> Subject: VS: Sending attachments to the list
> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:12:53 +0200
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Esa_Kivel=E4?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> One way is that get whole email in to some text editor and edit those parts
> where want to reply by hand and remove last parts away, then copy paste
Using OS 10.2.2, Rev 1.1.1
Having successfully built a standalone(? ) from a single stack file
consisting of a main stack
(no user entry and save not required) and several substacks (user
entries are to be saved and each substack has a save script in it).
I used the procedure in Tips 1 of RR s
>1. Why does the script window always hide when I switch to another
>applications window?
Don't know a way to stop this.
>When I click anywhere on a rev document, the open script
>changes to the script of the object I clicked upon. Which is about 75%
>of the time an accidental click or a click
On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 05:23 AM, Robert Brenstein wrote:
It seems that the first case uses the logic that backgrounds are behind
the card, whereas the second case seems to consider backgrounds as
groups placed on a card (so the background is in front of the card so
do speak. My gues
Rev 1.1.1 on Mac OS X
When I set the textFont of a field to empty (so that the owner determines the font
face), the textSize is also set to empty. Conversely, when the textFont is empty and
I set the textSize to something, the textFont is no longer empty -- and it doesn't
even take on the owner
These questions/points have probably already been asked or made. And
maybe I have missed them as I searched the archive and documentation.
Which usually happens to be the case. But I will ask and wait to be
toold where I should have look. I am running in mac OS X
1. Why does the script window a
All bg is unrelated, and control on card:
control --> card --> bg4 |
bg3 |
bg2 v
bg1 --> stack
All bg is unrelated, and control is included in bg3:
bg4 ( no message )
control --> bg3 --> card --> stack
Dar Scott wrote 02.12.20 01:18 AM:
>>
>> All bg is unrelated, and control on card:
>>control --> card --> bg4 |
>> bg3 |
>> bg2 v
>> bg1 --> stack
>>
>> All bg is unrelated, and control is inc
On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 12:50 AM, UDI wrote:
Sorry, I made a mistake.
Then ignore my comments that crossed in the mail.
All bg is unrelated, and control on card:
control --> card --> bg4 |
bg3 |
bg2 v
bg1 -->
On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 12:34 AM, UDI wrote:
All bg is unrelated, and control is included in bg3:
bg4 ( no message )
control --> bg3 --> stack
bg2 ( no message )
bg1 ( no message )
card ( no message )
bg3 is included bg2, a
10 matches
Mail list logo