
sharp in Western music to consider. I’ll be able to dig into this
after I get back to Ireland from Sweden on Friday.
You should check the Standard Music
a rake of pre-composed Hebrew characters though.
What about the Babylonian and Palestinian punctuation? Anything new currently?
Thanks!
Petr Tomasek
___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
I assume you mean Romanization, when you say transliteration.
Well, isn't Romanization a special case of transliteration?
Petr Tomasek
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:22:10PM +, Julian Bradfield wrote:
On 2012-02-06, Larson, Timothy E. telar...@west.com wrote:
FWIW, some of us consider OFL to be non-free (it doesn't allow sale
alone), so won't install fonts using it at all.
Could you explain this further? This is the
absorbed into the Unicode (based on regular
proposals, of course).
P.T.
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
EA 355:001 DU DU DU DU
EA 355:002 TU TU TU TU
EA 355:003 NU NU NU NU NU NU NU
EA 355:004
suggest that the letters used in each of these languages should be
encoded separately?
That would be the best :). People would stop pretending
they are able to read/write the language of the other one :
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
officially and for the broader these proposal as
they are very good starting point for people who wish to learn more
about particular codepoint / script.
-- Philippe.
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
...
[sigh]
--
Shriramana Sharma
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
EA 355:001 DU DU DU DU
EA 355:002 TU TU TU TU
EA 355:003 NU NU NU NU NU NU NU
EA 355:004 NA NA NA NA NA
.
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
EA 355:001 DU DU DU DU
EA 355:002 TU TU TU TU
EA 355:003 NU NU NU NU NU NU NU
EA 355:004 NA NA NA NA NA
.
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
EA 355:001 DU DU DU DU
EA 355:002 TU TU TU TU
EA 355:003 NU NU NU NU NU NU NU
EA 355:004 NA NA NA NA NA
Not true. See:
Collete Sirat. Hebrew Manuscripts of the Middle Ages. Cambridge University
Press 2002,
fig. 114 (p. 176) or fig. 127 (p. 189) or fig. 134 (p. 193).
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
EA 355
Hello,
I would like to ask why there are no PUA parts which would be reserved
for RTL scripts (i.e. would have the directionality set to strong RTL).
Thanks!
P.T.
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 02:43:56PM +0100, Michael Everson wrote:
On 19 Aug 2011, at 14:29, Petr Tomasek wrote:
I would like to ask why there are no PUA parts which would be reserved for
RTL scripts (i.e. would have the directionality set to strong RTL).
Thanks!
P.T
?
Would it be possible to change the properties of some part of these planes to
RTL or is this really impossible?
P.T.
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
EA 355:001 DU DU DU DU
EA 355:002 TU TU TU TU
as a combining
character than no problems would arise for the Arabic script.
P.T.
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
EA 355:001 DU DU DU DU
EA 355:002 TU TU TU TU
EA 355:003 NU NU NU NU NU NU NU
EA 355:004
letters or in isolation,
I think you may find isolated Wasla in Arabic textbooks and similar literature.
Not sure, however, how serious this usage is...
something that Miika-Markus also described in his posted message in
2001).
Philippe.
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber
: have I missed something?
Thank You!
P.T.
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
EA 355:001 DU DU DU DU
EA 355:002 TU TU TU TU
EA 355:003 NU NU NU NU NU NU NU
EA 355:004 NA NA NA NA NA
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 01:11:30AM -0700, vanis...@boil.afraid.org wrote:
From: Petr Tomasek tomasek_at_etf.cuni.cz
Hello!
I'm trying to find out if there are somwhere in Unicode the
characters used in ancient greek textual criticism, the so-called
obelus and metobelus signs. See
).
Thanks for any help you can provide.
Bob
Madda above the vowel (the madda prolongates the vowel, not the opposite...)
P.T.
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
EA 355:001 DU DU DU DU
EA 355:002
Algorithm) would have to be changed.
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
EA 355:001 DU DU DU DU
EA 355:002 TU TU TU TU
EA 355:003 NU NU NU NU NU NU NU
EA 355:004 NA NA NA NA NA
when someone proposes to encode something that
shouldn't be there. I don't see this as any different.
Well, what about adding just ONE more escaping character that
would make the following control code point be displayed?
P.T.
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber
.
Ugaritic, or Hieroglyphs (to name few) are dangerous too!
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
Could someone please cooperate with this Linux Xmodmap project?
Best,
Why Xmodmap? Why wouldn't You want to use some input-method?
P.T.
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
?
Raymond Mercier
To use some unicode variant of LaTeX (such as XeLaTeX). Or to use
special fonts, that would encoe the U+1212d in 8bit.
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
EA 355:001 DU DU DU DU
EA 355
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:51:10PM +0100, Michael Everson wrote:
A few new additions have been made. See
http://www.unicode.org/iso15924/codechanges.html
Michael Everson
Registrar
Does it mean the Old North Arabic will come to unicode soon?
Thanks!
Petr Tomasek
--
Petr Tomasek http
-uniqueness.pdf
* https://panopticlick.eff.org/
?
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
EA 355:001 DU DU DU DU
EA 355:002 TU TU TU TU
EA 355:003 NU NU NU NU NU NU NU
EA 355:004 NA NA NA NA NA
probably be yet another privacy security hole...
--
Petr Tomasek http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek
Jabber: but...@jabbim.cz
EA 355:001 DU DU DU DU
EA 355:002 TU TU TU TU
EA 355:003 NU NU NU NU NU NU NU
EA 355:004 NA NA NA NA NA
29 matches
Mail list logo
