it is not "unhandled" then...
or
if it is "passed" then...
or
if it is "handled" then...
and note that you can dispatch functions as well a commands, and the
return value of the function will be in the result if "it" is not
"unhandled".
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@g
nabled
then the command will be handled. If not then there's no downside to
calling the feature because it won't cause a runtime error.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url t
On 7/31/22 12:14, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote:
On 7/31/22 12:04 AM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote:
I don't think "wait 0" by itself does anything useful. Make a stack
with two buttons. Running the script in the first button will prevent
mouseUp events in button 2
On 7/30/22 19:02, Paul Dupuis via use-livecode wrote:
So Mark,
Your understanding is that 'wait 0' (WITHOUT with messages) would allow
OS events like a screen redraw, USB drive insertion/removal, etc. but
NOT livecode engine events in the queue like mouseDown, mouseUp,
resumeStack, etc
process any
pending instructions. The "with messages" statement in effect yields
control to the event loop to check if any "send in time" messages have
timed out and are pending or to handle other tasks that may have
accumulated (mouse or keyboard events, etc).
On 7/19/22 15:48, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
Thanks for the reply Mark, I did that (after declaring the global first) but
breakpoints did not break! But then I discovered that the error was that I was
calling a function as a command.
...and as a hint the glx2 script editor will pop
On 7/19/22 15:48, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
Thanks for the reply Mark, I did that (after declaring the global first) but
breakpoints did not break! But then I discovered that the error was that I was
calling a function as a command.
Shouldn't that have thrown a runtime error
tem stacks (starting with "rev" or
plugins). And remember to set it false afterwards. If you're trying to
debug a library that's been password-protected, though, it won't help.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode maili
use an array as an element
specifier.
Has that been around the whole time, or was it added in recent years?
I added it before 6.0 - probably in 4.5 or 5.
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
Hey, saw your post this am and much appreciated. I sent a request to support
as well.
Thanks for the assist and confirmation!
Mark
It seems that each time I sign up for the bug tracker and or forums my main
livecode.com <http://livecode.com/> password gets mangled. Been happening for
as the binary equivalents.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman
On 7/8/22 17:47, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:
But, an encoded array is STILL binary data. So any issues with "read
until linefeed" will still exist.
Try sending a header with number of bytes, followed by the bytes.
Yeah.
What he said.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...
. Curiously, if I just send and receive plain text it works every time.
Not sure what "looks like" an encoded array should mean.
When you encode an array you get binary data. You can't treat it like text.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
_
, start
by sending a header that contains the data length. Extract that and then
read that many bytes.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe
license whatever that maps to now). So, np
figure it out later, selected business license and LC starts but the
enhancements still show unlicensed. Is there something manual I’m missing?
TIA,
Mark (on digest mode)
___
use-livecode mailing list
use
On 6/24/22 10:04, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
The only way to use these keys is from server scripts running on a
server which you do your best to maintain the security of. Ideally these
keys should be stored in files which are only readable by specific users
- usually the web
everyone install
an app update with the new one in.
Anyway, that's probably more than Tom probably needed to know (or
perhaps knew already), but hopefully it is helpful (at least for those
who have to deal with API keys and such things!).
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m
- although the APIs, while similar,
do require different code.
However, if you are using ffmpeg for things other than concatenating
tracks/movies (i.e. the features those libraries provide) then the
separate code needed wouldn't be worth it to save inclusion of ffmpeg.
Warmest Regards,
Mark
On 2022-06-23 23:54, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:
Thanks Mark - works. I could have sworn I'd tried "line" earlier when
attempting to set the backgroundColor, and when it failed was when I
switched to trying "paragraph". But it works now so I don't mind be
IIRC you need to use ‘line’ to set ‘paragraph‘ properties of fields…
Sent from my iPhone
> On 23 Jun 2022, at 19:29, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Craig wrote:
>
> > Richard wrote:
> >> I had hoped the paragraph-level formatting options introduced in
> >> v5.x would help, but
On 2022-06-21 12:18, matthias rebbe via use-livecode wrote:
Am 21.06.2022 um 11:56 schrieb Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
:
Why?
First, it's more convenient for the developer.
I think the end user is more important (in this case) ;)
The Intel only and Apple only builds are smaller ins
binaries
mean that when a user upgrades their machine, their apps they already
have (backed up, more than likely, and re-imaged on the new machine)
will continue to take advantage of their hardware.
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
P.S. I should point out that Apple architecture support
as checked or not when the user hasn't
explicitly prodded it in the past (which obviously they won't have done
for new apps / those which didn't have the option before!).
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
I think in this instance, probably asking support would be the best bet.
> On 16 Jun 2022, at 2:31 pm, David V Glasgow via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I am writing a paper for publication (I hope) describing analysis of internet
> predator messages achieved using Livecode.
>
>
ly
on the cards.
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe
was going
to get a prize or something.
Bob S
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.
On 2022-06-09 20:54, Craig Newman via use-livecode wrote:
Mark.
Gong the other way, is your task made much simpler by losing
“converOctals”? I assume so, or the issue would never have come up.
Are there other similar language elements that also are on the block?
I'm not sure it makes things
On 6/9/22 05:44, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
So I'm currently sitting here about to embark on fixing
<https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=23653> (which is the final
thing to sort out before being able to merge my constant expression
patch) and I was re
On 2022-06-09 16:33, Devin Asay via use-livecode wrote:
Wait, you said three questions. But no.
What are those two hard problems of computer science again? ;)
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
> On 9 Jun 2022, at 1:44 pm, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> So I'm currently sitting here about to embark on fixing
> <https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=23653> (which is the final
> thing to sort out before being able to merge my c
iguous at parse time, it doesn't
require a runtime property set to true in order for the engine to
convert the string to a number correctly.
Please let me know your thoughts :)
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
P.S. In the scheme of 'breaking changes' - we've already made a number
of them for 10 a
tTarget
repeat for each item tS in tSource
put tC * tS + tK & comma after tTarget
end repeat
return tTarget
end randomNumbers
Hope this helps!
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode:
white noise generator too.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman
command onto what I expect that command to do in the server context.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscriptio
On 6/7/22 10:55, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
I don't buy the 'cognitively different' argument
Mark-
Thanks for the longish explanations there. I think we'll just have to
disagree on the cognitive thing then - I normally would expect functions
to return the result of some action
On 2022-06-07 17:16, Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote:
1. Because it's a function, not a constant.
put gkMyMagicValue() into tVar
is cognitively different from
put gkMyMagicValue into tVar
Something like 17 is a trivial case. Something more like real world
usage would be
constant
On 6/7/22 00:18, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
How is that any better than putting something like this in a library or
back script:
function gkMyMagicValue
return 17
end gkMyMagicValue
Including the global declaration its the same number of lines (indeed
less
nd gkMyMagicValue
Including the global declaration its the same number of lines (indeed
less, as you'd need to put a global declaration in every script which
wanted to use said global constant...).
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http
that the discrepancy is between
Apple and Intel architectures :)
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please
econd time. If the (badly-named) destroyStack property
of the substack is set to false (the default) then the substack will
still be in memory and your preOpenStack handler will be triggered at
its current card setting.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
_
like:
constant kPiBy2 = pi / 2
constant kPiBy2Squared = kPiBy2 * kPiBy2
constant kPiBy2String = format("%f", kPiBy2)
local sPiMap = { "pi-by-2": kPiBy2, "pi-by-2-sq": kPiBy2Squared }
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
P.S. Amusingly, your question came
-enhancer!!).
Cheers,
Mark
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Hi Tom,
You can “suspend” iOS apps by putting them into the background, where they are
maintained in a sort of “hibernated” state, ready to go when you open them
again, and you can detect this. But it is also possible to “unload” them from
memory by swiping up on apps that you can see lurking
to
“mainstack” or close this stack it always closes (quit) everything. Need
“mainstack” to reappear/remain ?
Looked at docs and other posts. But stuck no doubt I have missed something.
Do you have a closeStack handler in the script of the mainstack?
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
On 5/27/22 16:03, doc hawk via use-livecode wrote:
As a professor, I’ll grade it a B-.
I thought that was a pessimistic blood type.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit
not check spelling or grammar” for that format.
> You can also select the newly pasted text and then do the same procedure
> (Select language and check the do not check checkbox).
>
> :-Håkan
>
>> On 24 May 2022, at 13:00, Mark Smith via use-livecode
>> mailto
not know how to turn that off. Just
wondering if you’ve found a better way for distributing code in word docs.
Thanks!
Mark
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
On 2022-05-18 17:43, Rick Harrison via use-livecode wrote:
I wish it worked with variables though
because execution would be faster.
If variables could manipulate styled text (aka htmlText) then they
wouldn't be any faster than fields ;)
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m
milliseconds required to encrypt in 5632 runs: 45918
memory utilization 45.7 MB
Total milliseconds required to decrypt in 5632 runs: 41725
Thanks all, if anyone would like to check out the gcm flavor from a Mac I’d
like to know if you get different (better) results. I’m on 11.6.4, btw.
Mark
of the stack) was 44-45MB during both
operations. I’ll bump up the byte range and see how that compares.
Thanks,
Mark
> On May 10, 2022, at 11:00 AM, use-livecode-requ...@lists.runrev.com
> <mailto:use-livecode-requ...@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> there is no way to
Thanks for letting us know William. Glad the cleanup did the trick.
Mark
> On May 9, 2022, at 9:00 AM, William de Smet via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> Thanks for answering my questions.
> First off all I downloaded a newer version of Xcode 13.2.1 yesterday b
manageable chunk into memory, decrypting a portion, writing that
to disk and repeat. But that seems too simple. Think we need AES 256. Any
shared experience much appreciated.
Thanks all,
Mark
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please
and iPhone” setting, and it
installed and ran just fine on my iPad. I tried with both the Test button in LC
and installing the app with Xcode and in both cases it worked ok, so that can’t
be the problem. Do let us know if you track down the cause.
Cheers,
Mark
> On May 7, 2022, at 9:06 AM, Will
Hi Bob,
I am happy to say that Richard Gaskin is our first 3rd party provider. He wants
to make connections for many things external. Databases is top on the list the
last time we spoke. I’ll ping him to chime in with more details.
Best regards,
Mark Talluto
appli.io <https://appli
the goals of our suite soon. When they
announce, I am confident they will clearly articulate the value proposition.
If anyone has Appli questions, please feel free to write us at he...@appli.io.
-Mark Talluto
> On Apr 28, 2022, at 2:03 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
e scripting provides.
I think what I saw in Mark's keynote is the ability in appli do some
coding, just not to any extent the deep capabilities of LiveCode. Thus
"low code".
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-live
, and that's good for everybody.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman
bal/global2022/>
Same here. I misjudged the time so I overslept and missed Mark
Waddingham's keynote but I'll catch it on the rebound. I do think Appli
gives LC what's been missing to draw in new users, so check out Mark
Talluto's keynote on day 3 for the details. And I highly recommend Craig
Ne
be looking forward to
watching them post-conf when Heather has a chance to upload them. There were a
lot of very forward looking sessions from Kevin and company, and Mark Talluto
had an interesting take on app development presented during his plenary
(Appli.io <http://appli.io/>). Lots of ideas I
Mike, check out the LC blog posts for summaries of Days 1 and 2, not sure if a
day 3 will be posted
(https://livecode.com/reporting-on-day-1-of-the-livecode-conference/).
> On 28 Apr 2022, at 14:44, Mike Kerner via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> I am stuck in a time sink. I missed just about all
for LCB widgets and LCS group controls
* Organize widgets into folders
* Supports file links cross-platform
As always, PowerTools registrations will never expire, so you always
have access to the latest versions.
<https://www.ahsoftware.net/PowerTools/PowerTools.lc>
--
Mark Wieder
a
Hi-
It's been some three years since a major new release of PowerDebug, and
with the 2022 LiveCode conference right around the corner, I think it's
time to release PowerDebug 2.3.
NOTE: in order to get responsive speed out of this thing, it's now only
backwards-compatible to LiveCode 8.0.
m in the first place.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
uld go a long way
to making that happen.
Adding to that is the incoming LCS widget architecture, so I'm not
putting deep learning time into something I'll just have to unlearn when
the next wave hits.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-li
/replace of (e.g.) #ABCDEF with
currentColor.
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this
t... fancy pancakes. *Almost*
hated to eat mine.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.
gadget is no longer supported.
All right - now I'm hooked.
Looking forward to you talking about the LC interface to the real world.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url
On 4/5/22 10:36, Craig Newman via use-livecode wrote:
But I do use LC to control three very different machines in our shop. Would it
be of any interest to anyone to see one of these in operation?
Add me to the list of interested folks.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
umber and depth
sort numeric tProfiles by item 4 of each # depth
sort numeric tProfiles by item 1 of each # line number
sort tProfiles by item 2 of each # handler
sort tProfiles by item 3 of each # group by object
I just get this, but my mind is confusing me today.
Yeah. Not exactly intuiti
On 3/30/22 12:16, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote:
No question is too silly.
Gimme some time... I'm sure I can come up with something.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please
macOS exes would be in a different place (because they
need to be!) so it wouldn't resolve that - but at least you wouldn't
have been 'surprised' by what you found!
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode
On 3/21/22 13:04, matthias rebbe via use-livecode wrote:
Hi Panos,
in the bug report you link to a pull request which was removed for some reasons.
Nice fix.
I think *all* pull requests were orphaned when the opensource product
was removed.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
On 3/21/22 09:08, panagiotis m via use-livecode wrote:
Hello all,
There is a bug report about it:
https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=20223
From *five years ago*.
Status 'awaiting merge'
Pull request in 2019 removed from the 9.6.0 milesone and still 'waiting
for review'
--
Mark
r all
coordinates, and therefore can’t really be depended on. Since I am only
interested in portrait (at the moment), I will do some further testing to see
if I can get reasonable results for most devices using this orientation
(including inserting hard coded values where necessary).
All the best,
, rather than debugging JS executed from the
engine running the browser) - but I can't see why it wouldn't work.
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
___
use-livecode
ndlers as tail calls - i.e. as the last
thing on a handler.
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
P.S. The web engine is (essentially) the running the LC script 'as
JavaScript' so the same limitation does not apply - calling LC handlers
from JS in the web engine is synchronous.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...
- if you could post to a bug
report, then we will look into whether that is the case, or there is
something else going on.
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
P.S. We are hoping to move to the async version of XMLHttpRequest now
that we can wait - so that might well be the solution.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m
the filename passed and ':memory:'.
So, I suggest using ':memory:' as stated by SQLite and all will be well
:)
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
___
use
requests I think...)
Anyway, file a bug with an example if you can and we'll take a look.
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
___
use-livecode mailing list
use
put "*THIS*FIND*" into tTarget
put "abcdef" into
tLargeTextString
filter tLargeTextString with tTarget
set the itemDelimiter to "THIS"
put item 2 of tLargeTextString into tSubString
set the itemDelimiter to "FIND"
put item 1 of tSubStrin
On 3/12/22 12:06, Rick Harrison via use-livecode wrote:
Hi Mark,
matchText works fine.
That doesn’t explain why “filter” doesn’t work though.
Yes. It does. Filter won't give you a substring.
You can use filter to get the whole line of text, but you'll still have
to dig out the substring
tchtext(tLargeTextString, ".*THIS(.*)FIND.*", tText) into tFound?
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preference
mint which is based
on Ubuntu 20.
So you should be fine as long as you don't need printing or browsers or
the new chart widget or...
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit
Apart from searching I am sure it will provide many other great learning
opportunities as well. Looking forward to seeing how it all pans out.
Mark
> On Mar 6, 2022, at 8:18 PM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> On 3/6/22 9:40 AM, William Prothero via use-livecode wr
rather than
cherry. Consequentially I realize my confusion is due to a limitation of what
these characters mean to regex. Can anyone clarify for me what the “.” and “*”
are doing to change the filter?
Thanks
> On Mar 7, 2022, at 11:05 AM, Mark Smith wrote:
>
> I am not an expert
ents using “without regex pattern” and
using “a.*” as the argument returned “cherry” so at least whatever it is doing
it is consistent.
Mark
> On Mar 7, 2022, at 8:58 AM, Quentin Long via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> sez j. landman gay:
>> Interesting idea. There ar
I also asked about building widgets from LC script. The response was, this
could be a step along that path.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 4, 2022, at 2:54 PM, Mike Kerner via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> It's nice that aCompileIt!/Double-XX replacement is finally coming to
> LiveCode, maybe,
ts it is something else either on your phone, or in
your code which your phone doesn't like I think.
Warmst Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
___
use-livecode mailing
.
That's the New York *Post*.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo
On 3/1/22 10:26, Stephen Barncard via use-livecode wrote:
Paywall
Opened without a paywall for me.
That last quote is a keeper.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url
.
If the revLicenseInfo does say professional then something odd has
happened somewhere which will need to look into more deeply!
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
Thanks for the clarification Panos. Much appreciated.
Mark
> On Mar 1, 2022, at 2:14 PM, panagiotis m via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Note that this is necessary for building standalone for **macOS**. The
> version of the downloaded command line
How do you know which version you are getting with this? Or is it always just
“the latest”?
> On Feb 28, 2022, at 8:10 PM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> On 2/28/22 1:42 PM, Klaus major-k via use-livecode wrote:
>> We do not have to install the complete (ca. 16 GB) Xcode package
On 2/25/22 11:41, panagiotis m via use-livecode wrote:
> @Mark Wieder
>
> Did you manage to activate this version?
Finally after enough trial and error, yes. Both linux and osx.
I do have a followup question for support though.
> PS:
> *>>>>I'm guessing this did
On 2/25/22 10:16, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
Oddly, I was able to download the Pro version but I am not licensed for it. No
big deal, but it seems to be a departure from previous experience.
I'm guessing this didn't get much testing before release.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw
Can't activate the license, though.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com
desktop
manager, but after restarting that it looks nice.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http
On 2/22/22 00:52, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
Can you clarify what you mean by the 'socket seems to not be responding'?
Sure. Here you go.
I'm communicating between a standalone and a stack in the IDE. I've
tried this with 9.6.3, 9.6.6, and 10.0.0-rc2 with the same results, so I
On 2022-02-21 20:17, Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote:
On 2/21/22 10:37, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
Put another way - if you have done 'close socket i', then it is then
it should be logically impossible for i to be in the openSockets
immediately afterwards.
Ah. Sorry - after
r (caching the
results alongside the original image on the server).
For maximum fidelity you want the width/height * the device pixel scale
(which can vary from 1 to 3 these days).
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can c
301 - 400 of 8336 matches
Mail list logo
