Den 2012-04-28 12:50, skrev Richard Wordingham
richard.wording...@ntlworld.com:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:50:15 -0700
Ken Whistler k...@sybase.com wrote:
On 4/27/2012 10:45 AM, Richard Wordingham wrote:
If they are to be adopted by the CLDR, the digits need to be coded
consecutively.
I
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:50:15 -0700
Ken Whistler k...@sybase.com wrote:
On 4/27/2012 10:45 AM, Richard Wordingham wrote:
If they are to be adopted by the CLDR, the digits need to be coded
consecutively.
I doubt this matters in any case, because this proposed use is for
a vigesimal system,
David Starner prosfilaes at gmail dot com wrote:
I don't see these on the list of proposed scripts or on the roadmap,
but Wikipedia*, citing a newsletter of the Alaska Rural Systemic
Initiative**, that there is now a Inupaiq numeral system supporting a
vigesimal counting system. The proposal
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:32:09 -0700
David Starner prosfil...@gmail.com wrote:
The proposal seems trivial, except for the
minor problem of establishing sufficient use to justify encoding.
If they are to be adopted by the CLDR, the digits need to be coded
consecutively. However, the symbols for
On 4/27/2012 10:45 AM, Richard Wordingham wrote:
If they are to be adopted by the CLDR, the digits need to be coded
consecutively.
I doubt this matters in any case, because this proposed use is for
a vigesimal system, which has digits 0..19, not digits 0..9. Trying to
treat the first 10 digits
I don't see these on the list of proposed scripts or on the roadmap,
but Wikipedia*, citing a newsletter of the Alaska Rural Systemic
Initiative**, that there is now a Inupaiq numeral system supporting a
vigesimal counting system. The proposal seems trivial, except for the
minor problem of
6 matches
Mail list logo
