Re: NAVRAD was: lcb missing manual

2022-09-17 Thread Jacques Clavel via use-livecode
point 6. maybe potential for future performance gains : - But today LCB is surprisingly less efficient (/3) than LCS (???) JC Le sam. 17 sept. 2022 à 01:35, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> a écrit : > > On 15/09/2022 16:37, Ralph DiMola via use-livecode wrote: > >

Re: NAVRAD was: lcb missing manual

2022-09-17 Thread Alex Tweedly via use-livecode
On 17/09/2022 08:54, Jacques Clavel via use-livecode wrote: point 6. maybe potential for future performance gains : - But today LCB is surprisingly less efficient (/3) than LCS (???) Yes, at first glance it is surprising; typed variables etc. *should* make it possible to be more efficient. An

Re: NAVRAD was: lcb missing manual

2022-09-17 Thread Mike Kerner via use-livecode
Have a look at the CompileIt! manual again. That was 1990. There was no special intermediate language to get toolbox rom or native library calls. LC's choice to engineer LCB the way it did was a choice. It obviously makes it less approachable to the customer. Maybe it makes it easier for the team.

calling all LCB/widget/property editor/property inspector nerds

2022-09-17 Thread Mike Kerner via use-livecode
are there any more LCB/widget/property editor/property inspector nerds in here? I'm messing with the next iteration of the navBar/navRAD, and in the weeds, with no documentation to help guide the way. -- On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth On the second day, God created the oc