revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread LunchnMeets
Hi, I've been having this problem for a long time, but I've just been living with it. Almost every time I open the inspector it asks me to save the revPropertyPalette. I've been doing that but it keeps coming back. What am I doing wrong? Another problem I've been having is I can't seem

Re: revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread dunbarx
with it. Before my time, though. I still program in HC. And besides LC, nothing else. Craig Newman -Original Message- From: LunchnMeets lunchnme...@aol.com To: use-livecode use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Sent: Tue, Sep 6, 2011 7:43 am Subject: revPropertyPalette Hi, I've been

Re: revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Mark Schonewille
Hi Joe, I am having the same problem with revPropertyPalette. I don't expect it to get fixed. In any case, don't save it :-) I don't think that saving it makes sense, if it doesn't make things worse. If you can't ungroup a group, that group probably contains nested groups. Select the group

Re: revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Richard Gaskin
Joe wrote: I've been having this problem for a long time, but I've just been living with it. Almost every time I open the inspector it asks me to save the revPropertyPalette. I've been doing that but it keeps coming back. What am I doing wrong? It seems that the Inspector has somehow been

Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread dunbarx
that is where the inspector sort of lies. Now I can find files for stacks like the message boxand revTools. But I cannot find anything for revPropertyPalette. And why the blank line? Shy? Craig Newman -Original Message- From: Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com To: use-livecode use

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Richard Gaskin
dunbarx wrote: If I open a new LC session with any simple stack and call the stacks, I see the revmenubar, revMessageBox and whatever stack I opened with (I opened the msg box by hand). If I then open the inspector for the stack and call the stacks I get a blank line in the middle of the

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Richmond Mathewson
OK, OK; I'm behind in the race ( 4.5 ), but then, even if I had the money, I would feel a bit queer about buying things with numbers after a second fullstop: So: crack open 4.5. dp 4 and the Application browser: no revPropertypalette [and, this is extremely UNsurprising, as I have no stack

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Mark Schonewille
Hi, In this case, the blank line is because the revPropertyPalette is a cloned stack without a stackfile on disk. The revPropertyPalettes exist in memory only, while only one original exists on disk. -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Richard Gaskin
Mark Schonewille wrote: In this case, the blank line is because the revPropertyPalette is a cloned stack without a stackfile on disk. The revPropertyPalettes exist in memory only, while only one original exists on disk. Ah, right: that was the stacks, and not the windows. Since there's only

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Richmond Mathewson
the revPropertyPalette is a cloned stack without a stackfile on disk. The revPropertyPalettes exist in memory only, while only one original exists on disk. Ah, right: that was the stacks, and not the windows. Since there's only one Inspector open at any given time, why do they bother cloning it? -- Richard

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Mark Schonewille
/xtalkprogrammer KvK: 50277553 Send me a friend request on Facebook if you like https://www.facebook.com/marksch On 6 sep 2011, at 21:02, Richard Gaskin wrote: Mark Schonewille wrote: In this case, the blank line is because the revPropertyPalette is a cloned stack without a stackfile on disk

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Richmond Mathewson
://www.facebook.com/marksch On 6 sep 2011, at 21:02, Richard Gaskin wrote: Mark Schonewille wrote: In this case, the blank line is because the revPropertyPalette is a cloned stack without a stackfile on disk. The revPropertyPalettes exist in memory only, while only one original exists on disk. Ah, right

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Pete
Molly's Revengehttp://www.**mollysrevenge.comhttp://www.mollysrevenge.com On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com**wrote: Mark Schonewille wrote: In this case, the blank line is because the revPropertyPalette is a cloned stack without a stackfile

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Richmond Mathewson
we should doubt your claim. Pete Molly's Revengehttp://www.**mollysrevenge.comhttp://www.mollysrevenge.com On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com**wrote: Mark Schonewille wrote: In this case, the blank line is because the revPropertyPalette

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Bob Sneidar
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.comwrote: Mark Schonewille wrote: In this case, the blank line is because the revPropertyPalette is a cloned stack without a stackfile on disk. The revPropertyPalettes exist in memory only, while only one

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Bob Sneidar
Like when your children have grandchildren, or when you make a bunch of copies of a form, then hand out the original and have to use one of the copies next time you make more. Actually, it's not like either of those things. NVM Bob On Sep 6, 2011, at 12:28 PM, Pete wrote: reduplicated?

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Richmond Mathewson
On 09/06/2011 10:50 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: Like when your children have grandchildren, or when you make a bunch of copies of a form, then hand out the original and have to use one of the copies next time you make more. All I can say is that if computer programming were as easy as fathering

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Admin
suppose unless it can be reduplicated we should doubt your claim. Pete Molly's Revenge On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: Mark Schonewille wrote: In this case, the blank line is because the revPropertyPalette is a cloned stack without a stackfile on disk

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread FlexibleLearning
The persistent mis-use of this word REALLY annoys me! 'Wherefore' is 'Why' in modern parlance, and not (nor has ever been) 'where'. Back to your normal browsing. Hugh Senior FLCo ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Bob Sneidar
Beer don't know no good speaking. Bob On Sep 6, 2011, at 1:23 PM, FlexibleLearning wrote: The persistent mis-use of this word REALLY annoys me! 'Wherefore' is 'Why' in modern parlance, and not (nor has ever been) 'where'. Back to your normal browsing. Hugh Senior FLCo

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread dunbarx
Wherefore is why. Juliet set the bar. Craig Newman -Original Message- From: FlexibleLearning ad...@flexiblelearning.com To: use-livecode use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Sent: Tue, Sep 6, 2011 12:25 pm Subject: Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette The persistent mis-use of this word

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 9/6/11 1:38 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote: back to Application Browser and there one can see, at the bottom of the list (ou, a fond [ excusez moi, sans accents ] as they say in France) revPropertyPalette 1 created 'on-the-fly' as it-were, from some mysteriously hidden template . . . So

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Timothy Miller
O Romeo, Romeo! wherefore art thou Romeo? The 'wherefore' here means why? rather than where? What Juliet is asking, in allusion to the feud between her Capulet family and Romeo's Montague clan, is 'Romeo, why are you a Montague?'. Tim On Sep 6, 2011, at 1:23 PM, FlexibleLearning wrote: The

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Richmond Mathewson
On 09/06/2011 11:23 PM, FlexibleLearning wrote: The persistent mis-use of this word REALLY annoys me! 'Wherefore' is 'Why' in modern parlance, and not (nor has ever been) 'where'. Indeed, a veritable excess of curmudgeonliness Mr Chips. Back to your normal browsing. Hugh Senior FLCo

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Richmond Mathewson
On 09/07/2011 12:43 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote: On 9/6/11 1:38 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote: back to Application Browser and there one can see, at the bottom of the list (ou, a fond [ excusez moi, sans accents ] as they say in France) revPropertyPalette 1 created 'on-the-fly' as it-were, from

Re: Wherefore revPropertyPalette

2011-09-06 Thread Richmond Mathewson
On 09/07/2011 04:27 AM, Timothy Miller wrote: O Romeo, Romeo! wherefore art thou Romeo? The 'wherefore' here means why? rather than where? What Juliet is asking, in allusion to the feud between her Capulet family and Romeo's Montague clan, is 'Romeo, why are you a Montague?'. Give me