Re: App Rejected: IPv6 network?

It used to be the case that Apple would only allow JS to be downloaded, all other languages could not run. Of course the static analysis system is not perfect and probably it can't detect that that is what is happening with our LC apps, but the terms were clear that you could not download code

Re: App Rejected: IPv6 network?

I think they mean a binary executable, one that can instruct the processor to go do something. The engine is a binary executable. The scripts the engine interprets and runs is not, even though they are "compiled" in a sense. They are not compiled like a C++ code would be. It's more like

Re: App Rejected: IPv6 network?

Hi Dan, On 11/08/2017 7:43 AM, Dan Friedman via use-livecode wrote: To begin, the original purpose of this thread was to discover why the app was rejected by Apple. It turns out that my app disables tsNet (because I have had tons of trouble with it) and that’s why the first stack was

Re: App Rejected: IPv6 network?

To begin, the original purpose of this thread was to discover why the app was rejected by Apple. It turns out that my app disables tsNet (because I have had tons of trouble with it) and that’s why the first stack was successful and the second one failed. Simply not disabling tsNet resolved

Re: App Rejected: IPv6 network?

J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 8/10/17 2:27 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: >> jonathandlynch wrote: >> > LC scripts are not executable code? >> >> They are to the LiveCode engine, but not to the OS. >> >> LiveCode Script has no access to the OS, and can't touch anything >> outside of

Re: App Rejected: IPv6 network?

If this were allowed, LC could create a player app for iPhone and android and allow people to exchange stacks outside of the app stores. It could be quite big. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 10, 2017, at 3:42 PM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode > wrote: > >> On

Re: App Rejected: IPv6 network?

On 8/10/17 9:51 pm, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode wrote: Dan: this is "big news" -- I thought the downloading of LC binary stacks was definitely forbidden fruit inside Apple's Walled Garden Somehow the metaphor's are getting a bit mixed there. For starters if Tim Cook is

Re: App Rejected: IPv6 network?

On 8/10/17 2:27 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: jonathandlynch wrote: > LC scripts are not executable code? They are to the LiveCode engine, but not to the OS. LiveCode Script has no access to the OS, and can't touch anything outside of the LiveCode engine. So from the OS

Re: App Rejected: IPv6 network?

jonathandlynch wrote: > LC scripts are not executable code? They are to the LiveCode engine, but not to the OS. LiveCode Script has no access to the OS, and can't touch anything outside of the LiveCode engine. So from the OS perspective, scripts are just data, like glorified spreadsheet

Re: App Rejected: IPv6 network?

On 8/10/17 2:10 PM, Mike Kerner via use-livecode wrote: I didn't know that downloading stacks onto an app was ever a problem. It's not downloading a file of any sort that has been a no-no, it's loading executable code, which LC scripts are not, and LC stacks are not. If a script isn't

Re: App Rejected: IPv6 network?

LC scripts are not executable code? Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 10, 2017, at 3:10 PM, Mike Kerner via use-livecode > wrote: > > I didn't know that downloading stacks onto an app was ever a problem. It's > not downloading a file of any sort that has been a

Re: App Rejected: IPv6 network?

I didn't know that downloading stacks onto an app was ever a problem. It's not downloading a file of any sort that has been a no-no, it's loading executable code, which LC scripts are not, and LC stacks are not. On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode

App Rejected: IPv6 network?

Dan: this is "big news" -- I thought the downloading of LC binary stacks was definitely forbidden fruit inside Apple's Walled Garden Dan wrote: "The app, on launch, downloads a file (a compressed stack) from my server. I know for fact that went without error. That freshly downloaded stack

Re: App Rejected: IPv6 network?

Are you using sockets? We do not support IPv6 sockets and they will rejection from Apple when they test on an IPv6 _only_ network which is their policy to do. Cheers Monte > On 2 Aug 2017, at 3:14 pm, Dan Friedman via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > &

App Rejected: IPv6 network?

Hello. My app was rejected my Apple today. :( Here’s what they said: We discovered one or more bugs in your app when reviewed on iPhone and iPad running iOS 10.3.3 on Wi-Fi connected to an IPv6 network. The error occurs after launch with the only

Re: IPv6 iOS Rejection In-App Purchases

when the reviewer was testing using iOS 10.2 on an IPv6 only network. >> I'm using LC 8.1.1 Xcode 8.0 OSX 10.11.6. Has anyone seen this? Is this a >> known LC bug? >> >> Thanks for any insight... >> > > LiveCode does not support IPv6 yet. What I am not sur

Re: IPv6 iOS Rejection In-App Purchases

> On Dec 15, 2016, at 3:00 PM, Ralph DiMola <rdim...@evergreeninfo.net> wrote: > > I just got an app rejected from Apple because the in-app purchase errored out > when the reviewer was testing using iOS 10.2 on an IPv6 only network. I'm > using LC 8.1.1 Xcode 8.0 OSX 10.

IPv6 iOS Rejection In-App Purchases

I just got an app rejected from Apple because the in-app purchase errored out when the reviewer was testing using iOS 10.2 on an IPv6 only network. I'm using LC 8.1.1 Xcode 8.0 OSX 10.11.6. Has anyone seen this? Is this a known LC bug? Thanks for any insight... Ralph DiMola IT Director

Re: IPv6 & Apple

a couple of issues there. >>> >>> Using "198.01.234.54:1234" as tDatabaseAddress indicates you are using a >>> hardcoded IPv4 address which can cause problems. >>> >>> However there is a bigger issue there in that the database library in LC >>

Re: IPv6 & Apple

ss which can cause problems. >> >> However there is a bigger issue there in that the database library in LC >> does not support IPv6. >> >> This means that for iOS apps that you want to submit to the app store, you >> cannot directly connect to a remote database server

Re: IPv6 & Apple

ary in LC does not support IPv6. This means that for iOS apps that you want to submit to the app store, you cannot directly connect to a remote database server using LC's built-in database library. I should clarify that further... the database library does not support the use IPv6

Re: IPv6 & Apple

Hi Scott, Ok, there are a couple of issues there. Using "198.01.234.54:1234" as tDatabaseAddress indicates you are using a hardcoded IPv4 address which can cause problems. However there is a bigger issue there in that the database library in LC does not support IPv6.

Re: IPv6 & Apple

; Does anyone have any experience with this? The backend database guy I'm >> working with thinks this is a hosting issue (host needs to support >>IPv6). >> Will switching to a host that supports the new protocol allow us to >> troubleshoot/fix this? > >You do not require

Re: IPv6 & Apple

Hi Scott, On 23/08/2016 7:07 am, Scott Rossi wrote: Does anyone have any experience with this? The backend database guy I'm working with thinks this is a hosting issue (host needs to support IPv6). Will switching to a host that supports the new protocol allow us to troubleshoot/fix this? You

Re: IPv6 & Apple

Not a bug. Apple is now requiring that apps support IPV6 (presumably) because they think the only way to move people to use it is to enforce it. They may be right. Still, I would love to see the *actual* numbers of routable IP addresses in use on the inter webs to get an idea of how serious

IPv6 & Apple

I recently received an app review response from Apple stating my app has connection issues when connecting to a server on an IPv6 network: "We discovered one or more bugs in your app when reviewed on iPad and iPhone running iOS 9.3.4 on Wi-Fi connected to an IPv6 network. Your app shows an

Re: IPv6 for iOS??

Now that the weekend is over, I’ve had a chance to look at IPv6 support for iOS. The good news is that if you are using the URL syntax to access HTTP or HTTPS URLs, IPv6 support already exists. For example, see the screenshot here: http://downloads.livecode.com/fraser/ios_ipv6.png (the http

Re: IPv6 for iOS??

d Fabacher" > <use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com on behalf of tfabac...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I know this was on the feature thing once, but was funded. But Now it >> seems >> that Apple will NOT accept anything but IPv6 starting June 1. So what are >>

Re: IPv6 for iOS??

Kevin Miller wrote: > On 05/05/2016, 20:50, Todd Fabacher wrote: >> ...Apple will NOT accept anything but IPv6 starting June 1. So what >> are our options because the Internet lib for LiveCode only supports >> IPv4: >> >> http://www.zdnet.com/article/

Re: IPv6 for iOS??

t;use-livecode on behalf of Todd Fabacher" <use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com on behalf of tfabac...@gmail.com> wrote: >I know this was on the feature thing once, but was funded. But Now it >seems >that Apple will NOT accept anything but IPv6 starting June 1. So what

Re: IPv6 for iOS??

> On 6 May 2016, at 7:25 AM, Richard Gaskin <ambassa...@fourthworld.com> wrote: > > It seems Apple believes Apple customers use exclusively Apple-branded gear. ;) I’m using one of the biggest ISPs in Aus and need to use tunnelling to get IPv6. What’s more even with a high en

Re: IPv6 for iOS??

I got notice of this some months back. Over 6 months ago I think. Personally, I think it sucks. IPV6 is a sh*tstorm for IT Administrators. It is not at all needed for local area networks, and the doom of running out of IPV4 routable addresses has been going on for about the same time

Re: IPv6 for iOS??

- >> From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-bounces at lists.runrev.com] On >> Behalf >> Of Todd Fabacher >> >> I know this was on the feature thing once, but was funded. But Now it seems >> that Apple will NOT accept anything but IPv6 starting June 1. So what are &g

Re: IPv6 for iOS??

Information Services rdimola at evergreeninfo.net -Original Message- From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-bounces at lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Todd Fabacher I know this was on the feature thing once, but was funded. But Now it seems that Apple will NOT accept anything but IPv6 starting

RE: IPv6 for iOS??

] On Behalf Of Todd Fabacher Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 3:51 PM To: Use-livecode Use-livecode Subject: IPv6 for iOS?? I know this was on the feature thing once, but was funded. But Now it seems that Apple will NOT accept anything but IPv6 starting June 1. So what are our options because the Internet lib

Re: IPv6 for iOS??

Wow... Way to give under a month notice Apple... Sent from my iPhone > On 6 May 2016, at 5:50 AM, Todd Fabacher <tfabac...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I know this was on the feature thing once, but was funded. But Now it seems > that Apple will NOT accept anything but IPv6 starti

IPv6 for iOS??

I know this was on the feature thing once, but was funded. But Now it seems that Apple will NOT accept anything but IPv6 starting June 1. So what are our options because the Internet lib for LiveCode only supports IPv4: http://www.zdnet.com/article/apple-drops-ipv4-internet-support

Re: IPV6...

It has been two weeks and I still haven't seen a response? On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Kevin Miller wrote: > Yes, noted thanks. We¹ll have an announcement on this in the coming weeks. > > Kind regards, > > Kevin > > Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~

Re: IPV6...

ambassa...@fourthworld.comhttp://www.FourthWorld.com IPV6... J. Landman Gay jacque at hyperactivesw.com Mon Oct 12 19:16:30 CEST 2015 Previous message: IPV6... Next message: Release 8.0.0 DP 6 Messages sorted

Re: IPV6...

I read the article and was under the impression that iOS 9 would not support IPV4 anymore, but I am running iOS 9 and it is still there. So I am a bit confused here. Is Apple saying that they will no longer accept apps that use IPV4, and if so, is this a pre-cursor to Apple removing IPV4

Re: IPV6...

Isn't this a system setting rather than something LC needs to change? I thought LC just uses whatever the OS is set for. On October 12, 2015 10:49:48 AM CDT, Glen Bojsza wrote: >It has been two weeks and I still haven't seen a response? > > >On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:21 AM,

Re: IPV6...

to consider, nothing ever is as bad as it is originally made out to be. We make the necessary adjustments to prevent our own extinction and then have a beer or two at the end of the day. I find myself wondering why the Tier providers can't simply move all their routers over to use IPV6 exclusively

Re: IPV6...

problems to consider, nothing ever is as bad as it is originally made out to be. We make the necessary adjustments to prevent our own extinction and then have a beer or two at the end of the day. I find myself wondering why the Tier providers can't simply move all their routers over to use IPV6

Re: IPV6...

remember a subnet and a few IPV4 addresses. I can promise you I will *NOT* remember a single IPV6 address. If that is the case, why not just eliminate the whole layer 3 and just use Mac addresses from now on? (Again, tongue in cheek). My point is that I think we can do IPV6 on the WAN side of things

Re: IPV6...

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Bob Sneidar <bobsnei...@iotecdigital.com> wrote: > alleviate. I can just remember a subnet and a few IPV4 addresses. I can > promise you I will *NOT* remember a single IPV6 address. lol. You'll have to cut and paste like the rest of us . -- Step

Re: IPV6...

No I mean IPV6. The protocol is running on almost everything concurrent with IPV4, although IPV4 still seems to be preferred. I see it on every network device created in the last 5 or 6 years, maybe longer. Bob S > On Oct 2, 2015, at 17:52 , Mark Wieder <mwie...@ahsoftware.net&

Re: IPV6...

Bob Sneidar wrote: > Seriously, we were told the world would run out of IP addresses 10 > years ago. It hasn't. True. At the moment there are still some places (most in Africa) with available IPv4 addresses, while North America and others have completely depleted available supply:

Re: IPV6...

EFF iOS development then and EFF Apple to the lowest parts of heck. This might be the thing that pushes me over the edge and makes me switch to (ick) ANDROID! RRRGGG! Seriously, we were told the world would run out of IP addresses 10 years ago. It hasn't. We were told the world would

Re: IPV6...

t; To add to this discussion: It only SEEMs like there are plenty of IPv4 addresses available because of NAT (Network Address Translation). Most people get their IP address behind some sort of router doing NAT to the internet - you see an address like

Re: IPV6...

Almost everything these days is running IPV6. I don't have a problem with that. I have a BIG problem with Apple excluding IPV4 from their devices. Behind my gateway I want to use what I want to use. Apple is basically saying, "No, you can't." I don't like a company taking something

Re: IPV6...

On 10/02/2015 03:14 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: Almost everything these days is running IPV6. Heh. Now *that* is wishful thinking. I assume it's a typo and you meant ipv4. -- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode

IPV6...

Well, I just stumbled upon this: https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=08282015a this might get serious even earlier than I thought… All the best, Malte ___ use-livecode mailing list

Re: IPV6...

Yes, noted thanks. We¹ll have an announcement on this in the coming weeks. Kind regards, Kevin Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/ LiveCode: Everyone can create apps On 29/09/2015 14:07, "use-livecode on behalf of Glen Bojsza"

Re: IPV6...

evin's forthcoming announcement on IPv6 will reflect this long-acknowledged need with a solid plan for a smooth transition. -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Systems Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and t

Re: IPV6...

I would assume that the Livecode team is already aware of this and has a delivery plan without it they wouldn't be able to claim to be able to make iOS apps. True? Not True? Kevin can maybe comment. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Malte Brill wrote: > Well, I just

IPV6 SUPPORT

Hi all. I have customers that need to support IPV6 connections. Currently it seems not to be possible to connect to an IPV6 IP via livecode. Anyone else running into the problem? If so, what is the remedy? All the best, Malte ___ use-livecode

Re: IPV6 SUPPORT

KvK: 50277553 Installer Maker for LiveCode: http://qery.us/468 Buy my new book Programming LiveCode for the Real Beginner http://qery.us/3fi LiveCode on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/runrev/ On 8/14/2015 09:49, Malte Brill wrote: Hi all. I have customers that need to support IPV6

[OT] IPv6

Having merrily configured my Xubuntu box to handle IPv6 I find that mind ISP and/or cable modem won't play ball. Has anybody any advice as to how to determine if either or both are the culprit(s), OR, whether it is my PC? Richmond. ___ use-livecode

Re: [OT] IPv6

I turn off IPV6 on any device I encounter it on. Some day the world may turn off IPV4, and then I'm screwed. Until then, I LIKE being able to use IP addresses I can remember! Bob On Jun 6, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Richmond wrote: Having merrily configured my Xubuntu box to handle IPv6 I find

Re: [OT] IPv6

On 06/06/2012 07:55 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: I turn off IPV6 on any device I encounter it on. Some day the world may turn off IPV4, and then I'm screwed. Until then, I LIKE being able to use IP addresses I can remember! Oh, dear; another retro soul, like myself . . . :) Bob On Jun 6

Re: [OT] IPv6

Richmond- Wednesday, June 6, 2012, 10:03:26 AM, you wrote: Oh, dear; another retro soul, like myself . . . :) Yes, like Bob said. If you try to do the Right Thing you'll find that the rest of the world hasn't caught up yet and all sorts of things will break. I think some day there will come

Re: [OT] IPv6

On 06/06/2012 08:44 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: Richmond- Wednesday, June 6, 2012, 10:03:26 AM, you wrote: Oh, dear; another retro soul, like myself . . . :) Yes, like Bob said. If you try to do the Right Thing you'll find that the rest of the world hasn't caught up yet and all sorts of things

Re: [OT] IPv6

I'm sure we will need a huge tax increase worldwide to pay for the retrofitting of everything everywhere to accommodate IPV6 too. :-) Bob On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:57 AM, Richmond wrote: On 06/06/2012 08:44 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: Richmond- Wednesday, June 6, 2012, 10:03:26 AM, you wrote

Re: [OT] IPv6

On 06/06/2012 09:23 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: I'm sure we will need a huge tax increase worldwide to pay for the retrofitting of everything everywhere to accommodate IPV6 too. :-) They (meaning governments and big business) will always find a way to milk the poor chaps like us at the bottom