Re: Sockets (again)

code anything over sockets. And yes I do append a numtochar(13) > coming and going and strip it off before decoding and read until > numToChar(13). I don't use cr because I am uncertain how each OS platform > treats it. The Server Agent could be running on anything in the future. > >

Re: Sockets (again)

On 4/5/23 08:13, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: Thanks Phil. Yes I learned the hard way with my SQL Agent to base64encode anything over sockets. And yes I do append a numtochar(13) coming and going and strip it off before decoding and read until numToChar(13). I don't use cr because I am

Re: Sockets (again)

Thanks Phil. Yes I learned the hard way with my SQL Agent to base64encode anything over sockets. And yes I do append a numtochar(13) coming and going and strip it off before decoding and read until numToChar(13). I don't use cr because I am uncertain how each OS platform treats it. The Server

Re: Sockets (again)

e: I have sockets working in my File Server Agent, but only using non-blocking calls, that is using "with message". Removing the "with message" bit does not return any response from the server agent. For instance I send a payload using write payload to socket tSocket

Sockets (again)

I have sockets working in my File Server Agent, but only using non-blocking calls, that is using "with message". Removing the "with message" bit does not return any response from the server agent. For instance I send a payload using write payload to socket

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

On 7/8/22 19:47, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: Okay apparently base64Encode/Decode is my friend. I have this working now without encryption. I will re-enable encryption and see if that works. Base64 encoding will do the trick but at the expense of making your data strings twice as long

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

Hi all. Thanks for putting up with me. I finally got it all to work using base64Encode/Decode on the encrypted string before sending it with a delimiter appended. Same thing coming back. Thank for all your patience. I almost became a patient myself. Bob S > On Jul 8, 2022, at 19:14 , Bob

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

Okay apparently base64Encode/Decode is my friend. I have this working now without encryption. I will re-enable encryption and see if that works. Bob S > On Jul 8, 2022, at 19:14 , Bob Sneidar via use-livecode > wrote: > > It looks after the agent receives it generally like how it looked

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

It looks after the agent receives it generally like how it looked after I encoded the array but before I sent it. Obviously it's not the same. Something is corrupting it over the wire. I am not even using encryption now, just sending the encoded array data and a delimiter. When it decodes on

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

On 7/8/22 17:47, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote: But, an encoded array is STILL binary data. So any issues with "read until linefeed" will still exist. Try sending a header with number of bytes, followed by the bytes. Yeah. What he said. -- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

On 7/8/22 16:49, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: Well I disabled encryption alltogether, sending and receiving an encoded array instead. Upon trying to decode I still get an error, and looking at what I get back, it LOOKS like an encoded array. They is just something wrong with the data.

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

But, an encoded array is STILL binary data. So any issues with "read until linefeed" will still exist. Try sending a header with number of bytes, followed by the bytes. If you really wanted, you could do:    write  (the number of bytes in tSocketData) & linefeed to socket tSocket    write

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

Well I disabled encryption alltogether, sending and receiving an encoded array instead. Upon trying to decode I still get an error, and looking at what I get back, it LOOKS like an encoded array. They is just something wrong with the data. Curiously, if I just send and receive plain text it

Re: Encrypted Data over Sockets

On 7/8/22 16:14, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: My suspicion is that the hash contains a linefeed (sometimes). So the question I have is, what character is GUARANTEED to NOT be in an aes256 hash? Not a valid question. If you really need to send binary data over a socket connection,

Encrypted Data over Sockets

Hi all. I'm running into a curious thing. I am sending encrypted data over a socket connection. When I send the data, I am using blocking mode, where the commands look like this: if tCurrentConnectionA ["ssl"] is true then put slyEncrypt(tSocketData) into tSocketData

Sample Stacks Using RSA + AES Encryption with sockets

of code. I am using pretty verbose code here which you can of course mod to your own style--hopefully I've made it easy for those new to LC or sockets in general to understand and incorporate some of these ideas. The use of a long term RSA secret means there is no mechanism here for PFS: Perfect

RE: Sockets (again)

m: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Bob Sneidar via use-livecode Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 5:42 PM To: How to use LiveCode Cc: Bob Sneidar Subject: Sockets (again) Hi all. I’m trying to get sockets working. The host is working, but I am not getti

Re: Sockets (again)

I have a pair at http://dochawkbk.com/lcImages/ of master and slave stacks to talk to one another. They're meant to be compiled. They're probably 5.x stacks . . . I haven’t looked at them for a while. ___

Sockets (again)

Hi all. I’m trying to get sockets working. The host is working, but I am not getting the message to trigger. Here’s the basic code: on mouseUp put "test" into tPayLoad open socket to "localhost:8085" write tPayload to socket "localhost:8085" e

Re: read larger data streams over sockets - broken?

) our team loves it: super simple, never fails, we never lose data, ever. I use shell commands for everything. not sure why you need sockets if you are just copy files around…from our Macs to the Synology server in the next room… Right, a NAS device can work very well as it obviously does in your

Re: read larger data streams over sockets - broken?

via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > Is anyone else having problems with moving multi-MB data streams across > sockets in LC 8? > > I support a LAN-based system that relies on sockets to move data between > server and clients. The server's respo

Re: read larger data streams over sockets - broken?

. I use shell commands for everything. not sure why you need sockets if you are just copy files around…from our Macs to the Synology server in the next room… my long stack script just manages different put format "mv \"someFile\", \"newFileName\" # into cmdRename

read larger data streams over sockets - broken?

Is anyone else having problems with moving multi-MB data streams across sockets in LC 8? I support a LAN-based system that relies on sockets to move data between server and clients. The server's response to a single client request will often consist of several hundred KB to several MB of data

Re: asynchronous sockets

> using. >>> >> Ah, yes his is a use case that had lots of requests running in parallel >> and from the looks of things to the same API which libURL doesn’t cope with >> (would need a redesign to have request IDs rather than using the URL as the >> ID). I’m not su

Re: asynchronous sockets

, post or delete but that’s also something libURL doesn’t do. So the sockets are fine it’s just libURL implementation that would need some help to meet Todd’s requirements. In Todd's application there was a requirement for asynchronous HTTP POST requests which aren't supported in libURL. Without

Re: asynchronous sockets

libURL doesn’t do. So the sockets are fine it’s just libURL implementation that would need some help to meet Todd’s requirements. Cheers Monte ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubs

Re: asynchronous sockets

ahhh I got my sockets vs http requests confusled too On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Tom Glod <t...@makeshyft.com> wrote: > I'm relieved to hear that I think I misunderstood Todd's blog... maybe > his was a purely volume related bottleneck and not the library he was using

Re: asynchronous sockets

pplication. > > > > I'm aware of the built in internet library and the tsNet library > available > > to non-open source license owners. > > > > My question is "What isn't asyncronious about reading from and writing to > > sockets?” > > Nothing really as

Re: asynchronous sockets

ilable > to non-open source license owners. > > My question is "What isn't asyncronious about reading from and writing to > sockets?” Nothing really as long as you use the callback (with message) form then all the reading and writing is done on a separate thread. Of course your cal

asynchronous sockets

Hi everyone, I'm an open-source user and I am building socket communications for my application. I'm aware of the built in internet library and the tsNet library available to non-open source license owners. My question is "What isn't asyncronious about reading from and writing to so

Slow Sockets on Mac

I'm transferring 40mb over sockets a chunk at a time. The receiver is on a Win 10 Pro Hyper-V Host using LC 8.2.1. The sender uses LC 8.2.1 also. Sender on a Win10 Host==> 10 seconds Sender on a Win10 Pro VM==> 10 seconds Sender on a Win10 Home VM==> 10 seconds Sender on a 64 bit Linux

Re: Secure sockets problem... any update?

If the issue is SSL 4.0 vs 3.0 or TLS 1.2 vs. 1.0, it all goes back to the heartbleed exploit and the countermeasures for that. Bob S > On Aug 8, 2016, at 11:56 , Richard Gaskin wrote: > > Stephen MacLean wrote: > > > Hi Richard, > > > > Thanks for adding

Re: Secure sockets problem... any update?

Stephen MacLean wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Thanks for adding yourself to the CC list on this bug:) It's an important bug, very much looking forward to following its progress. Thank you for providing a link to it here. > I think you may be reading the post from Panos with the wrong date >

Re: Secure sockets problem... any update?

With all that went on in the LC conference, I was wondering if there > > was any update to the secure sockets problem I reported here: > > > > http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16871 and > > When status changes occur in a report the submitter and any subscribers to > t

Re: Secure sockets problem... any update?

Stephen MacLean wrote: > With all that went on in the LC conference, I was wondering if there > was any update to the secure sockets problem I reported here: > > http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16871 and When status changes occur in a report the submitter and any

Secure sockets problem... any update?

Hi All, With all that went on in the LC conference, I was wondering if there was any update to the secure sockets problem I reported here: http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16871 and http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=11=26225 <http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f

Re: [TRYING AGAIN] Secure Sockets Issue

uot;:5210") with message >> “chatConnected" >> >> Should create a secure connection between the two apps. >> >> > somewhere in the archives you will find a master/slave pair I wrote--and a > post by someone that fixed them :) > > > > -

[TRYING AGAIN] Secure Sockets Issue

Hi All, Going to give this another go: I can not get two LC apps to connect and transmit to each other via secure sockets. They connect fine and transmit fine without trying to secure them. As far as I can tell, doing this on the server: accept secure connections on port 5210 with message

Re: [TRYING AGAIN] Secure Sockets Issue

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Stephen MacLean wrote: > And this on the client: > > open secure socket to (field "host" & ":5210") with message > “chatConnected" > > Should create a secure connection between the two apps. > > somewhere in the archives you will find a

Re: [TRYING AGAIN] Secure Sockets Issue

One of the links in my post was a link to one of yours. Didn’t see a fix there, but will keep looking. Best, Steve MacLean > On Feb 2, 2016, at 11:45 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Stephen MacLean > wrote: > >> And

Re: **SPAM** [TRYING AGAIN] Secure Sockets Issue

> On Feb 2, 2016, at 11:40 AM, Stephen MacLean <smacl...@madmansoft.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > Going to give this another go: > > I can not get two LC apps to connect and transmit to each other via secure > sockets. They connect fine and transmit fine

Re: Accepting secure connections with sockets

questions on securing sockets both “server" and “client" side. > > On the server side (which is just an LC app, not a LC server deployment), you > open a connection with “accept connections on port ”. I am trying to make > sure that only secured connections are made

Accepting secure connections with sockets

Hi All, Some questions on securing sockets both “server" and “client" side. On the server side (which is just an LC app, not a LC server deployment), you open a connection with “accept connections on port ”. I am trying to make sure that only secured connections are made to

Sockets

I’ve read all the documentation and posts I can find and something still confuses me about sockets… Server computer accept connections on port 12345 with message “readSocket” Client opens socket IP:12345 Client writes to socket IP:12345 Server reads message from client: on readSocket

Re: Sockets

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Eric Corbett wrote: > Bonus: How do I use the "|[connection id]”? I use an id for open socket > and write to, but the address from the readSocket callback does not contain > an ID. Is this a bug? I use write to… with message… and this

Re: Sockets

confuses me about sockets… > > Server computer accept connections on port 12345 with message “readSocket” > > Client opens socket IP:12345 > Client writes to socket IP:12345 > > Server reads message from client: > > on readSocket pAddress, pMsg… > > pAddress i

Re: Sockets

Thanks Bob, but it doesn’t quite help. I can use sockets, just not sure how to talk back and forth without having both devices acting like a server. Thanks Dr. Hawkins, I’ll look that up. Does your code have both computers doing an “accept connection on port …”? And is the port different

Re: Sockets

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Eric Corbett wrote: > Thanks Dr. Hawkins, I’ll look that up. Does your code have both computers > doing an “accept connection on port …”? And is the port different on each > computer or the same? Maybe I’ll have my answer from a code

Re: Speaking of sockets...

Oh good to know. However, I am getting less than a second response time for open socket, and I wouldn’t want to set a timeout that low for SQL. Bob S On Jan 20, 2015, at 19:04 , Dr. Hawkins doch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Bob Sneidar bobsnei...@iotecdigital.com

Re: Speaking of sockets...

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Bob Sneidar bobsnei...@iotecdigital.com wrote: Oh good to know. However, I am getting less than a second response time for open socket, and I wouldn’t want to set a timeout that low for SQL. I'm currently seeing ~250 ms to connect to mySQL on dreamhost . . .

Re: Speaking of sockets...

Unplug your network connection and try again. The problem occurs when I cannot connect to the database because of firewall issues at a customer location. Then it takes a full minute at least to timeout before I get control of LC again. But no matter because the open socket method I posted fixes

Speaking of sockets...

I’ve mentioned in the past that if I am unable to connect to a mySQL server (such as going to a location with my laptop and finding their firewall blocks port 3306) it takes close to a minute for LC to release and tell me it cannot connect. During that time LC is completely unresponsive. I

Re: Speaking of sockets...

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Bob Sneidar bobsnei...@iotecdigital.com wrote: I’ve mentioned in the past that if I am unable to connect to a mySQL server (such as going to a location with my laptop and finding their firewall blocks port 3306) it takes close to a minute for LC to release and

postgres ssl authentication? sockets?

the certificates, etc. However, from the postgres docs, it seems that those will want another key from the client, and there's no way to specify this for livecode. I'm wondering if sockets might be a better approach. Most of what I use the remote db for would be better off asynchronously anyway--namely

Re: Sockets

Bug reported: 14287 - e On Dec 22, 2014, at 10:32 PM, Peter W A Wood peterwaw...@gmail.com wrote: When opening when starting a socket, I see the problem. This is the port number that was displayed 12345ر” Regards Peter On 23 Dec 2014, at 11:54, Eric Corbett e...@canelasoftware.com

Sockets

Hello all, I’m using LiveCode 7.0.1. I have a port open and when I get the openSockets list, the port has an extra character on the end like an ‘å’ or a double quote. I check to see if the port is in the openSocket list so I don’t try to accept connections again, but if I have wholeMatches

Re: Sockets

Hello Eric I ran a very simple test using LiveCode 7.0.1 on OS X Yosemite and didn’t see the issue. It was a very simple test though. My test had three buttons: open, list, close and one field: Report. The three button scripts were: open - open socket to 127.0.0.1:80

Re: Sockets

Thanks Peter, Try starting a server by doing accept connections on port 12345 with message xxx Then list the openSockets. The open port 12345 will or might have an extra character at the end. - Eric On Dec 22, 2014, at 17:35, Peter W A Wood peterwaw...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Eric

Re: Sockets

Yep, i'm seeing this on 7.0.0 too. The other versions I have (various 6xxx versions) work correction, though I haven't tried the most recent 6 stable. If I can get 7.0.1 to install I'll try it there also. On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Peter W A Wood peterwaw...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Eric

Re: Sockets

Eric, I see the same problem too on LC 7.0.1 (Build 1023) under Yosemite, works fine in LC 6.7.1 LC 6.6.5 as far as I can tell. Paul On Dec 22, 2014, at 8:02 PM, Mike Bonner bonnm...@gmail.com wrote: Yep, i'm seeing this on 7.0.0 too. The other versions I have (various 6xxx versions)

Re: Sockets

Thanks all, I'll send in a bug report. e On Dec 22, 2014, at 20:22, Paul Hibbert p...@livecode.org wrote: Eric, I see the same problem too on LC 7.0.1 (Build 1023) under Yosemite, works fine in LC 6.7.1 LC 6.6.5 as far as I can tell. Paul On Dec 22, 2014, at 8:02 PM, Mike

Re: Sockets

When opening when starting a socket, I see the problem. This is the port number that was displayed 12345ر” Regards Peter On 23 Dec 2014, at 11:54, Eric Corbett e...@canelasoftware.com wrote: Thanks Peter, Try starting a server by doing accept connections on port 12345 with message

Re: Secure Sockets

So can I safely assume that no one ever has tried to use secure sockets in LC? On 15 Oct 2014, at 18:59, Björnke von Gierke b...@mac.com wrote: Hi all I'm rather uneducated with encryption stuff, so I wanted to try out secure sockets. However, most likely due to my incapability

Secure Sockets

Hi all I'm rather uneducated with encryption stuff, so I wanted to try out secure sockets. However, most likely due to my incapability to understand what I'm doing, I've been unable to get a simple example working. I've used my own simplest socket client/server stacks from rev online, ran

Re: Using sockets

sockets vs. ports, but it's actually easy. For example, if you think of IP's as houses, then ports are their (thousands of) doors. Sockets are the little roads between two of those doors (yes even for the same house). Unlike in the real world, those roads are only constructed and paved when you

Re: Using sockets

: The dictionary adds to the confusion when, in the write to socket entry, it says the socket id is an ip address followed by a port when it's actually followed by a socket. I agree that there's some small inconsistencies in naming sockets vs. ports, but it's actually easy. For example

Using sockets

Diving into yet another new are of Livecode for me - sockets. My server issues an accept statement for port 10100. My client opens socket 10100. WHen the client connects to the server, the port number I get is not 10100, but some other number which changes on each connection. When sending

Re: Using sockets

sockets. If the client connects to a server and the new socket opened on the server side is 127.0.0.1:10100|567657 but you read from socket 127.0.0.1:10100 with a callback message, a message will never be received on that socket and eventually the socketTimeout message will be triggered

Re: Using sockets

the data. read from socket with messages doesn't block John. On 14/01/2014 17:22, Peter Haworth wrote: Diving into yet another new are of Livecode for me - sockets. My server issues an accept statement for port 10100. My client opens socket 10100. WHen the client connects to the server

Re: Using sockets

Haworth wrote: Diving into yet another new are of Livecode for me - sockets. My server issues an accept statement for port 10100. My client opens socket 10100. WHen the client connects to the server, the port number I get is not 10100, but some other number which changes on each connection

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

On Jul 13, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com wrote: On 14/07/2013, at 1:57 AM, Mark Talluto use...@canelasoftware.com wrote: What problems are you correcting regarding sockets for desktops? None, I was talking about getting the sockets implementation

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

is to fix sockets in the engine. It's not a huge job which I've done some of but at the moment I'm lacking two things to get the job completed: time, motivation. Somebody else might have more of both... somebody might want to motivate me to find the time... but at the moment client work

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

it... perhaps not mentioning mergSocket specifically... just mobile socket external. The Kickstarter campaign came along so I went quite about my little project so I didn't distract anyone. From here forward the simplest thing is to fix sockets in the engine. It's not a huge job which I've done some

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

On 14/07/2013, at 1:57 AM, Mark Talluto use...@canelasoftware.com wrote: What problems are you correcting regarding sockets for desktops? None, I was talking about getting the sockets implementation in the engine to work on iOS and android. -- Monte Goulding M E R Goulding - software

Sockets on mobile…at last!

Monte, I just want to thank you for completing this external. We have been using it every day for the last few days on iPads. Our iPads can now communicate directly with our desktops. It is truly amazing to see it all working so well. If you are looking for sockets on iOS, Monte has what

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

working so well. If you are looking for sockets on iOS, Monte has what you need. Long live these and other amazing 3rd party efforts to improve our programming lives. Thanks Mark, I'm glad it's doing the job for you. Cheers -- Monte Goulding M E R Goulding - software development services

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

few days on iPads. Our iPads can now communicate directly with our desktops. It is truly amazing to see it all working so well. If you are looking for sockets on iOS, Monte has what you need. Long live these and other amazing 3rd party efforts to improve our programming lives. Thanks

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

On 13/07/2013, at 10:19 AM, Roger Eller roger.e.el...@sealedair.com wrote: So the Android version will be next, right? Unfortunately not, if you remember mergSocket was crowd funded except we didn't make the funding target so in agreement with the funders (there were 5) I produced an iOS

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

It sounds more like mob-funding. We all know it only takes 3 to make a crowd. :-P On Jul 12, 2013 8:45 PM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com wrote: On 13/07/2013, at 10:19 AM, Roger Eller roger.e.el...@sealedair.com wrote: So the Android version will be next, right?

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

On 13/07/2013, at 10:56 AM, Roger Eller roger.e.el...@sealedair.com wrote: It sounds more like mob-funding. We all know it only takes 3 to make a crowd. :-P Well that ship sailed last year and didn't float... I see no reason why it would float now. -- Monte Goulding M E R Goulding -

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

I searched for mergSocket on the list and found only the recent mentions. Maybe people didn't hear about it. And good work! Dar On Jul 12, 2013, at 6:45 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: On 13/07/2013, at 10:19 AM, Roger Eller roger.e.el...@sealedair.com wrote: So the Android version will be

Re: Sockets on mobile…at last!

. The Kickstarter campaign came along so I went quite about my little project so I didn't distract anyone. From here forward the simplest thing is to fix sockets in the engine. It's not a huge job which I've done some of but at the moment I'm lacking two things to get the job completed: time, motivation

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

The sockets project sparked an idea and a question… Is is possible to create a LiveCode mobile app that while running, in foreground or background, can sense via bluetooth when a similar app is running on another iOS device? I'm thinking in terms of a game like environment, where iOS mobile

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

because w want to implement some matchmaking and play functions. Cheers -- M E R Goulding Software development services mergExt - There's an external for that! On 14/12/2012, at 4:27 AM, JOHN PATTEN johnpat...@me.com wrote: The sockets project sparked an idea and a question… Is is possible

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

On Dec 13, 2012, at 9:27 AM, JOHN PATTEN johnpat...@me.com wrote: The sockets project sparked an idea and a question… Is is possible to create a LiveCode mobile app that while running, in foreground or background, can sense via bluetooth when a similar app is running on another iOS device

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

On 14/12/2012, at 7:05 AM, JOHN PATTEN johnpat...@me.com wrote: Hi Mark… Hmmm? So it would appear if we wanted to make the ability for devices to discover each other, say via bluetooth, and we may use Android devices, we'd be best going after the socket external as opposed to the Game

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

Thanks Monte… I'm not familiar with Bonjour other than for the usual finding printers and OS stuff. I hadn't thought of using Bonjour to allow IOS devices to discover other iOS devices. This seems like a good direction to experiment in. Any example stacks floating around that demonstrate a

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

Unfortunately this is where you need the sockets external because right now you can't accept connections (like a server). So at the moment it's just for finding desktop apps. On 14/12/2012, at 7:31 AM, JOHN PATTEN johnpat...@me.com wrote: Thanks Monte… I'm not familiar with Bonjour other

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

in the android implementation of livecode. Sockets, advanced mapping/geospatial stuff is all being thought about when it comes to what is possible for us to make apps that leverage these features. On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com wrote: in the future after there's

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

Sorry to interject, but is there any kind of vague time frame for android externals that runrev has talked about? There's already been enough vagueness on this. Android SDK here yesterday ... pretty please! -- Nicolas Cueto ___ use-livecode mailing

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

and see… Thanks! I am not sure about bluetooth and the sockets external under development. Monte will have to chime in on that. I am expecting to be able to access the wifi and ethernet for sure though. Best regards, Mark Talluto http://www.canelasoftware.com

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

All I can say is if you know where to look after an iOS sdk external is compiled you will see that some work has been done to implement android externals and java interface etc. So... it's still in the hopefully soon bot don't hold your breath category. On 14/12/2012, at 8:23 AM, Andrew Kluthe

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

I expect the external won't care about the hardware as long as there's an ip network. On 14/12/2012, at 8:42 AM, Mark Talluto wrote: I am not sure about bluetooth and the sockets external under development. Monte will have to chime in on that. I am expecting to be able to access the wifi

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

Just in case anybody over here was leery of being an early in, we're in. On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.comwrote: Hi LiveCoders A number of LiveCode developers need sockets on iOS and android. The subject of developing an external for this feature

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

in. On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.comwrote: Hi LiveCoders A number of LiveCode developers need sockets on iOS and android. The subject of developing an external for this feature came up recently on the LiveCode Developer Program list. It was proposed

Re: Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

: Hi LiveCoders A number of LiveCode developers need sockets on iOS and android. The subject of developing an external for this feature came up recently on the LiveCode Developer Program list. It was proposed by a number of developers that the external would be a good candidate for crowd

Mobile sockets crowd funding opportunity

Hi LiveCoders A number of LiveCode developers need sockets on iOS and android. The subject of developing an external for this feature came up recently on the LiveCode Developer Program list. It was proposed by a number of developers that the external would be a good candidate for crowd funding

Re: Sockets or similar on IOS and Android

Rod- Wednesday, December 5, 2012, 7:15:50 AM, you wrote: directly. Are there any relatively simple extensions or native components that can be used or other workarounds? No. There is no socket support, and no way to add it. We gave up on LiveCode at work and went with Flex. Ugly, but it does

Re: Sockets or similar on IOS and Android

Thanks Mark, it looks like lack of sockets may mean the same for us. Anyway we will decide shortly. Kind regards, rod On 5 December 2012 16:52, Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net wrote: Rod- Wednesday, December 5, 2012, 7:15:50 AM, you wrote: directly. Are there any relatively simple

Re: Sockets or similar on IOS and Android

On Dec 5, 2012, at 8:14 AM, Rod McCall rodmccall...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Mark, it looks like lack of sockets may mean the same for us. Anyway we will decide shortly. Kind regards, rod Monte is looking to make an external that will support sockets. He mentioned he was going to post

  1   2   >