On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> The French revolution, the Russian revolution. Point out the
> longest lived totalitarian state that still exists today. They all fall
> eventually
>
Rome, however, took 1,500 years from the
One is a difference in kind, the other in degree.
Bob S
> On Aug 3, 2017, at 10:07 , Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Well, if you are aware of that distinction you should be aware of the
> difference between a law made by a democratically
The French revolution, the Russian revolution. Point out the longest
lived totalitarian state that still exists today. They all fall eventually.
Bob S
> On Aug 3, 2017, at 10:05 , Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Despotic machines are often
There have been lawyers for almost as long as there have been prostitutes.
Neither is going away anytime soon.
Bob S
> On Aug 3, 2017, at 05:08 , Roger Eller via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> This sparked a memory of an old scene in Star Trek
>
Wear your kilt. It's easior to pee.
Bob S
> On Aug 2, 2017, at 14:40 , Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Indeed - and (if I remember correctly) - one purpose of devils advocate is to
> ensure the other side justifies its case 'sufficiently' (for
Well, if you are aware of that distinction you should be aware of the
difference between a law made by a democratically elected body
and a decree called a "law" made by a non-representative body such as an
absolute monarch or an oligarchy.
R.
On 8/3/17 6:40 pm, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
On 8/3/17 6:33 pm, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
I don't see it that way. Apple has a choice to adhere to China's laws or no.
Well, money almost always talks louder than either morals or anything else.
China has a choice to allow the sale of Apple products in their country.
Read C. S. Lewis on the matter of "laws" in these two very different senses.
Laws of nature are not really laws that we can choose to break them and behave
in a manner contrary to them. Laws in this context simply means "how things
are". Laws in the second sense means "how we as a whole agree
I don't see it that way. Apple has a choice to adhere to China's laws or no.
China has a choice to allow the sale of Apple products in their country.
The world is full of totalitarian states, and the populations there also have a
choice: To live with their present situation, or to revolt.
I
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Just to pay reference to the comment about LiveCode - I missed it the
> first time around...
>
> We (LiveCode Ltd.) did not 'give away' LiveCode. We released it under a
> software license
On 8/3/17 1:21 am, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
Just to pay reference to the comment about LiveCode - I missed it the first
time around...
We (LiveCode Ltd.) did not 'give away' LiveCode. We released it under a
software license that has strings.
Indeed: but rather more flexible
I hope your G "did the trick".
Richmond.
On 8/3/17 12:40 am, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
Indeed - and (if I remember correctly) - one purpose of devils advocate is to
ensure the other side justifies its case 'sufficiently' (for some definition of
sufficiently - usually a great
Richmond Mathewson wrote:
A EULA is NOT a legally binding agreement
Your mind seems well made up; I would not try to convince you otherwise.
For others here looking to publish and comply with EULAs:
I do not claim to be licensed to give legal advice. My opinions are
only that, formed
Sorry - release the source-code of things you write in LiveCode you distribute
to others.
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 3 Aug 2017, at 00:21, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Just to pay reference to the comment about LiveCode -
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
>
> I have just changed my Devawriter licensing system so that each
> instantiation of it that I sell is tied to the MAC address of
> an individual computer. Therefore there is nothing to
Just to pay reference to the comment about LiveCode - I missed it the first
time around...
We (LiveCode Ltd.) did not 'give away' LiveCode. We released it under a
software license that has strings.
The GPL requires (subject to interpretation by lawyers - and a court of law)
you to also
Frankly I don't agree with "protection" that causes problems to the
legitimate user.
In all my years of writng bespoke software I ALWAYS placed a copy of the
source on the CEO machine and told them (for no extra) . If I got run over
by a bus then the company wouldn't be at a loss - there are many
Indeed - and (if I remember correctly) - one purpose of devils advocate is to
ensure the other side justifies its case 'sufficiently' (for some definition of
sufficiently - usually a great deal harder when pedanticism kicks in!).
I'm off to have another G!
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
Sent from my
There are one or two people around here who probably don't know what a
*devil's advocate* is . . .
Off to polish my horns.
Richmond.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and
On 8/3/17 12:03 am, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:
Richmond Mathewson wrote:
> No, I don't think we have to respect Apple's policy at all.
A similar view might ask whether the DevaWriter license terms need to
be respected, or LiveCode Ltd.'s, or Stephen King's, or the
protections
Richard just said what I was thinking but much much better!
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2 Aug 2017, at 23:03, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Richmond Mathewson wrote:
>
> > No, I don't think we have to respect Apple's policy
to me of interest.
>
> All the best,
> Erik
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
> Of Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
> Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 10:34 PM
> To: How to use
Richmond Mathewson wrote:
> No, I don't think we have to respect Apple's policy at all.
A similar view might ask whether the DevaWriter license terms need to be
respected, or LiveCode Ltd.'s, or Stephen King's, or the protections
afforded any creator of an original work.
Many of us here
2, 2017 10:34 PM
To: How to use LiveCode <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>
Cc: Mark Waddingham <m...@livecode.com>
Subject: Re: Hackintosh
Whilst that may be true - a significant part of LiveCode's business comes
from the US... As does our support for Apple devices.
Of course, Apple pr
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> "a fuzzy line"
>
> Sounds a bit like the Emperor's USA/Mexico wall.
>
> Nah, it was Representative Lincoln that questioned where the line was, not
Santa Anna . . .
:)
--
Dr. Richard E.
(through the WebView) apps on iOS for a while. So let's not
presume we can 'read' intent of such 'powerful' entities.
As I said there are other forums for discussing hackintosh creation - it is
definitely off topic for this forum; so beyond a few links of elsewhere to look
(which our helpful users
"a fuzzy line"
Sounds a bit like the Emperor's USA/Mexico wall.
Richmond.
On 8/2/17 11:00 pm, Dr. Hawkins via use-livecode wrote:
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
Not to start a riot or anything, but I wasn't aware
No, I don't think we have to respect Apple's policy at all.
But I do tend to agree that any discussion of anything that might rub
Apple up the wrong way if it is
to take place on this use-list should only be in relation to LiveCode.
Oh, and, by the way: there are buckets of resources and
I have just started the riot: but, hey, you knew you could rely on me :)
Kisses, Richmond.
On 8/2/17 7:13 pm, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
Not to start a riot or anything, but I wasn't aware discussions could violate a
copyright.
Bob S
On Aug 2, 2017, at 08:56 , Richard Gaskin via
Apple's EULA may not actually be legal or legally enforcable in a large
number of territories
where this Use-List is read.
Just seen Tim Cook "sucking the kneecaps" of China's one-party state's
leaders and blethering anent "adhering to the law" re VPNs.
Nothing makes me despise anyone more
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Not to start a riot or anything, but I wasn't aware discussions could
> violate a copyright.
>
> Under some legal systems, discussions about how to engage in a crime, and
encouraging others to
Indeed - freedom of speech and all.
However, I have to side with Richard here - this forum is about LiveCode and
not anything else. Sure we have 'OT' discussions now and again but generally
they either 'peter out' or are suggested that this is not the appropriate forum
(the latter in this
I also thought about creating a Hackintosh for my workplace to spent money.
After i read many many instructions and forum posts at that time i decided to
by a Mac.
Why?
Because i wanted to start working right away and did not want to spent to much
time on building, fiddling and so on.
And i
Also of interest, MacWorld article (yes, MacWorld) tells users how to build
a Hackintosh. Although the author whines a little about it being involving
some work.
http://www.macworld.com/article/3196994/macs/how-to-build-a-hackintosh.html
Someday, I believe Apple will come around and offer
Bob Sneidar wrote:
>> On Aug 2, 2017, at 08:56 , Richard Gaskin wrote:
>>
>> But we probably don't want to have discussions of violating Apple's
>> copyright as part of this community's permanent public archive.
>
> Not to start a riot or anything, but I wasn't aware discussions could
> violate
In the country where I live, the first step to buy
an Apple Computer is to built a Hackintosh.
After they fall in love with Mac OS X and their
hackintosh crash and burn really hard,
their next step is to buy the real thing...
This happens everytime without fail.
In the same way, I suspect
Not to start a riot or anything, but I wasn't aware discussions could violate a
copyright.
Bob S
> On Aug 2, 2017, at 08:56 , Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> But we probably don't want to have discussions of violating Apple's copyright
> as part
We have a great community, having earned a reputation for providing a
safe, friendly environment for learning LiveCode.
With that in mind, please remember that Apple's EULA for macOS requires
that it be run only on "Apple-branded computers".
Discussions of using VMs on Mac hosts is great,
ode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> In addition what Roger said.
>
> Hackintosh Rule #3: Buy only PC hardware components (if possible) which
> are supported by Apple native.
>
> Most problems can be avoided to use the wright components which are
> critical to build a good working Hack
In addition what Roger said.
Hackintosh Rule #3: Buy only PC hardware components (if possible) which are
supported by Apple native.
Most problems can be avoided to use the wright components which are critical to
build a good working Hackintosh.
Buy a motherboard which has already Wifi/BT
ode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >
> > Greetings!
> >
> > Has anyone built their own Hackintosh computer?
>
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subsc
Hi Dan,
You have to ask yourself the question, why are you trying to
create a Hackintosh computer? Is it about the learning experience,
or about trying to save yourself some money, or both?
If you are doing it just to try to save some money, you have to ask
yourself how much money is your time
use-livecode
> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> Greetings!
>
> Has anyone built their own Hackintosh computer?
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and
s.runrev.com> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> I have built 6 years ago a Hackintosh computer based on a (nowadays) old
> Foxconn H55 MS motherboard with and (nowadays) old Intel i7 processor.
> Working on this desktop machine (12 GB RM, 512 GB SSD) is even now still a
By the way, I would go the route of a VM version of a hackitosh, not a
hardware, build from scratch concept.
SKIP
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Erik Beugelaar via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> I have built 6 years ago a Hackintosh
ed them onto my own devices
> without any problem.
>
> ~Roger
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Dan Friedman via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> > Greetings!
> >
> > Has anyone built their own Hackintosh computer? If so,
Hi Dan,
I have built 6 years ago a Hackintosh computer based on a (nowadays) old
Foxconn H55 MS motherboard with and (nowadays) old Intel i7 processor.
Working on this desktop machine (12 GB RM, 512 GB SSD) is even now still a
pleasure beside the fact that I own a real MacBook Pro i7 which I
use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Has anyone built their own Hackintosh computer? If so, have you had any
> trouble working with XCode, iTunes Connect, Apple Developer tools, getting
> apps approved, etc. I would like to build one (I’m not i
Greetings!
Has anyone built their own Hackintosh computer? If so, have you had any
trouble working with XCode, iTunes Connect, Apple Developer tools, getting apps
approved, etc. I would like to build one (I’m not in love with Apple’s
pre-built choices), but don’t want any hassles down
49 matches
Mail list logo