Given that my rant was open ended…
Richard is a little more nuanced, thank you for that…
Agreed, a subset of what is "required" to be in the engine to meet modern
expectations would help.
For the rest, we could build them ourselves.
This we cannot build ourselves…. I would put " smooth seaml
Tom Glod wrote:
> ..as far as the whole philosophy...I really doubt that this is on the
> radar of Livecode the company they probably feel their efforts are
> better suited on technologies going into their development platform. I
> would agree with that.
Me too, but mobile OSes are now prett
We use the color pallete from material design .my goal eventually was
to create a plugin for LC for color selection, but as far as the whole
philosophy...I really doubt that this is on the radar of Livecode the
company they probably feel their efforts are better suited on
technologies going
My old familiar rant in this issue. I now have a "enternal business license"
and we use Livecode for so much in-house stuff… and I have spent $ non-profit
money on every offer Kevin has made in ~1999 when he got the company Scott
Raney.
So I have right to rant (ha)
Livecode is so for behin
Over 80% of my work in LiveCode is dedicated to user interface design.
I would like to support Material Design which is well supported by tools
such as Angular JS Material in Javascript -- and such framework (or similar
ones) give the idea of modern UIX.
I think it is worth reading for profession
