- Original Message -
From: Asmus Freytag
To: Shriramana Sharma
Cc: unicode@unicode.org
Sent: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:20:41 +0530 (IST)
Subject: Re: Noticed improvement in the Code chart link
http://www.unicode.org/charts/
On 10/13/2011 10:23 AM, Shriramana
On 10/13/2011 10:23 AM, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
On 10/13/2011 09:47 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
I'd like to have an opinion about why this chart (for example)
describes two code points 09E4 and 09E5 as, without
assigning any glyph, but still associating them with other punctuation
signs in anothe
On 10/13/2011 09:47 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
I'd like to have an opinion about why this chart (for example)
describes two code points 09E4 and 09E5 as, without
assigning any glyph, but still associating them with other punctuation
signs in another script. Are these positions permanently reserved
2011/9/28 Ken Whistler :
> It might be most productive for people concerned with this issue to be
> reviewing
> the charts currently in preparation for Version 6.1.0 of the Unicode
> Standard, rather than
> the already published charts from last year. Please see, for example:
>
> http://www.unicode
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:47:49 +0530 (IST)
delex r wrote:
> On 2011.09.27 22:56, delex r wrote:
> >I hope a proposal will come in near future to include an additional
> >letter 'Khya' which is as per our (Assamese)script is not considered
> >as a biconsonantal conjunct as in Devanagari 0915 (Hex)
On 9/28/2011 12:12 PM, delex r wrote:
Not possible. Character and block names cannot be changed once they are
assigned. It's two decades too late to make that change. The most that can be
done now is adding a few annotations for Assamese.
—Ben Scarborough
>...It's two decades too late to mak
- Forwarded Message -
From: delex r
Cc: benjamin scarborough
Sent: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:35:43 +0530 (IST)
Subject: Re: Noticed improvement in the Code chart link
http://www.unicode.org/charts/
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin M Scarborough
To: del...@indiatimes.com
On 2011.09.28 14:47, delex r wrote:
>"Complelling case"... Pls let us be explained more about it ?
>From my understanding, you would have to prove that there is a critical
>orthographic distinction between ক্ষ and ক্+ষ that is important to the
>language.
Please understand that just because
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin M Scarborough
To: unicode@unicode.org, del...@indiatimes.com
Sent: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 03:19:17 +0530 (IST)
Subject: Re: Noticed improvement in the Code chart link
http://www.unicode.org/charts/
On 2011.09.27 22:56, delex r wrote:
>I hope a propo
On 2011.09.27 22:56, delex r wrote:
>I hope a proposal will come in near future to include an additional letter
>'Khya' which is as per our (Assamese)script is not considered as a
>biconsonantal conjunct as in Devanagari 0915 (Hex) + 0937 (Hex)and instead
>given a full fledged letter status.( I
Well It's good to see that the Web Page at the link
http://www.unicode.org/charts/ has been modified with inclusion of the name
Assamese under the heading South Asian Scripts along with the name Bengali.
Thanx to thee whoever did it. " Assamese and Benagli" would have been more
appropriate so a
11 matches
Mail list logo
