. 2019 à 04:22, Tex via Unicode a
écrit :
> Oy veh!
>
>
>
> *From:* Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] *On Behalf Of *Mark
> E. Shoulson via Unicode
> *Sent:* Monday, April 15, 2019 5:27 PM
> *To:* unicode@unicode.org
> *Subject:* Emoji Haggadah
>
>
>
&
On 4/16/19 11:52 PM, James Kass via Unicode wrote:
>
http://historyview.blogspot.com/2011/10/yukaghir-girl-writes-love-letter.html
According to a comment, the Yukaghir love letter as semasiographic
communication was debunked by John DeFrancis in 1989 who asserted that
it was merely a prop i
> Perhaps that debunking was in the very book
> cited by Martin J. Dürst earlier in this thread.
Yes, starting on page 24.
https://books.google.com/books?id=hypplIDMd0IC&pg=PA24&dq=isbn:0824812077+Yukaghir&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj1n4r719zgAhWJn4MKHcdyCHIQ6AEIKjAA#v=onepage&q=isbn%3A0824812077%20Yu
>
http://historyview.blogspot.com/2011/10/yukaghir-girl-writes-love-letter.html
According to a comment, the Yukaghir love letter as semasiographic
communication was debunked by John DeFrancis in 1989 who asserted that
it was merely a prop in a Yukaghir parlor game. Perhaps that debunking
On 4/16/19 4:00 AM, James Kass via Unicode wrote:
On 2019-04-16 7:09 AM, Martin J. Dürst via Unicode wrote:
All the examples you cite, where images stand for sounds, are typically
used in some of the oldest "ideographic" scripts. Egyptian definitely
has such concepts, and Han (CJK) does so, too
I
suspect that this work would be jibber-jabber to any non-English
speaker unfamiliar with the original Haggadah. No matter how
otherwise fluent they might be in emoji communication.
You can't escape fundamental theses:
There
On 2019-04-16 7:09 AM, Martin J. Dürst via Unicode wrote:
All the examples you cite, where images stand for sounds, are typically
used in some of the oldest "ideographic" scripts. Egyptian definitely
has such concepts, and Han (CJK) does so, too, with most ideographs
consisting of a semantic an
o make the sentences
>> read left-to-right.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 10:05 PM Tex via Unicode > <mailto:unicode@unicode.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Oy veh!
>>
>> *From:*Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org
>> <mailto:unicode
On 2019-04-16 3:18 AM, Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode wrote:
> For whatever reason, the author decided to go with 🕉️ for "God" and
such, ...
"OM"igod.
Just a thought.
If the emoji OM SYMBOL is to be used for "god", shouldn't it be casing
to enable distinction between the common noun and the
hat he decided to make the sentences
read left-to-right.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 10:05 PM Tex via Unicode <mailto:unicode@unicode.org>> wrote:
Oy veh!
*From:*Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org
<mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org>] *On Behalf Of *Mark E.
nicode
> *Sent:* Monday, April 15, 2019 5:27 PM
> *To:* unicode@unicode.org
> *Subject:* Emoji Haggadah
>
>
>
> The only thing more disturbing than the existence of The Emoji Haggadah (
> https://www.amazon.com/Emoji-Haggadah-Martin-Bodek/dp/1602803463/) is the
>
Oy veh!
From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Mark E.
Shoulson via Unicode
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 5:27 PM
To: unicode@unicode.org
Subject: Emoji Haggadah
The only thing more disturbing than the existence of The Emoji Haggadah
(https://www.amazon.com/Emoji
The only thing more disturbing than the existence of The Emoji
Haggadah
(https://www.amazon.com/Emoji-Haggadah-Martin-Bodek/dp/1602803463/)
is the fact that I'm starting to find that I can read it...
~mark
13 matches
Mail list logo
