Hi,
I have an XML tree in memory, loaded with revXMLCreateTreeFromFile. Now
I want to make a copy of the tree. I could load it from file again, but
it seems more logical to me to duplicate the existing tree, something
like revXMLCopyTree, but that function doesn't seem to exist. Is there a
I think you can do it this way.
put revXMLtext(tTreeID) into tXMLdata
put revXMLCreateTree(tXMLdata,false,true,false) into tTreeIDCopy
Martin
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Duplicating-XML-tree-tp4680494p4680495.html
Sent from the
Hi Martin,
I was hoping to copy the tree directly. I thought of your solution and I
could also load the tree from file twice in this particular case, but
I'd rather copy an existing tree directly if possible.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software
I am trying to set the numberFormat so that calculation is precise enough for
the situation. Since I don't know ahead of time how many decimal places will
be used, I wrote a function that I hoped would adjust things as necessary.
But when this function is called with parameters m = 1.09131
I need help figuring out why AWS is returning an error 400 bad request
in a limited number of cases. We have a test group of some dozens of
people and only 2 have the problem.
What I know:
The data sent to the server is the same for everyone, and is correctly
formatted. I have logs of that
David,
The numberformat doesn't affect precision. It only affects output as is
shown by
on mouseUp
set the numberformat to 00
put 0.01*1 into x
set the numberformat to 00.00
put x*1
end mouseUp
It even only affects the current handler and doesn't affect precision in
calling
On 6/16/2014, 1:13 PM, dfepst...@comcast.net wrote:
I am trying to set the numberFormat so that calculation is precise enough for
the situation. Since I don't know ahead of time how many decimal places will
be used, I wrote a function that I hoped would adjust things as necessary.
But when
Also, if you don’t care about display, just set the *precision* to LC max.
Numberformat is as others have posted, really a display function. After you are
done, set the numberFormat back to default or “0”. I bit myself in the butt
because I had a counter that I was using to append a number to a
Are you using sessions?
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:25 PM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com
wrote:
I need help figuring out why AWS is returning an error 400 bad request
in a limited number of cases. We have a test group of some dozens of people
and only 2 have the problem.
What I
Hi Jacque,
AWS does have logs, you have to set them up for each bucket.
Simon
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Diagnosing-server-error-400-tp4680498p4680503.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Sorry that was a cop-out.
I'm using CloudBerry Explorer for Amazon.
Right click on the bucket
Logging Logging Settings or Cloudfront logging settings.
Simon
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Diagnosing-server-error-400-tp4680498p4680504.html
Sent
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:34 AM, J. Landman Gay
jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote:
set the numberformat to 0.## -- add more if you want
I think the reason David isn't doing that, and is trying to limit the
number of # to the absolute minimum is because of this note in the
Dictionary:
On 6/16/2014, 6:21 PM, As_Simon wrote:
Sorry that was a cop-out.
I'm using CloudBerry Explorer for Amazon.
Right click on the bucket
Logging Logging Settings or Cloudfront logging settings.
I'm in the dark about what's going on over at the server side, but on my
end, I'm just doing a GET to
On 6/16/2014, 10:28 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
I'm just doing a GET to a URL. There is an SQS queue (I'm not sure what
that is actually,) which is being processed server-side. I think we need
to know what's happening before my request hits the queue.
I should expand that a little bit. The
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 3:25 PM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com
wrote:
I need help figuring out why AWS is returning an error 400 bad request
in a limited number of cases. We have a test group of some dozens of people
and only 2 have the problem.
I think that some XML should be sent
Jacque-
Monday, June 16, 2014, 8:56:40 PM, you wrote:
Maybe a better question to everyone would be: can a server 400 error be
related to a bad SSL certificate chain?
I'd expect something more like a 401 for a security problem. The
official definition of a 400 response is malformed syntax.
--
16 matches
Mail list logo
