I found it. It's the menubar. Not sure why it at that position. I have a
handler that sets the topleft of the menubar group to the topleft of the stack
after setting the width of the group to the width of the stack because with
Windows the menubar is opaque and it looks crappy when the menubar o
Bob Sneidar wrote:
> Richard Gaskin wrote:
>> Could there be a group with hidden border and a margin that puts the
>> left edge at -1?
>
> Yes, but the formatted rect is supposed to IGNORE hidden objects.
The group's visible property set to false?
Or is it just that the showBorder is false?
If
Yes, but the formatted rect is supposed to IGNORE hidden objects.
Bob S
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 11:56 , Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Bob Sneidar wrote:
>
> >> On Jul 28, 2017, at 16:10 , Richard Gaskin wrote:
> >> Is there maybe an object at -1 left? When I tested here the
>
Bob Sneidar wrote:
>> On Jul 28, 2017, at 16:10 , Richard Gaskin wrote:
>> Is there maybe an object at -1 left? When I tested here the
>> formattedRect returned the bounds of all visible objects reliably.
>
> Possible, although it is not a VISIBLE one. I selected all with select
> grouped on and
Possible, although it is not a VISIBLE one. I selected all with select grouped
on and off. There is nothing I can see to account for it.
Bob S
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 16:10 , Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Is there maybe an object at -1 left? When I tested here the formattedRec
I use Firefox for dev'ing on the html5 engine as it tends to be at the
forefront of 'what is to come' and also I find it's dev console somehow more
responsive and 'better' than Chrome's and Safari's when dealing with huge blob
of JS that the html5 engine is.
For everything else I use Chrome.
I
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> I recently had a brief flirtation with Firefox for a few weeks, then gave
> up in disgust and went back to Chrome. Web browsers are such memory hogs
> these days.
I used slimjet for a few we
Bob Sneidar wrote:
> That [formattedRect] will do the trick, except that while the
> vertical works, the horizontal does not. By that I mean I can
> expand the size of the stack and the top and bottom items do
> not change, but if I expand the stack sideways the right DOES
> change. Further, the
On 07/28/2017 01:52 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
Duly submitted from Chrome. Something is wrong with Firefox.
I recently had a brief flirtation with Firefox for a few weeks, then
gave up in disgust and went back to Chrome. Web browsers are such memory
hogs these days.
--
Mark Wi
Duly submitted from Chrome. Something is wrong with Firefox.
http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=20201
Bob S
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 13:47 , Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> I selected IDE (I did it again) and I cannot see the OS field. The web page
> is jacked. Or my browse
I selected IDE (I did it again) and I cannot see the OS field. The web page is
jacked. Or my browser is. Not surprising the latter as Mozilla has been
becoming increasingly less usable as the months go by.
Bob S
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 13:39 , Alex Tweedly via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> It's
It's under item 4 of "enter a bug" (
http://quality.livecode.com/enter_bug.cgi )
It insists on you filling in this in order - so once you fill in the
"I can see this in ..." (choose IDE vs Desktop vs ...) ,
it will then present you with a box for OS,
then for version,
then for
-- A
Thanks Jacque and Richard.
That will do the trick, except that while the vertical works, the horizontal
does not. By that I mean I can expand the size of the stack and the top and
bottom items do not change, but if I expand the stack sideways the right DOES
change. Further, the left always rep
I cannot file a bug report. The QCC is saying "A value must be set for the
'Desktop OS' field, but I am not being presented with a Desktop OS field.
Bob S
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 13:11 , Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 28, 2017, at 11:34 , Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
>
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 11:34 , Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> It is hard to know from this what to expect (as I don't know what structure
> your card has).
>
> Could you file a report in the quality center, with a simple stack which
> shows what you are seeing?
I will file a re
Bob Sneidar wrote:
> What I am actually trying to do is get a list of every visible object
> on a card so I can set the windows size to encompass all VISIBLE
> objects. I need to take into account group borders though, because a
> group on one side of the card will produce a larger visible distan
On 7/28/17 1:33 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
What I am actually trying to do is get a list of every visible object on a card
so I can set the windows size to encompass all VISIBLE objects.
In that case, I think you want the formattedRect of the card. It ignores
invisibles.
--
Jac
Hi Bob,
On 2017-07-28 19:52, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
I can get the controlnames of a card, but at first blush the list does
not include button names. However it *does* list a great many numbers
of 4 digits. So I tried looking up controlNames in the dictionary and
there is no entry fo
Hi Jacque.
My growing consternation is that I have a LOT more lines in the list than show
up in the application browser. But I suppose I have a lot of groups within
groups so okay.
What I am actually trying to do is get a list of every visible object on a card
so I can set the windows size t
Moreover, the "controlNames" (as well as the "controlIDs") have never been
documented:
http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11901
Best,
Panos
--
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:30 PM, panagiotis merakos
wrote:
> Hi Jacque,
>
> Control names within a group can be obtained by:
>
> "the childCon
Hi Jacque,
Control names within a group can be obtained by:
"the childControlNames of group myGroup"
Best,
Panos
--
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:21 PM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> On 7/28/17 12:52 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
>
>> I can ge
On 7/28/17 12:52 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
I can get the controlnames of a card, but at first blush the list does not
include button names. However it*does* list a great many numbers of 4 digits.
So I tried looking up controlNames in the dictionary and there is no entry for
it,
Sorry, V8.1.5 OS X Sierra
Bob S
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 10:52 , Bob Sneidar wrote:
>
> hi all.
>
> I can get the controlnames of a card, but at first blush the list does not
> include button names. However it *does* list a great many numbers of 4
> digits. So I tried looking up controlNames
hi all.
I can get the controlnames of a card, but at first blush the list does not
include button names. However it *does* list a great many numbers of 4 digits.
So I tried looking up controlNames in the dictionary and there is no entry for
it, at least not by using the find function.
Bob S
24 matches
Mail list logo
