[UrJTAG-dev] Bus pirate for JTAG

Hi, Just discovered this page: http://hackaday.com/2008/12/01/bus-pirate-firmware-update-v0c-jtag-and-more/ I wonder if anybody on this list has ever used it... -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to leg

[UrJTAG-dev] USB2LPT

Hi, I was wondering if this kind of converter could work with urjtag, or tjtag: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~heha/bastelecke/Rund%20um%20den%20PC/USB2LPT/index.html.en Any thought? -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several f

[UrJTAG-dev] FT232RL and bitbanging?

Hi, I just saw that: http://www.geocities.jp/arduino_diecimila/bootloader/index_en.html Basically it is about reflashing an arduino with a FT232RL. Do you think the FT232RL could be used in bitbang mode with urjtag? Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403

[UrJTAG-dev] Flyswatter

age range: 1.2V to 3.6V)" I was wondering if anybody had experience with it. If some of you has an Amontec JTAGTiny, I would welcome your experience with such adaptor, because mine get stuck at: "jtag> detect Warning: TDO seems to be stuck at 1" with many boards I tried. Best,

[UrJTAG-dev] JTAG night this friday evening

). Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of software, they are now se

[UrJTAG-dev] Anybody with a Jtagtiny and a Broadcom SoC BCM47xx?

://www.zoobab.com/jtagkey-tiny Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of sof

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] Anybody with a Jtagtiny and a Broadcom SoC BCM47xx?

On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Benjamin Henrion wrote: > Hi, > > I am still trying to make my Amontec Jtagtiny working with a WRT54GS > with a BCM4712 soc. > > Anybody with similar hardware can guide me on which pin to connect to > what, and especially if there is a

[UrJTAG-dev] USB JTAG NT cable

Hi, I just discovered this USB cable: http://usbjtag.com/jtagnt/index.php Is it supported by URJTAG? I wonder on what kind of chip it is based on: http://www.usbjtag.com/image/jtagntmedia/usbjtagntbd.jpg And what is the Vref input tolerance. -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484

[UrJTAG-dev] UrJTAG segfault

ctflash 0x1E00 chain.c(149) Part 0 without active instruction Segmentation fault zoo...@buzek /home/zoobab/soft/jtagnight/urjtag-0.10 [82]$ ==== Any idea? -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after sev

[UrJTAG-dev] GuruPlug JTAG: Another FT2232 adaptor

: 12Mb/s (full) USB Version: 2.00 Device Class: 00(>ifc ) Device Subclass: 00 Device Protocol: 00 Maximum Default Endpoint Size: 8 Number of Configurations: 1 Vendor Id: 9e88 Product Id: 9e8f Revision Number: 5.00 Do you know if it is a good one? Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-

[UrJTAG-dev] FLOSS JTAG board

-jtag-programmer-with-openocd-support I am trying to order one DLP USB1232H online, but most of the online shops charge too much for the shipping (20EUR or 30USD). -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software

[UrJTAG-dev] Just found Opendous-jtag design

Interesting to build your own FTDI2232H JTAG adaptor: http://code.google.com/p/opendous/source/browse/trunk/#trunk/Current_Designs/Opendous_FT2232H_JTAG -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software pa

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] Anybody with a Jtagtiny and a Broadcom SoC BCM47xx?

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Oleg - Signalyzer wrote: > OB gmail.com> writes: > >> >> Benjamin Henrion a écrit : >> > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Benjamin Henrion udev.org> wrote: >> > If someone can help with the Amontec JTAG key configuration

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] Has anyone tried building the code using Cygwin?

232 chip on the Arduino, in order to reflash the bootloader of the ATMega: http://www.geocities.jp/arduino_diecimila/bootloader/index_en.html -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe

[UrJTAG-dev] Denx BDM4JTAG supported?

Hi, I bought some years ago a paraller port JTAG adaptor for PPC board named BDM4JTAG made by Denx.de: http://www.zoobab.com/denx-bdm4jtag Do you know if is supported by urjtag? Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several f

[UrJTAG-dev] Amontec JTAGkey tiny + Linksys WAP54G

flash chip now, because the detectflash does not see the Intel flash chip. Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Inste

[UrJTAG-dev] ICEBear supported

Hi, Just to say that a friend of mine had an ICEBear cable, so I discovered it was a yet-another-FTDI2232-based: http://hackerspace.be/Icebear_jtag I spent some time searching for documentation on the ICEBear+urjtag, but I did not found that much. Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels

[UrJTAG-dev] Description file for Ikanos Fusiv160 (EJTAG)?

?id=4191 I am now on #openjtag on freenode, if you can help. Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead of explicitly se

[UrJTAG-dev] Created #urjtag IRC channel on Freenode

Hi, I have just created an urjtag IRC channel on freenode, feel free to come if you are interested to help or chat with other urjtag users. Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software paten

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] ICEBear supported

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Jie Zhang wrote: > Sorry, I didn't reply earlier. > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Monday 29 March 2010 06:32:46 Benjamin Henrion wrote: >>> Just to say that a friend of mine had an ICEBear cable,  so

[UrJTAG-dev] GPIO interface

Hi, I was just reading this post about a patch for Avrdude flashing beased on GPIO bitbanging: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/avrdude-dev/2010-04/msg3.html It would be interesting to see urjtag support using the same GPIO method, even if it is slow. Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] SPIflash support written by nbd

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 13 October 2009 20:04:10 Benjamin Henrion wrote: >> Does this code would be integrated in current version of Urjtag? >> >> http://downloads.openwrt.org/people/nbd/openwince-spiflash.patch >> >>

[UrJTAG-dev] wrtag, JTAG from a D-Link DSL502T router

Interesting project: http://axio.ms/projects/wrtag/ -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead of explicitly seeking to san

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Add cable driver based on GPIOs using sysfs interface

f board are you using to make the JTAG over GPIO? Would it work on openwrt routers where some GPIOs are available? Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent estab

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] [PATCH V4] Add cable driver based on GPIOs using sysfs interface

ges urjtag builds nicely under openembedded and > it runs fine on my ppc. > Thanks alot for making such a nice piece of software. I am gonna try on some fonera this evening: http://vesta.homelinux.net/wiki/routeur_wifi_la_fonera.html It has enough GPIOs free to be used for an urjt

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] PATCH: SPI Flash memory

rint to a > Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your > business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev > _______ > UrJTAG-development mailing list > UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net > ht

[UrJTAG-dev] Tjtag arduino mod

For those who are interested in using an arduino as a jtag cable: http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=503914 -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establis

[UrJTAG-dev] urjtag segfaults

EJTAG version: <= 2.0 EJTAG Implementation flags: R4k DMA MIPS32 Segmentation fault I know from the Tjtag output that the IMPCODE is different: http://www.zoobab.com/fonera#toc7 Any idea how to get the EJCONTROL and EJIMPCODE right?

[UrJTAG-dev] Disable the "shell" command in urjtag?

But I don't want them to have access to a real shell. Any idea? -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment c

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] arduino + urjtag

-- > > Hello! > Did you happen to see an early note exactly on this idea? See here: > > http://tinyurl.com/openwrt0001 I tried it this weekend, but did not managed to make it work. I repushed the code to Github: https://github.com/zoobab/tjtag-arduino https://github

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] arduino + urjtag

envision a JTAG multiplexer > where you can control 3 independent JTAG chains (kind on smaller version of > SCANSTA111 - http://www.national.com/pf/SC/SCANSTA111.html#Overview) There is another piece of code here: http://hg.assembla.com/avr_jtag But I never managed to make it work. -- Benjamin H

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] arduino + urjtag

ns the GPL: https://github.com/zoobab/tjtag-arduino/blob/master/tjtag3-0-1_JTMOD/tjtag.h -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead o

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] arduino + urjtag

diff file and the new cable driver. > > The Arduino sketch can be found here: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/arduinodoodles/ > > All comments are welcome. Anybody tested the arduiggler? -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005,

[UrJTAG-dev] USS720

Hi, I was wondering if USB to parallel adaptors based on the USS720 chip would work with urjtag: http://www.linux-usb.org/USB-guide/x532.html http://www.equinoxefr.org/post/2007/08/17/programmeur-avr-parallele-et-adaptateur-usb-parallele/ Any experience with those? Best, -- Benjamin Henrion

[UrJTAG-dev] bsdl_config.h: No such file or directory

www.zoobab.com/bbox2#toc17), but the version I have segfaults when trying to detect the flash. BTW, I am on #openjtag channel if you want to help. Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software pate

[UrJTAG-dev] urjtag r1893 segfaults when doing a detectflash

t, (SSEG : Supervisor Mapped) start: 0xE000, length: 0x2000, data width: 32 bit, (KSEG3: Kernel Mapped) Segmentation fault I tried to strace, but it does not say anything when it segfaults. Any idea how to go fu

[UrJTAG-dev] cable usbasp

ke urjtag, but with support for the usbasp cable. Do you know if this cable is supported by urjtag? Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed

[UrJTAG-dev] Looking for a cheap embedded linux board with exposed GPIO pins

. Does someone has better suggestions for a linux board? Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead of explicitly seeki

[UrJTAG-dev] opendous-jtag cable with atmega32u4 (and maybe others...)

-board I had a quick look at the code, that might be portable to Arduino or Atmega, but maybe with less speed due to the FTDI serial convertor. -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] opendous-jtag cable with atmega32u4 (and maybe others...)

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 08 November 2011 09:41:04 Benjamin Henrion wrote: >> Just to make you aware that this cable has some patches to be >> supported by urjtag: >> >> http://code.google.com/p/opendous-jtag/source/browse/tr

[UrJTAG-dev] urjtag 9999 svn gentoo ebuild

0.10 ebuild crossbuilds fine, but 0.10 does not have the GPIO cable support. I suspect the autogen.sh to behave incorrectly with the corss-build environnement. Trying to investigate... -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several f

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] urjtag 9999 svn gentoo ebuild

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 11 March 2012 17:54:20 Benjamin Henrion wrote: >> I just quickly made an ebuild for gentoo of the urjtag SVN version here: >> >> https://github.com/zoobab/urjtag-ebuilds >> >> Feel free to test it.

[UrJTAG-dev] autogen error

: possibly undefined macro: AC_DEFINE configure.ac:172: error: possibly undefined macro: AS_IF configure.ac:247: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PATH_TOOL autoreconf-2.68: /usr/bin/autoconf-2.68 failed with exit status: 1 autoreconf failed. Any idea what went wrong? -- Benjamin Henrion FFII

[UrJTAG-dev] urjtag segfaults

(353) EJCONTROL or EJIMPCODE register not found chain.c(149) Part 0 without active instruction Segmentation fault = Any idea why? -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several failed attemp

[UrJTAG-dev] Just discovered Turtelizer JTAG over ATmega8

Hi, Just discovered Turtelizer JTAG over ATmega8: http://jtagomat.sourceforge.net/hardware.html I wonder how easy it is to add support for this to urjtag. -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise sof

[UrJTAG-dev] urjtag with only GPIO cable, how to disable libusb support?

: line 14311: syntax error near unexpected token `LIBUSB,' ./configure: line 14311: ` PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBUSB, libusb-1.0,' === Any idea how to disable this libusb requirement? -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-5661

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] FT232R driver

0/serial-communications-part-3-arduino-volt-meter-and-ft232r/ I also made a special USB cable in order to make the FTDI chip and the Atmega run in 3.3v: http://www.zoobab.com/arduino-duemilanove-in-3-3v -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after s

[UrJTAG-dev] When is next urjtag release?

Hi, Just a stupid question, when is next urjtag release? I am waiting for it because I would like to have some features which are only in the GIT repo (like the GPIO sysfs support). Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several f

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] FT232R driver

this one as well: http://dx.com/p/ft232-usb-to-serial-breakout-board-black-silver-161170 Since the ModernDevice BUB1 is not produced anymore, that might be a good replacement. -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to leg

[UrJTAG-dev] FT232H

Hi, Just saw this programmer based on FT232H, a friend of the FT2232: http://www.randomprojects.org/wiki/RushSPI Any idea if that chip is/would be supported? Seems that the chip shares a lot of similarities with his grand brother. -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2

[UrJTAG-dev] Days to flash 128K CFE bootloader with a launchpad at 9600 bauds

http://dangerousprototypes.com/2013/05/08/resurrecting-a-wrtg54-router-with-a-launchpad/ "backing up the 128k CFE took three days even though I didnt need it. Wrtiting is a little faster at one-ish day." -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In J

[UrJTAG-dev] usbasp cable support

Hi, I found urjtag support for the usbasp here: https://code.oregonstate.edu/svn/osuisp2/urjtag/urjtag-0.10-Tekbots/src/tap/cable/ Will try it once I receive my usbasp. Best, -- Best,Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed att

[UrJTAG-dev] Plenty of forks of 0.10, when is the next release of urjtag planned?

Hi, I just wanted to know when was the release planned for the next version of urjtag? Many distros are still stuck with 0.10, which starts to be old. Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise sof

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] usbasp cable support

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Benjamin Henrion wrote: > Hi, > > I found urjtag support for the usbasp here: > > https://code.oregonstate.edu/svn/osuisp2/urjtag/urjtag-0.10-Tekbots/src/tap/cable/ > > Will try it once I receive my usbasp. Seems to be for windows boxes

[UrJTAG-dev] usbasp cable support

Hi, I found urjtag support for the usbasp here: https://code.oregonstate.edu/svn/osuisp2/urjtag/urjtag-0.10-Tekbots/src/tap/cable/ Will try it once I have a usbasp working. Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed att

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] Status of urjtag development?

ber of > "forks" on the github with newer changes > https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=urjtag. > > Are you interested in moving things to github? +1 And release a 0.11 :-) -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2

[UrJTAG-dev] urjtag-arduigler

Does someone has a copy of this arduigler GIT repo? https://gitorious.org/urjtag-arduiggler/urjtag-arduiggler/ Linked from: https://github.com/jekkos/urjtag-st7xxx -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to leg

[UrJTAG-dev] arduiggler cable with an ESP8266?

some point by someone? Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentabili

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] urjtag in Debian

ming hobby projects will be my first encounter with JTAG. > > I want to do that with a recent version of urjtag in Debian. We should make a release at some point, 0.10 is way too old. -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several fail

[UrJTAG-dev] JTAG opened on Intel CPUs via USB

component. Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of software, they ar

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] cable usbblaster ID 09fb:6001 Altera Blaster

ot;666" Should that rule be installed by the package? Or sudo make install? -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead

[UrJTAG-dev] urjtag in debian experimental

Hi, urjtag 0.10+r2052-1 is now in debian experimental: https://packages.debian.org/experimental/urjtag Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment ch

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] tools/generate_orig_tar_xz [patch]

Let's fork on github and give it another name... On Feb 6, 2017 16:08, "Geert Stappers" wrote: > Hi, > > Here a retransmit of a previous message. > This time with '[patch]' appended to the Subject. > > What is needed to get it included? > > > Cheers > Geert Stappers > > > On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] tools/generate_orig_tar_xz [patch]

system based on tags, even though they are not wget friendly. Let me try to create an org on there. -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its s

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] tools/generate_orig_tar_xz [patch]

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Benjamin Henrion wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Kolja Waschk wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The development could move to primarily use git on SF as well, IMHO >> there's no need to change the provider, and why change the name? >

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] Switch to git. Re: git merged: Check on FreeBSD 10.3 and ByteBlasterMV.

would definitely object to staying on Sourceforge, for many reasons, the first one being advertisement. -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed i

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] autogen.sh fails on macOS

was noticed before by Xiafoan, but no solution was provided to the > source tree. We should fix this one. Any hints appreciated :-) Get some travis-ci in place? They have OSX slaves... -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several f

[UrJTAG-dev] ch341 and your parallel port knowledge

/lp0: https://openvz.org/USB_Printing_in_VE If MEM could not be used, there are 8 GPIOs in D0-D7 which could be used to implement a libusb based JTAG cable. Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise sof

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] ch341 and your parallel port knowledge

MD_UIO_STM_OUT>-->---0x80>---// UIO Interface Output(D0~D5) #define>CH341_CMD_UIO_STM_END>-->---0x20>---// UIO Interface End Command Now if there is code for a similar JTAG cable libusb based, that might be a good starting point. -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-5

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] GitHub + Travis

me on it. Autotools are trying to detect platforms from 1974. Cmake is an improvement. And Google is migrating most of the Android codebase to Ninja to speedup the configure part. -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several failed attem

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] GitHub + Travis

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Benjamin Henrion wrote: >> I forked ninja a year ago, I am willing to spend time on it. >> >> Autotools are trying to detect platforms from 1974. >> >> Cmake is an improveme

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] GitHub + Travis

y a few code changes? I also think cmake is better documented, and for such a small tool, it is good enough. -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment cha

[UrJTAG-dev] MANUFACTURERS file update with a more recent list?

Hi, Would it be worth to update the MANUFACTURERS file with a more recent update? http://www.idhw.com/textual/chip/jedec_spd_man.html I know Jedec claims copyright on the list, I don't know what you think. Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In

[UrJTAG-dev] versaloon url

ttp://www.versaloon.com. = This URL does not work anymore. It would be better to replace with: https://github.com/versaloon/versaloon I will write more docs once I have it working. Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several failed a

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] Patch: python binding additions

On Jun 27, 2017 01:29, "Steve Tell" wrote: The attached patch against git head adds to the python bindings New chain method "flush" - calls urj_tap_chain_flush to make sure all queued activity has been sent to the hardware cable New chain method get_tdo - gets the current value of

[UrJTAG-dev] jtag of the poor with serial port bitbanging pins TX, RX, DTS, CTS

code for openocd: http://vak.ru/doku.php/proj/bitbang/bitbang-jtag But this seems to use libftdi, and it is thus ftdi specific. Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe

[UrJTAG-dev] urjtag crash with stm32 versaloon device

Hi, I have added support for the cheap stm32 bluepill to versaloon firmware, but when I try to init the cable, urjtag segfaults. I am looking for a way to create a dummy USB device with the same vid/pid to see if urjtag segfaults as well. Any idea? Best, -- Benjamin Henrion FFII Brussels

[UrJTAG-dev] urjtag segfaults when doing a detectflash on a wrt54g

for IR 1110 ... 1 jtag> initbus ejtag_dma Initialized bus 5, active bus 0 jtag> detectflash 0x1fc0 Segmentation fault (core dumped) Any idea how to debug that? strace? Best, -- Benjamin Henrion (zoobab) Email: zoobab at gmail.com Mobile: +32-484-566109 Web: http://www.zoobab.com

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] time for release 0.11?

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Jiri Kastner wrote: > hi all, > i'm maintainer of urjtag in fedora, i see 500+ commits since 0.10, > are there plans to release 0.11 soon? > and some roadmap? At some point in time, it will be the right time to fork. -- Benjamin Henrion (zoob

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] time for release 0.11?

rver. Better compile it to markdown and have it displayed by github. I don't see the strict need to compile to HTML. Best, -- Benjamin Henrion (zoobab) Email: zoobab at gmail.com Mobile: +32-484-566109 Web: http://www.zoobab.com FFII.org Brussels "In July 2005, after several failed a

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] time for release 2017.10, 2017.10pre1 @ SF

lease extent my SF urjtag privileges. > > Thanks > > There is now urjtag 2017.10pre1 at SourceForge\o/ > > $ md5sum urjtag-2017.10pre1.tar.xz > urjtag-2017.10pre1.sums > $ sha1sum urjtag-2017.10pre1.tar.xz >> urjtag-2017.10pre1.sums > $ sha256sum urjtag-2017.10pre1.tar.xz >> urjtag-2017.

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] data/MANUFACTURERS updates

e. > > > > Why not just take current owner of the id as shown in (latest) jep106 > > and be done with it ? > > > We agree on that > * anybody should provide a patch > * it is OK if somebody does I am happy someone has worked on it. It is really annoying to NOT hav

Re: [UrJTAG-dev] [PATCH 0/4] provide reverse-engineered jamexp.y to generate jamexp.c/jamytab.h

Le mar. 20 sept. 2022 à 21:21, Geert Stappers a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 08:33:50AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 03:13:27PM +0200, Peter Pöschl wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I have reverse-engineered a jamexp.y from urjtag/src/stapl/jamexp.c. > > > The foll

[UrJTAG-dev] Broken links on urjtag.org

Hi, The links to the Doc 0.10 and 0.9 on the mside left menu urjtag.org are broken, they point to some svn. Any plan to put more up to date documentation on there? Best, ___ UrJTAG-development mailing list UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net https