Re: [uportal-dev] Some updates on Import/Export and a question

Drew, > there seems to be a bit less pain associated > with the .preferences approach. I'm okay with either approach. I think it may be more attractive to model fragment owner layout documents separately from end user layout documents, in that they are semantically different -- fragment owner

[uportal-dev] Some updates on Import/Export and a question

Hey folks, I'm at Yale this week working with Jen Bourey on some enhancements to Import/Export. Jen has make some terrific progress on UP-1899: http://www.ja-sig.org/issues/browse/UP-1899 I'm working on UP-1917 (support for portlet entity preferences): http://www.ja-sig.org/issues/browse/U

Re: [uportal-dev] Proposing jQuery migration for uPortal 3.0

Thanks! On Feb 19, 2008 3:54 PM, Parker Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We use a plugin for jQuery called Interface > Elements > and here is a demo of the re-ordering elements on a > page > . > > Attached is a patch fi

Re: [uportal-dev] Proposing jQuery migration for uPortal 3.0

We use a plugin for jQuery called Interface Elements and here is a demo of the re-ordering elements on a page . Attached is a patch file for the tab-column/xhtml-theme/xhtml-theme.xsl, I reference the jquery.js and interface.

Re: [uportal-dev] Proposing jQuery migration for uPortal 3.0

Hi Parker, Would you guys be willing to share the portlet re-ordering code you wrote? I haven't yet ironed out all the portlet drag and drop functionality, so it would be pretty useful in finishing the up3 theme! The screenshot you sent looks very nice :) - Jen On Feb 19, 2008 2:58 PM, Parker

Re: [uportal-dev] Proposing jQuery migration for uPortal 3.0

Jen, Wow, interesting news! If you're happy with your jQuery porting efforts so far, I say +1. I by no means think this is a necessary switch--Fluid plays nice with other toolkits--but if you're as happy with jQuery as we have been for our Fluid work, it makes sense to me. We'll be workin

Re: [uportal-dev] Proposing jQuery migration for uPortal 3.0

Jen, +1 Alignment with what Fluid is using is compelling. Andrew Jen Bourey wrote: Hi all, I'd like to propose that we migrate from dojo to jQuery as of uPortal 3.0. jQuery seems to be lighter weight, easier to use, and much faster. jQuery is also being used by the fluid reorderer, so

Re: [uportal-dev] Proposing jQuery migration for uPortal 3.0

Jen Bourey wrote: Hi all, I'd like to propose that we migrate from dojo to jQuery as of uPortal 3.0. jQuery seems to be lighter weight, easier to use, and much faster. jQuery is also being used by the fluid reorderer, so performing this migration will prevent us from needing to include two

Re: [uportal-dev] Proposing jQuery migration for uPortal 3.0

Jen Bourey wrote: jQuery seems to be lighter weight, easier to use, and much faster. jQuery is also being used by the fluid reorderer, so performing this migration will prevent us from needing to include two javascript toolkits in the new uPortal 3.0 theme. These points sound compelling.

Re: [uportal-dev] Proposing jQuery migration for uPortal 3.0

+1 for me. jQuery is very nice! On Feb 19, 2008 12:19 PM, Jen Bourey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to propose that we migrate from dojo to jQuery as of uPortal 3.0. > jQuery seems to be lighter weight, easier to use, and much faster. jQuery > is also being used by the fluid r

[uportal-dev] Proposing jQuery migration for uPortal 3.0

Hi all, I'd like to propose that we migrate from dojo to jQuery as of uPortal 3.0. jQuery seems to be lighter weight, easier to use, and much faster. jQuery is also being used by the fluid reorderer, so performing this migration will prevent us from needing to include two javascript toolkits in t

Re: [uportal-dev] WSRP producer and consumer de-scoped from uPortal 3

Thomas, We would be very happy to talk with you about getting WSRP support into uPortal 3. I would really like to see at a minimum WSRP Consumer support in uPortal 3 but as we discussed earlier the time to implement is the road block for us. I believe there will be some folks in contact direc

re:[uportal-dev] WSRP producer and consumer de-scoped from uPortal 3

Andrew, I had posted an email from the forum to you describing my current role and project scope focusing on uPortal and WSRP. I thought I would also post up the information here to the forum to enlighten all that were kind enough to answer my initial posting about the uPortal time-line and WS