Re: Considering work with livecode server

But apps that are browsers to bundled content are OK. That is how you get Apache Cordova and Phonegap to work. On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 02:06, Mark Wieder via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > On 1/18/21 2:20 PM, William Prothero via use-livecode wrote: > > > Building a single

Re: Considering work with livecode server

Andre Garzia wrote: > But apps that are browsers to bundled content are OK. That is how you > get Apache Cordova and Phonegap to work. > > On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 02:06, Mark Wieder wrote: >> >>> On 1/18/21 2:20 PM, William Prothero via use-livecode wrote: >>> Building a single web-based app that

Re: Swipe gesture script on datagrid

> Le 19 janv. 2021 à 08:37, Phil Davis via use-livecode > a écrit : > > Would the dgProp["left swipe control"] of grp "yourDG" help? At least that > might let you change the default trash can to some other control (maybe to a > group that contains your 2 buttons?). If you get that far,

Re: background images

I usually use the preOpenCard approach with background images but have occasionally wanted to have a set of images on individual cards that do not change dynamically over time. In that case I’ve used an image that was NOT part of the background group. To create a new card (with a new image), I

Re: Cmi5 eLearning Standard in LiveCode MEETING TODAY AT 1 PM EST

Hey everyone. I got buried yesterday and missed the meeting. Apologies. Was it recorded? Very interested in this. Bryan Anderson exnihilo-media.com > On Jan 18, 2021, at 1:34 PM, Martin Koob via use-livecode > wrote: > > Hi. > > Sorry I am on a train and

Re: Swipe gesture script on datagrid

Or “RowRightSwipeControlClicked” in your case. It depends on how you invoke the action control. > On Jan 19, 2021, at 4:18 PM, Mark Smith wrote: > > Yes, that’s how it’s done. And then in your row behavior script respond to > on EditModeActionControlClicked pTarget > > with pTarget containing

Re: Considering work with livecode server

Bill, Let me second what Richard said, you'd be better served by building desktop stack apps than by building web apps. There is no silver bullet for doing web work, there is no magical technology that makes it as easy as LC. The Web is a design by committee with various multi-billion companies

Re: Considering work with livecode server

Hi Andre, how are “apps to bundled content” different from “apps that are portals to web content" (Jacque’s description)? Or put another way, if someone wanted to design a tourist app that highlighted interesting local tourist destinations near them with a link you can click on to purchase

Re: Swipe gesture script on datagrid

Yes, that’s how it’s done. And then in your row behavior script respond to on EditModeActionControlClicked pTarget with pTarget containing the short name of your action control button. > On Jan 19, 2021, at 7:37 AM, Phil Davis via use-livecode > wrote: > > Would the dgProp["left swipe

xAPI in LiveCode (was Cmi5 eLearning Standard in LiveCode)

Hello, I wanted to get this sent before the list digest was sent today. After the first week of discussions, I’m realizing that CMI5, which is a standard profile (subset) of xAPI is too narrow of a topic, so we’re broadening to include xAPI in LiveCode. Other profiles include video content,

Re: Considering work with livecode server

When livecode supports WebAssembly as a build target you'll be able to do what you've asked On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, 20:46 William Prothero via use-livecode, < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Thanks, all, for your comments. It would sure be nice if there was some > equivalent to shockwave,

Re: Considering work with livecode server

Thanks, all, for your comments. It would sure be nice if there was some equivalent to shockwave, back in the days. Of course, downloadable plug-ins like shockwave and flash apparently have too many security issues and are not allowed anymore. HTML5 eventually? I assume HTML5 apps would run in

Re: Cmi5 eLearning Standard in LiveCode MEETING TODAY AT 1 PM EST

Attachments available until Feb 18, 2021 Hi David I have attached a manual for VideoLinkwell. It walks through the different features that the app has. It is for an older version (3.2) but mostly applicable. I haven’t had time to update it yet. I have also attached the most recent Mac

Re: Considering work with livecode server

If only! Bob S On Jan 19, 2021, at 5:56 AM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode mailto:use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>> wrote: A website from 1995 needs to be just as valid to the browser as one from 2021. ___ use-livecode mailing list

Re: Cmi5 eLearning Standard in LiveCode MEETING TODAY AT 1 PM EST

Hi List.  I didn't mean to spam everyone with this. I did not notice I was conversing with David G thru the use-LiveCode list till just now. We can take this offline. But since you now have the links you can do a trial of my software. Curious what people think. Martin > On Jan 19,

Re: Cmi5 eLearning Standard in LiveCode MEETING TODAY AT 1 PM EST

I intended to comment on list, because I was impressed with Videolinkwell and thought folks on the list might be interested! I watched the videos and think your app is really cool and worthwhile. There! I did it again! David G > On 19 Jan 2021, at 5:37 pm, Martin Koob wrote: > > Hi List.

In-app purchasing

Has anyone done in-app purchasing on iOS and Android? Does it work? We're looking into possibly implementing this but I've never done it before. Any tips welcome. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

Re: Considering work with livecode server

WebAssembly is on the roadmap. https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/ > Op 19 jan. 2021 om 20:43 heeft William Prothero via use-livecode > het volgende geschreven: > > Dan: > I just did a bit of Googling and wow! It sounds like a capability to compile > to WebAssembly would put LiveCode

Re: Considering work with livecode server

kee nethery wrote: > On Jan 19, 2021, at 7:58 AM, Mark Smith wrote: >> >> Hi Andre, how are “apps to bundled content” different from “apps that >> are portals to web content" (Jacque’s description)? Or put another >> way, if someone wanted to design a tourist app that highlighted >> interesting

Re: Considering work with livecode server

Dan: I just did a bit of Googling and wow! It sounds like a capability to compile to WebAssembly would put LiveCode in the big time. I wonder if there is any interest from the dev team. Sounds much more useful than HTML5. Best, Bill > On Jan 19, 2021, at 11:13 AM, Dan Brown wrote: > > When

Re: Considering work with livecode server

William Prothero wrote: > It would sure be nice if there was some equivalent to shockwave... For all practical purposes we do: The Shockwave plugin was an executable engine you could download and install once, and then play a wide range of scripted interactive media with it. A LiveCode

Re: Considering work with livecode server

> On Jan 19, 2021, at 7:58 AM, Mark Smith via use-livecode > wrote: > > Hi Andre, how are “apps to bundled content” different from “apps that are > portals to web content" (Jacque’s description)? Or put another way, if > someone wanted to design a tourist app that highlighted interesting

Re: Considering work with livecode server

Hmmm…. I see: "Add WebAssembly build target in HTML5 deployment”, in the"team is working on right now” category. I guess, given all the delays and getting HTML5 up, I won’t hold my breath. But, I’ll certainly be watching for it. Gaads, another subscription to purchase. But getting real livecode

RE: In-app purchasing

Yes it works. I've done it on both platforms. The tutorial in the LC lesions pretty much says it all. 1) Name your in-app purchase products exactly the same on both platforms. Make them all lowercase. One of them does not allow uppercase(forgot which) and of course I used the upper on the one

Re: background images

Just import an image for a card and set its level to 1: no 'nonsense' about background images at all. Richmond. On 19.01.21 2:44, Tim Selander via use-livecode wrote: Right, which is why this is so confusing. I do not want a 'shared text' image. Each card should keep it's own unique image, but