Re: Private Use areas

2018-08-24 Thread Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
On Thu, Aug 23 2018 at 11:49 -0700, beckie...@gmail.com writes: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 5:10 AM, Janusz S. Bień wrote: > > > I already provide this myself for my uses of the PUA as well as the > > CSUR and any vendor-specific agreements I can find: > > > >

Re: Private Use areas

2018-08-24 Thread Eli Zaretskii via Unicode
> From: jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl (Janusz S. Bień) > Cc: unicode@unicode.org, richard.wording...@ntlworld.com > Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 21:47:03 +0200 > > I'm very glad you join the discussion. I'm sorry for not joining sooner. In my defense, I missed the reference to Emacs, and the rest of the

Re: Emacs Verbose Character Entry (was Private Use Areas)

2018-08-24 Thread Eli Zaretskii via Unicode
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 22:15:10 +0100 > From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode > > On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 21:47:03 +0200 > "Janusz S. Bień via Unicode" wrote: > > > My needs are very simple, for example C-x 8 Return LATIN CAPITAL > > LETTER A WITH MACRON AND BREVE [MUFI] should yield the

Re: Private Use areas

2018-08-24 Thread William_J_G Overington via Unicode
Hi An approach that you might like to consider in relation to fonts is that it is possible to have in a font a Description field that consists of plain text. It is stored twice in the font, in two different ways, one of which is just plain text, possibly just ASCII. So if you had text such as

Re: Emacs Verbose Character Entry (was Private Use Areas)

2018-08-24 Thread Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
On Thu, Aug 23 2018 at 22:15 +0100, unicode@unicode.org writes: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 21:47:03 +0200 > "Janusz S. Bień via Unicode" wrote: > >> My needs are very simple, for example C-x 8 Return LATIN CAPITAL >> LETTER A WITH MACRON AND BREVE [MUFI] should yield the character with >> the code

Re: Private Use areas

2018-08-24 Thread Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
On Fri, Aug 24 2018 at 16:12 +0300, e...@gnu.org writes: >> From: jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl (Janusz S. Bień) >> Cc: unicode@unicode.org, richard.wording...@ntlworld.com >> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 21:47:03 +0200 >> >> I'm very glad you join the discussion. > > I'm sorry for not joining sooner. In my

Re: Thoughts on working with the Emoji Subcommittee (was Re: Thoughts on Emoji Selection Process)

2018-08-24 Thread William_J_G Overington via Unicode
Julian Bradfield wrote: > Not that I want to hear any more about William's unmentionables; I just wish > emoji were equally unmentionable. Well, as you mention them perhaps the moderator will allow the following, particularly as it relates to Japanese and Japanese has been mentioned elsewhere