RE: LC Roadmap

- From: use-livecode On Behalf Of Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode Sent: zaterdag 20 februari 2021 06:06 To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Cc: Curry Kenworthy Subject: Re: LC Roadmap e.beugelaar at me.com: > https://www.b4x.com if u dont want headaches. Thanks for the tip - looks pretty n

Re: LC Roadmap

e.beugelaar at me.com: > https://www.b4x.com if u dont want headaches. Thanks for the tip - looks pretty neat. I like the website. Before going all-in with LiveCode, I did a lot with VB-style code. HOWEVER, I don't have any big headaches, thank God! Nor do I feel any need to try another IDE.

Re: LC Roadmap

Andre: I think if your chapters offered several ways of organizing a project, starting with beginners, and then discussing the various philosophies, say how to name variables, using Levure, setting up MVC, etc, etc. And you are right to be concerned with how quickly the information gets out of

Re: Wasm and the LC Roadmap

David Bovill wrote: > Anyone know the wasm plans? > > I’m Woking on a project in collaboration with a number of other > platforms and partners that are using wasm. Would like to play > in the same place with LiveCode. Given the vast gulf between the browser DOM and LC's object model, and the

Re: LC Roadmap

I found your approach to publish and subscribe incredibly useful. I have an app that has data grids in multiple sub stacks that each can be open or no. Many of these data grids display data from the same database table but in different sub stacks. For example, I have a devices and an

Re: Wasm and the LC Roadmap

Wasm is a pretty mature target by now. Most of the projects I work with already have deployments using wasm on either the server side or the client side. ASP.NET and Blazer is making quite a stir. It’s not the sort of - let’s deploy it now thing - but when looking at a partnership between

Re: Wasm and the LC Roadmap

Let me begin by saying that WASM is not a silver bullet. I know this doesn’t happen on our community, and that David is not mentioning WASM as a magical solution for HTML5 deployment. A bit of context is needed to understand why WASM is important and cool. In the past, many C/C++ to Web

Re: Wasm and the LC Roadmap

Well done Klaus, I was still Googling it! I am in fact looking at articles (e.g. https://blog.bitsrc.io/whats-wrong-with-web-assembly-3b9abb671ec2 ) that suggest that despite some very significant users (Google Earth is one),

Re: Wasm and the LC Roadmap

To all who are also not familiar witht the gazillion abbreviations, David is talking about -> WebaSseMbly :-) > Am 17.02.2021 um 16:13 schrieb David Bovill via use-livecode > : > > Anyone know the wasm plans? > > I’m Woking on a project in collaboration with a number of other platforms and >

Wasm and the LC Roadmap

Anyone know the wasm plans? I’m Woking on a project in collaboration with a number of other platforms and partners that are using wasm. Would like to play in the same place with LiveCode. ***

Re: LC Roadmap

16 Feb 2021 15:26:49 + > From: Alex Tweedly > To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Subject: Re: LC Roadmap > > On 15/02/2021 12:55, Andre Garzia via use-livecode wrote: >> It is with this in mind, that I decided to create content for our >> community. Books are a

Re: LC Roadmap

> On 16 Feb 2021, at 15:26, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode > wrote: > > A sample 'skeleton' app - i.e. complete but not fleshed-out. Initially it > would be for a desktop app (the first sequel will cover mobile). It would > implement "good practices" for many of the common features, with

Re: LC Roadmap

BIG + If not for Livecode, I would not be developing at all. I am just grateful that there IS a Livecode. I am not a professional developer though, so I understand that some have issues with certain things. Bob S On Feb 15, 2021, at 4:55 AM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode

Re: LC Roadmap

On 15/02/2021 12:55, Andre Garzia via use-livecode wrote: It is with this in mind, that I decided to create content for our community. Books are an easy value proposition. Most of our community is beyond their thirties and have a fondness (and experience) for the written word and

Re: LC Roadmap

One-click-wonder is right… especially if you use DropDMG to create custom disk images! -- Scott Morrow Elementary Software (Now with 20% less chalk dust!) web https://elementarysoftware.com/ email sc...@elementarysoftware.com booth1-360-734-4701

Re: LC Roadmap

Initial setup is a bit of a journey because Apple likes to make developers jump through hoops to prove they're worthy. But every subsequent notarization is a one-click wonder. On 2/15/21 4:25 PM, William Prothero via use-livecode wrote: Jacqueline: Thanks. Yes, I have it. Haven’t tried it yet.

Re: LC Roadmap

Jacqueline: Thanks. Yes, I have it. Haven’t tried it yet. But I’ve downloaded it. Best, Bill > On Feb 15, 2021, at 1:35 PM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode > wrote: > > Do you use his notarization stack? Once you get it set up it's a huge > time-saver. No more Terminal commands. > > On

Re: LC Roadmap

> Andre wrote: > > LC is a small company regardless of how much we love them. They can't provide > solution to all our needs. It is not because they don't want to, they have > limited resources. We can't treat LC as we treat Apple or Microsoft. So true. I absolutely marvel at how much the

Re: LC Roadmap

Do you use his notarization stack? Once you get it set up it's a huge time-saver. No more Terminal commands. On 2/15/21 2:21 PM, William Prothero via use-livecode wrote: Codesigning is always a trudge for me because I don’t do it very often and Apple is regularly changing the parameters. So I

Re: LC Roadmap

I agree, the lesson is fantastic. I was just there minutes ago helping a client set up his stack. And now we have entitlements added; that's new and much appreciated. Matthias put a lot of work into that lesson. We use it for every new Mac release. On 2/15/21 1:32 PM, Roger Guay via

Re: LC Roadmap

Codesigning is always a trudge for me because I don’t do it very often and Apple is regularly changing the parameters. So I also very much appreciate Matthias’ lesson. Thanks from me too! Bill > On Feb 15, 2021, at 11:32 AM, Roger Guay via use-livecode > wrote: > > I definitely owe an

Re: LC Roadmap

I definitely owe an apology to Matthias Rebbe for not recognizing his outstanding lesson “Codesigning and notarizing your LC standalone for distribution outside the Mac Appstore- “, including the fact of the recent update of Feb 9th. The amount of work involved in creating this lesson is

Re: LC Roadmap

Great to hear Andre’s input! One point I hoped to make is that there is also a possibility of monetizing a help site that is created outside the mothership but coordinates and supports it. I think this kind of resource would be a significant investment and it is unrealistic to expect that the

Re: LC Roadmap

Hi Folks, > On 15 Feb 2021, at 01:46, William Prothero via use-livecode > wrote: > > Andre Garza’s post about his planning to write a book on some aspect of > Livecode programming got me thinking about this. First, I think writing books > is useful, but the way many busy folks access

Re: LC Roadmap

Le 2021-02-14 20:46, William Prothero via use-livecode a écrit : Jacqueline: I didn’t know about http://lessons.livecode.com . Thank you for letting me know of that resource. It looks very useful and I like the user feedback part. I find this a bit surprising,

Re: LC Roadmap

BTW, I like the idea of putting a reference link to the lessons in the "This Week in LiveCode" newsletter. It's an easy thing to do and I think it would help. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On February 15, 2021 12:26:30

Re: LC Roadmap

I had to check and the lessons are in fact in both the Help and Resources menus but they are called Tutorials. Both link to the lessons site. I never actually looked at those before, I only knew about the lessons from elsewhere and I always use a bookmark to get there. Like you, I don't want

Re: LC Roadmap

Jacqueline: I didn’t know about http://lessons.livecode.com . Thank you for letting me know of that resource. It looks very useful and I like the user feedback part. To be clear, it is my intent to stimulate thought toward opportunities, not to complain. In a

Re: LC Roadmap

I just noticed that the "Codesigning and Notarizing your LC Standalone etc” lesson was updated on Feb 9, 2021. Perhaps I misrepresented the real situation in my previous post. Roger > On Feb 14, 2021, at 2:35 PM, Roger Guay via use-livecode > wrote: > > Well, permit me to chime in here

Re: LC Roadmap

Well, permit me to chime in here with full knowledge that I may be out of date with what’s already available. Arguably the most important feature of LC is its muliplatformness. Recognizing that it is a moving target, We/I need and want up to date easy to use lessons on how to build

Re: LC Roadmap

Bill Prothero wrote: > I would like to see: > Better help files that go deeper. If I gave you a thousand pages of deep material but they were unrelated to your work, would you read them? If I gave you ten pages that completely nailed the subject you've been grappling with, would you kick in

Re: LC Roadmap

on time, but to me such promises are nothing more than a good intention. I look at the LC Roadmap in very much the same way. As a teacher I think I understand why the LC Roadmap is not a reliable tool to use for planning future solutions. As a teacher I am supposed to make plans in advance. I

Re: LC Roadmap

t; >> >> >> >> >> William Prothero >> https://earthlearningsolutions.org >> >>> On Feb 14, 2021, at 7:30 AM, e.beugelaar--- via use-livecode >>> wrote: >>> >>> https://www.b4x.com if u dont want headaches. >&g

Re: LC Roadmap

n Feb 14, 2021, at 7:30 AM, e.beugelaar--- via use-livecode >> wrote: >> >> https://www.b4x.com if u dont want headaches. >> >> Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> >> >> >> From: us

Re: LC Roadmap

There is a whole lot more at http://lessons.livecode.com. While these aren't videos, the amount of info there is impressive and lessons are added all the time. Personally I find written instructions much easier to follow and they don't require me to spend extra time watching a video and

Re: LC Roadmap

___ > From: use-livecode on behalf of Curry > Kenworthy via use-livecode > Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2021 11:31:47 AM > To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Cc: Curry Kenworthy > Subject: Re: LC Roadmap > > > JeeJeeStudio: > >>

Re: LC Roadmap

vecode on behalf of Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2021 11:31:47 AM To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Cc: Curry Kenworthy Subject: Re: LC Roadmap JeeJeeStudio: > I like Livecode a lot, but it has it's limitations, > lot of bugs are not solved. True. W

Re: LC Roadmap

worthy Subject: Re: LC Roadmap JeeJeeStudio: > I like Livecode a lot, but it has it's limitations, > lot of bugs are not solved. True. Would be more accurate with "yet" added; solving bugs is ongoing! We could also say that many bugs HAVE been solved. Moderate progress

Re: LC Roadmap

JeeJeeStudio: > I like Livecode a lot, but it has it's limitations, > lot of bugs are not solved. True. Would be more accurate with "yet" added; solving bugs is ongoing! We could also say that many bugs HAVE been solved. Moderate progress. (I know, having been on the front lines of the

Re: LC Roadmap

that they have our best interests at heart. But keep forgetting that this is BS too. Roadmap = careering off a cliff top. Clean up projected for New York 2022. On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 12:16, Richmond via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: I've said something to that effect e

Re: LC Roadmap

Hi David It is (a lie) if this has been going on for years... If they say specifcally it is to be released Jan 2021 in an effort to prevent me from cancelling my subscription and then find out it's likely not going to be around till mid 2022, it's a bit much really! Sean On Sat, 13 Feb 2021 at

Re: LC Roadmap

> On 13 Feb 2021, at 12:37 pm, Sean Cole (Pi) via use-livecode > wrote: > > I was told last year that HTML5 deployment would see upgrades maybe by > Jan2021 LC 9.7. Hi Sean, I think that kind of aspirational statement, particularly in the world of software development, is the kind of thing

Re: LC Roadmap

for this kind of service. I CANNOT afford to keep doing this with vague empty unfulfilled promises (lies). I KEEP falling for it because the likes of others on this forum keep trying to convince me that they have our best interests at heart. But keep forgetting that this is BS too. Roadmap = careering off

Re: LC Roadmap

I've said something to that effect earlier, at which point I was jumped all over. So, because I don't want to be jumped all over again, and because saying the 'roadmap' needs to be updated will have no effect (didn't the last 3 times), I'm NOT stating what I think. Love. kisses, and other

LC Roadmap

Hi folks, see subject -> Last Updated on July 14, 2020 I think it is time to update the roadmap, what do you think? Best Klaus -- Klaus Major https://www.major-k.de https://www.major-k.de/bass kl...@major-k.de ___ use-livecode mailing list

Re: The Roadmap

in the Notes > product 15 years ago. Going back 15 years ago and Livecode was at v2.5. > Remember back then? The clipboarddata was a new thing. We didn't have a > built-in web browser, nor multi-dimensional arrays, nor unicode, nor the > datagrid, nor behaviors, nor widgets, nor

Re: The Roadmap

+1 > On Oct 30, 2019, at 09:17 , Bernard Devlin via use-livecode > wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 7:00 PM Richard Gaskin via use-livecode < > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > >> >> If it were up to me I'd ditch it altogether. >> > > Whatever frustrations I have with Livecode

Re: The Roadmap

On 10/30/19 9:17 AM, Bernard Devlin via use-livecode wrote: IBM with all their resources and access to capital markets couldn't hold themselves to their own limited roadmap. ...and now IBM has bought RedHat. -- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com

Re: The Roadmap

. IBM with all their resources and access to capital markets couldn't hold themselves to their own limited roadmap. Livecode has successfully moved forward with a cross-platform solution when IBM couldn't do so. And without having $billions to play with. They shouldn't attempt to hold to

The Roadmap

Sorry about starting this as a new thread: email client misbehaving. Richard Gaskin wrote: "Richmond wrote: > Of course if certain long-term stuff from the Kickstarters don't > appear on the Roadmap it is easier to hold LC to account than if > the Roadmap were to disappear comp

Re: The Roadmap

Richmond wrote: > Of course if certain long-term stuff from the Kickstarters don't > appear on the Roadmap it is easier to hold LC to account than if > the Roadmap were to disappear completely. Which returns us to the question I posted an hour ago about the Roadmap: What pur

Re: The Roadmap

Of course if certain long-term stuff from the Kickstarters don't appear on the Roadmap it is easier to hold LC to account than if the Roadmap were to disappear completely. On 29.10.19 21:19, hh via use-livecode wrote: I also think all of them are still valuable targets. Of course one could

Re: The Roadmap

Well, even if nothing else, it gives an impression that the folk at LiveCode central have some sort of GANTT chart with deliverables and dependencies, and what can be reasonably expected in the near future. On 29.10.19 21:14, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: What purpose does it serve?

Re: The Roadmap

I also think all of them are still valuable targets. Of course one could say "I know features/repairs that should be made before that" and advertise for them. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to

Re: The Roadmap

What purpose does it serve? -- Richard Gaskin Richmond wrote: > > Why would you ditch it? > > On 29.10.19 20:59, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: >> Richmond wrote: >> >> > The Roadmap is more than a year out of date. >> > &

Re: The Roadmap

Why would you ditch it? On 29.10.19 20:59, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: Richmond wrote: > The Roadmap is more than a year out of date. > > https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/ > > Is there any chance of it being updated? I hope not. If it were up to me I'd ditc

Re: The Roadmap

Richmond wrote: > The Roadmap is more than a year out of date. > > https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/ > > Is there any chance of it being updated? I hope not. If it were up to me I'd ditch it altogether. Lagi wrote: > The silence is deafening. :-( ^ and that's why.

Re: The Roadmap

The silence is deafening. :-( On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 21:04, Richmond via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > The Roadmap is more than a year out of date. > > https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/ > > Is there any chance of it being

The Roadmap

The Roadmap is more than a year out of date. https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/ Is there any chance of it being updated? Richmond. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe

Re: Roadmap

thats new...nice find! happy new year richmond & everyone On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 3:53 PM Richmond via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/ > > Last Updated on September 24, 2018 > &g

Roadmap

https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/ Last Updated on September 24, 2018 Tut, tut. Richmond. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences

Re: Roadmap: "Automated REST API wrapping"?

, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode < use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote: Mark Waddingham wrote: > On 2018-01-17 04:29, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: >> The LC Roadmap at <https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/> includes >> under "Planned": >> &g

Re: Roadmap: "Automated REST API wrapping"?

> On 2018-01-17 04:29, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: > >> The LC Roadmap at <https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/> includes > >> under "Planned": > >> > >> Automated REST API wrapping > >> > >> Sounds entici

Re: Roadmap: "Automated REST API wrapping"?

Mark Waddingham wrote: > On 2018-01-17 04:29, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: >> The LC Roadmap at <https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/> includes >> under "Planned": >> >> Automated REST API wrapping >> >> Sounds enticing.

Re: Roadmap: "Automated REST API wrapping"?

Mark Waddingham wrote: > On 2018-01-17 04:29, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: >>> The LC Roadmap at <https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/> includes >>> under "Planned": >>> >>> Automated REST API wrapping >>> >>>

Re: Roadmap: "Automated REST API wrapping"?

January 2018 at 12:10, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > On 2018-01-17 04:29, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: > >> Mike Kerner wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 9:40 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: >>> >>> T

Re: Roadmap: "Automated REST API wrapping"?

On 2018-01-17 04:29, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: Mike Kerner wrote: On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 9:40 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: The LC Roadmap at <https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/> includes under "Planned": Automated REST API wrapping Sounds

Re: Roadmap: "Automated REST API wrapping"?

I believe from my take on the discussion at the LCG, that the api wrapping will be for specific common and widely used api's., so automatic wrapping my be little misleading . - Andy Piddock My software never has bugs. It just develops random features. TinyIDE a Free alternative

Re: Roadmap: "Automated REST API wrapping"?

Mike Kerner wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 9:40 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > >> The LC Roadmap at <https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/> includes >> under "Planned": >> >> Automated REST API wrapping >> >> Sounds enticing. Wha

Re: Roadmap: "Automated REST API wrapping"?

This was discussed at LCG but I'll get the month wrong - August? On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 9:40 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > The LC Roadmap at <https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/> includes > under "Planned": >

Roadmap: "Automated REST API wrapping"?

The LC Roadmap at <https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/> includes under "Planned": Automated REST API wrapping Sounds enticing. What is it? And is there even a loose, no-I-won't-hold-you-to-it-but-just-curious target version? If it's what I think it is it ma

SVG in widgets - any roadmap?

Just to maintain interest in this topic - the LC Conference didn’t reveal any plans for extending the SVG capabilities of widgets in the LC 8 series. Does anyone know if such plans exist, or if on the contrary we are stuck with monochrome etc? The answer will obviously have an effect on

Re: Updated LiveCode roadmap

Open Language? On 21 October 2015 at 16:53, Peter TB Brett <peter.br...@livecode.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've updated our roadmap page, which explains the work that the core dev > team is doing. It can be found at <https://livecode.com/roadmap>. > >

Re: Updated LiveCode roadmap

> On 23 Oct 2015, at 9:20 am, David Bovill wrote: > > Open Language? I can’t say I understand fully how it will all work but my understanding is there will be an eventual merge of LCB with LCS and LCB appears to already have some scope for defining syntax:

Updated LiveCode roadmap

Hi all, I've updated our roadmap page, which explains the work that the core dev team is doing. It can be found at <https://livecode.com/roadmap>. Peter -- Dr Peter Brett <peter.br...@livecode.com> LiveCode Open Source Team LiveCode on r

Re: Updated LiveCode roadmap

Yes you can Richmond. Now go back to sleep. ;-) Bob S > On Oct 21, 2015, at 10:06 , Richmond <richmondmathew...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 21/10/15 18:53, Peter TB Brett wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've updated our roadmap page, which explains the work that the co

Re: Updated LiveCode roadmap

On 21/10/15 18:53, Peter TB Brett wrote: Hi all, I've updated our roadmap page, which explains the work that the core dev team is doing. It can be found at <https://livecode.com/roadmap>. Peter Can I get that on my GPS for my car? Very helpful,

Re: Updated LiveCode roadmap

R. Bob S On Oct 21, 2015, at 10:06 , Richmond <richmondmathew...@gmail.com> wrote: On 21/10/15 18:53, Peter TB Brett wrote: Hi all, I've updated our roadmap page, which explains the work that the core dev team is doing. It can be found at <https://livecode.com/roadmap>.

Re: HTML5 Roadmap?

us this soon), great to see what's happening to HTML5, but does this project have its own roadmap? It would be nice to see what is currently being worked on, or planned as POST is something I'm personally waiting for! Well, activity on GitHub is always a good way of seeing what is currently

HTML5 Roadmap?

happening to HTML5, but does this project have its own roadmap? It would be nice to see what is currently being worked on, or planned as POST is something I'm personally waiting for! Paul :) ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com

RE: HTML5 Roadmap?

September 2015 14:14 To: How to use LiveCode <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> Subject: Re: HTML5 Roadmap? On 2015-09-23 13:56, Paul Richards wrote: > Interesting to see on v8 DP6 > (https://github.com/livecode/livecode/pulls?q=milestone%3A8.0.0-dp-6+i > s%3Apr+is%3Aclosed) that LCB widg

Re: Roadmap

to swim. The main point about what I said is not really about the Full IDE as such, but the fact that although there is a lovely webpage with a roadmap it is still unclear as to what has been completed, semi-completed, yet to be completed, or dumped when it was realised that it was undoable

Re: Roadmap

On 04/06/15 00:09, Richard Gaskin wrote: Richmond wrote: Where is the Full IDE prototype . . . ? This is odd, as it states that a Full IDE Prototype depends on Widgets and Themes, which just is not true: an alternative IDE can be cobbled together right now - I mucked around with the

Roadmap

Um: http://livecode.com/the-present-and-future-livecode/ Maybe I'm doing some fuzzy thinking, but I do seem to remember something about import and export of vector graphics, possibly in the SVG format. Where is the Full IDE prototype . . . ? This is odd, as it states that a Full IDE

Re: Roadmap

Richmond wrote: Where is the Full IDE prototype . . . ? This is odd, as it states that a Full IDE Prototype depends on Widgets and Themes, which just is not true: an alternative IDE can be cobbled together right now - I mucked around with the revToolbar palette extensively way back with

Re: Roadmap

On 4 Jun 2015, at 6:50 am, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote: This is odd, as it states that a Full IDE Prototype depends on Widgets and Themes, which just is not true: an alternative IDE can be cobbled together right now - I mucked around with the revToolbar palette

Re: New Year Roadmap

 Funny how it is the Roadmap from last year. As someone who bought a lifetime license in the Kickstarter based on the promised new functionality, I really wasn't expecting them to deliver in the originally stated timeframe - I have too much experience with complex software projects

New Year Roadmap

Really? Funny how it is the Roadmap from last year. Naughty; where's the 'top story' ? What would be much more useful is the 'Roadmap' with the items that have been completed ticked off, and a more definite idea of a timescale (GANTT chart?) as to when it is envisaged the other goals