Re: Re[7]: groups and background

[Dar Scott]

On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 12:50 AM, UDI wrote:

Sorry, I made a mistake.

Then ignore my comments that crossed in the mail.

All bg is unrelated, and control on card:
   control --> card --> bg4 |
                        bg3 |
                        bg2 v
                        bg1 --> stack

All bg is unrelated, and control is included in bg3:
               bg4 ( no message )
   control --> bg3 --> card --> stack
               bg2 ( no message )
               bg1 ( no message )

I guess the idea is that if a control is in a group, even a background group, it is in the environment of that group or groups. But if the control is directly on the card it is in the environment of the card as modified by background groups.

Even so, I am not able to rationalize why groups on the card or nested groups and controls within those do not have a message path like the first case.

Dar Scott

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution