Votes added.
Ian
On 4 Mar 2010, at 00:37, Richard Gaskin wrote:
This inconsistency seems worth addressing, since doing so has
practical application as you've noted, so I logged it as a request:
http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=8645
On Mar 3, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Ian Wood wrote:
I just had a quick try but can't see how to apply a backgroundpattern
to anything less than the whole field.
Mea culpa.
According to the dictionary RevTalk allows backgroundColor for
chunks, and backgroundPattern for
On 4 Mar 2010, at 12:42, Peter Brigham MD wrote:
Is this one of those why not just do it, looks simple things that
runs into the apparently huge complexity of the field object? Which
I seem to recall Scott Raney describing as the monster it terms of
complexity.
That could well be.
Peter Brigham wrote:
On Mar 3, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
...
According to the dictionary RevTalk allows backgroundColor for
chunks, and backgroundPattern for fields, and textPattern/
foregroundPattern for chunks, so I was a little optimistic about the
orthogonality of the
Thanks for the suggestions, everyone. It would certainly save me a lot
of time if this could be done in Rev, so maybe it's time to look from
a different direction - how do we make a Rev field as OS X-like as
possible.
On 3 Mar 2010, at 04:00, Scott McDonald wrote:
The look of the spell
Ian,
Ian Wood-3 wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions, everyone. It would certainly save me a lot
of time if this could be done in Rev, so maybe it's time to look from
a different direction - how do we make a Rev field as OS X-like as
possible.
I understand why the RRP SpellCheck
Scott McDonald wrote:
But you are right, the Rev field is not native enough for your users. For
example, the way of marking unknown words when doing the contextual check
was something I thought about a lot during the design.
anything but dashed red underlining is going to leap out
While
On 3 Mar 2010, at 21:24, Scott McDonald wrote:
I understand why the RRP SpellCheck doesn't meet your needs, and you
have certainly made several comments that give me ideas to work on.
Thanks for taking the in the way it was meant! That's partly why I
changed the direction towards ways of
I just had a quick try but can't see how to apply a backgroundpattern
to anything less than the whole field.
Do you have some example syntax for setting it for part of a field?
Ian
On 3 Mar 2010, at 22:03, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Have you tried a transparent GIF or PNG with the dash near the
Concur. Text chunks cannot have that property.
Bob
On Mar 3, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Ian Wood wrote:
I just had a quick try but can't see how to apply a backgroundpattern to
anything less than the whole field.
Do you have some example syntax for setting it for part of a field?
Ian
On 3
Ian Wood wrote:
I just had a quick try but can't see how to apply a backgroundpattern
to anything less than the whole field.
Mea culpa.
According to the dictionary RevTalk allows backgroundColor for chunks,
and backgroundPattern for fields, and textPattern/foregroundPattern for
chunks, so I
11 matches
Mail list logo
